Visitor’s Comments

NOTE: Visitor’s comments containing personal attacks, profanity, and/or blasphemy will not be posted. If you oppose the political stance of this blog, then please present a reasoned argument with documentation. Many thanks!

A new – and extraordinary – blog called “Once Upon a Time in West” updates Golitsyn ‘predictions’  by an accurate news analysis and prove the old communist defector – that gave us outstanding books like “New Lies For Old” and “Perestroika Deception” – is still ahead of the news.
— Lui­s Afonso Assumpção, Brazilian blogger, Swimming against the Red Tide

Once Upon a Time in the West is one  of the best sources of news on the new reality in Russia.
— Trevor Loudon, New Zealand politician and blogger

Dear Once Upon A Time site: Thank you for your hard work to keep important news on the web. Your site is one of our true favorites. Thanks too for your references to the authoritarian dictatorship underway in Ecuador. We appreciate the facts being shared. Regards.
— Editors of ECrisis, Ecuadorian bloggers

From Puerto Rican terrorists, to Dominica being absorbed into neo-communist Bolivarian Alternative, or Red China’s container port facility in the Bahamas,  and the Sao Paulo Forum’s influence in Barbados through Clement Payne Movement, the Once Upon A Time in the West blog’s coverage this week  of left-wing, neo-communist movements in the Western Hemisphere is spot on.

The editors of Once Upon a Time in the West are on a “world tour” of sorts. They have been focusing on the left-wing, neo-communist movements on a region-by-region basis. This week it has been the Western Hemisphere that is on target. They do not disappoint.

The good people at Once Upon A Time in the West blog had a series of Western Hemisphere posts this week that are surely worth a read. Once Upon A Time in the West blog, always worth a visit.
— Editors of Western Hemisphere Policy Watch, Washington DC

Folks, I stumbled on . . . the most amazing blogspot I’ve seen in a long time,  with a fabulous amount of info, and with a great analysis. The blog is based on Anatoliy Golitsyn’s book, “New Lies for Old” (1984)  wherein he stated that there was a massive STRATEGIC DECEPTION  in the form of the FAKE collapse of Communism.  Golitsyn was a Major in the KGB before he fled to the West.  I’ve read the book.

On this blog they also mention that Communists are taking over South America.  They discuss the links between Islamic terrorists, the enemies of Israel and Russia and China.

There are amazing quotes from Commies.

I see too that they mention something I thought I was one of the very few to ever mention: That Chomsky is a communist. Chomsky, the “American Academic”  is really a fully blown communist operating unashamedly in American society and helped on by the media. Who owns this brilliant blog? I have no idea. I wish I knew. This is definitely the type of blog I’d like to liaise more with and share more with.
— Jan Lamprecht, Editor, African Crisis

44 responses to “Visitor’s Comments

  1. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada May 28, 2011 at 12:59 pm

    Canada, USA to be merged into Red South America:

    Declaration of Quebec City – the Third Summit of the Americas, Quebec City, Canada, April 20-22, 2001
    “We, the democratically elected Heads of State and Government of the Americas, have met in Quebec City at our Third Summit, to renew our commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people.”

    The “Declaration” continues:

    “We have adopted a Plan of Action to strengthen representative democracy, promote good governance and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

    Tyrants covertly annexing our countries with NO CONSTITUTIONAL POWER IN CANADA to do so flatter themselves that they are “democratically elected” and are working to “strengthen representative democracy”.

    Meanwhile, as Once Upon A Time in the West has pointed out:
    Army units from Russia, Belarus, Vietnam and China will participate in the April Independence Day military parade in Venezuela marking the country’s 200th independence anniversary, President Hugo Chavez announced Thursday (Feb 12, 2010) 10:24 Moscow Time. . . . while Chavez admits CUBANS are training the Venezuelan Army.

    FOUND: package of Official Plans for WESTERN HEMISPHERIC UNION:

    Including an “INTER-AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC CHARTER” (Adopted by the General Assembly at its special session held in Lima, Peru, on September 11, 2001) — the very DATE of the 9/11 “attacks” which were immediately used as the PRETEXT to throw a military perimeter around Canada and to begin forcibly integrating Canada into the USA and Mexico.

    In order to carry out hemispheric union, Canada and the USA must be dissolved. For decades, since well before the illegal 1980 referendum to “secede” in Quebec — the plan has been to use Quebec to force Canada to accept the European EEC-EU system in place of Confederation. That system is the basis of world government spreading to all the continents, including the UNASUR (South American Union). The EEC-EU system has been exposed as SOVIET in “modern guise” by Vladimir Bukovsky:

    and by the late Vilius Brazenas who called it “The New European Soviet”:

    American patriot Charlotte Iserbyt has also warned us of:

    Meanwhile, crypto-communist GILLES DUCEPPE, “former” Marxist-Leninist pretending to lead a “secessionist” political party to take Quebec out of Canada, is thrown out of office almost unanimously by Quebec voters on May 2, 2011 in federal elections. In a surprise turn of the tide, Quebecers vote for the New Democratic Party … making JACK LAYTON leader of the Official Opposition, unaware that Layton is a MARXIST pushing world government and secretly attending the North American Forum on Integration and its Model Parliament for North America intended to replace the Parliament of Canada. Not only are Layton and his NDP — same party name as that of the recently ousted Mubarak — crypto-communists, they are full members of the SOCIALIST INTERNATIONAL, who are special friends of CUBA and of the SANDINISTAS, and have featured LAYTON on the front page of their web site this month:

    “Unprecedented gains for Canada s New Democrats 06 MAY 2011
    Canada’s New Democratic Party (NDP) has recorded impressive gains in the country’s Federal Election, winning the largest number of seats in its 50-year history.

    Although Stephen Harper’s Conservatives remain in government following the 2 May poll, the New Democrats, lead by Jack Layton, will form the official opposition for the first time since the party was founded in 1961.

    The result represents a seismic shift in Canada’s political landscape, giving the social democratic party increased influence, legitimacy and profile, while revealing an increasingly polarised Canadian electorate.”

    Source (permanent urls):
    Member parties of the SI:

    A new blog has been started on the topic:

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union
    Main blog:

  2. Gerry Mussett May 28, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    The most refreshing site since Trevor Loudon’s. Well done, neighbors to the north.

  3. Albert W. L. Moore, Jr. June 1, 2011 at 5:59 am

    I’m increasingly concerned that Mr. Obama is Comintern mole.

    His DNA or an analysis of it could be key to breaking the seal against exhaustive investigations of the Obama cabal.

    His DNA or verifiable analysis thereof would disprove his latest (27 April 2011) “birth certificate”, which is actually an adoption certificate, naming his adoptive parents. This would also expose as a hoax his official autobiography, claiming a black Luo tribesman as his birth father.

    This would be a propitious time to publish a genetic analysis of his DNA, as Obama acts more and more in sync with communist global strategy.

  4. The Wandering White June 6, 2011 at 3:55 am

    I think it would be more respectful if you referred to the late, great James Angleton simply as “James” or “Jim” rather than as “James Jesus”. None of his friends or colleagues ever called him by his middle name.

  5. Nancy June 6, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    Everyone who visits this site should also have a close look at the following videos on YouTube.

    Charlotte Iserbyt: The Subterfuge of America – 1 of 3

    watch all 3 parts.

    Charlotte Iserbyt: Societies Secrets

    US moving into full-fledged totalitarianism — Charlotte Iserbyt on Alex Jones

    Norman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations

    Hidden Agenda Norman Dodd 1 of 6

    Even if you know about these, you may need to refresh your memory and then share them with everyone you can think of. Shocking.

  6. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada June 13, 2011 at 7:13 am

    Glad to see Ms. Iserbyt. I just found a document you might like to look at:

    Click to access The%20Abiding%20Communist%20Threat.pdf

  7. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada June 16, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    I’m not familiar with STRATFOR Global Intelligence reports, what do you think of this one on a new German-Russian security “institution” said to be introduced into the EU?

  8. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada June 22, 2011 at 5:18 am

    I just found this, perhaps you already know about it?

  9. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada June 22, 2011 at 7:19 am

    This looks like a relevant book:

    And Reality be Damned…
    By Robert Buchar

    Authentic and Eye-Opening Account of Western Civilization’s Main Enemy

    “Robert Buchar’s book fills a vacuum, shedding light on the KGB’s secret assistance to Communism and its tyrants … [His] book shows the inner workings of [this] machine running its disinformation … for all to see.” – Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai

    In And Reality Be Damned…, author Robert Buchar discusses the great political upheaval of the late 20th century—the fall of communism in Eastern Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union. You will be spellbound as he describes the machinations of Uri Andropov, chairman of the KGB, who sought to preserve the wealth that threatened to slip out of the organization’s hands. And you will be fascinated to learn about Andropov’s hand-picked successor, Mikhail Gorbachev, and his so-called spontaneous freedom movement, which was, in fact, a coup d’état that was orchestrated by Moscow. And Reality Be Damned… is a riveting exposure of how Russia became the perfect KGB state, how its primary objective was to overthrow the United States as the world’s leading power, and how they felt that terrorism should become their main weapon. Don’t miss this opportunity to peak behind the once impenetrable Iron Curtain.

    Meet the Author

    Robert Buchar is a political refugee, born and raised in Czechoslovakia. He received his MFA in cinematography from the Film Academy of Fine Arts in Prague and worked as a cinematographer before defecting to the United States in 1980. Buchar is an associate professor and author of the Cinematography Program at Columbia College in Chicago. This book is based on his documentary feature film, The Collapse of Communism: The Untold Story.

    The book page:

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

  10. Kathleen Moore, Montreal, Canada June 23, 2011 at 3:04 am

    “(Red) China Wins NAFTA Super-Highway Battle by Jerome R. Corsi, Human Events, 08-09-2006”

  11. Kathleen Moore June 30, 2011 at 2:19 am

    Just in, and submitting this news for your analysis:

    “Welcome to the personal web page of Dimitri A. Khalezov – a serious
    9/11 researcher and an eye-witness to the actual 9/11 conspiracy.”

    Now, that’s a mouthful! Who is this Dimitri A. Khalezov? He purports to be ex-Russian nuclear intelligence, exposing the nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center and Building 7. Says Khalezov at his main page:

    “I am pleased to inform everybody that “The Third Truth about 9/11 Foundation” intends to publish several information web-sites and discussion boards that deal with these topics:

    * nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center following 9/11 attacks;
    * nuclear demolition of the WTC-7 following 9/11 attacks;
    * true definition the “ground zero” term and its meaning in pre-9/11 English language;
    * technical principles of nuclear demolition of buildings in general and in relation to the WTC nuclear demolition in particular;
    * information related to the so-called “terrorism” in general and to the nuclear terrorism in particular (alias so-called suicidal and non-suicidal “truck-bombings” and “car-bombings”).

    * * *
    A 26-part series of videos, apparently all one interview split up, has been merged into two very long videos on YouTube:
    [1] “911 explained – Dimitri Khalezov (1of2)”

    [2] “911 explained – Dimitri Khalezov (2of2)”
    1 hour and 59 minutes:

    A blog called This is Zionism has collected and posted the 26 parts of these two videos:

    I tried to download them from the file-share urls as posted, but the 3-meg zips were all gone. The 26 videos are however embedded live in the same page but not from YouTube, so I’m trying to download them with HiDownload which has a sniffer; and am also trying StreamTransport. Both those free download methods are fairly effective, but with the disadvantage that the resulting .flv files are not numbered, and it will be quite a task to re-assemble them. So, if you have a really high-speed line, give a try to downloading the two long YouTube versions.

    I am still in the download process and haven’t listened to much yet. But it looks too interesting to keep to myself. I look forward to the evaluation that may be made of the nature and goals of Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov by the blog author(s) of Once Upon A Time in the West, and your visitors.

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

  12. Kathleen Moore June 30, 2011 at 5:24 am

    This purports to be the personal YouTube channel of Dimitri Khalezov. Oddly, it doesn’t contain his video interviews, perhaps the site is underway:

    Two pages of important links re Khalezov:

  13. HabeasCorpusCanada September 2, 2011 at 5:03 am


    Original French Title: “PARTI COMMUNISTE” [COMMUNIST PARTY] by Éric Duhaime
    Original publication and date: Le Journal de Québec, 15 August 2011

    A mega-gathering of the radical left will be held this weekend in St-Alphonse-de-Rodriguez, in Lanaudière [Quebec, Canada]. The “17th Alternative Days 2011” presents a shocking program of events.

    On the menu, presentations by our local Left, from new president of the CSN, Louis Roy, to the leader of “Project Montreal”, Richard Bergeron, by way of New Democratic [NDP] Neo-MP, Alexander Boulerice, not to forget the representatives of United Quebec, the FTQ and other labour unions.


    What is shocking about this conference on “human rights” is the presence of Leonel Gonzales, coordinator of international relations for the Parliament of Cuba, and Theresita Sotolongo Vicente, Cuba’s Ambassador to Canada.

    Guest speaker Gonzalez is former Director of the Workers Central of Cuba, a puppet organization which holds the monopoly over representation of Cuban workers.

    Cuba does not recognize the right to collective bargaining, nor to strike. Movements of the self-employed are illegal. The true union leaders are thrown into prison, persecuted, or worse, confined in secret.

    Rather than reporting these excesses, the Quebec Left invites the autocrats of the regime to join them in denouncing capitalism, and to sing the communist International under the supervision of Castro’s representative in Canada.


    That’s not all. The Leftist activists will also listen to Noel Marquez of the Council of Social Movements of ALBA, an organization created by Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro to broadcast their death-to-liberty ideology in Latin America, and which maintains links with terrorist Marxist groups such as FARC and the Shining Path.

    A journalist-student of the Prince Arthur Herald of McGill University moreover revealed last week that the Bolivarian Society of Quebec, a local branch of sympathizers with dictators, holds its regular meetings at the CSN in Montreal.

    With their communist comrades, our union activists shut their eyes to abuses of the rights of workers.

    I am not alone in denouncing Cuban and Venezuelan anti-trade-unionism; so does the Confederation of International Trade Unions (CSI) of which the CSN is however a member!

    CUT, PLEASE!!!

    This gathering of communists and of devils’ advocates for the worst dictatorships is organized by International Alternatives, the same organism which financed the Canadian ship for Gaza which never left the Greek islands.

    Another workshop of the weekend is called “Against Harper”. If they were consistent, our Leftist friends would also denounce the “subsidies of Harper”.

    In recent years, the Federal Government [of Canada] has contributed over 5 million dollars to “Alternatives” under the rubric of — hang onto your seats — “democratic partners”. The Quebec Governement added 1.8 million dollars. And that’s without counting projects currently underway which are costing the Federal Government $769,828 and the Quebec Government $541,340.

    And thus our taxes are squandered to fight our democratic and union rights.

    Unionized workers, how do you feel about your obligatory union dues being spent to bring in representatives of the torturers of Latin-american trade unionists?

    We knew the Quebec Left was against freedom of association for workers. When it participates in circuses like this one organized by “Alternatives”, we must admit that it is against freedom, period.

    Éric Duhaime

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    This English translation first posted here with text of French original:

  14. HabeasCorpusCanada September 3, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    AN IMPORTANT NEW TRANSLATION – read it here in text, or see it with links and images at my blogger :

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    THE PLAN FOR QUEBEC By Otto Kretzmer, Sunday, 16 April 2006, a post of the blogspot entitled LE COMPLOT CONTRE LE QUEBEC.

    Originally posted on Sunday, April 16, 2006 in French as Le plan pour le Québec by Otto Kretzmer. With brief additions from other articles of Mr. Kretzmer. English translation by Kathleen Moore for Habeas Corpus Canada. Note: In translating this article, I take no position on religion, except to attempt to convey the concerns of the article’s original author, Otto Kretzmer; and except to acknowledge absolutely the Constitutional nature for French Canadians of their entrenched right to their historic Catholic religion.

    Translator’s subtitle:
    The Communist Parentage of Quebec Separatism

    And now, Mr. Otto Kretzmer:


    The idea of separatism in Quebec has been part of a communist plan to overthrow Quebec and Canada. With a foothold in Quebec, communism could take all of Canada as well. Independence is a communist-Marxist strategy to take power in a country. We have this example in a number of countries: separations in Vietnam, in Algeria, in Biafra, in Korea, in Bengla-Desh, in Pakistan, etc.

    The Canadian Council of Protestant Churches, with its headquarters in Toronto, published a small brochure in 1969 entitled “Quebec’s Impending Fate Communist State?” (Le Québec deviendra-t-il un Etat communiste?) It is quite useful to re-read these extracts in 2005; we will therefore quote a few paragraphs from that brochure.

    [Re-translating into English, for lack of a copy of the brochure:]

    “The most militant Zone in Canada for communist activity is the Province of Quebec. The first goal adopted at the convention of the Communist Party of Quebec held in Montreal in 1967, was: “The establishment in Quebec, in Canada, and in the entire world, of a socialist society, and finally of a communist society.

    Noting that their goals accord with the efforts of other revolutionary communist groups throughout the world, the convention proclaimed:

    “This is an institution of the internationalism of the international proletariat, a science that the Communist Party of Quebec adopts proudly and which will guide us in our battle.”

    The December 1967 Communist Manifesto of Quebec is an appeal to militants to establish first, a socialist state, by armed revolution if necessary, so as to finally arrive at communist dictatorship.

    The Communist Party of Quebec declares in its Manifesto:

    “The Communist Party of Quebec is the Marxist-Leninist Worker’s Party.”

    This declaration has great significance. It identifies the Communist Party of Quebec with a tentacle of the World Communist Party, guilty of massacres, and the worst criminal atrocities against the peoples it has subjected to slavery. It represents the butchery of a hundred million persons whose only crime was to express their confidence in our democratic way of life, or who questioned the right of a small minority to impose their absolute will on the great majority.

    This communist Quebec Manifesto sets out a plan of political and social action. This plan includes a new federal constitution, and a new constitution for Quebec, the right to self-determination for Quebec, and the privilege to separate from Canada if necessary.”

    Separating Quebec from the rest of Canada is thus a plan of the Communist Party of Quebec, a plan announced in their Manifesto, a communist plan of conquest for Quebec and for the whole of Canada. Do not think that communism is dead and buried, even if some countries have succeeded in liberating themselves from this infernal slavery. Communism seeks to foment revolutions in countries to weaken the strength of their peoples, and to finally arrive at a world communist government. The Parti Québécois enters into the plans of the Communist Party of Quebec.

    False Patriotism

    The separatists say they are ardent defenders of the French language, of our culture, of our Quebec identity. However, they dissociate our culture from our Catholic faith transmitted by our ancestors. They are hardly concerned with the safeguard of Catholicism in Quebec. Their goal is to permanently annihilate it. These ardent “independentists” preach patriotism to us in every key, but they themselves work to achieve an atheistic and anticlerical communist plan, whether they know it or not.

    In the name of false patriotism, they carry the Quebec people toward separation, which will spawn a bloody revolution, a civil war. Separatism flows from socialist-Marxist ideology. Those who fight the battle for separation in Quebec are not patriots, but veiled communists.

    Marxist Constitutions

    A great deal is heard about the preparation of a new federal constitution and a new constitution for Quebec*, about the “right to self-determination for Quebec”, a certain “sovereignty”. These changes correspond strangely with the 1967 Manifesto of the Communist Party of Quebec. Will Ottawa itself contribute to separating Quebec from Canada? Is the provocation of a civil war a part of the plot? Is the desire to establish atheistic, Marxist and communist constitutions in Quebec and in Canada to lead us into a tyrannical world government?

    Canada and all the Provinces are the slaves of Big Business. This is the real problem. Our governments, from the biggest to the smallest, are weighted down with public debt. When will they break loose these chains of banker dictatorship and stop genuflecting at the feet of the money men to borrow numbers? The thing to be changed in the federal and provincial constitutions is to detach Canada and the Provinces from High Finance, our common enemy. The law which empowers banks and private institutions to create money must be abolished.

    It is also important to realize that the concept or the word “communism” is employed as a mask for the New World Order, which was begun by the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and continues unabated up to the present.

    The energies and the idealism of the working people are used by the protectors of such revolutions – the Big Bankers – to demolish what has been created methodically by generations before us. At the price of blood and destruction, the power of the Bankers is expanded and consolidated, whereas, the proletariates increasingly find themselves worse off than they were at the start. They face the prospect of nothing less than slavery.

    In my first article, (says Kretzmer) I described without proving it, that it [communism] is the separatist movement, whether in Quebec or in any other part of the world. As for Quebec separatists, I personally knew a member of the FLQ, Charles Gagnon, who had always been a communist. I don’t know what has become of him, because I lost touch with him ages ago.

    There have been various separatist movements in Quebec, but I am going to focus above all, at first, on the RIN and its former President, the now deceased Pierre Bourgault. The anglophone reader or anyone who doesn’t know the history of Quebec will indeed be surprised by certain facts and certain declarations. That is expected, it’s normal.

    All those organizations that mobilized the “Parti-Pris” and the “Révolution Québécoise” magazines as the front line of their advance, used the nationalism (including the respectable nationalism) of the French Canadians to launch the communist revolution in Quebec.

    For these organizations, separatism – one should more properly say: “the tactic of independence” is only a means to their ends, a “Trojan horse” at the service of the aspirations of Moscow (or of Peking!) to a world hegemony. By way of illustration, let’s see what we can read on this subject in the September, 1964 issue of “Révolution Québécoise”:

    “Just as every imperialist war must be transformed into a civil war to overthrow the power of the culpable ruling classes, in the same way EVERY nationalist movement must be transformed into a socialist movement to liberate the working classes” (page 35)

    We know that excellent Christians have been deceived by the RIN-PQ-BQ* and their false gloss of patriotism. However, other than Mister Bourgault who repeated to all who would listen that an “independent” Quebec would be socialist, the apologia that one reads in the Marxist magazine “Révolution Québécoise,” as made by the RIN’s official publication, L’ndépendance (November 1964, p. 7), must provide sufficient reason to all true patriots and Christians of Quebec to oppose the PQ-BQ-RIN by total refusal, in both words and acts. Here is an excerpt from the official mouthpiece of the RIN, L’ndépendance (November 1964):

    A new magazine just came out: “Révolution Québécoise,” run by Pierre Vallières (a former Felquist {FLQ terrorist}), who left the team of “Cité Libre” – Pierre Elliot Trudeau was part of the team at Cité Libre – to participate in the building of a free city up to the measure of our era: the one that a (liberated!) Quebec will form tomorrow in which all property will be absolutely redistributed (!!). This magazine (Révolution Québécoise) is an addition to the several avant-garde magazines born in Québec the past few years, and must take its place on the bookshelf of every independentist whose heartfelt desire is to be informed on the economic and cultural problems of Québec.”

    The official magazine of the RIN-PQ-BQ* thus suggests that every independentist read a review which is self-identified as communist-Leninist. It therefore seems futile to insist on pointing out, when it’s so easy to recognize, the ideology which has inspired the RIN-PQ-BQ each in its turn. However, it is necessary to return to the subject in order to examine, more closely this time, the RIN, the “Rassemblement Pour l’Indépendance Nationale” (the Rally for National Independence).

    Pierre Bourgault, the former President of the RIN, toured Quebec. He was received officially in some towns, in some Catholic seminairies, and he even held public meetings in a well known Dominican monastery in Montreal. Here, then, is the gist of it.

    The RIN and the Revolution

    In its October 10th, 1964 edition, the Montreal daily newspaper “Le Devoir” published a long article on page 4 under “Reader’s Opinion” entitled: “The Independence of Quebec” (“L’indépendance du Québec”). This article permits us to trace the goals pursued by the RIN-PQ-BQ. To be clear, and to keep it short, we have taken the liberty of extracting only the most significant passages from this article. Here they are:

    “Independentist parties and movements, which are proliferating in Québec, endorse opposing theories, according to which they describe themselves as left or right. Some of them claim to be the champions of independence; but in studying their writings we perceive that their real ultimate goal is revolution via the scientific socialism of Karl Marx. To drive us to this goal, they use as “research themes and as battle cries: socialism, secularism and independence”. I refer in particular to the magazines Parti-Pris and L’Indépendance, the latter being the official organ of the RIN.

    In support of this grave accusation, here are a few typical excerpts, which are merely a fraction of those we could cite. A special edition of Parti-Pris was published on September 1st, 1964. The “manifesto” begins with a report of Marx on the Revolution; then, at page 12, we read:

    “Independence, which was a goal, becomes a preliminary, a necessary step in the revolutionary conflict which exceeds it and amplifies it”.

    We will see that the realness, the authenticity of the independentist idea resides in the political thought and practise of the Left.” (page 23)


    “Trained in the school of Sartre, which is that of Marxism-Leninism, we are agreed upon the necessity to use, as research and battle themes, socialism, secularism and independence.” (p. 36).

    “The recognition of the RIGHT to believe that religion is an evil” both follows and precedes the tirades of the priests.” (p. 30).

    L’Indépendance – the magazine of the RIN, and Parti-Pris (2) get along very well, even if, for public consumption, they keep a certain distance between them. For example, in Parti-Pris the current President of the RIN, Mister Pierre Bourgault, published his political and electoral program on December 3rd, 1963. But, it is in the July 1964 issue of L’Indépendance at page 2, 2nd column, that we read:

    “It is time to recall that independence is a means that must bring us to social and working-class revolution.

    The revolutionary party that achieves independence will, for example, abolish the two-party system…” (p. 6).

    Then we will publicly recommend, and above all accomplish, the separation – the great work – of the spiritual from the temporal, of the Church from the State” (p. 2).”

    This extract may seem long to some readers, but it was necessary. It reveals the communist parentage of the separatist movement in Québec and the place occupied within it by the RIN-PQ-BQ.

    Tactics of the RIN

    In December of 1964, Mr. Bourgault returned from a “thrilling tour” of Québec. That’s even the title of the article he wrote in RIN’s magazine that same month. In that article, he declared, most notably:

    “Past violence is detrimental to our present action, and it is not in the name of principles that we denounce it, but in the name of efficiency.”

    How do we interpret this? An about-face? A conversion?

    No: because “past violence” is not denounced “in the name of principles”, which is to say in the name of the immutable commandments that come from God, or by reference to genuine ethics, but solely “in the name of efficiency.” Yesterday, violence might have been useful, today, No!! Because we [I mean, the RIN] ]have perceived that the Quebec people still have a solid ethical sense in this era, and that, accordingly, recourse to the mere idea of “violence” is unpopular. And on account of this, it undermines the work of the RIN. But tomorrow? Tomorrow, maybe, violence could be used. All depends on the greatest efficacy.

    And then the bombs flew just about everywhere and we had the tragic murder of Pierre Laporte.

    To show how well anchored was the thought of Mister Bourgault in the realm of the communist dialectic, it would be useful to quote two extracts from an article on “The True Nature of Communism” by Jean Daujat:

    “Most of our contemporaries,” writes Mr. Daujat, “have no idea how to react to communism because they don’t know it, which leads them into it, or allows them to be used by it. They are especially totally led astray by the perpetual contradictions of the communists, who often say and do the opposite today of what they said and and did the day before, which induces one and another to marvel at how they have changed their ways. This non-comprehension of Marxism has grave consequences …

    ” … Because, for such a philosophy (Marxist), the only consideration that counts is material power, efficacity; the only rule is to say or to do whatever the moment requires, more efficacious and more powerful. There is no place for truth, for good, or for justice to intervene.

    Whatever a true communist says or writes is never the teaching of a truth, which is something that makes no sense to him, but propaganda to carry off an action: it will consist not in saying what is true, but whatever more efficiently serves the action to be exercised.

    It is therefore absurd to say, as some do, that one can collaborate in an action practised by communists without adopting Marxist doctrine. Because communism is not at all the teaching of a doctrine, but the action exerted by the communist himself.” (Jean Daujat: The True Nature of Communism)

    “Past violence is detrimental to our present action,” writes Mr. Bourgault, “and it is not in the name of principles that we denounce it, but in the name of efficiency.” This simple phrase can tell us a great deal about the philosophy of the separatist movement. Did not Lenin write: Marxism must take account of living reality, precise facts, and not cling to a theory of yesterday. Our doctrine is not a dogma, but a rule of action (Lenin, Works XXIV).

    Who Was Pierre Bourgault?

    In May of 1964, Mister Pierre Bourgault publicly confessed his agnosticism in MacLean’s Magazine (p. 44). He renewed this public confession on television networks; he reaffirmed it at Alma in Lake Saint-Jean to the regional press; and finally at Valleyfield over the airwaves of the local radio station.

    During this interview granted to the Valleyfield press on November 17th, 1964, a journalist read to Mister Bourgault what the Vatican Council had ruled in respect to agnosticism:

    “If someone says that the only true God, our Lord and Creator, is unknowable in the light of reason through the things he has made, that he be excommunicated.”

    To which Mister Bourgault replied: “I could be wicked and answer you like Jean-Paul Sartre: Je ne communias déjà plus!” [Literal translation: I will no longer take communion]

    Let us not forget that one day or another, every man, every ideology, every social institution or human society must speak for or against the Church. The separatist movement chose its side and it has never sidetracked. Let’s re-read attentively the extract reported in I’indépendance (July 1964). The official mouthpiece of the RIN writes:

    “Then we will publicly recommend, and above all accomplish, the separation – the great work – of the spiritual from the temporal, of the Church from the State” (p. 2) What are we to think?

    The Christian citizen naturally knows that it is not society, but man, which has an immortal soul. It follows from that fact that society (along with its government) is made for man, and, that man is made for God. In this light, the suggestion of the separatist movement which says “publicly recommend, and above all accomplish, the separation – the great work – of the spiritual from the temporal, of the Church from the State” cannot but recall the famous statement of Lenin: “God is the personal enemy of communist society.”

    To impose “the separation – the great work – of the spiritual from the temporal, of the Church from the State” upon a human society is at basis to compel a man practically to separate his body from his soul, because one is temporal and the other is spiritual! And it is not because they want to establish a simple distinction between the spiritual and the temporal, but they demand a great separation, a break, and “above all,” “to accomplish this” does not go without violence nor terrorism. Lenin made no effort to hide it when he said:

    “Millions of excrements, defilements, violences, sicknesses, pestilences, are much less to be feared than the most subtle, the most refined, and the most invisible idea of God! God is the most personal enemy of Communist Society.”

    The vehement opposition of Holy Pope Pius Xth to this doctrine is well explained thus:

    “[translation of Kretzmer’s French:] that it is necessary to separate the Church from the State”, he wrote, “is an absolutely false thesis, a very pernicious error. Based, in effect, on this principle, that the State must recognize no religious practice, it is first of all gravely injurious for God; because the Creator of man is also the Founder of human societies, and he maintains them in existence just as he does us. We owe him not only our private worship, but public and social honor.”

    One thing must be clarified: secularism – or secular humanism – is a recognized religion according to a judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States. When the Liberals and the free-thinkers gild the pill for us, in speaking to us of pseudo-neutrality, they knowingly lie. Neutrality exists nowhere in the universe. These are the refrains of the Quebec Secular Movement which have given the order to the Governments of Quebec and of Canada to remove ancestral rights, rights conferred by the Constitution, concerning the teaching of Catholicism and Protestantism in Quebec schools.

    The Quebec Secular Movement is also behind homosexual marriage or civil union. The Quebec Secular Movement is the true gouvernement du Québec, not the useless Quebec Legislature, stuffed with hypocrites who love to shake hands, appear in public and fly around in limousines.

    The RIN, to give to its position the semblance of orthodoxy, readily spreads the idea among its members that it is necessary to liberate religion from politics; in fact, it proposed exactly the opposite: to “liberate” politics from religion! And that’s called secularism. But, secularism is a religion called Freemasonry.

    “In the lives of states themselves,” writes Pope Pius XII in this regard, the strength and the weakness of men, sin and grace, play a capital role. The politics of the 20th Century can’t ignore it, nor admit that one persists in the error of wanting to separate the state from religion in the name of a secularism that the facts have not been able to justify” (Christmas, 1956).

    No! “The Catholic Church will never allow itself to be enclosed within the four walls of the temple! The separation of religion from life, and of the Church from the world, is contrary to Christian and Catholic doctrine!” (Pius XII).

    It is therefore easy to see that the revolutionary doctrine of the separatist movement is “contrary to Christian and Catholic doctrine”; which is, because of this fact, “an absolutely false thesis, very gravely injurious for God, Creator of Man and founder of human societies”. And, it is rigorously logical to conclude that every devoted Catholic must make it his business to put his hatred for error and his love for truth into open battle in full light of day, against such an ideology!

    I will conclude by reporting the public declaration (just one among many) of Mr. Bourgault, published in LaPresse, of which he was then an Editor, on February 3rd, 1964 (page 17). It’s a report of a meeting held the previous evening of February 2nd at the Champagnat school.

    “These cryptic zones proliferate, cryptics of centralization, of bilingualism, but also cryptics of betrayal, of intermediate bodies, of bishops and of embezzlers of public funds.”

    Mister Bourgault thus quite simply lumps together the bishops and the embezzlers of public funds, which has nonetheless not prevented him from being received by certain of our Catholic colleges. The former president of the RIN was a man who disliked – as he readily admitted – mixing religion with politics, nor with his own life, yet he never shied away from vilifying the Church in its own public assemblies!

    What is the real goal of the separatist movement?

    We have seen clearly, despite the distance these two movements prudently kept between them, (to assure the efficacy of their action upon the public) that the RIN closely pursued the same goals as the Marxist team of the Parti Pris.

    “Seeking means capable of achieving the Revolution, Marx found misery”, wrote Rosenberg. Without a doubt, had he lived in Quebec in 1965, Marx would have found “independentism”. And the question returns: What is the real goal of the separatist movement?

    The answer: “It is time to recall.” as written in the July 1964 issue of L’Indépendance, “that independence is a means that must bring us to social and working-class revolution”.

    And there it is. The real, the only, goal of the separatist movement! And it is not by chance that this is the goal of the World Communist Party: Stalin declared to the 7th world congress of the Comintern:

    “All the detours, all the zigzags of our policy have but one goal and one goal only: world Revolution!”

    Once again, it is clear that a true Catholic must not join the ranks of the separatist movement, if he really wishes to remain Catholic.

    [Summarizing]: A Few Statements from the President of the RIN

    With respect to the Quebec people:

    “Give me 5% of the Quebec population, and I’ll take it where I want because the other 95% are sleeping.”

    – Pierre Bourgault at Alma, in the church basement of St-Sacrement on November 2nd, 1964

    “Despite history, despite English, despite the noteworthies, and a little bit also despite ourselves, alas!, the Quebecois people have stayed French. I had violently returned. This people had no need of directives to affirm its French pride in the face of the whole world”.

    – Pierre Bourgault

    Concerning terrorism:

    “But, if Michelle Duclos preferred the cause of the blacks, I understand her. As for me, if I were a black, I would have long ago made them all jump”

    – Pierre Bourgault, February 21st, 1965, Paul Sauvé Arena

    Concerning social ethics:

    “Past violence is detrimental to our present action, and it is not in the name of principles that we denounce it, but in the name of efficiency.”

    – Pierre Bourgault in “L’Indépendance” December 1964

    Concerning religion:

    “I could be wicked and answer you like Jean-Paul Sartre: Je ne communias déjà plus!”

    – Pierre Bourgault in an interview taped on November 17th, 1964 at Valleyfield at the local radio station

    Concerning his adversaries:

    “These cryptic zones proliferate, cryptics of centralization, of bilingualism, but also cryptics of betrayal, of intermediate bodies, of bishops and of embezzlers of public funds.”

    – Pierre Bourgault, 2 February 1964, Ecole Champagnat

    “Because the truly socialist parties have never been able to seize power in any country whatsoever except in the course of a civil war”

    – said “Parti-Pris”, coming to the point.

    Let me say it again, clearly. “Parti-Pris” was a communist magazine. Moreover, they did not hide this and they wrote openly of it in their September 1964 edition:

    “Marxism, to which we ascribe, is not a catechism, but above all, a method of analysis and of work required for us put it into operation in Québec.”

    Which is why Mister Bourgault, past president of the RIN, published his “political and electoral programme” in a magazine which openly advertised itself as Marxist-Leninist.

    This ideal of a break between the spiritual and the temporal is the core of the Revolution (with a capital “R”). It is very instructive to read what Stalin had to say in this regard:

    “In realizing such a separation (of Church and State) and in proclaiming freedom of religion, we have at the same time reserved to every citizen (read: to the Communist Party) the “right” to fight for this conviction through propaganda and through unrest… against all religion” (Voprosy, Leninism, Leningrad 1932, pp- 285-286).*

    We are seeing it ever more clearly, the secessionist movement and the Communist Party are converging toward one and the same goal: the Revolution.

    – 30 –


    * Dr. John Laughland considers that the European Union essentially embodies Marxist ideology (“The European Union: a Marxist Utopia?”. Quebec “separatist” parties have, for decades, attempted not to “secede” by referendum, but to extract a mandate to negotiate the imposition on Quebec and on all of Canada of the EU system. The EU system therefore appears to be the veiled communist system, emerging progressively. The use of Quebec to force the system onto all of Canada would then result in a new Marxist “federal constitution, and a new Marxist constitution for Quebec”. See my blog post of 14 October 2009: “Sarkozy Scamming Quebec’s Hoodwinked Separatists”. KM/HCC.

    * “PQ” is the acronym for Parti Québécois, a Quebec provincial “party” founded formally in 1968 by communist, René Lévesque (it was actually planned by others), and typically labeled “separatist” by press and media. However, “separatist” is a misnomer. The platform of the Parti Québécois has always been to impose the European system on all of Canada in place of Confederation. “Separatism” is merely a threat of UDI (unilateral declaration of independence) to destroy Canada, as blackmail to force the rest of Canada to accept the European system. Therefore, Mr. Kretzmer’s understanding of the Quebec Communist Party Manifesto appears to be on the right track: the attempt by Lévesque in 1980, and then by Jacques Parizeau in 1995 is to impose a new, ultimately “Marxist” Constitution on Quebec, and on all of Canada: the European Union system. A 1991 interview with Parizeau and then-Premier of Quebec Robert Bourassa shows that both are already quite conversant with the notion of a common North American Parliament. Bourassa, a “Liberal”, a label Canadians have been trained to identify as “fighting against separatists”, actually passed a law in 1991, Bill 150, compelling a referendum for Quebec to secede by a fixed date in 1992. That law, however, was blackmail to attempt to force all Canadians to accept so-called “amendments” to the federal Constitution presented as the Charlottetown Accord to “keep Quebec in Canada”. But, in reality, the proposed amendments were a ruse to appear to harmonize Canada with “international law” that emerged from the Badinter Commission during the overthrow and breakup of Yugoslavia. Had Charlottetown passed, Quebec would have “seceded” and used UDI to force the EU system on Canada. I wrote about this in my 2008 Federal Elections newsletter: “NO ONE TO VOTE FOR Federal Elections – Canada”
    When former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev visited Britain in 2000, he described the European Union as “the new European Soviet.” Others, including former Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, American Charlotte Iserbyt and Lithuanian-American Vilius Brazenas, equate the EU system with the basis of a nascent world Soviet system. Still others identify the EU as being essentially Marxist in ideology (“The European Union: a Marxist Utopia?” by Dr. John Laughland, Online publication date: 2011-04-20).

    * “BQ” is the acronym for Bloc Québécois, a so-called ‘federal’ ‘separatist’ party founded in approximately 1990 when a handful of mostly former Liberals and former Conservatives who had crossed the floor two to five months earlier to sit as independents, crossed the floor again inside Parliament to sit – we are told – as ‘separatists’. However, the agitations of this party since its founding have been designed to help get Quebec out of Confederation by intimidating Canadians into accepting the European system in lieu of threatened “break-up”. Again, it is a misnomer and thus misleading to call these parties “separatist”. They are not “separatist”. They are communist parties hiding behind separatist ideology.

    Like the Parti Québécois, the Bloc Québécois wants a European-style union. Their recent past leader, Gilles Duceppe, admitted on camera on 30 April 2011 that he wants “a good constitution, like they have in Europe”. He wants a North American Union including a “sovereign” Quebec. In other words, the communists have targeted all of North America, and apparently they have counterparts in the U.S.A. who are ready and willing to give it to them, though this would necessitate the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, Congress and the White House. It is worth noticing that there is a “secession” movement in the USA at precisely the same time that Duceppe is making this declaration. It’s called the “Tenth Amendment Movement” by which 38+ States have filed formal declarations intending to ‘secede’ from their federal government and destroy the USA because of federal encroachment on States’ constitutional rights. I wrote about this in my blog post of 27 June 2011, “Taking America Down for Globalism in the Name of Patriotism”

    * “The official magazine of the RIN-PQ-BQ” – I now don’t know what Mr. Kretzmer means. “BQ” appears to refer to the Bloc Quebecois which arrived on the scene as of 1990. The Bloc could therefore not have been involved in the 1960s with the RIN and the PQ. Was it a typographical error to have included the BQ in the Kretzmer article? Or does BQ stand for still something else that I’m not yet aware of?

    Gilles Duceppe, recent former leader for over 20 years of the “separatist” Bloc Québécois (an illegal party in the federal Parliament) was a colleague of FLQ terrorist leader Charles Gagnon. Duceppe wrote for Gagnon’s communist magazine “En Lutte!” (Struggle!). See my translation “Has the Far Left Hijacked the Quebec Sovereignty Movement?” under my general title: “Communist Links of the NDP and the Bloc Québécois”.

    As Mr. Kretzmer notes above, Pierre Elliott Trudeau was part of the team at the magazine, Cité Libre. More importantly, Trudeau and other important federal figures in the “Quebec secession” scheme, including Gérard Pelletier, Jean Marchand, and René Lévesque, were also a part of Cité Libre and, thereby, colleagues of the second of two FLQ terrorist leaders, Pierre Vallières, who acted as Director of Cité Libre in the early 1960s around the time Vallières met Gagnon and the FLQ bombings began in Quebec.

    René Lévesque founding the Parti
    Québécois, a fake “separatist” party designed
    to impose the EU system on Canada
    disguised as Quebec “sovereignty”.
    The FLQ had been set up by Fidel Castro, who met Belgian immigrant to Montreal, Georges Schoeters during Castro’s visit to Canada on 26 April 1959. Castro later brought Schoeters to Cuba where he trained him to organize the FLQ. Castro also trained some of the terrorists handpicked by Schoeters. In the photo below, we see René Lévesque, the year before he entered politics with the Liberals, interviewing Castro on the very same day that Castro linked up with Schoeters. FLQ terror would be the springboard and the pretext for a “political” settlement of the “complaints” of the FLQ about conditions in Quebec. Had it been Lévesque who originated the idea of the “separatist” party which would fight it out with the rest of Canada in negotiations after a referendum, that would be sufficiently odd, given Lévesque’s link to the man who set up the FLQ in the first place: Castro. However, it was a group of mostly Liberals, federal ministers from Quebec in the government of Lester Pearson, who decreed that a “separatist” party should be erected. Those men included, notably, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Gérard Pelletier and Jean Marchand, all three recruited by Pearson to “fight separatism”. But, strangely, the “separatist” party they decided should be set up to “fight separatism” in a referendum, actually had as its platform the “negotiation” of the European Economic Community (EU) system to replace Confederation. This is the very system viewed today as increasingly Soviet, and as Marxist in nature. Who would decree that a “separatist” party be set up so that “separatism” could be “fought” in a referendum? A secret committee of Power Corporation would, and did, in 1967, led by Claude Frenette, a Liberal with close ties to Trudeau and a Power Corp. executive and right-had man to Paul Desmarais. Power Corporation in 2010 is headquarters of the Rhodes Scholarships for Quebec (a free education in promotion of world government). And more importantly, Power Corporation is a founding member of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives which authored the Building A North American Community report of 2005 outlining the creation of a North American Community on the pretext of the September 11th, 2001 “terrorist attacks”, and published by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the U.S. branch of the network involved in the Cecil Rhodes society, and whose “sister institute” in Canada is the Canadian International Council (CIC), on whose Board and Senate we find Power Corporation.

    Again, despite the steadfast complicity of press and media pretending that Quebec, led by “separatists,” was attempting to “secede,” the real subject of the referendum was not secession, but the imposition on all of Canada of the EU system. René Lévesque ultimately “founded” that “separatist” party, the Parti Québécois, which has been used ever since to attempt to force the European Union system onto Canada in place of Confederation.

    Journalist René Lévesque interviews Fidel Castro in Montreal on 26 April
    1959 for his show Point de Mire. Behind Lévesque: Jean-Claude Dupras of the Youth
    Chamber of Commerce. Foreground, far right: criminal lawyer Raymond Daoust, organized
    Castro’s visit. There is a cropped version of this image at Dupras’s personal web site.
    Lawyer, Raymond Daoust
    Castro’s trip to Montreal on 26 April 1959 (when he connected with Schoeters) was organized by Raymond Daoust, a criminal lawyer, according to the caption under the same photo (above) in a biography entitled René Lévesque – Un enfant du siècle 1922-1960, by Pierre Godin. It is unclear whether Daoust was working for the mafia at that time; however, Daoust is ultimately identified as a lawyer for the Vic Cotroni mafia family and also in circumstances suggesting that he, himself, was a part of the mob. In the 1963, when twenty-three FLQ terrorists were picked up and charged, some of them, including Raymond Villeneuve, hired criminal lawyer Daoust to conduct their defense. It is therefore quite odd that Daoust should have organized Castro’s trip to Montreal on the very day in 1959 when Castro connected with Schoeters, who was used to set up the Front de Libération du Québec (FLQ) terrorists; and that Daoust himself, three or four years later – at which date he is known as a lawyer for Cotroni – would end up defending some of the terrorists, one of whose leaders – Pierre Vallières, is a colleague of Trudeau, and of the two other man recruited by Lester Pearson to join the Liberals to “fight” these same terrorists whom they call “separatists” …. although, they are clearly not “separatists” but communists. And in the process of “fighting” them, he, Trudeau, the defender of Canada, will facilitate their attempted imposition of what is apparently the economic basis of a world-wide communist system: for the 1980 referendum proposes to replace Confederation with the European Economic Community system, which today we see as the European Union with special status at the U.N.

  15. peter Courtenay Stephens September 18, 2011 at 12:12 am

    One of the methods used int he 1917 Bolshevik revolution was when a haraunger was, well haranguing the workers in a factory or elsewhere, if a man disagreed and spoke out against what was being said, the haraunger had what I refer to as isolators in the crowd who would immediately isolate the person who was speaking against the speaker and try and disorient them by engaging in conversation or if necessary by pushing him or if necessary starting a fight with him and beating him. This dissuaded people from speaking out and the end result was to silence them. The Communists of today use the same tactics and Alinsky has them in his list. They use them in the media and with their useful fools in the Unions.
    The bottom line is that the Marxists/Communists use the same tactics as the Nazi’s/Fascists as the saying goes.
    “Beware the Marxist/Fascist Axis as their excrement smells the same.”

  16. Kathleen Moore January 5, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    USA reports in current e-letter: “America is being disarmed”
    A link goes to:

    “one year ago Ron Paul joined forces with Barney Frank on a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to George Soros…”


    Not only did Paul join forces with Barney Frank to slash military preparedness, but he ended up putting the experts of a foreign billionaire with global ambitions in charge of the project. And that was what he did as a congressman. Can anyone imagine what he would do as president?

    But why would Ron Paul allow George Soros that much power and influence over America’s defense policy? There are a number of possibilities. There is the possibility that Ron Paul just didn’t know and didn’t bother to do his research. Which is not much of a recommendation for the job he’s running for. There’s another possibility that Ron Paul knew and didn’t care, that he had no objection to being part of a left-right alliance against the “American Empire” with Soros. But there’s also a third possibility.

    During the previous election, Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) ran an ad praising Ron Paul for his position against the war. AAEI was an umbrella group for, the Center for American Progress, SEIU, Americans United For Change, the National Security Network and others in the progressive bestiary. A number of those beasties were Soros groups.

    I’m not one to dabble in conspiracy theories, but when Soros pays for an ad praising you during the Republican primaries and then you put his experts in charge of America’s defense policy, then maybe some questions should be asked.

  17. Kathleen Moore (@HCCanada) January 12, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    “Russian Move Against US Called “First Shot” Of World War III by on January 10, 2012”



    A grim Ministry of Finance report prepared for Prime Minister Putin is warning today that the decision by Iran to cease taking US Dollars for its oil could verybe the “first shot” fired in World War III, and one which Russia will be blamed for by the Obama regime.

    According to this report, Iran swiftly countered planed US sanctions against its Central Bank yesterday by announcing that it will no longer accept the US Dollar as payment for its oil shipments to India, Japan and China, and further announced that bilateral trade between itself and Russia will, also, break from the US Dollar for settlement in favor of the Iranian Rial and Russian Rubles.

    Sure to enrage the Obama regime, this report continues, was that the proposal to switch to the Ruble and the Rial was raised by President Medvedev at a meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in Astana, Kazakhstan, of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

    Though Iran had previously announced in 2008 that it had stopped trading its oil for US Dollars (Ahmadinejad called the depreciating US Dollar a “worthless piece of paper”) India, Japan and China were made exempt due to their large holdings of American currency and fears of wreaking further chaos on the global economic collapse that had just begun.

    Important to note, this report reminds us, is that a similar move by Iraq’s former leader Saddam Hussein in not accepting US Dollars for oil in 2000 brought about the invasion of his country by the Americans and their European allies resulting in his eventual execution and causing the vast wealth of Iraqi oil and gas fields to be turned over to the Western oil giants.

    Likewise, this report says, former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi earned the same fate as Hussein after he, in the months leading up to the US-NATO military attack on his country, called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create a new currency that would rival the US Dollar and Euro and saying that Libya would only sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars.

    Most oil sales throughout the world are denominated in US Dollars, and according to proponents of the petrodollar warfare hypothesis, because most countries rely on oil imports, they are forced to maintain large stockpiles of Dollars in order to continue imports.

    This creates a consistent demand for US Dollars and upwards pressure on its value, regardless of economic conditions in the United States. This in turn allows the US government to gain revenues through seignorage and by issuing bonds at lower interest rates than they otherwise would be able to. As a result the USgovernment can run higher budget deficits at a more sustainable level than can most other countries.

    But, this report reminds us, the current budget deficit of the US has now reached the staggering amount of $15.23 trillion which is the size of its entire economy, and with the Federal Reserve preparing to being another round of massive printing this coming summer the loss of Iran’s oil customers needing US Dollars could very well signal the collapse of the entire American economy.

    Though the Obama regime has sent its Treasury Secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, to China and Japan today in an effort to persuade them to cut back on Iranian oil this effort appears doomed from start as the Chinese have outright rejected this move and Japan has, likewise, expressed its concerns.

    As is always the case in these type of dire matters, reports from the US show its mainstream propaganda media organs are not reporting on this potentially catastrophic turn of events leading to yet another circumstance where the American people will be taken by complete surprise when this cold war suddenly turns hot.

    In order to prepare itself for what is to come, however, a vast Russian naval fleet arrived in Syria yesterday in an attempt to forestall US-NATO action against its Middle East ally currently under attack by the CIA-backed terrorist group known as al-Qaida.

    Most shocking in this report are some Russian economists stating that the Obama regime is actually anticipating the collapse of the US Dollar as a “solution”to their being able to implement drastic socialistic change such as was done during the Great Depression under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and which the grim statistics being reported from the US show they are, indeed, nearing total economic collapse and include:

    1. A staggering 48 percent of all Americans are either considered to be “low income” or are living in poverty.

    2. Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be “low income” or impoverished.

    3. If the number of Americans that “wanted jobs” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would be up to 11 percent.

    4. The average amount of time that a worker stays unemployed in the United States is now over 40 weeks.

    5. One recent survey found that 77 percent of all U.S. small businesses do not plan to hire any more workers.

    6. There are fewer payroll jobs in the United States today than there were back in 2000 even though we have added 30 million extra people to the population since then.

    7. Since December 2007, median household income in the United States has declined by a total of 6.8 percent once you account for inflation.

    8. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 16.6 million Americans were self-employed back in December 2006. Today, that number has shrunk to 14.5 million.

    9. A Gallup poll from earlier this year found that approximately one out of every five Americans that do have a job consider themselves to be underemployed.

    10. According to author Paul Osterman, about 20 percent of all U.S. adults are currently working jobs that pay poverty-level wages.

    As the buildup for war between the US and Iran continues to escalate, UN Chief Ban ki Moon’s call for the easing of tensions has gone unheeded as the Obama regimes call for the “dogs of war” to be unleashed on the Iranian people shows no sign of abatement.

    To what the final outcome may be in all of these events was detailed by Professor Igor Panarin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs who has long warned the United States is in a state of economic collapse which will see America being divided up into 6 regions due to a “vulnerable political setup,” “lack of unified national laws,” and “divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions.”

    Interesting to note about Professor Panarin’s prediction of the United States splintering into different regions are new reports coming from the United States showing that the Obama regime has recently called for the staffing of what are called FEMA Concentration Camps in not just 6, but 10 different regions of their country.

    Professor Panarin further warned that “a secret agreement was reached between Canada, Mexico and the US on a common Amero currency as a new monetary unit” and said that “this could signal preparations to replace the dollar.”

    When asked how Russia should react to his vision of the future, Professor Panarin said: “Develop the ruble as a regional currency. Create a fully functioning oil exchange, trading in rubles… We must break the strings tying us to the financial Titanic, which in my view will soon sink.”

    January 10, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.

  18. dfgh March 24, 2012 at 10:26 pm

    First, sorry for this terrible english…im from one of the countrys of Central AMERICA.
    i dont know why USA want control all the world?, if LATIN AMERICA become more socialist(communist) whats the problem with that?, its our problem or not?, we dont want “declare the war” or something like this..we only want better quality of lifes for us and nothing more, so please USA dont conquer us 🙂
    by the way….Hugo Chavez is a bad President….he prefer buy arms but not make better the economy and society of Venezuela.

    And i dont think the Russians want conquer the world like you 😉 oh well i remember the plans in Mexico, Central and south AMERICA…or how you says “National Sexurity”, have a great day.

    • Sophia Marsden September 2, 2012 at 11:06 am

      The USA needs to control the whole world in order to ensure that the markets of the world remain open to it’s capitalists.
      It also needs to secure specific control of resources that are vital to the functioning of it’s economy, especially fossil fuels and as time goes on probably various other raw materials such as ceirtain rare earth metals (though China is by far dominant in that for the time being).
      Finally there is the argument that it needs to export local discontent to the periphery to avoid rebellions in the center by maintaining a higher standard of living in the central nations of capitalist rule (OECD) at the expense of other nations. I am not sure if the USA actually thinks things through to that degree though and I think largely it does not think in those terms.

  19. Kathleen Moore June 17, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    Hello. We have a very serious problem in Canada. Our External Affairs Department and our Civil Service may have been set up largely under the control of the Comintern, through its trusted agent, Louis Kon, around 1923-1925.

    Kon is said to have recruited Oscar D. Skelton of Queens University to set up External Affairs Canada, and to also recruit Marxists into its ranks, and into those of the rest of the Civil Service of Canada.

    Skelton wrote his PhD thesis at the University of Chicago, in supposed opposition to “Socialism”. However, I suspect he did so in order to master his enemy, and provide himself with impeccable cover credentials.

    I am just beginning to learn about the invasion of Canada by Marxism, Marxists, Fabians, pro-Soviets, and Soviet agents in our government.

    Anyone who would be able to help clarify the Canadian picture and our current status would be welcome to drop by my new WordPress blog “Canada – How The Communists Took Control” at

    That domain is named for the weather report unearthed by journalist Peter Worthington, which proved that Pierre Elliott Trudeau was lying when he claimed he had thrown “snowballs” at Stalin’s statue in USSR. Trudeau was in fact, at that time, leading a Communist delegation in Moscow.

    We also have another Communist Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson, exposed by GRU defector Elizabeth Bentley, to whose control Hazen Size, Pearson leaked classified information while he worked in Canada’s External Affairs Department under O.D. Skelton who had recruited Pearson on recommendation of William Archibald Mackintosh.

    Then, there is something called the “Featherbed File” containing intelligence on Soviet subversive activities in the government of Canada, apparently compiled from papers provided to Canada by the courageous defector, Igor Gouzenko in the mid-1940s. Trudeau squelched the Featherbed File and RCMP (national police) materials on himself and others once he arrived in the Prime Minister’s Office, and put a moratorium on the file shortly before he left office.

    Any and all leads and help will be appreciated.

    I am working to stop the annexation of Canada to the USA and Mexico in a regional (Communist) union called the North American Union. This project has developed out of my research in constitutional law concerning the so-called “secession” of Quebec. I have discovered that Quebec was not trying to secede, it was using a threat of secession to blackmail all of Canada into adopting the EC-EU system, which is the basis of regional union.

    I have only just learned of the Communist element in the last few months, and am rushing to try to get up to speed on what has happened, is happening, and is intended to happen.

    I hope you will drop by. Thank you.

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union
    Main blog: (explains the “secession” scam)

  20. Kathleen Moore September 6, 2012 at 8:01 pm

    Breaking news – Senator McCarthy missed this one: Canada’s Chief FTA negotiator SIMON REISMAN was a suspected Communist subversive. RCMP warned the federal government in vain:

  21. Kathleen Moore September 7, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    I’ve changed the URL of this post to correct a typo in the title, and have added pics of some of the RCMP Communist subversive suspects in the Featherbed File:

  22. Anatoly September 8, 2012 at 4:56 am

    I was not able to reach your blog while you made it invite only on Blogger, but I am very glad that you have opened it up on WordPress. Thank you for the information, it’s much appreciated

  23. r petrol January 1, 2013 at 11:25 pm

    Soviet Deception in the Cuban Missile Crisis
    Learning from the Past
    James H. Hansen 6-27-2007

    Moscow’s surreptitious dispatch of nuclear-capable SS-4 and SS-5 surface-to-surface missiles to Cuba in 1962 upset the strategic balance in an alarming way.1 The resulting showdown—which the Russians call the “Caribbean Crisis” and the Cubans call the “October Crisis”— brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. From its inception, the Soviet missile operation entailed elaborate denial and deception (D&D) efforts. The craft of denying the United States information on the deployment of the missiles and deceiving US policymakers about the Soviet Union’s intent was the foundation of Nikita Khrushchev’s audacious Cuban venture. Piecing together the deception activities from declassified US, Russian, and Cuban accounts yields insights that can help us anticipate and overcome the D&D efforts of a growing number of foreign adversaries today.

    Range of Soviet SS-4 medium-range ballistic
    missiles and SS-5 intermediate-range ballistic
    missiles, if launched from Cuba.

    Moscow has always had a flair for D&D, known in Russian as maskirovka. Its central tenet is to prevent an adversary from discovering Russian intentions by deceiving him about the nature, scope, and timing of an operation. Maskirovka covers a broad range of concepts, from deception at the strategic planning level to camouflage at the troop level.2 Russian military texts indicate that maskirovka is treated as an operational art to be polished by professors of military science and officers who specialize in this area.

    DIA analysis preceding the missile crisis noted that the Soviet Army had probably employed large-scale battlefield deception “more frequently and with more consistent success than any other army.”3 The Soviets practiced extensive maskirovka before their move into Czechoslovakia in 1968. Moscow also trained foreign forces to apply deception, including North Vietnamese units before the Tet offensive in 1968 and Egyptian forces before crossing the Suez Canal in 1973.

    Close-hold Planning
    Gen. Anatoli Gribkov—then a senior member of the Soviet General Staff—provides revealing insights into the early planning of the operation. He says that, after Nikita Khrushchev decided to emplace the missiles in Cuba in the spring of 1962, the General Staff detailed only five officers—four generals and a colonel—to serve as the center of the military planning apparatus. Col. Gen. Semyon Ivanov, chief of the General Staff’s Chief Operations Directorate, was in overall charge.4 During that summer, the circle of collaborators and contacts expanded to include members of each of the relevant service branches, but secrecy and need-to-know prevailed. The most senior officers brought into the plan were at least told that Cuba was involved in the operation, but only a few were informed of the exact nature of the mission.5

    The top civilian and military officials conceptualizing the operation did not see eye-to-eye about the likelihood of pulling off a successful deception. At the very center of those making the decisions stood First Deputy Prime Minister Anastas Mikoyan, Presidium member Frol Kozlov, Defense Minister Marshal Rodion Malinovsky, and Marshal Sergei Biryuzov, commander of the Strategic Rocket Forces.6 Alternate Presidium member Sharaf Rashidov was brought in as well, possibly for the cover that he later provided for traveling delegations.7Biryuzov and his experts believed that the deployment could be made expeditiously and secretly, without the US discovering the missiles. Mikoyan was surprised at this judgment and believed the marshal to be a fool.8Rashidov was confident that the missiles could be hidden, claiming that they could be placed so as to blend in with the palm trees. Gribkov held that only somebody inexperienced in military matters could reach such a conclusion, given the extensive preparations needed for each missile site.

    Throughout the early planning stage, no secretaries were used to prepare final typed texts. A colonel with good penmanship wrote the proposal that the Defense Council adopted. It grew into a full-fledged plan, still handwritten, which was approved by Malinovsky on 4 July and Khrushchev on 7 July.9 From May through October, for reasons of security, no communications about the proposed, planned, and actual Soviet deployments in Cuba were sent, even by coded messages. Everything was hand-carried by members of the small coterie of senior officials who were directly involved.10

    Developing A Cover Story
    The General Staff’s code name for the operation—ANADYR—was designed to mislead Soviets as well as foreigners about the destination of the equipment. Anadyr is the name of a river flowing into the Bering Sea, the capital of the Chukotsky Autonomous District, and a bomber base in that desolate region. Operation ANADYR was designed to suggest to lower-level Soviet commanders—and Western spies—that the action was a strategic exercise in the far north of the USSR. Promoting the illusion, the troops that were called up for the Cuban expedition were told only that they were going to a cold region. Those needing more precise instructions, such as missile engineers, were informed that they would be taking ICBMs to a site on Novaya Zemlya, a large island in the Arctic where nuclear weapons had long been tested.11

    To strengthen the concealment, many units were outfitted with skis, felt boots, fleece-lined parkas, and other winter equipment.12 Moreover, perhaps to further backstop the cover plan, Moscow tapped four ground forces regiments from the Leningrad Military District in the north for dispatch to Cuba. The deception was so thorough that it fooled even senior Soviet officers sent to Cuba. One general there asked Gribkov why winter equipment and clothing had been provided. The general admonished him to “think like an adult,” and explained, “It’s called ANADYR for a reason. We could have given away the game if we had put any tropical clothing in your kits.”13

    Getting the Cubans On Board
    Secrecy surrounded the first Soviet delegation that went to propose the audacious plan to Fidel Castro and other Cuban leaders. The officials arrived in Havana with little fanfare on 29 May, amidst a delegation of agricultural experts headed by Rashidov. The group included Col. Gen. Ivanov and several missile construction specialists and other military experts, whose job it was to determine whether the missiles could be deployed in secrecy.14 Ambassador Aleksandr Alekseev took Cuban Defense Minister Raul Castro aside to explain that “Engineer Petrov” in the group actually was Marshal Biryuzov, and that he needed to meet with el lider maximo without delay. Only three hours later “Engineer Petrov” was shown into Fidel Castro’s office.15 The Cuban leadership unanimously and enthusiastically gave its approval in principle.16

    Soviet maritime policy began to shift in accordance with these first trips. In June and July, the USSR began to charter Western ships to carry general cargo from the Soviet Union to Cuba, reserving its own freighters for carrying military cargo.17

    During 2-17 July, a Cuban delegation led by Raul Castro traveled to Moscow to discuss Soviet military shipments, including nuclear missiles. Khrushchev met with the Defense Minister on 3 and 8 July. Raul Castro initialed a draft treaty with the Soviet Defense Minister that governed the deployment of Soviet forces to Cuba. This pact was not to be publicly revealed until a visit that Khrushchev planned to make to Cuba in November.18

    The Russians began to dispatch officers and specialists covertly to Cuba by air….

  24. Kathleen Moore April 12, 2013 at 6:42 am

    Meet the Castro-loving family of Canada’s future Liberal Leader (Justin Trudeau may be elected this weeknd)

  25. Kathleen Moore June 1, 2013 at 5:40 pm

    This was in two days ago, but I wasn’t able to get bandwidth to post it:

    “No Longer Unthinkable: Should US Ready For ‘Limited’ Nuclear War?” – By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR. on May 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM

    KM: This must have been planned by the psychopaths, like Pearl Harbor, 9/11, War on Iraq, Lusitania, etc., etc., because they were digging the graves in USA in early 2009.

    I saw the live video footage of mass open graves the size of football fields which were being dug at night by FEMA, and then filled with concrete bunkers containing multiple empty black rubber individual sarcophagi.

    When done, on the final morning, the sun came up and they had steam-shoveled the earth back over all the empty graves at night, and “paved” it with huge architectural flagstones– too big to be flagstones, but slabs, huge concrete slabs you could build a skyscraper with.

    There is NO SUCH THING as “limited” nuclear war! Iraq, Afghanistan, and former Yugoslavia are already contaminated FOREVER with depleted uranium spiked with plutonium ILLEGAL WEAPONS!. Now they want to pave the planet!

  26. Kathleen Moore July 18, 2013 at 4:41 am

    “Russia is Full Combat Ready” says the Alex Jones Channel
    Published on Jul 17, 2013

  27. Kathleen Moore July 26, 2013 at 12:06 am

    Alex Jones
    Just days after it concluded the biggest military exercise since the cold war, Russia has ordered its missile forces to conduct a snap drill in order to ascertain the readiness of putting intercontinental ballistic missiles on “high-alert” within a short time frame.

  28. Kathleen Moore August 14, 2013 at 5:30 pm

    According to The Daily Sheeple of 17 August 2012,

    In a report made available at Before It’s News and originally published by Steve Quayle, a reader with inside ties to the US military and DHS warns that thousands of Spetnatz operatives, Russia’s Special Purpose Forces, have been infiltrating the United States: –

    All of us have heard over the years rumors of foreign troops in the USA. I’ve always been reluctant to mention on-air because I have no way of verifying the reports. I received a call today from a long-time trusted Christian friend whom I have known for many years. The couple is wealthy and well-connected to movers and shakers in the USA and Europe. Trust me, if they want to “name drop” it’s not an exaggeration for them. I was was informed by the wife that they have a friend in DHS who promised to pass on anything significant that would be a sign for immediate preparation. ******** That agent called yesterday. He is hearing talk inside DHS that thousands of Sp….N…Z boys from that place connected to Alaska have been infiltrating from Canada into USA throughout this summer. He estimated the number so far exceeds 20,000 commandos. He advised my friends to take action immediately for food, water, ammo. I told her forget it! You need a plane ticket. The greatest shock to the American people will not be the invasion, but the merger of DHS with the invaders. Then they will understand the purpose of the 750 million rounds of hollow point ammo. Marxist Communist Valery Jarrett is the real power in DHS – not Napolitano. The nation has been compromised and sold out. Colonel Lunev told me in 1999 that the Sp…N…Z…boys will start arriving in large numbers months before the war. ********

    See more at:

  29. Kathleen Moore August 30, 2013 at 10:23 am

    “Leaked Documents U S Framed Syria in Chemical Weapons Attack”. Russia threatening nuclear war if US attacks Syria.

  30. Habeas Corpus Canada March 20, 2014 at 11:45 am

    I’ve just seen a presentation by Patrick Wood entitled “TECHNOCRACY” that is mind-blowing.

    It may well be that what we are being ushered into is not communism, but Technocracy, which is even worse:

    Please read my comments under that video.

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

  31. Habeas Corpus Canada March 20, 2014 at 11:49 am

    I am gradually translating into English a 1956 book by Quebec historian, Robert Rumilly, entitled “The Leftist Infiltration in French Canada”. Rumilly spots Pierre Elliott Trudeau and other pro-Soviets setting up their network in the 1950’s and denounces them. I’ve posted a couple of translated chapters at my web site:

    If you read French, you can download the scans of Rumilly’s books, linked to the bottom of my introductory post:

    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American Union

  32. alicewpdotcom2014 May 28, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    “Strategic Relocation”, a 2-hour video with Alex Jones and Joel M. Skousen, takes for granted that Russia and China are militarily gearing up to a pre-emptive nuclear strike on America, while America is deliberately gearing down and disarming. Skousen also takes for granted that the “fall” of the USSR was staged. Skousen claims the Rothschilds do not “control” the “communist Oligarchs” who in turn control Putin, despite the fact the Rothschilds are financially speaking “above” the communist Oligarchs. Skousen claims that what he calls the “Anglo-American Establishment” (from the famous Quigley book title) do not “control” the Soviet behemoth which they in fact undertook to create, so that we cannot expect them to stop the Sino-Soviet attack on America. Skousen alleges there are several “predator” areas of power now all maneuvering to dominate. What is true? What is not? Who, today, constitute the so-called “Anglo-American Establishment”? Are they “Anglos”? Are they “English”? Are they “British”? Are they “American”, which is to say, more or less “ethnically” speaking? On the other hand, Skousen acknowledges to some extent the role of Israel in fomenting the upcoming world war… What’s going on? Could someone please review Skousen and clarify. Please get a dialogue going amongst all knowledgeable observers. Thank you.

    URGENT: knowledgeable people are called upon to carefully FACT-CHECK all assertions in this video, and to compare statements made in the video for possible self-contradiction. Let’s clear up how much is likely to be true, and find the weak spots. Let’s identify far more precisely exactly who the “players” are in this alleged plan to “collapse civilization” with a pre-emptive nuclear attack on the USA.

    This video is about 2 GB in size, I used the free edition of “HiDownload” to download it.

  33. AudacesFortunaJuvat2015 February 10, 2015 at 2:53 am

    Just found this in my email (link expires 7 days from non-use, so please download and make use of the information, if you can):

    “Russian ‘Shock Of March’ Battle Plan Targets Norway, Saudi Arabia.pdf”

  34. AudacesFortunaJuvat2015 February 11, 2015 at 10:19 am

    Exclusive: the Complete Text & Scan of Pat Walsh’s
    “Inside the ‘Featherbed File’? Canada’s Watergate —
    The story of treason in Ottawa”

    – 30 –

  35. AudacesFortunaJuvat2015 July 2, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    CANADA: How The Communists Took Control

    Updates on the research into Canada’s penetration by the Far Left:

    “Singing tomorrows?” or “Grinding tomorrows?”:The Soviet Union is not yet Dead (Quebec, 1996)

    Quebec: A North-American Communist Military Power Built by the Federal Government of Canada

    Barry Lee Strayer, Q.C., a Trudeau advisor and principal architect of the 1982 “patriation” (Parliamentary and Constitutional coup d’etat on Canada) discusses “legality” of the admitted “coup”:

  36. AudacesFortunaJuvat2015 August 20, 2015 at 7:19 pm

    A new Free DOWNLOADS page is online at NoSnowinMoscow (CANADA How The Communists Took Control):

    Visitors can now have PDF copies of the exclusive English translations of the 1972 COMMUNIST manifesto of the PARTI QUEBECOIS, and related materials. The French version of the manifesto is also available now as a flash flip-book, with your choice of French or English menu control buttons. Please share these free downloads with your address book, to keep the links live. They expire after 30 days of non-use.

    The English translation is almost complete. One short chapter plus about 6-7 other pages are left, after which the English book will be proofread against the French, and produced as a flip-book as well.

    If you haven’t dropped in lately, you will want to read:


    Kathleen Moore
    The Official Legal Challenge
    To North American (Soviet) Union

  37. godgunsguts February 29, 2020 at 3:52 pm

    How about we leave this pussycat of a corona virus behind and get back to covering the World Revolution?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: