>Latin America File: Zelaya regroups with allies in San Salvador, plots 2nd attempt to return to Honduras, but not by “regular entry points”
July 8, 2009Posted by on
This past Sunday Honduras’ military-backed government prevented Manuel Zelaya’s airplane, a jet loaned by Venezuela’s communist thug-in-chief Hugo Chavez, from landing at Toncontin airport by blocking the runway with police and military vehicles. The deposed president began his flight from Washington DC, where he received the blessing of the Organization of American States (OAS) to return to his homeland and reassert his credentials as democratically elected head of state/government.
While in flight Zelaya communicated an order to the armed forces to receive his entourage. No doubt this order was countermanded by the de facto government of former congressional speaker, President Roberto Micheletti. Meanwhile, on the ground thousands of Zelaya partisans surged through the fence enclosing Tegucigalpa’s airport, but were repelled by soldiers who used tear gas, rubber bullets, and live rounds.At least five people were hit by gunfire and at least one killed.
Deterred, the deposed president flew to Managua, where he has received considerable support from Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega, and then San Salvador. There Zelaya, in collaboration with other regional leftist leaders who converged in El Salvador’s capital for that purpose, began to plot another attempt to return to Honduras. Present in San Salvador were Argentine President Cristina Kirchner, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa, Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo (“The Red Bishop”), and Jose Miguel Insulza, a Chilean who heads up the OAS. After KGB assets Chavez, Ortega, and Raul Castro, these individuals, in our opinion, represent the “second rank” of trenchant opponents to political and economic freedom in Latin America.
Both Zelaya and Micheletti, it should be noted, are members of Honduras’ ruling Liberal Party. However, repulsed by wealthy rancher Zelaya’s leftward drift since his election in 2006, the communist orientation of his domestic advisers, and his allegiance to Chavez, the Liberal Party has disowned Zelaya. Significantly, since the June 28 coup that ousted Zelaya, leftist groups have made no attempt to hide their support for Zelaya by organizing the People’s Resistance Front to overthrow the post-coup government. Significantly, the Communist Party USA has also denounced the “brutal” coupists and praised the Obama White House for acknowledging Zelaya as Honduras’ legitimate president.
On Monday Zelaya’s housing minister, Luis Roland Valenzuela, speaking in the Honduran capital, announced that his boss will make another attempt at returning to his homeland on July 8, but not through the “regular” entry points. Zelaya, he explained, will attend a press conference in Washington on Tuesday to announce his plans after a possible meeting with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a leftist whose husband Bill, the former president, is a suspected KGB asset. “They deceived us,” Valenzuela complained, citing an alleged agreement with interim President Micheletti that would have allowed Zelaya to land. The Micheletti government denies that any such agreement was reached. “Have no doubt, I will return to Honduras,” Zelaya vowed to reporters in Managua, adding: “But I won’t say how, because otherwise they will wait for me in any town or state.”
Since the June 28 coup the military has arrested nearly 800 civilians for defying a government curfew, although most have since been released. Pictured above: Zelaya partisans protest outside the US embassy in Tegucigalpa on July 7. Note obligatory Che Guevara flag.
Meanwhile, the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), a new European Union-style organization with overlapping membership in ALBA (Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia), has joined the global chorus condemning Honduras’ military-backed government. On July 6, the foreign ministers of Uruguay and Chile argued that UNASUR can arbitrate the conflict in the Central American nation. Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, an East German-educated socialist who has praised the legacy of Soviet/Cuban pawn Salvador Allende, is president pro tempore of UNASUR. Both Bachelet and OAS chief Insulza are cadres of the Socialist Party of Chile.
The Regional Military Threat Posed by the Havana-Caracas- Managua Axis
Within 24 hours of the June 28 coup in Tegucigalpa Chavez declared that he had placed his armed forces on alert and threatened to intervene if Venezuela’s ambassador was killed. It is significant that Honduran soldiers singled out the Cuban, Venezuelan, and Nicaraguan ambassadors for rough treatment, suggesting that the Micheletti government takes a dim view of these countries and their alliance with Zelaya. The ambassadors, however, were not “kidnapped” as the leftist press crowed.
On several occasions last week Honduras’ de facto president, without citing specific intelligence, alluded darkly to military forces that were preparing to invade his country and reinstall his opponent as head of state/government. Last Sunday Micheletti accused Nicaragua of deploying small squads of troops along their common border in a “psychological invasion” designed to intimidate Hondurans into accepting Zelaya’s return. “We have been informed that in the sector of Nicaragua, some troops are moving toward the border,” Micheletti contended in a televised news conference on Sunday. Ortega protested the charge: “There is no such conflict with Nicaragua. Our nation is not sending troops to Honduran territory. We are keeping our troops in their normal positions, where they have always been to protect national sovereignty.”
During the first Sandinista dictatorship, Nicaragua’s army, with 80,000 conscripts, was the largest in Central America. Although the Sandinista People’s Army was purportedly deprived of its Marxist foundation in the 1990s and is presently a mere shadow of its former strength, according to a 2005 US Defense Department assessment the commander of the Nicaraguan National Army is a “hardline Sandinista.”
In addition to pertinent military news from Venezuela and Nicaragua, it is worth observing that last Friday, four days after attending the Red Axis strategy sessions in Managua, President Castro chaired a meeting of Cuba’s National Defense Council. Reports on war readiness were delivered by officials of the ruling Communist Party of Cuba, the Communist Youth League, the Interior Ministry, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Cuba, and the provincial defense councils. Castro assessed the results of the training of regular troops and the Territorial Militia Troops, and advances made in the maintenance, modernization, and production of arms. He confided to those present that in 2003 the communist regime believed that then US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was planning a “huge attack” against the island. In a related story, Cuba’s Bastion 2008 military exercise was postponed after last year’s devastating hurricane season, but we await its execution some time in 2009.
The Honduran armed forces coup, in our assessment, has raised the specter of a regional military threat posed by the Havana-Caracas-Managua Axis. Along with Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria, and Libya, the administration of President George W. Bush rightly identified Cuba with the “Axis of Evil.” In February 2008 President Chavez floated the idea of transforming ALBA, then known as the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas and since June of this year as the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas, into an “anti-imperialist” (meaning anti-USA) military coalition.
Last month ALBA, founded in 2004, expanded by three countries and now embraces: Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Bolivia, Honduras, Dominica, Antigua and Barbuda, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Notably, the first five countries are ideologically aligned with Moscow and recipients of Russian military hardware. Since the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front assumed control of the reins of government in El Salvador earlier this year, it is expected that that country, too, will shortly hook up with ALBA.
In view of the new episode of political instability in Central America, therefore, we believe that the coordinated movements of the Cuban, Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, and Russian militaries in the Western Hemisphere bear close watching. Last year the MSM extensively covered Russia and Venezuela’s first-ever joint naval drill in the southern Caribbean Sea, as well as the week-long deployment of two Tu-160 Blackjack bombers at a Venezuelan air base. Both events were “post”-Cold War “firsts.” Not content with these anti-USA provocations, Moscow and Caracas have planned more combined maneuvers.
In itself, of course, the Havana-Caracas-Managua Axis poses no threat to the USA, often touted as the world’s sole post-Cold War superpower. Nicaragua’s standing army has 14,000 active personnel, Cuba 46,000, and Venezuela 600,000. Spurred on by Russia and using a United Nations or OAS resolution as pretext, though, this communist troika could potentially threaten errant Red Axis members like Honduras, which boasts 20,000 troops, or anti-communist holdouts like Colombia, which has about 420,000 troops whose battle-readiness has been tested by the government’s decades-old war against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.
Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua should also be viewed as potential bases either for Soviet subversion or a strategic nuclear attack against North America. The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis and the under-reported arrival of Russian bomber crews in Cuba in 2008 to identify suitable refueling sites for their aircraft offer historic and contemporary proof that such a scenario is possible again.
Ortega and Arias Revive Cold War-Era Schism between Central America’s Center and Far Left
Incidentally, the return of the Sandinista National Liberation Front to open power in Nicaragua in 2007 should trouble that country’s southern neighbor Costa Rica, which has no standing army. On July 1 Ortega, president pro tempore of the Central American Integration System (SICA), reluctantly handed over this office to Oscar Arias, the mildly center-left president of Costa Rica. Instead, the Sandinista leader wanted to transfer the presidency of SICA to Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom, a devoted center-leftist who is chummy with Cuba and Nicaragua. Arias was not Ortega’s first pick since Costa Rica’s commitment level to SICA is less than that of its partners, whereas Nicaragua’s communist dictator is a staunch advocate of regional integration.
Twenty years ago, in a previous incarnation as Costa Rican president, Arias was instrumental in establishing the peace accord that ended Central America’s insurgencies, forcing the Soviet/Cuban-backed guerrillas to discard their machine guns in favor of voting machines. No doubt Ortega remembered this fact when he tapped Arias. No doubt, too, Latin America’s Red Axis leaders will bring considerable pressure upon Arias to support full-blown regional integration in Central America. On July 7 US Secretary of State Clinton announced that Arias will reprise his past role as peacemaker by mediating the conflict between Honduras’ rival governments.
>Latin America File: Honduras’ de facto president: Nicaraguan troops moving toward common border; Zelaya’s flight to Tegucigalpa diverted to Managua
July 5, 2009Posted by on
>Just as we expected, it appears that Latin America’s Red Axis leaders, primarily including Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Daniel Ortega, are prepared to use military force to reimpose their leftist lackey Manuel Zelaya upon an unwilling population. Honduras’ de facto President Roberto Micheletti, Reuters reports today, has announced that Nicaraguan troops are moving toward the two countries’ common border:
Honduras’ interim President Roberto Micheletti said on Sunday Nicaraguan troops were moving to the mutual frontier and urged Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega to respect Honduran sovereignty.
He gave no further details about troop movements in Nicaragua which shares a border with Honduras to the southeast of the Honduran capital Tegucigalpa.
His comments came as ousted President Manuel Zelaya attempted to fly home a week after he was ousted in a coup. Zelaya is a left-wing ally of Ortega and Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez.
The interim government said it had contacted the Organization of American States to express its willingness to enter dialogue. The OAS earlier on Sunday suspended Honduras for refusing to reinstate Zelaya.
For its part, the Nicaraguan military denies that it has moved troops to the country’s northern border with Honduras, which served as a base for the Contras during the 1980s civil war against the first Sandinista regime. “Brother Honduran soldiers, brother Honduran officials, I want to assure you, swearing before God and nation, that Nicaragua is not deploying troops towards Honduras, and that we are not preparing any kind of attack on Honduran garrisons on the border,” past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega protested on domestic radio. Nicaragua’s top general, Omar Halleslevens, is regarded by the Pentagon as a “hardline Sandinista.”
Managua has also denounced statements issued by the Micheletti regime to the effect that the communist governments of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua have armed Zelaya partisans ahead of his publicized return today. Denis Moncada, Nicaragua’s ambassador to the Organization of American States (OAS), refuted the allegations before the OAS General Assembly on Saturday.
In another previous post we suggested that military intervention to restore Zelaya to the presidency was a possible topic on the agenda of the leftist leaders who converged in Managua on Monday. There Ortega hosted the meetings of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas, the Central American Integration System, and the Rio Group. At the time we quoted Micheletti as saying: “I have come to the presidency not by a coup d’etat but by a completely legal process as set out in our laws. Furthermore, I would like to warn Venezuela that our country is ready to go to war if there is interference by this gentleman [meaning Chavez]. Several battalions of troops were being prepared outside of Honduras for intervention.”
Last Monday, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador halted cross-border trade with Honduras. Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom is a compliant, pro-Cuban center-leftist, while the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front recently assumed control of El Salvador’s presidency for the first time.
On Friday Honduras’ military-backed government withdrew from the OAS, seeking to preempt today’s expulsion from that body. Zelaya, risking arrest, intends to return to his homeland in the company of fellow leftists, Argentine President Cristina Kirchner, Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa, and the OAS’s Chilean chief Jose Miguel Insulza.
On Sunday, reports the AFP news agency in a late-breaking story, military personnel and thousands of Zelaya partisans surrounded the airport in Tegucigalpa. Military vehicles blocked the runway to prevent Zelaya’s plane from landing (pictured above). The deposed president, who began his flight at Dulles International Airport in Washington DC and was accompanied by other aircraft containing the officials mentioned above, was forced to land in Managua.
In a related story, the newly inaugurated president of Panama, business magnate Ricardo Martinelli, has vowed to challenge the leftward shift in politics that has characterized Latin America over the last decade. Last Wednesday he promised: “I will challenge the ideological pendulum in Latin American by promoting free economics.” Intriguingly, Cuba sent a representative to attend Martinelli’s inauguration: Vice President Estaban Lazo Hernandez.
>WW4 File: N. Korea test-fires seven tactical missiles today, launched four on Thursday; Russia bolsters anti-missile defense in Far East
July 4, 2009Posted by on
>The Republic of Korea’s Yonhap News Agency reports that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) fired four short-range missiles off its east coast on Thursday evening. The projectiles, which flew about 60 miles, were identified as KN-01 missiles with a maximum range of up to 100 miles.
On Saturday the DPRK test-fired seven more tactical missiles from sites along the country’s east coast. The missiles are estimated to have a maximum range of about 300 miles, much farther than the salvo fired previously. Their launch was apparently timed to coincide with Independence Day in the USA.
In reaction to a mid-June report in the Japanese media suggesting that Pyongyang might fire a long-range missile toward the Hawaiian Islands in early July, the Pentagon has bolstered anti-missile defense around the Aloha State. Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura confirms that a long-range missile launch by the DPRK this weekend is possible.
Pictured above: A Seoul pedestrian passes by a television screen showing news of the North Korean missile launch mentioned above.
Not so coincidentally, Interfax reports that the Russian military has deployed an early-warning missile launch system in its Far East to guard the country against external threats including, apparently, Communist North Korea. Under cover of such deployments, of course, the Kremlin, in the event of a nuclear exchange, is also protecting itself from a US counterstrike via Alaska or the Pacific Ocean.
Last week, the ROK’s defense ministry informed parliament that the military was boosting its pre-emptive strike capabilities to counter the North’s nuclear missile threat. According to Yonhap, the South Korean military has forward deployed air and artillery assets to the Yellow Sea border region to counter possible North Korean gunboat or missile attacks. Meanwhile, black-clad, heavily armed commandos attached to the coast guard, known as the Special Sea Attack Team, are training to interdict weapons of mass destruction on the high seas under the aegis of the US-led, 90-nation Proliferation Security Initiative.
Currently, a US Navy destroyer is shadowing the North Korean freighter Kang Nam 1 in the South China Sea. The freighter’s movements are also being monitored electronically at the South Korean Coast Guard station at Incheon. Incheon was the scene of General Douglas MacArthur’s September 1950 seaborne landing that turned the tide of the Korean War.
Under the leadership of conservative President Lee Myung-bak, South Korean Coast Guard cutters mount 20 mm rotary chain guns and, in the event of war, they would support naval operations. “The guidelines for rules of engagement have changed,” explained Coast Guard spokesman Yun Byeong-du, adding: “In the past, vessels had to get permission from the Blue House [presidential residence] to retaliate. Now it is up to captains.” “The Coast Guard,” opines the Washington Times, “is just the front line in the toughest South Korean defense posture in more than a decade.”
“North Korea is the weakest state in the region,” comments Dan Pinkston, director of the International Crisis Group’s office in Seoul, “They don’t have the technological or economic base to compete conventionally, so they have to rely on asymmetric capabilities.” For this reason, argues Kim Shin-jo, a Northern defector captured during a 1968 raid from the South, the DPRK will rely on its 120,000-strong commando force and insurgent forces in the ROK. The last could include an uprising led by “affluent, sophisticated and well-informed southerners,” meaning communist sympathizers, a possibility recently acknowledged by General Walter Sharp, commander of US forces in Korea.
>Latin America File: Insulza visits Honduran coup leaders, opponents; Micheletti regime preempts expulsion from OAS, withdraws from organization
July 4, 2009Posted by on
- Up to 600 US Troops Stationed at Soto Cano Ordered to Stay on Honduran Army Base; Joint US-Honduran Military Exercise Suspended; Cuba’s Official Media Identifies Base as Hub of Intrigue against Zelaya
Zelaya’s allegiance to Chavez is difficult to stomach. I would have a hard time taking orders from a leftist. He used soldiers as political tools. [Wealthy rancher] Zelaya is a leftist of lies.
– Colonel Herberth Bayardo Inestroza, top legal advisor to Honduran army, veteran of counter-insurgency operations of the 1980s
On Friday Jose Miguel Insulza, Secretary General of the Organization of American States (OAS), arrived in Tegucigalpa, the capital of Honduras, to urge the interim government of de facto President Robert Micheletti to stand down and make way for the restoration of the democratically elected Manuel (“Mel”) Zelaya, ousted by the military last Sunday morning and exiled to Costa Rica. Insulza, the Cuban News Agency reported, met with members of Honduras’ Supreme Court, parliamentarians, and representatives of the popular movements and union organizations opposed to the military coup. “We are not going to Honduras to hold any negotiations,” Insulza admonished the day before, “We are going to demand the end of what has been done thus far and to look for ways to bring the country back to normality.”
Insulza announced his trip to Tegucigalpa while visiting Georgetown, Guyana, where he was attending the 30th Meeting of the Heads of State and Government of the Caribbean Community (Caricom). On Wednesday the OAS passed a resolution demanding Zelaya’s reinstatement within 72 hours, a deadline that will expire on Saturday. Caricom also expressed its support for Zelaya’s return to power. In addition to the OAS and Caricom, on Tuesday the United Nations General Assembly, under the presidency of Sandinista cadre/Catholic priest Miguel D’Escoto Brockmann, passed a unanimous resolution condemning the coupists and urging Zelaya’s reinstatement. D’Escoto’s paymaster is Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega, who is leading the charge against Honduras’ new military-backed regime.
For his part, Micheletti, who was formerly speaker of the national congress and next in line of succession to the presidency, insists that the transfer of power was according to the constitution. Zelaya, however, has pledged to return to his homeland this Sunday, in the company of Insulza, Cristina Kirchner and Rafael Correa, the presidents of Argentina and Ecuador respectively, and serve out the balance of his presidency, which expires next year. Insulza, a Chilean, Kirchner, and Correa are all leftists so their animosity to the Honduran coupists is to be expected. Pictured above: Micheletti addresses supporters at a rally in Tegucigalpa on July 3.
Not surprisingly, the vindictive communist dictator of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, has suspended subsidized deliveries of oil to Honduras to punish the military-backed regime that deposed his compliant lackey. On Venezuelan television last night former paratrooper Chavez pathetically denied claims that Petrocaribe’s energy supplies to Honduras on preferential terms had constituted “financial assistance” to Zelaya. No doubt, too, Comrade Hugo, will absolve himself of all involvement in the shipment of referendum ballots to Honduras for the purpose of helping Zelaya subvert the constitution of that Central American country and establish a left-wing dictatorship.
At the same time, opposing demonstrations in support of the rival Micheletti and Zelaya governments continued in cities throughout Honduras. Leftist groups have come out in full force to rally behind the deposed president. Juan Barahona, leader of the United Workers’ Front, has joined with other Zelaya partisans to create the People’s Resistance Front. Pro-Zelaya protests have occurred in Tegucigalpa and the northern city San Pedro Sula. At least two pro-Zelaya demonstrators were killed, at least 60 others injured, and over 270 arrested. In the opposing camp, pro-Micheletti supporters formed the Civic Democratic Unit, staged a sit-in in the capital on Tuesday, rallied in the southern city Choluteca on Wednesday, and held rallies in San Pedro Sula on Thursday.
In an interview with the Miami Herald the Honduran army’s top legal advisor, Colonel Herberth Bayardo Inestroza, acknowledged that military brass “circumvented” laws to forcibly remove Zelaya. It was the first time any participant in the coup admitted committing an offense. “We know there was a crime there,” conceded Inestroza, adding: “In the moment that we took him out of the country in the way that he was taken out, there is a crime. What happens is that that crime, the moment that the circumstances that it occurred, there is going to be a justification and cause for acquittal that will protect us.”
Zelaya was ousted in a predawn raid at his house after he vowed to resist a court order that ruled a non-binding referendum to be held that day illegal. The wealthy rancher had clashed with the attorney general, the Supreme Court, congress, the armed forces normally under his command, and even the Catholic Church. Instead of being arrested to stand trial for abuse of power and treason, the military grabbed Zelaya from bed at gunpoint and forced him onto a plane bound for San Jose, Costa Rica. “What was more beneficial, remove this gentleman from Honduras,” Inestroza explained, “or present him to prosecutors and have a mob assault and burn and destroy and for us to have to shoot? If we had left him here, right now we would be burying a pile of people.”
Speaking for both himself and many other career soldiers in Honduras, Inestroza confided: “Zelaya’s allegiance to Chavez is difficult to stomach. I would have a hard time taking orders from a leftist. He used soldiers as political tools. Zelaya is a leftist of lies.” Referring to the communist insurgencies and civil wars that wracked Central America in the 1980s, Inestroza, now 54 years old, recalled:
We fought the subversive movements here and we were the only country that did not have a fratricidal war like the others. It would be difficult for us, with our training, to have a relationship with a leftist government. That’s impossible. I personally would have retired, because my thinking, my principles, would not have allowed me to participate in that.
I am 54 years old. I left my youth, my adolescence and part of my adulthood here — an entire lifetime. You should understand it’s very difficult for someone who has dedicated his whole life to a country and an institution to see, from one day to another, a person who is not normal come and want to change the way of life in the country without following the steps the law indicates.
Even though Article 24 of Honduras’ penal code would apparently exonerate the generals who directed the coup, Inestroza still fears a political slaughter if Zelaya returns: “I will resign and leave the country, and so would most of the military. They would come after us and the other political leaders who were involved in this.”
On Thursday, the possibility that Zelaya could return to his old job became more likely when Micheletti moderated his rhetoric somewhat, offering to hold early elections or a referendum that would permit his deposed rival to finish out the remaining months of his term. The latter, however, would be “difficult” to implement immediately. The potential for a mass resignation of patriots from the Honduran military, however, would enable Zelaya to stack the armed forces with officers sympathetic to his leftist ideals and the process of Latin American integration that has bound Honduras’ destiny with the Havana-Caracas Axis. Zelaya’s restoration would also be a victory for the region’s Red Axis leaders like Chavez, Ortega, Raul Castro, and others.
However, late on Friday, after Insulza’s visit to Tegucigalpa, the Micheletti regime hardened its position again and preempted the OAS’s threat to expel Honduras by voluntarily withdrawing from the organization. On July 4 the Voice of America reported: “The Supreme Court of Honduras told OAS chief Jose Miguel Insulza Friday that its decision to oust Mr. Zelaya is irreversible, and that the leftist leader would be arrested if he returned home.” In addition to the resolutions passed by the OAS, the Caribbean Community, and the United Nations condemning the military coup, the World Bank is suspending loans and the US State Department is considering freezing aid to the Central American country. Thus, the political and economic isolation of Honduras grows and, in our assessment, the potential for a showdown between the country and a pan-Latin American military coalition increases.
Meanwhile, in the wake of last Sunday’s coup, a joint US-Honduran military exercise was suspended. Accordingly, up to 600 US troops stationed at Soto Cano Air Base under Southern Command’s Joint Task Force-Bravo have been ordered to stay on base until the political turmoil in Honduras blows over. The US Armed Forces uses the Honduran military base for counter-narcotics interdiction and humanitarian missions. Incidentally, the official communist propaganda machine in Cuba was quick to identify the US military presence in Honduras as a hub of intrigue against Zelaya and his government. Similar imprecations against Washington’s “meddling” in Honduras issued from the mouth of Chavez this week too.
>Latin America File: Zelaya, backed by UN, OAS, accompanied by Kirchner, Correa to return to homeland this weekend; Micheletti: "No way, Jose"
July 1, 2009Posted by on
The war of words between, in the one camp, the military- backed government of de facto Honduran President Roberto Micheletti, formerly the speaker of that country’s congress, and, in the other camp, the deposed president Manuel Zelaya, the Organization of American States, and the United Nations is heating up. Zelaya, accompanied by fellow leftist presidents, Cristina Kirchner of Argentina and Rafael Correa of Ecuador, is threatening to return to his homeland this weekend, after the OAS’s 72-hour ultimatum for reinstating the head of state.
Pictured above: On Monday Cuba’s communist thug-in-chief Raul Castro arrived in Managua for emergency sessions of the Bolivarian Alliance (formerly Alternative) for the Americas and the Rio Group. He is greeted by President Daniel Ortega’s wife, Rosario Murillo, who heads up the neo-Sandinista regime’s Councils of Citizens’ Power. Castro characterized the Honduran coup plotters as “fascists.”
Micheletti has vowed that Zelaya will be arrested upon his arrival in Honduras and would be able to avoid that fate only by entering the country at the head of a foreign army. “Zelaya,” he declared, “has already committed crimes against the constitution and the law. He can no longer return to the presidency of the republic unless a president from another Latin American country comes and imposes him using guns. Seven and a half million Hondurans will be ready to defend our territory against a foreign invasion.”
Is it possible that Zelaya’s comrades in the region’s Red Axis, particularly Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez, and Daniel Ortega were drafting this very scenario in Managua on Monday? There’s no question that the Chavezista regime had every intention of helping Zelaya establish a left-wing dictatorship via the constitutional referendum slated for last Sunday. The ballots, after all, were printed in Venezuela and impounded at a Honduran military base.
Will the UN and OAS, moreover, sanction a Cuban-Venezuelan- Nicaraguan intervention force in Honduras? Will we witness a dry run for Red Dawn 2? Your resident blogger may post the following headline in the weeks ahead: “Communist troops invade Honduras from Guatemala and Nicaragua.” US President Barack Hussein Obama will no doubt look the other way and the shopping mall regime will heave a great sigh. At the very least, the Honduran coup could provide impetus for the Havana-Caracas-Managua Axis to transform ALBA into a military alliance, a subject that Chavez first broached in January 2008.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: 4th Sino- Soviet war game to begin July 22; 8,500 Russian troops drill near Georgia; US Air Force preps for nuke war
July 1, 2009Posted by on
>Russian and Chinese troops will begin their fourth joint war game, disguised as an “anti-terrorist” operation, between July 22 and 26. Dubbed “Peace Mission 2009″, the drill will involve 2,500 military personnel, who will arrive at the deployment area on July 14. The first phase of the exercises consists of military and political consultations and will be held in Khabarovsk, in Russia’s Far East, while the second and third phases will take place outside Baichen in northern China. Lt. Gen. Sergei Antonov, spokesentity for the Russian General Staff, commented: “Peace Mission 2009 will become an important step in the development of the Russian-Chinese partnership and their armed forces.” Pictured above: Russian soldiers.
Not too far away from the site of Peace Mission 2009, of course, political tensions between North and South Korea are on the rise. In late May, after detonating its second test nuclear bomb, Pyongyang scrapped the 1953 armistice that halted hostilities, but did not establish a peace treaty, with Seoul.
Under the auspices of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the first-ever Sino-Soviet exercise, Peace Mission 2005 took place in Russia and the eastern Chinese province of Shandong, involving warships, aircraft, and over 10,000 servicemen, including marines and paratroopers. Russia and China also hosted Peace Mission 2007, when then President Vladimir Putin announced the resumption of long-range bomber patrols. Most recently, the SCO states held Norak-Antiterror 2009 in Tajikistan in April. Peace Mission 2010 is slated to occur in Kazakhstan, obviously next year.
Meanwhile, under the aegis of the Caucasus 2009 war game, the Russian armed forces appear to be positioning themselves for another invasion of the former Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, now the site of a tremendous tug-of-war between the Soviet strategists and NATO, which is attempting to woo Tbilisi into its fold. In late July and early August of last year the Russian military prepared to attack Georgia under cover of the Caucasus Frontier 2008 drill.
“The Caucasus 2009 war games,” opines CBS News, “are being seen by many experts as a warning shot for nearby Georgia, where the government says it has rearmed armed forces and where NATO recently wrapped up its own exercises.” A Russian Defense Ministry official related that more than 8,500 troops will take part in the drill, along with nearly 200 tanks, armored vehicles, 100 artillery units, and several units from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. The exercises are being personally overseen by Gen. Nikolai Makarov, chief of Russia’s General Staff.
In addition to the military personnel that will participate in Caucasus 2009, more than 6,000 Russian troops have been illegally stationed in each of Georgia’s breakaway regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Russia has also been building military bases, storage facilities for supplies, and roads in the two regions, which Moscow and Managua alone recognized as independent. Last month, NATO wrapped up four weeks of training exercises in Georgia. Even though just a few hundreds troops participated, Russia was annoyed, branding them a provocation.
Deputy Defense Minister Col. Gen. Alexander Kolmakov was quoted by Kremlin media on Monday as saying that Caucasus 2009 was adjusted as a result of the NATO games and would be “quite major, as compared with those that were conducted in Soviet times.” Over the weekend, Russia and NATO agreed to resume military ties that were suspended after last August’s Caucasian War.
Pictured here: The iconic, 1950s-era B-52H Stratofortress still comprises part of the backbone of the US Air Force’s strategic bomber fleet. In spite of the fact that the USA now faces the socialist, pro-Islamic administration of President Barack Hussein Obama, the military is still prudently preparing to counter a strategic nuclear attack. Although there is much discussion about the threat posed by Iran and North Korea’s missile capabilities, the fact of the matter is there are only two states that possess the ability to annihilate the USA: Russia and, to a much lesser extent, the People’s Republic of China. The US Air Force reports on the Global Thunder 09 exercise underway at Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota:
A B-52H Stratofortress soars through the air during the rapid launch portion of Global Thunder 09 here June 30. Global Thunder 09 is the USSTRATCOM Field Training Exercise and Battle Staff Exercise designed to exercise all mission areas withprimary emphasis on Nuclear Command and Control (NC2). Global Thunder 09 provides training opportunities for component, task force, unit, forces, and command posts to deter, and if necessary defeat, a military attack against the United States and to employ forces as directed by the President.
Global Thunder 09 coincides with the routine launch of an unarmed Minuteman 3 ICBM from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on June 30. The missile struck a target near the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. The local media reported on the coordination between military personnel at Vandenberg and Minot:
A task force from Minot Air Force Base, N.D., worked with members of Vandenberg’s 576th Flight Test Squadron to ready the missile for the test. Airmen from the 576th also installed test-specific equipment such as tracking, telemetry and command-destruct systems necessary to collect data and meet 30th Space Wing safety requirements.
“These are dangerous times we’re living in right now,” said Lt. Col. Lesa K. Toler, the 576th Flight Test Squadron commander and the mission director for this test launch.
“It’s extremely important our combatant commander has the capabilities he needs to perform the mission of fighting and winning our nation’s wars,” Toler added. “Testing an operational asset pulled from the missile field at Minot provides us confidence our weapon system is capable of performing when needed.”
“The Air Force,” the same article concludes, “conducts several Minuteman tests each year to verify the weapon system’s reliability and accuracy. Some 450 Minuteman 3 weapons sit on alert in and around Malmstrom AFB, Mont., F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo. and Minot AFB, N.D.”
>Latin America File: Honduran military ousts Zelaya in Central America’s first post-Cold War coup; region’s Red Axis leaders convene emergency meetings
June 30, 2009Posted by on
- Honduras’ De Facto President Micheletti Responds to Venezuela’s Saber Rattling with Threat of War, Informs Press: “Several Battalions of Troops Were Being Prepared Outside of Honduras for Intervention”
- Hugo Chavez Arranges Jet to Fly Zelaya from Costa Rica to Nicaragua to Attend Red Axis Strategy Sessions, Accuses CIA of Fomenting Coup against Deposed President
Pictured above: In spite of his misfortunes, ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya (left) jokes around with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (right) and Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega (center, covering microphone) at the Central American Integration System summit in Managua, on Monday.
Last Thursday, as we blogged here, Venezuela’s communist thug-in-chief Hugo Chavez formally received three new countries into the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA)–Ecuador, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Antigua and Barbuda. “The ALBA continues to grow in Latin America. Now we have nine nations to build a new project. It is the most dynamic core,” gushed Chavez during his weekly TV-radio program. ALBA’s leaders, meeting in Caracas, also repackaged ALBA as the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of the Americas, or Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas, suggesting that a deeper political-economic-social integration is underway. In 2004 Cuba and Venezuela organized the regional bloc of socialist states to counter the Washington-led Free Trade Area of the Americas. Nicaragua, Bolivia, Dominica, and Honduras are also members of ALBA. Significantly, from the vantage of the Soviet strategy of quietly encircling the USA with enemies, even Russia has expressed an interest in joining ALBA.
Perhaps alarmed by President Manuel Zelaya’s post-election leftward lurch and determination to attach the country’s destiny to the Havana-Caracas Axis, the Honduran military overthrew the president on Sunday morning. Soldiers surrounded Zelaya’s official residence, seized the president, who was still in his pajamas, drove him to an air force base, and forced him to board a plane for Costa Rica. Electricity and telephone service was simultaneously cut throughout the country. The military then swore in congressional speaker Roberto Micheletti as interim chief executive. A majority of the members of congress voted to accept a letter of resignation that Congressional Secretary Jose Alfredo Saavedra insisted was signed by Zelaya and dated last Thursday.
Speaking to the media upon his arrival in San Jose, Costa Rica, Zelaya accused “dark forces from the past” of perpetrating the putsch, no doubt referring to the alliance between the military and business oligarchy that ruled Honduras during much of the Cold War. “There is no way to justify an interruption of democracy, a coup d’etat,” the exiled Zelaya complained on Sunday, during a telephone interview with Telesur, the electronic platform of Latin America’s Red Axis. “This kidnapping is an extortion of the Honduran democratic system,” he added. Zelaya vehemently denied writing a letter of resignation. Zelaya called on Honduran soldiers to desist, urged citizens to hold peaceful protests, and requested Honduran police to protect demonstrators.
Meanwhile, as Bloomberg reports above, troops also seized Honduras’ foreign minister, Patricia Rodas. In comments broadcast on Telesur, Venezuela’s ambassador to Honduras, Armando Laguna, asserted that his colleagues from Nicaragua and Cuba were also beaten and briefly detained after trying to defend Rodas against masked soldiers. On Monday morning Rodas sought asylum in Mexico, where she was welcomed by government representatives.
Later on Sunday government supporters took to the streets of Tegucigalpa to protest Zelaya’s ouster, hurling rocks at the soldiers and shouting “Traitors!” Labour union leader Rafael Alegria, a Zelaya ally, allegedly organized the protests. On Monday the Cuban News Agency reported that since midnight 20,000 protesters had encamped outside the presidential palace. Meanwhile, Honduras’ General Labor Confederation and the People’s Union Bloc announced that they intend to cripple the economy with a general strike until Zelaya is reinstated. On the same day, reports the Latin American Herald Tribune, police with helicopter support used tear gas and clubs against several hundred supporters of President Zelaya. An employee of the state telephone company was gunned down Monday morning by a soldier, while 60 other Zelaya partisans were injured.
The Honduran military, the MSM reports, acted after the nation’s Supreme Court overturned Zelaya’s decision to fire the commander of the armed forces, General Romeo Vasquez, who in turn had refused to guarantee security for a referendum that Zelaya intended to use to impose constitutional changes on the country via a constituent assembly. The ballot had been slated for Sunday. The president’s critics charged that Zelaya hoped to remove term limits to his re-election. If true, then Zelaya was simply following the path blazed by Venezuela’s “President for Life” Hugo Chavez and his comrades in Nicaragua, Bolivia, and Ecuador, who are attempting to do the same, no doubt to implement a uniform communism throughout the region.
Signs of an impending military putsch were evident last Thursday, when Zelaya led a caravan of supporters to air force headquarters to collect the ballots for the non-binding referendum, preventing them from being destroyed in compliance with the Supreme Court’s ruling. Earlier that day hundreds of troops were deployed to strategic points in Tegucigalpa in what their commanders explained was a move to “avert potential disturbances” by Zelaya partisans. Significantly, even the country’s ruling Liberal Party, with which Zelaya is associated, urged the public not to vote for the president’s referendum. Although elected as a conservative in 2005, Zelaya has moved dramatically to the left while in office.
Within hours of the Sunday coup, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez announced that he had placed his armed forces on alert and warned that Caracas would intervene with force if Venezuela’s diplomats in Honduras were harmed. “We will bring them down. We will bring them down, I tell you,” Chavez, a former paratrooper, ranted on Venezuelan television on Monday, threatening military intervention: “I have put the armed forces in Venezuela on high alert.” Chavez, who was himself briefly ousted in a 2002 coup that he blamed on then US President George W. Bush, accused the Central Intelligence Agency of fomenting the coup against Zelaya. The CIA, as we reported last week, is one of Chavez’s favorite bête noires, another being capitalism. In reality, leftists worldwide absurdly blame the US intelligence community for much of the world’s ills.
De facto Honduran President Micheletti disregarded the international condemnation of Zelaya’s ouster and issued a counter-challenge to Chavez’s saber rattling. On June 30 the Australian media quoted Micheletti as saying: “I have come to the presidency not by a coup d’etat but by a completely legal process as set out in our laws. Furthermore, I would like to warn Venezuela that our country is ready to go to war if there is interference by this gentleman [meaning Chavez].” Micheletti confided that he possessed intelligence that “several battalions of troops were being prepared outside of Honduras for intervention.”
The region’s Red Axis was quick to rally to Zelaya’s side in Managua, where on Monday past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega hosted emergency meetings of ALBA, the Central American Integration System, and the Rio Group, which welcomed Communist Cuba into the fold last December. In summoning his comrades to Managua, Ortega stated that they intended to “fight back the forces of resistance” against Zelaya.
In attendance at the ALBA meeting were self-avowed communist presidents Raul Castro and Hugo Chavez, self-avowed socialist presidents Evo Morales and Rafael Correa, their foreign ministers, and deposed leader Zelaya himself, who flew from San Jose to Managua on a jet provided by Chavez. Together the region’s leftist leaders resolved to withdraw their ambassadors from Honduras. The ALBA leaders afterwards released a joint statement: “In the face of the dictatorial government that intends to be imposed, the countries of Alba have decided to withdraw our ambassadors and to leave minimal diplomatic representation in Tegucigalpa. There is no question of seeking diplomatic accreditation from the usurpers.” The motion was read out by Ecuador’s Foreign Minister Faldor Falconi.
“I denounce the criminal, brutal character of this coup,” Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez told a news conference in Havana earlier in the day, before flying to Managua. He ranted: “This coup has removed a legitimate and constitutional government simply for wanting to hold a vote. There is only one constitutional government in Honduras, and one constitutional president who should return immediately without conditions.”
Faux rightist Mexican president Felipe Calderon later arrived in Managua for the Rio Group meeting, at which time he informed reporters that “Both Mexico and the Rio Group strongly reject the coup d’etat in Honduras.” In step with the Red Axis, Mexico and Chile also announced that they, too, are withdrawing their ambassadors from Tegucigalpa.
Almost without exception, world reaction to the Honduran coup has been negative. The USA’s socialist president Barack Hussein Obama has called on the coup leaders to “respect the rule of law.” Not surprisingly, on Monday the Russian Foreign Ministry also condemned the coup. “The embassies of the member countries of the regional Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA) backed Russia’s condemnation, the Cuban ambassador said at a news conference in Moscow,” reports Novosti, inadvertantly exposing the nexus between Russia and its offspring, ALBA. United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urged “the reinstatement of the democratically elected representatives of the country.” Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, president of the UN General Assembly, who is also a Sandinista and a Catholic priest, invited Zelaya to address an extraordinary session of the assembly in New York City.
Obama characterized the coup as “not legal.” “All of us have great concerns about the situation in Honduras,” Obama admonished, after meeting at the White House with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, one of Washington’s few allies in Latin America. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose husband, former president Bill is an alleged KGB asset, declared that “Democracy should be restored in Honduras.” Clinton revealed that a US delegation would go to Honduras after a special meeting of the General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) on Tuesday. “We have a lot of work to do to help the Hondurans get back on the democratic path,” Clinton stated. Incidentally, about 600 US troops are stationed at a base in Honduras under Southern Command’s Joint Task Force-Bravo, primarily for the purpose of drug interdiction.
For his part, Zelaya, speaking in Managua, vowed to return to his homeland on Thursday: “I will fulfill my four-year term of office, whether you agree –the ones in favor of the coup – or not. I was expelled by force and will return on my own free will.” He then invited the General Secretary of the OAS, José Miguel Insulza, to accompany him in his return to Honduras. Accepting D´Escoto’s invitation to address the UN General Assembly, Zelaya travelled to the USA on Tuesday. During his visit to New York City, the UN General Assembly unanimously approved a resolution demanding the restoration of Zelaya to the presidency.
>Africa File: Nigeria’s “ex”-red president announces insurgent leader’s release at joint press conference with Medvedev, MEND bombs Shell pipeline
June 27, 2009Posted by on
- Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta Plays Up Opposition to New Gazprom Deal in Communique to Russian President
- Kremlin Energy Giant Puts the Squeeze on the European Union’s Nigerian Natural Gas Supply
Pictured above: The Nigerian and Russian presidents in Abuja, on June 24.
Under KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin the neo-Soviet leadership has restored political-economic-military relations with the Arab socialist regimes in the Middle East and North Africa that were dormant during the 1990s and the early 2000s. “Post”-communist Russia remains closely allied with Syria, Egypt, Libya, and Algeria. Moscow is also revitalizing relations with sub-Saharan Africa’s communist regimes, including Angola, Namibia, and South Africa.
Last week Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a Soviet Komsomol graduate and compliant Putin lackey, toured Egypt, Nigeria, Namibia, and Angola in that order. Military sales, joint business ventures, and ideological opposition to a US-dominated, “unipolar” world are constant themes emerging from such trips. In other words, little has changed within the Communist Bloc since the fake demise of the Cold War in 1991.
On June 23 Medvedev arrived in Cairo where he signed a strategic partnership agreement with Egyptian counterpart Hosni Mubarak. Mubarak’s National Democratic Party and its predecessor, the Arab Socialist Union, have dominated Egyptian politics since Soviet ally Gamal Nasser overthrew King Farouk I in 1952. Medvedev summarized the meeting with Mubarak as follows:
Our negotiations were held in a frank and amicable atmosphere, which had always been characteristic of the top-level dialog between Russia and Egypt and had largely contributed to the achievement of impressive results. The strategic cooperation treaty we have signed will determine bilateral relations for years to come.
There are promising areas of cooperation between Russia and Egypt. We have achieved rather good results in the economic cooperation. Bilateral trade exceeded $4 billion last year. We have many promising projects in energy, transport and space exploration. There are new spheres of interaction, as well, such as ecology, archives and suppression of narcotics.
Tourism is one of the most dynamic spheres. Tourism grew 22% last year to 1.8 million Russian visitors. That is why we have signed the strategic partnership agreement that defines long-term cooperation guidelines.
The three-page document defines Moscow-Cairo relations for the next decade, pledges regular political contacts and biannual presidential visits, and fosters inter-parliamentary contacts. “The sides traditionally develop defense and military-technical cooperation with due account of mutual interests and international commitments,” the agreement explains. Among other bilateral links, the Russian TV and Radio Broadcasting Company and the Egyptian Radio and Television Union signed a cooperation protocol.
After shoring up the decades-old Soviet-Egyptian partnership, Medvedev flew to Nigeria to meet that country’s “ex”-communist president, the first-ever such visit by a Soviet/ Russian head of state to the populous, oil-rich country. On June 24 Medvedev arrived in the Nigerian capital Abuja, where he met counterpart Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, who assured the Russian president that he was committed to ensuring “total peace and security across the country.” Shortly after the encounter, the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed that its guerrillas attacked Royal Dutch Shell’s Bille-Krakama pipeline in Rivers state. In a dramatic statement addressed to Medvedev himself, MEND threatened: “This is the fate that awaits the gas pipelines you plan to invest in Nigeria, if justice is not factored in the whole process.”
Kremlin energy monster Gazprom has signed a deal to invest at least US$2.5 billion in a joint venture with Nigeria’s state-owned oil company, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, to explore and develop the country’s vast gas reserves. “If we carry out all our plans, Russian investment in Nigeria can reach billions of dollars,” Medvedev gushed. The formation of Nigaz will be a 50-50 partnership.
“Gazprom’s action to secure a foothold in Nigeria,” opines the Financial Times, “where western groups have led the development of the oil industry for half a century, has given rise to concerns in Europe that Moscow is seeking to gain control of Nigerian reserves to tighten its grip on the European Union’s gas supplies.” The same source exposes Moscow’s pincer strategy in this respect: “European governments see Nigeria’s gas reserves – the seventh-largest in the world – as a potential route to diluting their reliance on Russia, which supplies up to half the gas consumed by the EU.” Thus, while the Kremlin strangles the EU’s African gas supplies, the Soviet strategists are positioning themselves to become Europe’s sole provider via the Nord Stream and South Stream pipelines.
Intriguingly, Medvedev’s visit to Nigeria coincided not only with the MEND terrorist operation in Rivers state, but also the release of self-avowed Islamo-Marxist terrorist leader Alhaji Mujahid Dokubo-Asari, who was arrested by the State Security Services the previous day. By his own account Dokubo-Asari, founder of the Niger Delta People’s Volunteer Force (NDPVF), was apprehended at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport in Lagos on arrival from Germany, where he had been hanging out since May 23, putatively for a medical check-up. In a joint press conference with Medvedev, President Yar’Adua declared that Dokubo-Asari was released under an amnesty agreement with the militants: “So, there was no arrest or detention. What happened does not amount to arrest or detention.”
MEND appears to be a spin-off from Dukubo-Asari’s NDPVF and thus the insurgent leader, who was previously jailed for two years, appears to be still involved in the sabotage campaign against Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and other Western oil companies. Although the Niger Delta militants have kidnapped some Russian oil workers in the past, in light of Gazprom’s new venture with the Nigerian government it would appear that the MEND-NDPVF insurgency may be a cover for the Kremlin’s attempt to oust Western petroleum companies and take control of Nigeria’s natural resources.
From the Nigerian capital Medvedev flew to Windhoek, the Namibian capital, where he met President Hifikepunye Lucas Pohamba on June 25. State-run Itar-Tass reports on Medvedev’s reception: “The Namibian president welcomed Medvedev on the square in front of the main entrance in the State House of Receptions. The leaders shook hands and took their seats on the podium in front of the line of the guard of honor. The military orchestra played the national anthems of the countries, and the guns fired 21 salvos.” Russian presidential aide Sergei Prikhodko summarized the agenda for Medvedev and Pohamba’s face-to-face conference:
The Russian business community has been displaying growing interest of late in entering the promising market of Namibia that possesses rich natural deposits. In this connection during the visit the sides will discuss possibilities for the expansion of Russian investment participation in major projects of the Namibian economy, in particular, in the sphere of the prospecting and development of mineral deposits, hydrocarbons, electric power industry, transport and tourism.
One of the promising cooperation spheres is the energy industry starting from the hydropower to atomic power industry. We are ready and are even offering at the expert level cooperation programmes, so we will speak about this.
The agenda of the talks between the presidents of Russia and Namibia is expected to include a broad range of international and regional problems. In particular, they will consider in detail problems related to ensuring the sustainable development of countries of the African continent, issues linked with peacekeeping in Africa and search for ways of the settlement of conflicts that are the main obstacle to stability and socio-economic growth in African states. Among other possible themes will be international cooperation in overcoming the global financial crisis, issues of ensuring global energy security.
Medvedev was also expected to meet with the first Namibian president, Sam Nujoma, who founded the ruling South-West African People’s Organization in 1960, at which time South West Africa was still administered by South Africa as a League of Nations mandate territory. During the Namibian War of Independence that began in 1966, when South Africa’s mandate over its de facto fifth province ended, Nujoma commanded his guerrillas against the South African Defense Force, achieving internationally recognized independence in 1989. Today he remains an outspoken supporter of Zimbabwe’s racist Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe.
Incidentally, with respect to the subject of “peacekeeping in Africa,” the Russian Armed Forces currently maintain small peacekeeping groups in Chad, Sudan, and the Central African Republic under United Nations-African Union command At the same time, Russian destroyers, in combination with an international flotilla of warships, ply the waters off the coast of Somalia to curb high seas piracy. Taking advantage of civil war and anarchy in east-central Africa, the Kremlin has re-projected a limited strategic influence in the region, forfeited during the 1990s and early 2000s. A revitalized relationship with Yemen may also see the re-establishment of a Russian naval presence on the Arabian Peninsula. The re-projection of Moscow’s power throughout the world has in fact been promised by Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov since 2007.
From the Nambian capital Medvedev flew to the Angolan capital, where he was received by counterpart Jose Eduardo Dos Santos. Angola is the last stop in Medvedev’s African tour. The main themes of the talks between Medvedev and Dos Santos will be the promotion of major high-tech joint projects, presidential aide Prikhodko commented.
Three areas of joint Soviet-Angolan economic cooperation are diamond mining (with well-known industrial applications), oil exploration, and hydroelectricity. For example, Angolan mining companies Catoca and Luo will join the Russian company Alrosa in exploiting the Cacolu diamond field. Alrosa has also been granted geological and oil prospecting rights in the basins of the Cuanza and Congo Rivers. A joint partnership will be established between Zarubezhneft and Angola’s state-run oil company Sonangol. The Soviet-Angolan HydroChicapa joint company, along with Alrosa, completed a hydroelectric station on the Chicapa River in 2008. Tekhnopromexport also participated in the construction of Angola’s largest Capanda hydroelectric plant and is currently involved in the construction of two large stations on the Cuanza River.
Finally, Russian companies are expected to participate in the creation of Angola’s national satellite communication system, ANGOSAT. Military-technical cooperation, however, is not viewed as a priority direction, Itar-Tass quoted a Kremlin source as saying. Prikhodko remarked: “Particular attention will be paid to international issues for further consolidation of foreign policy cooperation between Russia and Angola.”
Between 1975 and 2002 Angola was the scene of a significant conflagration between the ruling Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), which declared independence from Portugal, and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA), which was backed by the USA and South Africa before the latter fell to communism in 1995. Between December 1987 and March 1988, UNITA and South African troops combined their forces at Cuito Cuanavale to clash with Angolan government troops, which enjoyed the support of Cuban troops, SWAPO guerrillas, and Umkhonto we Sizwe–the armed wing of the South African Communist Party and the African National Congress. More ominously, Angola’s army and its foreign allies operated under the direct command of Soviet generals. Years later, in 2002 UNITA leader and ex-Maoist Jonas Savimbi was killed in a clash with government troops. Angola and Cuba maintain close relations to this day.
Back in the USSR, Medvedev wiped off Angola’s tropical sweat from his brow and enthused: “Work with our African partners should have been started earlier. Africa is waiting for our support. Our policies here will be very friendly, but at the same time pragmatic. The Soviet Union always held a very friendly position with regard to African countries, helping them win independence.” During his eight-year stint as president Putin visited Libya, Algeria, and South Africa.
>Latin America File: Chavez welcomes Ecuador, two Caribbean states into ALBA; Cuban troops join other soldiers in Venezuelan military parade
June 26, 2009Posted by on
- Blast from the Past: Grenadian Government Renames Point Salines International Airport after Slain Marxist Dictator Bishop, Cuban Delegation in Attendance, New ALBA Member Officiates
Pictured above: In attendance at his June 1 presidential inauguration in San Salvador, Nicaraguan counterpart Daniel Ortega welcomes Mauricio Funes into Latin America’s Red Axis. At far left is Cuban Vice President Esteban Lazo Hernandez, second from left is Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa, and second from right is Funes’ vice president, Salvador Sanchez Ceren. The last was the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front’s battlefield commander during the 1980s civil war.
On Wednesday, Venezuela’s communist thug-in-chief Hugo Chavez formally received three new countries into the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA): Ecuador, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Antigua and Barbuda. “The ALBA continues to grow in Latin America. Now we have nine nations to build a new project. It is the most dynamic core,” gushed Chavez during his weekly TV-radio program “Alo, Presidente.”
In 2004 Cuba and Venezuela organized the regional bloc of socialist states to counter the Washington-led Free Trade Area of the Americas. Nicaragua, Bolivia, Dominica, and Honduras are also members of ALBA. Significantly, from the vantage of the Soviet strategy of quietly encircling the USA with enemies, even Russia has expressed an interest in joining ALBA.
On May 25 of this year Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa ratified his country’s decision to jon the bloc, after the country previously attended ALBA meetings as an observer. The accession of the two Caribbean island states was approved during the last ALBA summit in mid-April, held ahead of the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago. Chavez also showed up in Port of Spain, using the occasion to schmooze with fellow socialist, US President Barack Hussein Obama.
To celebrate the accession of three new countries into Latin America’s Red Axis, officers, cadets and troops from Cuba and the other ALBA states will march in a military parade on Venezuelan soil. El Universal reports that some 100 military personnel of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Cuba have rehearsed for this occasion. The participating military delegations will commemorate the 188th anniversary of the Battle of Carabobo and Venezuela’s Army Day. General Clíver Alcalá Cordones, commander of the 41st Armored Brigade of the Venezuelan National Armed Forces, explained that 175 foreign military officers will march in Campo de Carabobo, in southwest Valencia state.
Rocío San Miguel, director of the non-governmental Organization for Social Monitoring of Security and Defense Affairs, cautioned that “This particular and unprecedented situation violates Article 187, number 11 of the Venezuelan Constitution, since the National Assembly must authorize the deployment of foreign missions in Venezuela. The government, moreover, has not published any resolution in the Official Gazette to confirm this action.” The National Assembly, of course, is totally dominated by the United Socialist Party of Venezuela and other pro-Chavez parties, so an NGO’s appeal to the constitution will probably fall on deaf ears. Furthermore, the high-handed deployment of Cuban troops in Venezuela, even for ceremonial purposes, reflects a wider movement among Latin America’s leftist-communist regimes to welcome foreign militaries into the region, to wit the Russian Navy’s visit to Nicaragua last December, over the objections of the country’s liberal opposition.
In another sign of the deepening integration within the Western Hemisphere’s section of the Communist Bloc, ALBA leaders decided to change the name of the organization to the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America or “The People’s Trade Agreement.”
It may be some time before Russia joins ALBA, even as an observer, but the Soviet strategists have already re-established many Cold War-era links in Latin America, especially with Communist Cuba, neo-Sandinista Nicaragua, Bolivarian Venezuela, Red Bolivia, and Socialist Ecuador. On June 23, at a ceremony in Novo-Ogarjovo, the official residence of the Russian president outside Moscow, Russia and Venezuela agreed to organize a new bilateral bank. In attendance were Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Venezuelan Executive Vice President and acting Minister of Defense Ramón Carrizález. The agreement was initialed by Russian Vice Minister of Finance Dmitry Pankin and Venezuelan Vice Minister of Finance and Economy Gustavo Hernández.
“The founders of the bank, on the Russian party, are Vneshtorgbank and Gazprombank. The Government assumes that Russia will have a 51% share,” explained Pankin. State-run oil company PDVSA and the National Treasury will be the new bank’s Venezuelan stockholders. Carrizález, who described the relations between both countries as “strategic,” gave Putin a letter written in the Russian language and signed by President Chavez. The content of the missive was not revealed. For his part, Putin hailed the visit of the Venezuelan vice president as “very successful.”
Carrizález arrived in Russia after visiting Belarus, another strategic partner of Venezuela in the Not-So-Former Soviet Union. On the initiative of Caracas, the presidents of Belarus and Venezuela held a telephone conversation on June 20, the same day Carrizález began his official visit to Minsk. Alexander Lukashenko and Chavez discussed bilateral relations in the fields of economic and political cooperation, including large-scale joint projects in construction, engineering, and petrochemistry. Special attention was given to the implementation of a joint oil production venture in Venezuela. Lukashenko and Chavez agreed to meet in the near future. The Venezuelan dictator has previously materialized in Minsk.
Communist Cuba Subverts Grenada 25 Years after Operation Urgent Fury
Like the Soviets and their major Latin American client states, the smaller countries of the Caribbean Basin are also using the global financial crisis to agitate for political and economic integration via organizations like the Caribbean Community (Caricom) and the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS). For example, OECS members Trinidad and Tobago, St. Lucia, Grenada, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines have indicated their willingness to form an economic and political union by 2013. Trinidadian Prime Minister Patrick Manning, addressing a special convention of the ruling People’s National Movement, urged Caricom and the OECS to coordinate regional integration with the newly expanded ALBA.
Before the phoney end of the Cold War in 1991, when the Soviet Union deceptively dismantled itself, the Caribbean Basin, like other areas of the globe, was a target for communist subversion, particularly from the revolution’s hemispheric headquarters in Havana. Between 1979 and 1983, for example, Grenada suffered under the Soviet/Cuban-backed Marxist dictatorship of Prime Minister Maurice Bishop. Under the auspices of Operation Urgent Fury, President Ronald Reagan dispatched the US Armed Forces and allied militaries from the OECS to depose Bishop’s New Jewel regime and rescue US medical students at St. George’s University. In recent months Grenadian Prime Minister Tillman Thomas has once again allied the country with Havana, effectively negating the liberation that came to his island 25 years ago.
On May 29, 2009 Thomas’ government officially renamed the Point Salines International Airport in St. George’s in honor of slain coup-leader Bishop. A Cuban delegation, led by Vice President Esteban Lazo Hernandez, was in attendance. The Cuban media reports: “Cuban constructors played a decisive role in the construction of the airport, a project begun by Bishop Revolutionary Government.” The same source continues: “Also present were relatives of Maurice Bishop, with whom the Cuban Vice President met and shared memories and experiences of the close ties between Bishop and Fidel Castro.” St. Vincent and the Grenadines counterpart Ralph Gonsalves, now a proud member of ALBA, gave the feature address at the ribbon-cutting ceremony.
The CIA Makes Life Uncomfortable for Comrade Hugo
In a related story, Chavez is once again weaving intricate fantasies about Washington DC’s attempts to whack him. This time Comrade Hugo contends that infamous Cuban-born Venezuelan citizen and ex-CIA agent Luis Posada Carriles was behind a plot to kill him while attending the June 1 inaugural ceremony of Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes. It was on this pretext that Chavez and sidekick Evo Morales, Bolivia’s Trotskyist president, refused to attend the installation of El Salvador’s first Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front government. Communist Cuba, no doubt rejoicing that its proxy has finally taken over the small Central American country, sent a high-level delegation to San Salvador, which promptly restored long-severed relations with Havana.
Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator, President Daniel Ortega, first announced the alleged assassination plan during his speech at the ceremony when he said both presidents could not attend for “security reasons.” Staunch Soviet ally Ortega, who trooped to Moscow last December in his first post-Cold War pilgrimage, refused to divulge details. Later, Venezuelan Foreign Affairs Minister Nicolas Maduro identified the “ultra-right” (meaning “fascists”) as the murder plot’s organizers: “Ultra-right wing assassination groups in Venezuela, linked to ultra-conservative coup sectors, together with the international ultra-right were involved in the possibility of an assassination.” Talking to the press after Funes’ installation, Maduro specifically accused Alejandro Esclusa of masterminding the plot. Esclusa is apparently a Venezuelan rightist who has worked with the US Central Intelligence Agency on “numerous occasions” and was in El Salvador advising the Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA) government in its campaign against Funes.
On June 2, back in Venezuela, Chavez acknowledged that he received word of the assassination scheme–which consisted of blowing the president’s airliner out of the sky with SAMs–from fellow commie thug Ortega. “It was information with a lot of weight that motivated the suspension of our travels,” Chavez stated, adding:
In this case the information was very precise, it indicated that they were going to launch one or several rockets at the Cubana airline plane that was ready to leave from Maiquetia airport in Venezuela.
We have to remember that there, in El Salvador Carriles lived and did what ever he felt like…and they were preparing this attack against us…when we were to be arriving or leaving San Salvador.
I accuse Luis Posada Carriles and I demand that President Barack Obama bring about justice and comply with the law…send us this terrorist…to put him where he should be, in prison.
Daniel Ortega knows the details …some Venezuelan coup plotters entered San Salvador two weeks ago. And I know them…they have sworn to me that they were going to kill me, because they say its my fault that they lost their jobs and didn’t reach the highest military ranks.
The government of the United States is behind all of this. And I’m not accusing Obama. No. As Fidel [Castro] has said, I think Obama has good intentions, but beyond Obama there is a whole empire: The CIA and all its tentacles, is alive and kicking… President Obama, it’s time to dismantle all this machinery of terror.
Keeping in mind that this story was published at the pro-Chavez Venezuelanalysis.com website, it serves the Latin American Red Axis’ cause of dethroning US influence in the region and promoting communism.
>USSR2 File: Voronin meets Medvedev, Putin in Moscow; Russia extends US$500 million loan to Moldova; CPRF plasters Stalin’s mug on billboards
June 25, 2009Posted by on
>This past Monday Russia threw its weight behind Moldova’s outgoing President Vladimir Voronin, a communist who formerly played the part of Soviet Interior Ministry general, by extending a US$500 million loan to Chisinau. Moldova is Europe’s poorest country, even lagging behind places like Albania. Voronin has held the presidential office since 2001 but is barred from running for a third term. He dissolved parliament last week and called an early election for July 29 after deputies twice failed to elect a new president, lacking just one vote to approve Voronin’s candidate, the current prime minister. The Communist Party of the Republic of Moldova triumphed in an April parliamentary election, but the results sparked violent protests by anti-communists and Romanian irredentists.
“Of course, I would like to tell you that we supported and support the measures taken by Moldova’s leadership to restore constitutional order,” Russian President Dmitry Medvedev assured Voronin during their meeting in the Kremlin. Medvedev continued: “These are difficult times now, very difficult from the economic point of view. We should give it some thought and decide what else needs to be undertaken to develop trade and economic ties at a time of crisis.”
Voronin, alluding to Romania’s alleged involvement in the post-election riots, replied: “I am very grateful that in these hard days of political uncertainty and attempts to destabilize our country … Russia was the first and probably the only country that advocated Moldova’s lawfully elected authorities.” Although now a putative ally in the North Atlantic Alliance, the Romanian president, Traian Basescu, is an “ex”-communist, indicating that Bucharest, too, is playing along with the Soviet strategic deception.
Voronin continued his rant against the West: “We should call a spade a spade … they aimed to carry out a ‘coloured revolution’ in our country, but I believe our coordinated actions and your unambiguous position should discourage the organizers from any such plans. This had nothing to do with a people’s revolution. This was an organized group of hirelings who … attempted to carry out this coup d’etat.”
After meeting with Medvedev, Voronin was received by Russia’s KGB-communist dictator, Vladimir Putin, who soothed: “We are considering your request to extend to Moldova a state credit of $0.5 billion. We consider this possible.” Putin indicated that the first tranche worth US$150 million could be disbursed within six to eight weeks. He offered no other details related to the conditions of the loan.
Pictured here: A Georgian man kisses a portrait of Joseph Stalin in front of the monument to him in the town of Gori, on December 21, 2008. Strategically sandwiched between NATO member Romania and NATO aspirant Ukraine, the neo-Soviet leadership has a vested interest in keeping Moldova (not to mention Romania and Ukraine) under its thumb. The virus of communism is not only alive and well in the former Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic, but also Russia itself, as a recent incident in the southern city of Voronezh proves.
Last December the local section of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation purchased space on 10 billboards throughout the city to display former Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin’s mugshot with the cheery proclamation: “Victory will be ours!” The pro-communist advertisements coincided with the 130th anniversary of the birth of ethnic Georgian Stalin, who ruled the Soviet Union during the Second World War and dispatched millions of people to their deaths in prison camps during political purges in the 1930s.
Now the communications department at Voronezh City Hall is pondering whether the billboards could be classified as “improper advertising” since they are of a political nature and no election is underway. “Under the law, a billboard should be used for advertising purposes only, including social advertising. The billboard can not be used to display any other information. This is where I see the violation,” a city official intoned. The sincerity behind such objections is questionable. For nearly 20 years Russians have argued whether to remove Vladimir Lenin’s mummy from Red Square, but the corpse of the Soviet Union’s founder has yet to receive a proper burial (physically or ideologically).
“The exact number of those killed or imprisoned during Stalin-era repressions is not known,” huffs state-run Novosti, “but according to research conducted by British historian Robert Conquest, more than 14 million people are estimated to have passed through the Gulag from 1929-1953 and an additional 6-7 million people were deported and exiled across the Soviet Union.” Russia’s embattled human rights groups, the same source admits, are “still concerned” that many Russians view the genocidal communist tyrant as a “statesman.” Indeed, we don’t mind saying that that is a very appropriate concern. As of 2008, by the way, the Soviet gulag system was still in operation, according to impeccable sources like the Wall Street Journal, which calls them “Putin’s torture colonies.” Did Lenin’s mummy twitch just now?
>WW4 File: N. Korea to launch ICBM on 4th of July, Pentagon beefs up anti-missile defenses around Hawaii, top US general: DPRK insurgent tactics likely
June 24, 2009Posted by on
- Former ROK President Roh “Committed Suicide” Two Days before DPRK’s Second Atomic Bomb Test
I believe we will face IEDs [improvised explosive devices] and insurgent forces, in addition to large conventional attacks.
– General Walter Sharp, commander of US forces in Republic of Korea, June 23, 2009
Pictured above: South Korean soldiers bow their heads at the National Cemetery in Seoul on June 25, 2009.
On June 23 the Japanese media revealed that North Korea plans to hold a live-fire military drill off its east coast between June 25 and July 10, coinciding with a long-range missile launch over the Pacific Ocean, possibly targeting Hawaii on the 4th of July. This revelation follows bans issued in the past month by Pyongyang prohibiting civilian ships from entering its waters in the Yellow Sea (west coast) and Sea of Japan (east coast). According to CNN, the Stalinist regime’s hydrographic department emailed this information to Japan’s coast guard on Monday. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) did not specify the consequences for ships entering those waters during the drill, but the North issued a similar notice before it tested a long-range rocket on April 5. On May 25 the DPRK tested its second atomic device in three years.
On June 17 the Korea Times confirmed that North Korea’s “missile train,” which transported an ICBM to a launch site in Tongchang-ri, North Pyongan province in May, recently moved from a missile research center in Sanum-dong, Pyongyang to another launch site in Musudan-ri, North Hamgyong province. Analysts in Seoul and Washington speculate that the North might simultaneously launch missiles from both sites. Alternately, the train could be a “smokescreen” to confuse observers. The DPRK apparently has three or four ICBMs, and may be keeping one or two more at the research center in Sanum-dong.
Since May, Pyongyang has considered almost any international resistance to its nuclear bomb and missile programs a “declaration of war.” This includes United Nations Security Council sanctions and South Korea’s participation in the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative, which seeks to interdict the transportation of WMDs on the high seas. Last Thursday, a senior US official disclosed that the navy is tracking a North Korean ship, Kang Nam, which left port on June 17 and is believed to be carrying illicit weapons or technology. Two days later the Kang Nam was spotted off the east coast of Mainland China. Earlier this month, Pyongyang in reprisal convicted two US journalists, Euna Lee and Laura Ling, of illegally entering the country via the People’s Republic of China, and planning to conduct a smear campaign against the regime. Lee and Ling were sentenced to 12 years in a labor camp.
The DPRK was established by Kim Il Sung, father of the regime’s current head of state, Kim Jong Il, at the end of the Second World War, under the aegis of Soviet occupational forces. At the same time, in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula US forces, fresh from their victory over the Japanese Empire, supported the new Republic of Korea. The North’s invasion of the South in 1950 led to the three-year Korean War and an armistice that Pyongyang scrapped last month. The Korean Demilitarized Zone is the most heavily fortified border in the world and a stark reminder that the Cold War has not ended on this part of the planet. However, according to a recent public opinion poll, most young South Koreans have little personal knowledge of that conflict more than half a century ago.
In response to North Korea’s pending missile launch, the US military has positioned more missile defenses around Hawaii, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates assured reporters last Thursday. “We do have some concerns if they were to launch a missile to the west in the direction of Hawaii,” Gates admitted. Without divulging details, he explained that a ground-based mobile missile system has been deployed in Hawaii and a radar system positioned nearby. “Without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say … we are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect Americans and American territory,” Gates said. Japan’s Yomiuri newspaper hypothesized that Pyongyang might launch the missile on July 4, which is Independence Day in the USA. The newspaper cited an analysis by Japan’s Defense Ministry and intelligence gathered by US spy satellites. Is Crazy Kim’s communist nuthouse crazy enough to attack Hawaii? We’re watching . . .
In a related story, reported by Seoul’s Yonhap News Agency, General Walter Sharp, who commands US forces in the Republic of Korea, warned South Korean army personnel that North Korean commandos could use explosive devices against both civilians and troops in rear areas, among other insurgent tactics, should war break out on the peninsula. “I believe we will face IEDs [improvised explosive devices] and insurgent forces, in addition to large conventional attacks,” Sharp said on Tuesday, adding:
The IEDs could target civilians as well as US and South Korean forces who should strengthen preparedness to tackle such threats. Realistic training ensures that the Republic of Korea is fully prepared for a thinking enemy, an enemy that will use IEDs, hide among the population and strike our rear forces and civilians. This enemy will require us to use our weapons much more precisely, to reduce civilian casualties and collateral damage.
A white paper published by the ROK’s defense ministry contends that the North’s 180,000 special warfare troops have expanded their capability to wage night-time combat, as well as mountain and street warfare. About 680,000 South Korean soldiers, equipped with the latest military technology and bolstered by 28,500 US troops, confront the North’s largely outdated 1.2 million-strong People’s Army. It can be surmised that whatever modern military hardware Pyongyang possesses, it must originate, openly or covertly, from Moscow and Beijing.
Meanwhile, political machinations within the North’s ruling Korean Workers’ Party regime continue. According to the Korea Times, close aides of Kim Jong Un, 26-year-old third son and heir apparent of Jong Il, last week attempted to assassinate the leader’s first son Jong Nam, who lives in Macau, a Special Administrative Region in the PRC. Citing Red Chinese government sources, the Korea Times elaborated: “Aides to Kim Jong-un planned to assassinate Jong-nam, who lives in Macau, after first eliminating his close aides in North Korea. The sources said, ‘It seems they tried to assassinate Kim Jong-nam without telling Kim Jong-il.’” Beijing foiled the plan by warning Pyongyang about the murder plot and by sending intelligence and military officers to escort Jong Nam to safety. The Korea Times’ government sources in Red China explained that the PRC is protecting Jong Nam because he has been developing friendships with high-ranking Communist Chinese officials for a long time. In fact, Jong Nam may seek asylum in Mainland China.
This is not the first time that North Korea’s ruling Kim dynasty has been involved in assassination plots. In 1983 Seoul accused Jong Il of ordering the murder of South Korean President Jeon Du Hwan, then visiting Rangoon, Burma, now known as Myanmar. A bomb exploded at a mausoleum, killing 21 people, including South Korean cabinet members. Jeon narrowly escaped death. In 1987 Seoul accused Jong Il of ordering the bombing of Korean Air Flight 858, which killed 155 crew and passengers. DPRK agent Kim Hyon Hui confessed to planting the bomb aboard the airliner and admitted that Jong Il personally directed the operation. In the 1980s Jong Il had yet to succeed his father as head of state, but occupied senior posts in the Korean Workers’ Party’s Politburo, Military Commission, and Secretariat.
The fact that Jong Il recently placed his youngest son in charge of the State Security Department as a prelude to handing over control of the regime may have some bearing on Jong Un’s reported attempt to murder his half-brother. The Kims visited the headquarters of the State Security Department in March, at which time “Dear Leader” ordered the communist security chiefs to “uphold” his third son as head of the department. The State Security Department, reports the Korea Times, is the backbone of the Kim dynasty’s iron rule over North Korea. Pyongyang’s equivalent to the KGB monitors bureaucrats, soldiers, and civilians for any signs of dissent, as well as engages in espionage abroad.
On May 23, 2009 former South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun jumped to his death from a mountain cliff. Roh’s centrist Yeollin Uri Party, which ruled the ROK between 2004 and 2007, holds a conciliatory “Sunshine Policy” toward the DPRK, prompting opponents to label party members as communist sympathizers. Roh’s alleged suicide does not appear to have a North Korean connection but, in the context of the current escalation of tensions between the two Koreas since April, is somewhat suspicious. Roh died two days before Pyongyang carried out its second underground atomic bomb test. Coincidence? Maybe, or maybe not . . .
>Final Phase Backgrounder: Gorbachev promotes “global perestroika”; SCO slaps Pyongyang on wrist, embraces Ahmadinejad, floats common currency
June 18, 2009Posted by on
>To this day former Soviet dictator and master deceiver Mikhail Gorbachev agitates for perestroika. In the 1980s, in conformity to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union’s long-range plan for global domination, he implemented perestroika and glasnost in the Soviet republics and Eastern Europe. In the 1990s “Gorby” took up residence at The Presidio, an army base in San Francisco that closed down after the Cold War supposedly ended, and promoted world peace and environmental issues. In Russia he organized a social democratic party.
Gorby also materialized on the speaking circuit of US universities and business groups to urge his adoring but deceived followers to promote perestroika in the USA. Following Barack Hussein Obama’s election to the US presidency last November, Gorby once again urged the (Kenyan-born?) socialist senator from Illinois to implement perestroika domestically. Now Gorby is advocating global perestroika.
But, what, pray tell, is perestroika? Perestroika is nothing less than socialist restructuring, as Gorby clearly outlines in his manifesto Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World (Harper & Row, 1987). Glasnost, which means “openness,” is perestroika’s counterpart. Gorbachev’s advocacy of perestroika and glasnost is nothing new. These two communist tactics were first promoted by Vladimir Lenin, founder of the Soviet Union, to obscure the true intentions of the Bolshevik revolutionaries: namely, the destruction of private property, religion, and the family. Global perestroika, therefore, must be a codeword for world communism.
Pictured above: Former US Secretary of State George P. Shultz with Gorbachev, at the conference on nuclear disarmament “Overcoming Nuclear Dangers,” at the Italian foreign ministry headquarters, in Rome, on April 17, 2009.
Seizing the global financial crisis as pretext and echoing a recent report published by United Russia–in which the potemkin “ruling” party in Moscow advocates authoritarianism–Gorby penned the following song for world communism in the June 7 edition of the Washington Post: “We Had Our Perestroika. It’s High Time for Yours.”
“Years ago, as the Cold War was coming to an end,” Gorby reminisces, “I said to my fellow leaders around the globe: The world is on the cusp of great events, and in the face of new challenges all of us will have to change, you as well as we. For the most part, the reaction was polite but skeptical silence.” The former Soviet dictator then refers to his stint on the speaking circuit: “In recent years, however, during speaking tours in the United States before university audiences and business groups, I have often told listeners that I feel Americans need their own change — a perestroika, not like the one in my country, but an American perestroika . . .”
Gorby then pitches his scheme for global perestroika by taking a dig at the “US model,” meaning a free market society with constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties: “Our perestroika signaled the need for change in the Soviet Union, but it was not meant to suggest a capitulation to the U.S. model. Today, the need for a more far-reaching perestroika — one for America and the world — has become clearer than ever.”
In describing the political and economic reforms that were implemented in the Soviet Union during the late 1980s, Gorby disingenuously distances himself from his “hardline” comrades in the CPSU: “At first, we labored under the illusion that revamping the existing system — changes within the ‘socialist model’ — would suffice. But the pushback from the Communist Party and the government bureaucracy was too strong. Toward the end of 1986, it became clear to me and my supporters that nothing less than the replacement of the system’s building blocks was needed.”
Among these “hardliners” were Oleg Shenin, former first secretary of the old CPSU Politburo, ringleader of the faux coup of August 1991 and presently a “gray eminence” in neo-Soviet politics; and Gennady Zyuganov, current chair of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Incidentally, in a 2005 interview with Vlast, Valentin Falin, former chief of the old CPSU’s International Department, frankly admitted that Gorby was not only apprised of the coup ahead of time, but also committed to advancing the Soviet strategic deception by creating fake political parties to “compete” with the open communists.
Shenin and Zyuganov are alluded to in the following narrative: “Two conspiracies hijacked the changes — the attempted coup in August 1991, organized by the hard-line opponents of our reforms, which ended up weakening my position as president, and the subsequent agreement among the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus to dissolve the Union. Russia’s leaders then rejected the evolutionary path, plunging the country into chaos.”
Gorby reflects on the outcome of perestroika and his lateral transfer from the Soviet presidency to the role of roving Soviet propagandist: “Nevertheless, when I am asked whether perestroika succeeded or was defeated, I reply: Perestroika won, because it brought the country to a point from which there could be no return to the past.”
The former Soviet dictator wraps up his history lesson by chastising the West’s capitalist class for viewing the collapse (self-dismantling) of the Soviet Union as a victory for capitalism over communism:
In the West, the breakup of the Soviet Union was viewed as a total victory that proved that the West did not need to change. Western leaders were convinced that they were at the helm of the right system and of a well-functioning, almost perfect economic model. Scholars opined that history had ended. The “Washington Consensus,” the dogma of free markets, deregulation and balanced budgets at any cost, was force-fed to the rest of the world.
But then came the economic crisis of 2008 and 2009, and it became clear that the new Western model was an illusion that benefited chiefly the very rich. Statistics show that the poor and the middle class saw little or no benefit from the economic growth of the past decades.
The current global crisis demonstrates that the leaders of major powers, particularly the United States, had missed the signals that called for a perestroika. The result is a crisis that is not just financial and economic. It is political, too.
Gorbachev’s “humble” prescription for the communist-manipulated global financial crisis, of course, is more socialism with a “market face”:
. . . . I am convinced that a new model will emerge, one that will emphasize public needs and public goods, such as a cleaner environment, well-functioning infrastructure and public transportation, sound education and health systems and affordable housing.
Elements of such a model already exist in some countries. Having rejected the tutorials of the International Monetary Fund, countries such as Malaysia and Brazil have achieved impressive rates of economic growth. China and India have pulled hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. By mobilizing state resources, France has built a system of high-speed railways, while Canada provides free health care. Among the new democracies, Slovenia and Slovakia have been able to mitigate the social consequences of market reforms.
The time has come for “creative construction,” for striking the right balance between the government and the market, for integrating social and environmental factors and demilitarizing the economy.
Washington will have to play a special role in this new perestroika, not just because the United States wields great economic, political and military power in today’s global world, but because America was the main architect, and America’s elite the main beneficiary, of the current world economic model. That model is now cracking and will, sooner or later, be replaced. That will be a complex and painful process for everyone, including the United States.
However different the problems that the Soviet Union confronted during our perestroika and the challenges now facing the United States, the need for new thinking makes these two eras similar. In our time, we faced up to the main tasks of putting an end to the division of the world, winding down the nuclear arms race and defusing conflicts. We will cope with the new global challenges as well, but only if everyone understands the need for real, cardinal change — for a global perestroika.
Gorbachev’s communist-leftist colleagues in the “BRIC” governments of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, presently meeting in Yekaterinburg, near the Ural Mountains, are faithfully executing this very script. There Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Chinese President Hu Jintao, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, agreed on promoting energy cooperation between their four “emerging economies.” “We are for strengthening the coordination and the cooperation of states in the energy sphere, including between producers and consumers of energy and transit states, in the efforts to reduce uncertainty and ensure stability and steadiness,” a joint statement declared. The BRIC leaders also supported increasing the number of representatives of developing countries in global financial institutions. The second BRIC summit will be held next year in Brazil.
Not so coincidentally, meeting also in Yekaterinburg this week are the heads of state of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The SCO includes Russia, four “former” Soviet republics from Central Asia, and Red China, plus (Islamo-Nazi) Iran, (socialist) India, (socialist) Pakistan, and (“ex”-communist) Mongolia as observers. The SCO is not only a political-economic unit binding the Eurasian section of the Communist Bloc, but also a dangerous military alliance in opposition to NATO, as evidenced by three Sino-Soviet war games thus far and two more scheduled for this year and 2010.
Yesterday, the SCO leaders’ summit slapped communist North Korea on the wrist with a feeble denunciation of Pyongyang’s nuclear bomb tests and threat to take on the USA in a nuclear showdown. Medvedev sighed: “Among other issues, we discussed the North Korean problem, including the recent threats, and we noted that such behavior is unacceptable in the current situation.” The only reason that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) is a “problem” for the international community is because Soviet occupying forces set up the Stalinist regime at the end of the Second World War, in opposition to the legitimate Republic of Korea in the south.
“We also noted that the international community had no choice but to react by means of adopting an appropriate UN Security Council resolution,” Medvedev, a former Soviet Komsomol graduate, continued. All 15 council members recently voted in favor of Resolution 1874, which expands an arms embargo and allows searches of North Korean ships on the high seas but, significantly, does not authorize the use of force. This toothless resolution renders the UN’s policy on the DPRK useless, which is no doubt Moscow and Beijing’s goal.
In furtherance of Lenin’s dream of a “world Soviet republic,” the SCO summit also endorsed the notion of a common currency for member states, a proposal that Medvedev first floated some months ago. The SCO currency would be similar to the currency unit used by the European Community until the introduction of the euro in 1999. “The current set of reserve currencies and the main reserve currency – the U.S. dollar – have failed to function as they should,” Medvedev lamented at the summit, adding that the Russian ruble could also become a reserve currency in the “foreseeable future.”
In attendance at the SCO summit was Iranian dictator Mahmoud (“Iwannajihad”) Ahmadinejad, re-elected last Friday in a contested poll that turned deadly. This is the not the first time that Ahmadinejad, Israel’s arch-nemesis and aspirant to the legacy of Adolf Hitler, has shown up at an SCO shindig. Iran is seeking to place itself under Russia’s protective nuclear umbrella, safe from Israeli and/or US preemptive strikes against its Russian-built nuclear bomb program, by applying for full membership in the organization.
“Iraq continues to be occupied, chaos is growing in Afghanistan, the Palestinian problem remains unresolved, the world is swept by political and economic crises, and there is no hope for their resolution,” Ahmadinejad grumbled, adding: “The U.S. and its allies are unable to cope with the crises, showing that the end has come for the current unipolar world order. The SCO must take a leading role in efforts to tackle the global economic recession.” After this plug for the Moscow-Beijing Axis’ leading role in world affairs, Ahmadinejad briefly met with Medvedev on the summit sidelines. “The parties agreed to continue economic and humanitarian cooperation, and other contacts,” a Kremlin spokesentity intoned afterwards.
>Final Phase Backgrounder: "Ruling" United Russia exposes its link to Soviet strategic deception: party think tank: "No democracy needed for Russia"
June 15, 2009Posted by on
>A think tank connected to the “ruling” United Russia party, the Public Projects Institute headed by parliamentarian Vladmir Pligin, has released a report that rejects any need for democracy in Russia, citing the global financial crisis as pretext for “strong leadership.” A more candid but unpublished draft of the report, as well as the published version itself both express contempt for Western-style mass participation in politics. In so doing United Russia betrays the image of liberal reformer that its candidate President Dmitry Medvedev has carefully cultivated and projected abroad. KGB-communist dictator Yuri Andropov, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s mentor, purused a similar ruse before he handed the prosecution of the Soviet strategic deception to his successor Mikhail Gorbachev, another “liberal reformer.”
Some significant quotes from the published version of the report follow:
Russia does not need to move toward greater democracy because the financial crisis requires strong leadership.
It would be more honest and realistic to say that the democratization of Russia’s political system in the near future cannot be a priority. The priority for now is good governance.
The unpublished early draft, quoted by business daily Vedomosti, stated:
Regional leaders . . . are appointed via arrangements strongly reminiscent of regional committee secretary nominations in the Soviet era.
Russia’s tightly controlled media resembles that of the old Soviet media during the so-called “period of stagnation” prior to Mikhail Gorbachev’s “perestroika” reforms in the 1980s.
“In times of war and crisis,” the final version ominously recommended, “a successful political system becomes charismatic, and therefore, inevitably more authoritarian. A storm requires a captain.”
Some regional leaders, who prefer the “liberal” reforms promoted by President Boris Yeltsin in the 1990s, are not happy about the re-centralization of power in Moscow. On June 5 Murtaza Rakhimov, president of the southwestern Russian region of Bashkoristan, complained to the Moskovsky Komsomolets daily: “Russia is walking away from the process of democratization . . . The level of centralization is worse than Soviet times.”
“It’s pretty clear a mass-scale democratization will never take place in Russia,” independent political analyst Stanislav Belkovsky observes. At one point former prime minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, whose Our Home-Russia party merged into United Russia in 2000, was even more candid: “No matter what new party we create, in the end, it always turns out to be the Communist Party of the Soviet Union!” Indeed.
What will Moscow’s Leninist masterminds, who are working feverishly to modernize their nuclear arsenal and associated delivery systems, think of next? We are still waiting for the Potemkin parties represented in the State Duma—United Russia, Just/Fair Russia, and the Liberal Democratic party of Russia—to one day re-merge with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation into a monolithic Stalinist organization. The name of the new entity won’t be important, but the spirit of Vladimir Lenin, with his strategic accommodation with capitalism via the New Economic Policy, will animate its directors.
In the end, the Soviet tactic of fake internal political/economic reform will come full circle, but don’t expect the West to organize an effective counter-strategy under the leadership of putative Soviet mole, Barack Hussein Obama. Gorbachev has publicly urged the US president to implement perestroika (socialist restructuring) under the patriotic colors of the red, white, and blue. Got Wolverines?
>Event Convergence Alert: Moscow, Beijing plan summer military drills in Far East Russia, northeast China as DPRK raises tensions on Korean Peninsula
June 10, 2009Posted by on
- High-Tech South Korean Destroyer Dispatched to Detect DPRK Missile Launch, Crippled by “Software Glitch” (Computer Virus?)
As if to stick a finger in Washington’s eye, Pyongyang has sentenced two US journalists to 12 years in a labor camp. Charged with illegal entry into North Korea and an unspecified “grave crime,” Laura Ling and Euna Lee have no recourse beyond the Central Court that sentenced them on Monday. In an ABC television interview over the weekend US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton calls the charges thrown at Ling and Lee “absolutely without merit or foundation.” The former First Lady and US Senator admitted to sending a letter to North Korea’s communist leadership demanding Ling and Lee’s release. Clinton indicated that she has received “responses.”
Pictured above: A not-so-flattering caricature of North Korean head of state Kim Jong Il, from the movie Team America: World Police.
Detained by North Korea authorities on March 17, while filming material for a documentary on North Korean defectors, Ling and Lee work for Current TV. Ironically, the San Francisco-based Internet news outlet was co-founded by Al Gore, Bill Clinton’s vice president. Washington, according to the Korea Times story above, does not rule out the possibility of Gore flying to Pyongyang to negotiate their release. Incidentally, we think that’s an excellent idea. Maybe Comrade Gore, the self-avowed inventor of the Internet and global warming, will decide to take up permanent residence in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK).
On June 2 Bloomberg reported that Kim Jong Il, North Korea’s de facto head of state, in a significant political move, has named his third son Kim Jong Un as heir. North Korea’s communist leadership has notified its diplomatic offices abroad and is teaching its citizen-slaves a song in praise of the anointed leader. Some intelligence, states an opposition legislator in South Korea, reports that Pyongyang is requiring loyalty oaths to Kim Jong Un. Little is known about the youngest Kim, who is 26 years old and was educated at an international school in Switzerland. Jong Un and older brother Jong Chol have a different mother than the eldest son, Jong Nam. Jong Il succeeded his father, North Korea’s founder Kim Il Sung, as head of the Stalinist country in 1994.
In addition to dynastic maneuvers and “anti-imperialist” provocations, Crazy Kim’s communist nuthouse has imposed a no-travel zone off the east coast of North Korea, that is, in the Sea of Japan, between June 10 and June 30. Two weeks ago Pyongyang imposed a no-travel zone off the country’s west coast, in the Yellow Sea. “We do not know the reason why North Korea has set up the no-navigation zone,” related Japan’s chief cabinet secretary Takeo Kawamura, adding: “We cannot rule out the possibility of North Korea launching missiles including ballistic ones.”
South Korea has deployed an Aegis Combat System-equipped destroyer to its western sea border with the North and vowed last week to send F-15K fighter jets in the event of a maritime clash. Intriguingly, after setting sail the missile-detecting system of Sejong the Great was crippled by a “software glitch” of unknown origin. Incidentally, it is a well-established fact that many “software glitches” (computer viruses) are spawned from covert cyberwarfare units in Russia, China, North Korea, and other Communist Bloc states.
In a related story reported by the AFP news agency, on June 4 a North Korean navy patrol boat crossed into South Korea’s portion of the Yellow Sea. The boat remained there for almost one hour before retreating. A spokesman for the South Korean Joint Chiefs of Staff suggested that the enemy vessel was apparently chasing Chinese fishing boats, but did not exclude the possibility it was a planned intrusion to raise tensions further. About 70 of some 90 Chinese fishing boats withdrew overnight from the area. The Korean Peninsula’s west coast has been the site of two deadly clashes between the two Korean states in the past 10 years.
The same article, citing the People’s Daily, also reports that on the previous day Chinese President Hu Jintao conversed by telephone with US counterpart Barack Hussein Obama about Pyongyang’s nuclear program. They conversed about bilateral relations and exchanged opinions on the situation on the Korean Peninsula, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China offered, without giving details.
For the first time, on June 9, in yet another attempt to annoy the world, Crazy Kim’s communist nuthouse threatened to use nuclear weapons in a “merciless offensive” if provoked. The Korean Central News Agency ranted: “Our nuclear deterrent will be a strong defensive means . . . as well as a merciless offensive means to deal a just retaliatory strike to those who touch the country’s dignity and sovereignty even a bit.” I wasn’t aware that North Korea possessed any dignity. As for Pyongyang’s sovereignty, that seems to reside in Moscow or Beijing.
Meanwhile, the Republic of Korea’s political and military leadership are making plans to counter a possible missile attack from the DPRK. South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff have submitted to conservative President Lee Myung-bak a scenario in which the South and the USA respond to a communist missile attack by launching joint attacks from surface, air and sea against the North’s missile bases. This past Saturday President Lee warned that his government would neither cower before the DPRK’s provocations nor offer anything less than a strong defense against the North.
Incidentally, the ROK is the real Korea, unlike the illegitimate Stalinist state in the north, created by Soviet fiat in 1945, after the retreat of Imperial Japan’s army (see below). The demilitarized zone between North and South Korea is the most heavily fortified border in the world and a blatant reminder that the Cold War is not over in this part of the world.
The Moscow-Beijing Axis Prepares for Korean War 2
It is doubtful that the Korean Workers’ Party makes any serious decisions without consulting the (secretly ruling) Communist Party of the Russian Federation/Soviet Union and the (openly ruling) Communist Party of China. On June 15, reports Novosti, Chinese President Hu Jintao will visit Russia to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which includes Russia, China, and four “ex”-Soviet Central Asian states. Hu will also rub elbows at the first leaders’ summit of BRIC, an alliance of the world’s four largest emerging economies–Brazil, Russia, India, and China. Both summits will be held in Yekaterinburg, near the Ural Mountains. Hu will confer with President Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and the speakers of the State Duma and Federation Council, Boris Gryzlov and Sergei Mironov, respectively.
No doubt the Korean conflict will rank high on the SCO discussion agenda. The BRIC summit will also provide a venue for the Soviets and Red Chinese to plot and scheme. “The development of cooperation between BRIC benefits the four countries as well as contributing to the revival of the world economy,” explains PRC Deputy Foreign Minister He Yafei. He added: “We also share positions on many issues, and the countries’ roles in the world, including in political affairs, is growing.”
Unnoticed by most Western analysts, Russia and the PRC are positioning military assets in China’s northeast region as nearby North Korea escalates political tensions with the South. Pyongyang’s provocations include a nuclear bomb test, the second since 2006, multiple missile launches, and unilateral withdrawal from the 1953 armistice ending the Korean War’s hot phase. It is unlikely that this event convergence is coincidental but, rather, reflects a coordination of tactics and strategy between Moscow, Beijing, and Pyongyang. Indeed, after the DPRK’s underground N-bomb test on May 25, a spokesentity for the Russian Foreign Ministry admitted that Moscow is beefing up security in the region. Although not commonly analyzed as such, the DPRK’s controversial missile and nuclear bomb programs could provide Russia and China with a potential platform to nuke the USA with arms-length plausible deniability.
Last November World Net Daily editor Joseph Farah, citing sources at MI6’s Asian Desk, reported that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) had deployed as many as 100,000 troops along the Yalu River, ostensibly to thwart an exodus of refugees in the event of Kim Jong Il’s death. We were unable to confirm this report with other news agencies but, if true, then the Communist Chinese would have been well-positioned at the time to aid their North Korean comrades in an invasion of the South. At least eight months later, it is not clear if the PLA is still massing along the border with the DPRK. The PLA is the world’s largest army, boasting 2.3 million active personnel, deployed in seven military districts, and more than 800,000 reserves.
On June 8 Novosti reported that the People’s Republic of China will hold a week-long, large-scale “anti-terrorist” exercise dubbed Great Wall 6, which will take place in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and the Shanxi and Hebei provinces. Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, and Hebei are located in northeast China, near Beijing, although not immediately adjacent to the PRC’s border with the DPRK. Last year, the PRC held similar antiterrorism drills called Great Wall 5 in preparation for the 2008 Olympic Games. Those exercises involved the PLA, civilian and military police, and emergency services.
The relationship between Great Wall 6 and the “large-scale” military exercise Kuayue 2009, reported by Novosti and Xinhua in early May, is not clear. The latter is slated to begin during the second half of this year and will involve 50,000 troops from the Shenyang, Lanzhou, Jinan, and Guangzhou military districts. It should be noted that the Shenyang military district borders the DPRK, while Lanzhou spans north-central and northwest China, Jinan is located in east-central China, and Guangzhou is situated in southeast China. Kuayue 2009 will test the PLA’s command and decision-making capabilities, the interoperability of ground troops and air units in “intense electronic warfare conditions,” and entail airborne assault operations and special forces missions.
Possibly in coordination with Kuayue 2009, the Soviets and the Red Chinese will hold their fourth combined war game, Peace Mission 2009, in Far East Russia and northeast China this summer. The northeast region of the PRC, of course, is near North Korea, while Far East Russia shares a small border with the DPRK. Russian and Chinese military delegations recently met in Khabarovsk to hammer out the details of the joint maneuver. The Vladivostok Times reports:
Maneuvers are planned to be held in July-August of 2009 in three stages. The first one is to be held in Russia, the second and third – in China. Talking to journalists in Khabarovsk, the deputy chief of the Russian Ground Forces General Sergei Antonov noted that almost 1.5 thousand personnel are to take part in the exercise from both parties. From Russia – a motorized rifle battalion, a separate ground cavalry troop and other subdivisions of the Far Eastern military district.
The first two joint Sino-Soviet war games were Peace Mission 2005 and Peace Mission 2007. The two communist superpowers, with little fanfare, held their third combined military exercise Norak Antiterror 2009 in Tajikistan in April. A fifth joint drill, Peace Mission 2010, is slated to take place in Kazakhstan. Political and military coordination between Moscow and Beijing, per the 25-year-old predictions of KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, are occurring under the guise of “anti-terrorist” exercises and under the auspices of the SCO.
Blast from the Past File: North Korea: Moscow’s Baby
The Soviet Union gave birth to the DPRK in August 1945 when Moscow’s occupying forces took over the Korean Peninsula north of the 38th parallel. The Soviet Army established the Soviet Civil Authority to rule over the country. Communists were placed in key posts. Land was confiscated from Japanese owners and Korean collaborationists. Strategic industries were nationalized. In February 1946 a temporary government called the North Korean Provisional People’s Committee was organized under Kim Il Sung, who had trained with Soviet forces in Manchuria. Soviet troops vacated the DPRK in 1948, but Moscow has retained a vested interest in controlling North Korea–and no doubt the whole peninsula–since then.
Two years later, after forcing the Chinese Nationalists to flee for Taiwan, the People’s Liberation Army, with Soviet air support, invaded the Korean Peninsula. There the PLA was repulsed by US, Canadian, and allied troops under United Nations command. On October 8, 1950, the day after US troops crossed the 38th parallel, Chairman Mao Zedong issued the order to organize the People’s Volunteer Army (PVA). Seventy percent of the soldiers in the PVA were regulars from the PLA. Mao ordered the PVA/PLA to move to the Yalu River, in preparation for an invasion. Earlier that year, on June 27, President Harry Truman, fearing a two-pronged communist invasion, ordered the US Navy’s 7th Fleet to protect the Republic of China on Taiwan.
On October 15, Truman flew to Wake Island where he met General Douglas MacArthur, who estimated that the Chinese had mustered 300,000 soldiers in Manchuria, with between 100,000 and 125,000 men hard along the Yalu River. For his part, Mao cabled an urgent telegram to Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin: “If we allow the United States to occupy all of Korea, Korean revolutionary power will suffer a fundamental defeat, and the American invaders will run more rampant, and have negative effects for the entire Far East.” Soviet assistance was limited to providing air support no nearer than 60 miles from the battlefront. The Soviet pilots disguised their MiG-15s under the colors of the PRC and posed a serious challenge to UN pilots. The Korean War was the first in history where both sides employed jet-powered combat aircraft.
In late November 1950 the Red Chinese struck in the west, along the Chongchon River, overwhelming several South Korean divisions and crushing the flank of the remaining UN forces. Seoul was deserted and captured by communist troops on January 4, 1951, only to be recaptured by the US Eighth Army on March 7, the fourth time in a year the city had changed hands.
In April 1951 the Red Chinese launched their Fifth Phase Offensive, fielding an enormous 700,000 troops in three armies. UN forces resisted the communist offensive at the Imjin River and Kapyong, halting the PVA/PLA at a defensive line north of Seoul, referred to as the No-Name Line. A final communist offensive in the eastern part of the peninsula was halted on May 20. The US Eighth Army counterattacked and by the end of May had regained Line Kansas. The UN’s decision to stop at that line, just north of the 38th parallel, and to refrain from offensive action deeper into North Korea initiated a stalemate that characterized the conflict until the 1953 armistice. The rest, as they say, is history.
The Republic of China Armed Forces Simulates PLA Invasion
As Moscow and Beijing urge the UN to refrain from imposing more sanctions upon their client state North Korea, the Republic of China—the real China, otherwise known as Taiwan—and India are preparing for the eventuality of war with the PRC. On June 5, reports the APF news agency, ROC brass held a “virtual military exercise” that simulated an invasion of the island by 200,000 Communist Chinese troops. The drill, which was part of the annual Han Kuang war games, was executed entirely on computers in a Taipei military command center. President Ma Ying-jeou was in attendance. A scenario in which the PLA attempts to seize Taiwan’s leaders was scrapped from this year’s drill because of the improvement in cross-strait relations since Ma took office in May 2008. Beijing has repeatedly threatened to invade the island should Taipei declare formal independence.
India to Deploy New Russian-Built Fighter Jets, Additional 60,000 Troops along Eastern Sector of Indo-Chinese Border
On June 9 the Times of India related that Red Chinese military incursions into India rose “sharply” in 2008, with 270 violations recorded in the western, middle, and eastern border sectors. During the first five months of 2009, the PLA appears to have backed off somewhat, with a little over 60 violations occurring thus far. The brunt of “aggressive patrolling” by the Red Chinese has been witnessed in Ladakh, a region in India’s northwest Jammu and Kashmir state.
However, Chinese troops have also illegally strayed into Arunachal Pradesh which is located in India’s northeast. Beijing claims territory in this Indian state and thus the PLA incursions here have attracted greater attention in the Indian media. On June 6 the governor of Arunachal Pradesh, former chief of army staff General J.J. Singh, announced that two more army divisions consisting of 25,000 to 30,000 personnel each will be deployed along the Sino-Indian border in Arunachal Pradesh within a few years.
With the first squadrons of advanced Russian-built Sukhoi-30MKI fighter jets ready for forward deployment in the state of Assam, which is just to the south of Arunachal Pradesh, the Indian government, the Times of India admits, “is slowly responding to the uncertainties of Chinese intentions, by enhancing its state of preparedness in the area.” According to former air force chief Fali Homi Major, India will deploy a full squadron of these fighter jets in the eastern sector of the Sino-Indian border.
That the Communist Party of China is still committed to exporting Maoist revolution throughout southern Asia, including through India’s Naxalite rebels, is evident from a 2005 statement by CPC cadre Zhang Zheng at the MaoFlag website: “The Indian Government cannot succeed in suppressing the armed revolution of India’s Maoists” (quoted by South Asia Analysis Group, May 10, 2005).
Therefore, in spite of expanding bilateral commercial relations and even joint military drills, as well as India’s observer status in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, political tensions between New Delhi and Beijing continue to fester. India and the PRC fought a Himalayan border war in 1962. Last month, India’s incumbent air force chief admitted that the country faces a greater threat from China than Pakistan because “New Delhi knows little about Beijing’s combat capabilities.” A war between India and China, two countries that have split the atom, could conceivably escalate into nuclear warfare.
>Latin America File: Retired US State Dept. employee spied for Cuba for 30 years; Moscow resumes building Havana’s Cold War-era nuke plant
June 9, 2009Posted by on
>On June 3 the 39th General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) convened in Honduras, which is also a member of the Havana/Caracas-led Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas. The OAS agreed to readmit Cuba into its ranks, if Havana so desired. Cuba was expelled in 1962. At the OAS summit Nicaragua’s past/present dictator Daniel Ortega shilled for fellow commie thug Raul Castro. “Cuba has fought a battle, a heroic one for 50 years, facing many aggressions from the U.S.,” Comandante Ortega ranted, “that is why it deserves our recognition.”
For his part, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro insisted that “The revocation of the suspension of Cuba represents an assertion to Cuba, to its people, to Commander Fidel Castro and to the historical direction of the Revolution. We call for lifting the embargo against Cuba. It is a step more in favor of the regional integration.”
Pictured above: On June 3 in Havana, Cuban President Raul Castro welcomes Paraguayan counterpart, Fernando Lugo, the latest in a series of Latin American leftist leaders to consult in person with the hemisphere’s most dangerous communist.
In view of the Obama White House’s recent overtures of peace and love to KGB assets Raul and Fidel, it can be expected that Washington will not only warmly promote the OAS’s new accommodationist stance on Cuba, but also downplay or quash charges leveled against retired US State Department employee Walter Kendall Myers and spouse Gwendolyn. Husband and wife are accused of spying for Cuban intelligence for 30 years. The US Justice Department contends that the couple received coded messages via shortwave radio, rendezvoused with Cuban agents in Mexico (like former US Marine and KGB-trained assassin Lee Harvey Oswald), and carefully watched over their shoulders for any sign of US surveillance. Myers retired from the State Department in 2007.
Although a fitting conclusion to this sordid saga of communist espionage would be a re-application of the sentence applied to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, don’t hold your breath. Alternately, perhaps the Myers can join the Cuban Five in the same cell block, thereby forming the Cuban Seven and enjoying “solidarity” with the world’s communist press.
Notwithstanding the endorsements from Managua and Caracas and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s cautious ratification of the OAS resolution, Cuba itself remains adamant in its opposition to membership in the OAS. On June 8 Cuba’s foreign minister insisted that the communist state 90 miles south of Florida has no plans to return to the fold of that organization. “There is no discussion about Cuba’s reentry into the OAS,” Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez was quoted as saying in Granma, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party of Cuba. Rodriguez elaborated: “One way or another, the OAS is totally anachronistic; it serves other interests, and we feel that our path, Cuba’s path, is one of Latin American and Caribbean integration, without a presence from outside the continent.” For some reason, the OAS neglected to give the boot to Nicaragua and Venezuela, two countries with red regimes that barely tolerate organized opposition.
While it is possible that Cuba’s communist leadership is feigning disinterest in OAS membership, the fact is that Latin America’s Red Axis, as noted by Cuba’s foreign minister, has made great strides toward regional integration through transnational bodies such as ALBA, mentioned above, the Union of South American Nations, the South American Defense Council, the Caribbean Community, Petrocaribe, the Bank of the South, and TeleSur. Incidentally, the SADC only sets a common defense policy for South America’s nations and does not impose a unified military command over member states, as with NATO or NORAD. However, South America’s predominantly leftist leaders tout the SADC as a hemispheric counterweight to the North Atlantic Alliance.
Behind Cuba’s communist dictatorship, of course, lurks the neo-Soviet leadership, which under President/Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is once again openly aligned with its outpost in the Caribbean Basin. On May 27, reported Novosti, Moscow and Havana agreed to renew their cooperation in the construction of a nuclear plant in Cuba. The project was suspended in 1992 following the stage-managed collapse of Soviet communism. The participating agencies will be Rosatom and Cuba’s Nuclear Energy Agency. Rosatom chief Sergei Kiriyenko made the announcement during an awards ceremony in Moscow, where nuclear physicist Fidel Angel Castro Diaz-Balart, Fidel Castro’s son, received the Kurchatov Award.
“On behalf of the entire nuclear division,” gushed Kiriyenko, “I present the highest award…the Kurchatov Award, to Fidel Castro Diaz-Balart. Today, we will renew our cooperation at [Cuba’s] nuclear research center that will allow us to develop a number of directions in modern science.” Diaz-Balart, 59, is a member of Cuba’s Academy of Sciences and studied theoretical physics in the Soviet Union. In the 1980s he directed Cuba’s nuclear agency and oversaw the initial stages of construction of Havana’s n-plant. The agency conducts research not only in nuclear physics, but also biotechnology and nanotechnology. In light of this story, would one be presumptuous for speculating that Cuba’s ruling communists will utilize Russian nuke know-how in the pursuit of a tropical A-bomb? At the very least, joint Soviet-Cuban research and development projects provide “cover” for Moscow to insert agents into its Caribbean garrison.
US Officials, National Security Experts Fret over Russian SA-24 ManPADS in Venezuela, 600 Soviet-Era SA-7 SAMs in Nicaragua
Venezuela’s communist dictator Hugo Chavez is saying little in public about his country’s recent acquisition of Russia’s most deadly shoulder-fired, surface-to-air missile (SAM), the SA-24 Man-Portable Air Defense System (ManPADS). The silence from Caracas is prompting US government officials and national security experts to fret that these weapons could fall into the hands of Colombia’s Marxist guerrillas, with whom Chavez is closely and openly allied. “We are concerned about Venezuelan arms purchases that exceed its needs and are therefore potentially destabilizing,” US State Department spokesperson Sara Mangiaracina admitted, adding: “The Man-Portable Air Defense Systems Venezuela have purchased from Russia are sophisticated weapons systems. It is important that these weapons systems be appropriately controlled to avoid the possibility of diversion.’”
Financed by high oil prices, the Miami Herald relates, Chavez embarked on a weapons-buying spree in 2006, purchasing more than US$4 billion worth of Russian-built Sukhoi warplanes and helicopters and 100,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles to “professionalize” his 62,000-member armed forces. The low-maintenance SA-24 missile and launcher weigh 42 pounds, can take down targets flying as high as 19,500 feet, and features “fire and forget” and night-vision capabilities. The SA-27 can easily strike the Colombian government’s slow-moving, ground-attack warplanes. Previously, the only SAMs in use by the Venezuelan military were the pedestal-mounted Swedish RBS-70 and French Mistral.
On April 19 Chavez, in attendance at an annual military parade, halted marching troops in front of his reviewing stand to address a unit of 50 soldiers with shoulder-borne missiles. The Venezuelan president declared: “We have decided to make this brief halt in the parade to highlight the importance that this new unit has for the sovereignty and defense of the country.” Chavez then identified the weapons as SA-24s, boasting about their speed and weight. He continued his rant: “We are a peaceful country. The revolution is peaceful . . . We do not want war but we are required to be capable of defending ourselves.” Addressing President Chavez, the captain who commanded the SA-24 unit replied: “These missiles are part of the process of strengthening and transforming our revolutionary, anti-imperialist and socialist armed forces.”
‘”It’s been our position that we don’t consider Venezuela a military threat,” explained Colonel Bill Costello, spokesman for the US military’s Miami-based Southern Command. However, Costello admitted that “Weapons proliferation in the region poses a long-term threat to security, and any potential illegal transfer of such weapons to terrorist groups such as the FARC in Colombia remains a concern.’”
Venezuela’s Chief of Military Intelligence, Chief of Secret Police, and Former Interior Minister Facilitate Red Cocaine Flow in Collaboration with FARC
Last September the US Treasury Department accused three top officials in the Chavezista regime of aiding FARC with weapons, finances, and drug trafficking, thereby inadvertently exposing Red Venezuela’s role in the Communist Bloc’s five-decade narco-subversion plot against the West. The accused included former Venezuelan Interior Minister Ramon Rodríguez Chacín; General Hugo Carvajal, chief of Venezuela’s military intelligence; and General Henry Rangel Silva, chief of the Directorate of Intelligence and Prevention Services (DISIP), Venezuela’s secret police. In the 1980s, according to Joseph Douglas in Red Cocaine, Raul Castro, now president of Cuba, and Tomas Borge, then Nicaragua’s Maoist interior minister but now that country’s ambassador to Peru, played important roles in Moscow’s drug offensive against the capitalist countries. No doubt, they continue to do so.
US Treasury officials specifically accused of Chacín of facilitating FARC’s acquisition of weapons, describing him as Caracas’ “main weapons contact for the FARC.” They also alleged that Chacín assayed to facilitate a US$250 million loan from the Venezuelan government to FARC in late 2007. For their part, Generals Carvajal and Silva were accused of protecting FARC-linked drug shipments out of Colombia. The accusations were part of a move to freeze any assets these Venezuelan officials had in the United States. The US Treasury’s allegations were based on information gleaned from laptop computers seized on March 1, 2008 by Colombian security forces in an Ecuador-based FARC jungle camp. During the raid, Colombian troops killed FARC’s second-in-command Luis Edgar Devia, better known as Raul Reyes. President Chavez denied the content of the computer files, but Interpol examined the digital archives on Reyes’ laptop and concluded that they were not doctored.
One email between rebel commanders, dated January 4, 2007, revealed that Venezuelan military and FARC officials met and discussed “taking advantage of the Venezuelan arms purchases from Russia to include some containers’” for Colombia’s rebels. Another email stated that Chacín “suggested a mechanism for meeting with the Australians.’” A third email, dated September 6, 2007, discloses that FARC officials met with two Australian arms dealers who offered missiles and other weapons “at very favorable prices.” A fourth email reported that General Carvajal offered to deliver 20 bazookas to FARC. Several more referred to Chacín’s extension of the US$250 million loan. Finally, one email between rebel commanders showed that they “desperately” wanted ManPADs to counter the Colombian armed forces’ air supremacy: “The anti-aircraft weapons are already for us an urgent necessity.”
In like fashion Washington is bothered about President Ortega’s aging stockpile of 600, less-advanced, Soviet-built SA-7 man-portable SAMs. During the 1990s, when the Sandinista National Liberation Front did not openly rule Nicaragua, Managua voluntarily destroyed about 1,400 SA-7s, used against the Contra freedom fighters in the previous decade. US officials are still urging Ortega to dismantle the weapons so that they do not wind up in the hands of FARC, with which Nicaragua’s Marxist president, like Chavez, is in sympathy. “There is an offer that is still valid,” US ambassador Robert J. Callahan explained in a statement, adding: “In return for the destruction of 600 or so missiles, we are still very willing to give $5 million for the rehabilitation of the Children’s Hospital La Mascota in Managua.”
FMLN Regime Installed in San Salvador under Approving Gaze of Cuban Delegation; Paymaster Chavez Attends Funes-Sanchez Inauguration
As previously blogged here, El Salvador’s first-ever Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN) government is making the restoration of relations with Cuba top priority. A succession of military and rightist regimes in San Salvador maintained a diplomatic embargo against the communist island since the 1959 revolution. On May 31 Salvadoran Foreign Minister Hugo Martinez stated that President-Elect Mauricio Funes will officially announce the normalization of relations after he assumes his post on June 1. At the right time, Martinez added, the two countries will exchange ambassadors. Martinez also related to Cuba’s Prensa Latina that 20 heads of states confirmed attendance at the inauguration ceremony of Funes and Vice President-Elect Salvador Sanchez Ceren, the FMLN’s battlefield commander between 1984 and 1992. We strongly suspect that the FMLN’s hard-core Marxist leadership will exercise its influence upon the country primarily through Sanchez, while using former CNN journalist Funes as media-savvy PR man.
On June 1 Vice President Esteban Lazo led Cuba’s delegation at the Funes-Sanchez inauguration. At San Salvador’s international airport the Cuban delegation was received by the full political commission of the FMLN, headed by general coordinator Medardo González, and incoming VP Sanchez. Among the Cuban visitors were Jose Arbesu, deputy head of the International Relations Department of the Communist Party of Cuba, and Vice Foreign Ministers Alejandro Gonzalez, Rogelio Sierra, and Ramiro Abreu. Waving the FMLN flag, Salvadorans by the thousands lined the road to the international airport to welcome the Cuban visitors. They sang songs dedicated to Cuba and carried signs with messages of greeting to Fidel and Raul Castro. On June 2 the Cuban News Agency confirmed that after Funes’ installation as president, an accord establishing diplomatic relations between the two countries was inked by Salvadoran Foreign Minister Martinez and his Cuban counterpart, the apparently unrelated Alejandro Martinez.
Finally, the Salvadoran foreign minister confirmed that Funes met on May 31 with faux rightist Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Chile’s socialist president Michelle Bachelet, who is also president pro tempore of the Union of South American Nations. Both Calderon and Bachelet oppose the US embargo against Cuba. Martinize confirmed that Funes would hold talks with Venezuela’s communist dictator Chavez after the inaugural ceremony. As previously blogged here, President-Elect Funes flew to Caracas on May 19 to confer with Chavez. During the March election El Salvador’s new president was accused by the outgoing Nationalist Republican Alliance government of being in the pay of Chavez.
Chavez Confirms Ecuador’s Intention of Joining ALBA This Month; Last November Medvedev Expressed Russia’s Interest in Joining Bloc of Latin American Socialist States
For some years now, in fact, Venezuela’s top red thug has been skimming petrodollars from state-run PDVSA to finance the campaigns of ruling leftist politicians throughout Latin America, including Nicaragua’s Ortega, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa, and Argentina’s Cristina Kirchner, defeated leftist politicians like Panama’s Balbina Herrara, and defeated rightist politicians like Belize’s Said Musa. The official subsidies and shady sums from Chavez’s revolutionary coffers are directed through the Caracas-sponsored initiative Petrocaribe, as well as ALBA’s front companies. Although Panamanians put a halt to Latin America’s “Red Spread” last month by electing a supermarket magnate as president, El Salvador and Ecuador have most definitely fallen under the sway of the Havana-Caracas Axis.
Since socialist Correa was first elected to the presidency of Ecuador in 2005, Quito has hummed and hawed about integration into ALBA. On June 4, Cuba’s Prensa Latina quoted Chavez as saying that the absorption of the small South American nation into the regional Red Axis is now a done deal. Speaking on a television program on June 3, the Venezuelan dictator stated that President Correa has finally confirmed his country’s official integration into the regional bloc. Chavez explained that the official incorporation of Ecuador into ALBA will take place in Carabobo, Venezuela, on June 24 during an upcoming meeting of the group.
ALBA presently consists of Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Honduras, Dominica, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Correa was re-elected to the presidency in April, a victory that no doubt emboldened his attempts to link Ecuador’s destiny with the Havana-Caracas Axis. During his first-ever November trip to Venezuela, President Medvedev articulated Russia’s intention of joining ALBA, an admission that exposes the Soviet strategy of encircling America with socialist states, but which was totally overlooked by the brain-dead MSM. ALBA was founded in Havana on December 14, 2004.
Paraguay’s “Red Bishop” President Shrugs off Paternity Accusations, Makes Pilgrimage to Havana to Receive Unholy Orders
Shrugging off paternity accusations acquired during his stint as a liberationist Catholic bishop, Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo made his pilgrimage to Havana on June 3. Lugo is the latest in a procession of Latin American leftist leaders to receive unholy orders from Cuba’s communist dictatorship. Earlier this year, Chavez, Ortega, Correa, Kirchner, and Bachelet as obedient sons and daughters of “la revolucion,” paid homage to the Castro Bros., Raul and the cadaverous Fidel. Bolivian President Evo Morales is the most recent visitor to Havana’s all-inclusive gulag paradise.
Presidents Lugo and Castro held official talks at the Palace of the Revolution. The Cuban welcoming party also consisted of First Vice President Jose Ramon Machado Ventura, Health Minister Jose Ramon Balaguer, and Culture Minister Abel Prieto, all of whom are members of the CPC’s Politburo. During his first day in Cuba, Lugo laid a wreath at the monument of national hero Jose Marti. He also visited the Latin American School of Medicine in the Cuban capital. On Friday, June 5 Lugo departed for his homeland. While still under the government of the long-ruling conservative Colorado Party, Ascunsion established consular relations with Havana in 1996 and diplomatic relations in 1999.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: Russia’s top general Makarov details major army maneuvers to occur near Poland, Finland, and Georgia
June 6, 2009Posted by on
- Railway Troops Instrumental in Facilitating Re-Invasion of Georgia in August 2008
The Russian military plans to stage at least three major exercises between June and September of this year: Zapad 2009 on the territory of Belarus, abutting NATO member Lithuania and Warsaw Pact-turned-NATO member Poland; Ladoga 2009 in the Leningrad Military District, near Finland, which is not in the North Atlantic Alliance; and Kavkaz 2009 in the North Caucasus Military District, immediately to the north of Georgia, a “former” Soviet republic that aspires to NATO ranks. Pictured above, Nikolai Makarov, chief of the Russian General Staff, outlined the maneuvers for Novosti:
This year we will start a series of large-scale drills in line with current military reforms. During the Zapad [West] large-scale exercises on September 8-29, we will deploy two full-sized armies in Belarus. The exercises will, among other things, rehearse interoperability within the framework of the Belarusian-Russian integrated air defense system, which the two countries agreed to establish recently. In addition to the Zapad exercises, we will conduct two large-scale drills and a brigade-level exercise on our own territory, which will involve units from three military districts and three fleets.
The last Zapad exercise took place in 1999 and before that, in the days of overt communism, 1981, when Soviet forces carried out a mock amphibious attack on Polish territory.
Inadvertently suggesting a possible window of opportunity for thrusting deeper into Georgian territory and seizing the capital Tbilisi, Makarov said: “On June 29-July 10 we will conduct a large-scale exercise involving all brigades of the North Caucasus military district, the Black Sea Fleet and the Caspian Flotilla.” It was under cover of the Caucasus Frontier 2008 drill that Russia positioned its military assets for the August invasion of Georgia that year.
As we suspected in a previous post, Ladoga 2009 will take place in northwestern Russia, which includes Lake Ladoga. Makarov explained: “From August 10 to September 28, all units of the Leningrad military district, and several units of the Siberian military district, the Northern Fleet and the Baltic Fleet will take part in the Ladoga exercises.” Ladoga, the world’s 14th largest freshwater lake, was once owned by both Finland and the Soviet Union, but after the Winter War became an internal basin of Russia. Further Soviet aggression against Finland in this region took place during the Continuation War.
Significantly, Makarov relates that a total of 60,000 military personnel will join all three drills. On May 19 a digest of the Russian media, citing the Russian Defense Ministry, reported that railway troops will take part in both Zapad 2009 and Ladoga 2009. Pavel Felgenhauer writes of the Russian army’s use of railway troops in advance of the re-invasion of Georgia in August 2008, :
On May 31, Railroad troops were moved to repair the tracks south of Sokhumi to prepare the infrastructure for the invasion. On July 30, they completed their work and all was set for major combat in August, since later bad weather would impede an invasion (see EDM, June 12, July 30). The West seems to have dismissed the Russian warnings and preparations as bluff until it was too late.
In view of the Kremlin’s planned and previous military and civil defense preparations, one is inclined to pose the question: After grinding Georgia into the ground, are the Soviets preparing to re-invade and re-occupy their former satellites, especially Poland and the Baltic republics?
The Soviets Talk Peace while Modernizing Strategic Nuclear Strike Capability
Since the Russian military’s combat readiness can only be determined from open sources, it is very probable that some or much of the information cited here is either not entirely accurate or pure propaganda in line with the long-range Soviet deception. Still, the general impression that Western analysts such as your resident blogger acquire from sources like the Kremlin website, the Russian Ministry of Defense website, Novosti, Itar-Tass, Russia Today, and independent media outlets like the Moscow Times is that the Soviet “military kit” is aging, but undergoing a vigorous modernization in terms of weapons and delivery systems, wide-ranging reforms in terms of command and control, and integration with the armed forces of other states in the Collective Security Treaty Organization.
The Russian armed force’s logistical and technological failures during the Caucasian War last year were an important “wake up call” to Russia’s largely “ex”-communist political elites. “It seems the main drive of the Russian invasion was Georgia’s aspiration to join NATO, while the separatist problem was only a pretext,” opines Felgenhauer at the link above, adding: “Georgia occupies a key geopolitical position, and Moscow is afraid that if George joins NATO, Russia will be flushed out of Transcaucasia.” Thus, we see that the Soviets are still serious about confronting NATO, an organization against which President Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin have directed much invective.
The Russian Defense Ministry, consequently, plans to throw 40% of this year’s US$42.5 billion budget at the navy, particularly on the development of strategic nuclear forces. “This money is mainly directed to strategic submarines. This is hundreds of billions of rubles,” Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said in an interview with Novosti. Russia is currently building a fourth-generation Graney attack submarine and three Borey-class submarines, Yury Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky, and Vladimir Monomakh. Russia is planning to build a total of eight submarines of this class by 2015. Ivanov continued: “Upon completion, the submarines will be deployed both with the Northern and Pacific fleets, which will require $1 billion investment to create the appropriate coastal infrastructure.”
Ivanov admitted that the Bulava SLBM will be adopted by the navy only jointly with its delivery platform, Yury Dolgoruky. The three-stage Bulava-M (SS-NX-30) carries up to 10 nuclear warheads and has a range of 8,000 kilometers (5,000 miles). The Russian Navy intends to test-launch at least five Bulava missiles in 2009. Previous tests of this delivery vehicle have had mixed results.
The Russian Navy is anxious to commission the Borey and Graney classes since only eight of the country’s 12 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines are apparently combat-capable. “Out of 12 vessels, Northern Fleet’s Typhoon class Dmitry Donskoi submarine has been overhauled to test new Bulava sea-based ballistic missiles, six Delta-IV class units are being refitted with modernized version of the R-29RM (SS-N-23) missile, known as Sineva, and five Delta-III class submarines are deployed with the Pacific Fleet,” explains Mikhail Barabanov, editor-in-chief of the Moscow Defense Brief magazine. He added that two Typhoon-class submarines, Arkhangelsk and Severstal, are parked at a naval base in Severodvinsk in Arctic Russia, but they are not fitted with missiles and require further repairs. In addition, the Russian Navy maintains about 30 nuclear-powered attack subs equipped with either SS-N-19 Shipwreck long-range anti-ship cruise missiles or torpedo tubes, but only 17 of them are operational.
Negotiating America’s Capitulation to the Red World Order
The frantic pace of the neo-Soviet military build-up is taking place under the deceptive cover of a new strategic arms reduction deal to replace the START 1 treaty, which expires in December 2009. According to a report published by the US State Department in April, as of January 1 Russia had 3,909 nuclear warheads and 814 delivery vehicles, including ICBMs, SLBMs, and ALCMs. The same report said the United States had 5,576 warheads and 1,198 delivery vehicles.
A draft of the new treaty may be ready before US President Barack Obama’s first-ever visit to Moscow on July 6-8, a Russian presidential spokesentity acknowledged this past Tuesday. “We are working on it,” Natalia Timakova said. The team negotiating the US surrender to the Soviet communists is Assistant US Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller, while the Russian delegation is headed by Anatoly Antonov, director of the Foreign Ministry’s Department of Security and Disarmament. The first session of “full-format” negotiations was held in Moscow on May 19-21. Negotiators from both camps agreed to submit a draft treaty at a US-Russian summit in Moscow in early July. The second round of talks is currently being held in Geneva.
The Kremlin media frankly concedes that the neo-Soviet leadership has no plans whatsoever for slashing its nuclear stockpile as long as Washington’s intentions for missile defense shield in Poland and the Czech Republic remain “unclear.” Actually, there’s no ambiguity with respect to Washington’s relationship with Warsaw: interceptor missiles will be deployed in Poland by year’s end.
Incidentally, if the Soviets were more candid then the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department of Security and Disarmament would be better named as the Department of Soviet Security and US Disarmament.
Calling Rambo: Soviets Stirring the Pot Again in Afghanistan
In the third installment of the First Blood series of movies, actor Sylvester Stallone, portraying Vietnam War veteran Rambo, blasted his way through occupying Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Although Moscow withdrew the last of its forces in February 1989, around the same time Rambo III was released, the Kremlin is still exerting influence in its Cold War-era stomping grounds, Afghanistan, now occupied by NATO troops. Moscow plans to deliver humanitarian assistance, including flour and medicine, to Kabul by way of 50 Kamaz trucks and two Mi-8 helicopters, respectively.
“In July-August we plan to dispatch to Afghanistan 50 Kamaz trucks which will be used to deliver humanitarian aid to the country,” related Yuri Brazhnikov, who heads the international cooperation department of the Russian Ministry of Civil Defence, Emergency Situations and Disasters. The long-time chief of Russian civil defense is Sergei Shoigu, the son-in-law of Oleg Shenin, Stalinist mastermind of the potemkin anti-Gorbachevist coup of August 1991. Russia, Novosti notes, delivered 18,000 tons of flour to Afghanistan between January and April. The flour is being delivered within the context of the United Nations World Food Program. “This humanitarian operation is unprecedented in its size compared with other operations that Russia carried out in Afghanistan,” Brazhnikov boasted.
>Asia File: N. Korean ICBM arrives at Dongchang-ri launch site; Pyongyang doubles ammunition for patrol ships, holds live-fire, amphibious attack drill
June 2, 2009Posted by on
>The Korea Times reports today that “An object presumed to be an ICBM was recently transported by train to the Dongchang-ri missile site, a newly-built long-range missile site located on North Korea’s western coast, according to authorities.” Last September, South Korea’s Defense Minister Lee Sang-hee admitted that North Korea had almost completed a new missile base in the North Pyeongan Province. The Korea Times opines: “Observers expect North Korea to conduct an ICBM test-firing near the middle of this month when the South Korea-U.S. summit takes place in Washington, in a bid to further ratchet up tension on the peninsula and add pressure on U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration.”
Pictured above: South Korean Marines patrol a beach on the Republic of Korea’s western Yeonpyong Island, near the disputed sea border with communist North Korea, on Tuesday, June 2, 2009.
The same news source quotes Hwang Jin-ha, a retired South Korean major general and lawmaker associated with the ruling rightist Grand National Party, as saying: “As it did before, North Korea will weigh in much on political impacts before provocative acts. I believe that would be the case this time.” North Korea’s Taepodong-2 missile is believed to have a striking radius of between 4,000 and 6,700 kilometers, thus placing Alaska within its sights. However, Hwang holds the opinion that the North has not yet fully mastered the technology required to successfully launch an ICBM or miniaturize a nuclear warhead to mount on a long-range missile. On April 5 North Korea fired a rocket from the Musudan-ri site, located in the country’s northwest, which was widely perceived as a disguised test of the Taepodong-2 missile. The rocket splashed down in the Pacific Ocean about 3,000 kilometers after launch.
In a related development, reports the Korea Times, “the North also banned [civilian] ships from waters off its west coast until the end of July, an apparent sign of a further provocation near the sea border.” Citing an unidentified South Korean government official, Yonhap news agency reported that “North Korea has strengthened its military training exercises near the western sea border [on the Yellow Sea]. Intelligence shows that the North has also conducted amphibious attack exercises, using high-speed landing vessels.”
When the next Korean hot war begins in earnest, be assured that Moscow and Beijing will be totally committed to a communist victory, even if that policy is not apparent or admitted in the early stages of the military campaign.
>End Times File: Moscow, Tehran coordinate naval deployments in Persian Gulf, Gulf of Aden; Muslims: Netanyahu supports Third Temple construction
May 30, 2009Posted by on
>For Bible prophecy enthusiasts events in the Middle East portend key tribulation period events, including the Magog-Persian-Arab invasion of Israel, the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem, and the formation of a Palestinian terrorist “statelet.” The physical translation of born-again Christians to heaven will likely take place weeks and months before this prophetic scenario unfolds.
Pictured above: Golden menorah to be used in Third Temple worship services.
Many Bible scholars rightly identify Magog as Russia or the “former” Soviet Union. Moscow’s disdain for Israel and infatuation with the Palestinians (“Philistines”) originates in the anti-Semitism that has historically plagued Russia and which was manifested in the production of the nefarious “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin’s contrived “Jewish Doctors’ Plot” and, following the “collapse” of communism, in the politically motivated legal attacks against the country’s high-profile Jewish oligarchs. Most recently, Russia’s opposition to Israel originates in the latter’s military support for the “former” Soviet republic of Georgia, the “Israel of the Caucasus.”
In connection with Iran’s determination to wipe Israel off the map with Moscow’s nuclear “know how,” Debkafile reports that Russia has for the first time acquired a “maritime foothold” in the Persian Gulf by way of taking on fuel and provisions at Omani and Bahraini ports previously open only to the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet:
Russian warships are due to call Wednesday, May 27, at the Bahrain port of Manama, seat of the US Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf, DEBKAfile’s military sources reveal. They will be following in the wake of the Russian vessels already docked at the Omani port of Salalah, the first to avail themselves of facilities at Gulf ports.
Their arrival is fully coordinated between the Russian and Iranian naval commands. According to our sources, this is the first time a Russian flotilla will have taken on provisions and fuel at the same Gulf ports which hitherto serviced only the US Navy. Moscow has thus gained its first maritime foothold in the Persian Gulf.
The flotilla consists of four vessels from Russia’s Pacific Fleet: The submarine fighter Admiral Panteleyev is due at Manama Wednesday, escorted by the refueling-supply ship Izhorai. The supply-battleship Irkut and the rescue craft BM-37 are already docked in Salalah.
DEBKAfile opines: “[M]ilitary sources report that the Russians, like the Iranians, cover their stealthy advance into new waters by apparent movements for joining the international task force combating Somali pirates.” This is what we have been saying for several months in our reports about the Russian Navy’s participation in the United Nations-sanctioned anti-piracy flotilla near Somalia. On May 26 President Nicolas Sarkozy, during a one-day visit to the United Arab Emirates, formally inaugurated a 900-foot quay allocated to the French Navy in Abu Dhabi’s Zayed Port, a French air force installation at the Dhafra Air Base near the city, and a downtown military barracks for several hundred French soldiers. Russia will no doubt use France’s military new permanent presence in the Persian Gulf to justify its own geopolitical maneuvers.
While the Russian Navy sails unopposed into the Persian Gulf, the Iranian navy is taking up positions in the Gulf of Aden, near the entrance to the Red Sea and neo-communist Eritrea, where Tehran has reportedly deployed ballistic missiles, presumably targeted against Israel to the north.
On Monday, May 25, the Iranian naval chief, Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, announced that six Iranian warships had been dispatched to “the international waters” of the Gulf of Aden in a “historically unprecedented move… to show its ability to confront any foreign threats.” He did not bother to mention the pirates. Russian and Iranian naval movements in the two strategic seas are clearly synchronized at the highest levels in Tehran and Moscow.
Fox News confirms Iran’s naval deployment in the Gulf of Aden, quoting Jim Phillips, senior fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Heritage Institute: “What’s very important here is the timing of this move — and this naval muscle flexing comes after Iran’s missile test earlier this week, which was saber rattling that was meant to send the same signal as this naval dispatch.” It should be pointed out, too, that Russian and Iranian naval movements in the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Aden are “clearly synchronized” with Pyongyang’s saber rattling on the Korean Peninsula.
Meanwhile, Israeli Islamists have got their headdress in a twist over the rumor that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intends to sanction the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple, historically located on the Temple Mount but long desecrated by the Dome of the Rock shrine and the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Speaking at a conference in Qatar, Sheikh Raad Salah, leader of the Northern Wing of the Islamic Movement in Israel, ranted: “Netanyahu is about to build the false Temple and the Jews will only build the Temple upon the ruins of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The solution to the threat against Jerusalem is a complete mobilization of the Arab world, including the religious imams, who need to act and recruit the masses.”
According to Bible prophecy a Third Temple will stand briefly on the Temple Mount, only to be defiled by “that man of sin” (2 Thessalonians 2:3), Israel’s coming false Messiah-King, the Gentilized Jewish leader of the revived Roman Empire. Orthodox Jews are in fact in an advanced state of readiness to ascend the Temple Mount and reinstate the bloody animal sacrifices of the Levitical worship system. Two things are stopping them: the “rapture of the church” and a certain seven-year covenant with the “many,” brokered by the “prince that shall come” (Daniel 9:26) has yet to come into effect. Yeshua Ha’Mashiach referred to this imposter in John 5:43 when He said: ” I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.”
Finally, almost the entire world, as represented by the Middle East Diplomatic Quartet, is resolved to wrest territory from Israel in order to appease the Palestinian Arabs. The Global Islamic Caliphate, however, will not be satiated by territorial concessions, but only by the blood of every Jew and Christian on the planet.
>WW4 File: Russia fears Korean conflict could go nuclear, takes “precautionary security measures”; US, S. Korean WATCHCON level boosted, DEFCON stable
May 29, 2009Posted by on
On Thursday Itar-Tass quoted a Russian Foreign Ministry official as saying that his country is taking “precautionary security measures” because the Kremlin believes that international tensions over Communist North Korea’s May 25 nuclear test, the second in less than three years, “could descend into nuclear war.” Reuters picked up the Itar-Tass interview in which the anonymous source raised the spectre of atomic war and then promptly backtracked:
The need has emerged for an appropriate package of precautionary measures. We are not talking about stepping up military efforts but rather about measures in case a military conflict, perhaps with the use of nuclear weapons, flares up on the Korean Peninsula. We assume that a dangerous brinkmanship, a war of nerves, is under way, but it will not grow into a hot war. Restraint is needed.
Seoul’s full participation in the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative, which entails interdicting weapons of mass destruction on the high seas, earned Pyongyang’s wrath earlier this week, prompting its second underground nuke test and at least three missile test-launches.
Also on Thursday South Korea’s armed forces and the 28,500 US troops stationed in the Republic of Korea boosted their surveillance to the second highest level for the first time since October 2006, when the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea conducted its first nuclear test. The so-called WATCHCON system has five stages and the new heightened alert entails the deployment of more intelligence assets and enhanced reconnaissance operations “over” North Korea, presumably meaning aerial and satellite surveillance. South Korean defense spokesman Won Tae-jae insisted, however, that the five-stage combat alert level, DEFCON remains at four.
South Korean military authorities, according to the Korean Times, believe there is a high possibility that North Korea could soon provoke conflicts near the Northern Limit Line (NLL) in the West Sea, or Sea of Japan, where two bloody naval battles occurred between the two Koreas in 1999 and 2002. The NLL, drawn up by the United Nations Command at the end of the 1950-53 Korean War, has served as the de facto inter-Korean sea border. The North, however, does not recognize this boundary. The Republic of Korea’s navy has deployed a 3,500-ton KDX-I light destroyer off the country’s west coast to counter a possible attack by North Korean patrol ships.
The South Korean army has increased the number of K-9 howitzers and surface-to-air missile systems on islands near the sea border to counter potential North Korean artillery attacks. Pyongyang is reported to have hidden thousands of weapons in mountain caves and tunnels near the inter-Korean land and sea borders. The North Korean army has eight 27-kilometer-range 130 mm guns and eight other 76.2 mm artillery units with a range of 12 kilometers on islands located just north of the NLL. Pyongyang is also reported to be deploying about 100 152 mm howitzer guns with a range of 17 kilometers near the port of Haeju.
“I cannot elaborate, but we are constantly bolstering equipment,” a South Korean military official told the Korean Times, adding: “We are also devising a range of countermeasures in accordance with scenarios on North Korea’s provocative action.”
South Korea’s Yonhap news agency reported on Friday morning that North Korea test-fired its sixth short-range missile since the beginning of the week. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates, however, denied that the situation had reached “crisis levels” and there had been “no unusual moves” by the North Korean military since Monday’s nuclear test. “I don’t think there is a need for us to reinforce our military presence in the South,” Gates soothed, adding: “Should the North Koreans do something extremely provocative militarily, then we have the forces to deal with it.”
Despite the Kremlin’s blather about “restraint,” a new Korean hot war, which would tie down a good chunk of the US military in the Western Pacific theatre, would provide the Moscow-Beijing Axis and its allies in the Collective Security Treaty Organization and Shanghai Cooperation Organization ideal cover to launch preemptive strikes against NATO countries. Specifically, a surprise Soviet missile assault against the USA, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France could be followed by armoured thrusts by land into “former” Soviet Bloc states like Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, “former” Soviet republics like the Baltic countries, Ukraine, and Georgia, and neutral countries like Finland.
A “neutral, socialist” federal Europe, as predicted by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn 25 years ago, would offer only token resistance to the Soviet re-occupation of Eastern and Central Europe. Faux rightist regimes with entangling military-commercial alliances with Moscow, such as those found among NATO’s Mediterranean members like Italy, Greece, and Turkey, would no doubt capitulate. A new Korean hot war could also be accompanied by a Red Chinese invasion of Taiwan, and a combined thrust into Thailand by communist troops from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
The above scenario could occur in the near future if circumstances suddenly became favourable to the Soviet strategists, but more likely in several years, after Russia completes its military modernization program.
>Asia File: North Korea dumps 1953 armistice, threatens to attack South over US-led Proliferation Security Initiative; detonates 2nd nuclear device
May 27, 2009Posted by on
>Over the past week tensions have once again risen on the Korean Peninsula, where Crazy Kim’s communist nuthouse– otherwise known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, a Stalinist regime backed by Moscow, Beijing, former US attorney general Ramsey Clark, and the lobotomized Marxists in the US-based Workers’ World Party–is once again threatening to blow up the world for some misguided cause called “proletarian revolution.”
Pictured above: South Korean soldiers look at the North Korean side of the Demilitarized Zone at Dora Observation Post, near the border village of Panmunjom, on May 27, 2009.
Earlier today the official media of North Korea warned that the communist regime was no longer bound by the provisions of the 1953 armistice that ended the Korean War. Pyongyang’s pretext for saber rattling was the Republic of Korea’s participation in the US-led Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), which entails the interdiction of ships suspected of smuggling weapons of mass destruction. The DPRK’s role in WMD smuggling is disputed, but the Stalinist regime regularly ships missiles and parts to terrorist states like Iran, Syria, and Libya.
North Korea’s official media retaliated by stating that the leadership of the Korean Workers’ Party could no longer guarantee the safety of vessels off the peninsula’s west coast, in the Sea of Japan. It also ranted that the PSI was “tantamount” to a declaration of war. “Any tiny hostile acts against our republic, including the stopping and searching of our peaceful vessels… will face an immediate and strong military strike in response,” Pyongyang’s military representative at the border truce village of Panmunjom spluttered. For good measure he added: “Our military will no longer be bound by the armistice accord as the current US leadership… has drawn the puppets [meaning South Korea] into the PSI.” One wonders if “tiny hostile acts” includes negative comments about Kimmy’s hair-do and wardrobe.
The violent blast of rhetoric from the North Korean capital comes hard on the heels of the country’s detonation of a second nuclear device this past Monday. Russia’s Defense Ministry confirmed that North Korea did in fact conduct an underground nuclear test on May 25. “According to our data, North Korea indeed conducted a nuclear test in the northeast of the country on Monday morning,” a ministry spokesentity intoned to Novosti. Pyongyang withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003 and conducted its first nuclear test in October 2006.
“The information on North Korea’s nuclear test causes concern but before we draw any final conclusions it should be thoroughly checked,” Russian defense ministry officials said dismissively. According to Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, the UN Security Council held an emergency meeting later that day to discuss the North Korean provocation. Churkin presently holds the council’s rotating presidency. The Russian Federation, like its predecessor state, the Soviet Union, is a permanent member of this body.
Following the nuke test, reports Novosti at the link above, Pyongyang test-fired a ground-to-air missile with a range of 80 miles (130 kilometers) from its northeastern Musudan-ri launch site. This was followed on Tuesday by the launch of two more short-range missiles into the western Pacific Ocean. North Korea has threatened for several weeks to resume work at its Yongbyon nuclear facility, which produces weapons-grade plutonium, after bailing out from the largely useless six-party talks. The move came in response to international condemnation of a failed April 5 rocket launch, which Pyongyang insisted was carrying a harmless communications satellite.
North Korea is banned from nuclear and ballistic activities under UN Security Council Resolution 1718, passed in 2006 after the North’s first nuclear test, and is already subject to various international sanctions. However, neo-Soviet officialdom is loath to pass another resolution against Pyongyang on account of its Russian-built nuclear program. “In any case it is counterproductive to raise the question of the DPRK’s international isolation. The path to dialogue should not be disrupted, and the problem can be solved only in political and diplomatic ways,” an unidentified Russian official huffed to Itar-Tass.
Like the Islamo-Nazi regime in Iran, North Korea enjoys Russia’s benevolent oversight. And so advances the Soviet tactic of creating political-military “hot spots” and “flash points” around the world to divert the attention of Western governments away from Moscow and Beijing’s own preparations for the Fourth World War.
>Latin America File: Chavez to make ninth trip to Russia, El Salvador’s new FMLN president dutifully troops to Caracas, Ecuador eyes full ALBA role
May 27, 2009Posted by on
Hugo Chavez, Venezuela’s president and arguably the second most dangerous commie thug in the Western Hemisphere, after Raul Castro, intends to make his ninth official trip to Moscow in the second half of June. El Universal states that this is Comrade Hugo’s sixth trip, but by our reckoning Chavez has actually averaged about one trip to Russia per year since his inauguration in 1999. After conferring with his handler, KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin, Chavez will sashay on over to St. Petersburg where he will attend the Russian-Venezuelan committee for cooperation and planning of joint projects.
This past Monday, strategic partners Chavez and Putin, both of whom along with Noam Chomsky are committed to the destruction of “US unipolar hegemony,” conversed by telephone and set the agenda for their upcoming meeting. According to the AFP and Itar-Tass news agencies, the two leaders discussed bilateral military-technical, energy, financial, and economic cooperation. Chavez dutifully related to Putin his May 24 encounter with Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa (see below) and planned encounter with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, two Soviet allies, as well as his meeting this week with the foreign ministers of the socialist states of the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA), to which Moscow has expressed an interest in joining. (“Earth to shopping mall regime. Earth to shopping mall regime. Heeellooo, anyone there?”)
Venezuela and Russia held their first-ever joint naval drill in the southern Caribbean Sea last November and later this year are scheduled to hold another combined naval drill in the North Sea, as well as joint air force exercises, presumably in the skies over Venezuela. Last September, in another “post”-Cold War “first,” the Russian Air Force dispatched two supersonic Blackjack bombers to Venezuela for a week-long regimen of maneuvers, as above, over the southern Caribbean. According to the Kremlin media, Russia’s bomber pilots were acquainting themselves with combat in a tropical climate. That’s nice. No worries, mate. Nothing to see here, move along.
Caracas-San Salvador Axis: New Communist on the Bloc
During El Salvador’s March general election, the long-ruling Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA) government accused Mauricio Funes, presidential candidate of the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN), of being in the pay of the Chavezista regime. Although such accusations were stridently denied, it should not be surprising that President-Elect Funes has already made his pilgrimage to the Red Mecca in Caracas. Funes and Chavez are pictured above at Miraflores Palace in Caracas on May 19. In much the same fashion, Paraguay’s leftist president Fernando Lugo, before his formal installation, also flew to the Venezuelan capital to confer with Chavez. Lugo is profiled below.
High on Funes’ agenda was the subsidized oil supply that Venezuela is already funneling to El Salvador via the mayor’s office in San Salvador, which is also controlled by the FMLN, and a joint venture set up by ALBA and called ALBANISA. FMLN party leader Medardo Gonzalez informed Cuba’s Prensa Latina that Venezuela will increase its current oil supply to El Salvador by 10,000 barrels per day. It is expected that El Salvador will, after many years of ARENA’s opposition to Soviet influence in the region, seek membership in the communist-dominated ALBA.
President-Elect Funes, a former correspondent for CNN’s Spanish service, has stated that FMLN cadres, many of whom are veterans of the 1980-1992 civil war, will have a “visible presence” in El Salvador’s new government and that this is “logical.” Funes’ vice president, Salvador Sanchez Ceren, was formerly the FMLN’s battlefield commander who sanctioned numerous assassinations, which means he is a hardened communist revolutionary. Journalist John Thomson, writing for the Hispanic American Center for Economic Research, asserts that Sanchez’s low profile during the election was not accidental:
Veteran local journalist Lafitte Fernandez is one of several with whom I spoke who believe the heretofore unknown role of Sanchez Ceren will be a major issue, once the story becomes widely known. “Sanchez has been practically out of sight, ever since he was nominated,” Mr. Fernandez observed. “They want the presidential candidate, Mauricio Funes, to be the FMLN face, this time, unlike previous elections when the top of the ticket was always a senior terrorist officer.”
Caracas-Quito Axis: Chavez and His “Mini Me” Correa
El Salvador is not the only Latin American leftist country seeking admission to ALBA. On May 24, while hosting Chavez in Ecuador’s national capital of Quito, recently re-elected socialist President Correa announced that his country intends to secure full membership in the organization. Thus far, the ALBA bloc of nations consists of Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Dominica, and Honduras, and serves as a socialist vehicle to resist the “imperialist” designs of the Washington-led Organization of American States, Free Trade Agreement of the Americas, and the Dominican Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement. Chavez and his Ecuadorean “mini me” signed five cooperation agreements on energy, mining, tourism, agriculture, and banking.
“With these agreements, Liberator Simon Bolivar’s dream of working on the construction of a large homeland comes true,” Correa enthused, referring to the nineteenth-century South American liberal revolutionary, who would have probably condemned communism, then in its infancy. The Ecuadorean president, in the presence of his Venezuelan protector, announced that state-run Petroleos de Venezuela plans to begin construction of a US$10-billion oil refinery on Ecuador’s Pacific coast by 2010.
Moscow-Managua Axis: Cold War-Era Linkages Revived Amidst New Round of Political Repression
On May 18 Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega praised Russia for its donation of 130 buses to alleviate the country’s public transit problems. “Brotherly Russia helped us, without any political or economic conditions,” Ortega gushed at a ceremony in the country’s capital, Managua. In September, Nicaragua became the only country other than Russia to recognize the independence of the separatist Georgian republics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. “The Russian and Nicaraguan people are connected by the long, strong bonds of friendship, and the buses are just one more vivid confirmation of this,” intoned Russia’s consul in Nicaragua, Igor Kondrashev, who was also present at the ceremony. The buses were provided by GAZ Group, Oleg Deripaska’s financially troubled company. The Russian-built buses will be used on suburban routes connecting Managua with regional cities. Incidentally, oligarch Deripaska is buddy buddies with Russian Prime Minister Putin.
This is only the beginning of many bilateral projects planned by Managua and Moscow, as we have blogged previously. Others include replacing Nicaragua’s Soviet-era military hardware with new combat and troop transport helicopters; the rehabilitation of the Soviet-built, never-used, nuclear bomber-capable air base at Punta Huete; the dredging of a deep-water port at Monkey Point on Nicaragua’s anarchic, cocaine-drenched Caribbean coast; and the construction of geothermal energy plants, to be named “Che Guevara” and “Hugo Chavez.”
On the domestic front, Nicaragua’s liberal opposition is coalescing behind the country’s non-governmental organizations (NGOs), which have declared that they will resist the neo-Sandinista regime’s attempt to quash dissent. The leaders of the Nicaraguan Human Rights Center (CENIDH), Federation of Non-Governmental Organizations, and Civil Coordinating Committee released this manifesto to reporters this past Saturday. They singled out the Interior Ministry as spearheading the charge against freedom in Nicaragua, much as the Sandinista Interior Minister Tomas Borge (now Nicaragua’s ambassador to Peru), targeted anti-communists in the 1980s.
CENIDH director Bayardo Izaba noted that ever since the government of President Arnoldo (“Fatso”) Aleman (1997-2002), there have been official attempts to control the activities of NGOs. In 2001 Aleman entered into a sordid agreement with Ortega called El Pacto, the purpose of which was to lock out smaller parties from power while handing control of the levers of state exclusively to the Sandinista National Liberation Front and the Liberal Constitutionalist Party (PLC). Beginning with Ortega’s re-inauguration as president in January 2007, the neo-Sandinista regime has turned on its former allies in the PLC in order to vanquish all opposition.
Comandante Ortega is also determined to control the pace and direction of Central American integration via his pro tempore presidency over the Central American Integration System (SICA). On Monday Nicaragua’s Vice Foreign Minister Manuel Coronel Kautz insisted that the rotating leadership of SICA should be passed to Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom instead of Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, who is slated to take over in July. Unlike Arias, Colom, Guatemala’s first social democratic president in five decades, is more energetic in his leftist commitments and his pro-Cuban orientation. Arias has shunned all SICA meetings held over the past half-year, three of which convened in Managua.
“We can’t afford to put Central American integration at risk,” Coronel opined to the Nica Times. Costa Rica, the English-language news source points out, has been the least receptive Central American country to regional integration, refusing to join the Central American Court of Justice, the Central American Parliament, and the CA-4 immigration initiative. Venezuelan strongman Chavez has not hesitated to express his disdain for Arias, who spearheaded the Esquipulas Peace Agreement that ended Central America’s civil wars of the 1980s. “My experience is that these meetings are not good; the agendas are not made to address the principal problems facing Central American countries,” retorted Arias in statements published in the Costa Rican daily La Prensa Libre. Nicaragua’s neo-Sandinista regime, however, has interpreted President Arias’ stance as a personal insult against President Ortega, who has over the last six months set the SICA agenda.
It should be observed that Latin America’s Red Axis is using ALBA, SICA, the Caribbean Community, and the Union of South American Nations, as well as regional institutions like the South American Defense Council (a counterweight to NATO), the Bank of the South (a counterweight to the World Bank and the IMF), and TeleSur (a counterweight to the not-so-leftist North America media), to transform the Western Hemisphere into a regional socialist monolith under Moscow’s tutelage.
Catholic-Communist Cohabitation in Paraguay (In More Ways than One)
Meanwhile, Paraguay’s first-ever leftist president, Fernando Lugo, has admitted that he fathered a child out of wedlock. The boy is now two years old. Big deal, right? Ahem, Lugo was a Catholic cleric, under a vow of celibacy, when his relationship with a female parishoner became a little too friendly. Two other women have come forward to claim he is the father of their sons. Lugo has meekly agreed to submit to a DNA test. He calls clerical celibacy a “flawed” institution. Indeed.
In a related story, President Lugo dismissed the chiefs of Paraguay’s army, navy, and engineering corps for permitting 800 Marxist youth from across Latin America to host a three-day congress at a military facility, in early May. While Lugo refused to comment on the dismissals, opposition leaders called on the president to also sack two government ministers who allegedly sponsored the gathering, namely, Youth Minister Karina Rodriguez and National Emergency Minister Camilo Soares. Although Paraguay was perceived as a bastion of anti-communism during the Cold War, it appears that the country’s armed forces are infiltrated by communists at the highest level.
During Lugo’s stint as liberation theologian, moreover, the “Red Bishop,” as he is known, denied any affiliation with Venezuela’s red dictator Chavez. After last year’s election in Paraguay, then president-elect Lugo suddenly materialized in Caracas where he shmoozed with Comrade Hugo. “I hope the friendship between Venezuela and Paraguay may be a symbol of brotherhood and solidarity within Latin America,” gushed Lugo. For his part, Chavez urged Lugo to lead Paraguay into full membership in ALBA.
The New Washington-Havana Axis? Obama’s Overtures to KGB Asset Raul Castro
Finally, in a sign that the Obama administration intends to defrost the last vestiges of the Cold War in Latin America, the White House, reports UPI, has sent Cuban diplomats an official request to resume talks about the migration of Cuban citizens to the USA. The discussions, which were suspended in 2004 by President George W. Bush, had been held every two years, with Cuba and the USA alternating as the venue. “We intend to use the renewal of talks to reaffirm both sides’ commitment to safe, legal and orderly migration,” explained Sara Mangiaracina, a US State Department spokesentity.
In our assessment, this is a foolish policy on President Barack Hussein Obama’s part, but it reflects his subterranean socialist commitments and his pro-communist orientation. Havana’s Intelligence Directorate, as we have stated before, will no doubt use the Washington-initiated detente to infiltrate even more KGB-trained communist agents into the USA.
>WW4 File: Soviets to hold “large-scale” Zapad 2009, Ladoga 2009 maneuvers near Poland, Finland in Sept.; Kavkaz 2009 drill near Georgia in July
May 22, 2009Posted by on
>On March 10 Novosti reported that Russia and Belarus, united since 1997 in the Union State, will stage a “large-scale strategic military exercise” this September and October. The drill, called Zapad 2009, will involve around 13,000 service personnel from both countries. Zapad means “west” in the Russian language. Belarusian Defense Minister Leonid Maltsev revealed that the Russian military will contribute elements of its Ground Forces, Air Force, Air Defense Forces, and reconnaissance units. He elaborated: “The drill will, among other things, rehearse interoperability within the framework of the Belarusian-Russian integrated air defense system, which the two countries agreed to establish recently.”
In Belarus the KGB still operates under its old name and the Belarusian armed forces, like their Russian counterparts, proudly display the Bolshevik red star as their emblem. Belarus’ unreformed communist dictator Alexander Lukashenko, a close ally of Russia’s KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin, soothed over the troubling ramifications of a Soviet military drill next to former Warsaw Pact state Poland by saying: “Belarus is pursuing a peaceful foreign policy and does not regard any state as an enemy, but military force could not be discounted as an essential security factor.” The last combined Russian-Belarusian maneuver took place last fall, during the multi-theater Stability 2008 exercise, and before that, three years ago, during Union Shield 2006. Lukashenko is pictured above at the May 9 Victory Day celebration in Minsk.
Much to the Kremlin’s displeasure, Poland is to host 100 US service personnel and a Patriot theater anti-missile defense network by year’s end. “This will be the first time U.S. soldiers are stationed on Polish soil, other than those who come under NATO control, on exercises for example . . . This will be symbolic for Poland,” Poland’s deputy defense minister Stanislaw Komorowski is quoted by Novosti as saying on Thursday. The Patriot (MIM-104) system is designed to counter tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and advanced aircraft. It is in service in Egypt, Germany, Greece, Israel, Japan, Kuwait, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, and Taiwan.
On April 6 and 7 Nikolai Makarov, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, visited Minsk, where the Russian delegation conferred with Maltsev and Makarov’s Belarusian counterpart Syarhei Hurulyou. On April 21 Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, speaking from Minsk, described the intent behind and extent of Zapad 2009:
This will be the most spectacular military event since the establishment of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Significant Russian land, naval, and air forces will be deployed. The Zapad exercises will involve nearly 13,000 military personnel, including about 7,000 Russian soldiers. These exercises are both operational and tactical, and will objectively assess the state of combat readiness of both armies. Zapad 2009 will aim to counter a possible aggression against the Union State of Russia and Belarus.
Previous Soviet military exercises designated “Zapad” occurred in 1981, when the Russians were still known as the “Soviets,” and again in 1999, after Soviet communism was supposedly defunct. Zapad 81 was the largest drill ever to be carried out by the Soviet Union, rivaled only by another that took place in 1984 and, in the “post”-Soviet era, last year’s Stability-2008 exercise. Zapad 81 began on September 4, 1981, lasted eight days, involved all branches of the Soviet Armed Forces, and introduced the RSD-20 medium-range strategic missile and the Kiev Project 1143 aircraft carrier. Zapad 81 included amphibious landings in Poland, near Gdańsk, reminding Poland’s striking shipyard workers and other dissidents that the Soviet Union could resort to military force if deemed necessary. The new Reagan Administration criticized Moscow for violating the Helsinki Final Act of Notification of Military Exercises. In response, the Kremlin broadcast propaganda tapes of the military offensives.
When “ex”-communist Boris Yeltsin was president of Russia, another large-scale military exercise, Zapad 99, was carried out in June 1999. The exercise revealed that Russia’s conventional armed forces could not repel a NATO offensive, which increased Moscow’s interest in employing tactical nuclear weapons. Zapad 99 sparked international tensions when US fighter jets intercepted Russian strategic bombers allegedly in violation of Icelandic and Norwegian airspace. That December Putin became prime minister of Russia for the first time and in March 2000 replaced Yeltsin as president.
The online Spanish edition of Novosti and Cuba’s Prensa Latina admit that Zapad-2009 and other scheduled drills are the Kremlin’s direct response to NATO’s ongoing Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2009 exercise in the former Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic, an aspirant to NATO membership. Referring to the “anti-Russian provocations” taking place under the watch of President Mikhail Saakashvili, Colonel-General Alexander Kolmakov, Russia’s deputy defense minister, explained: “We examined and analyzed these maneuvers carefully and we anticipate that it will result in certain corrective combat actions on our part.”
In particular, Russia’s North Caucasus Military District, which is located just to the north of Georgia, will hold, in collaboration with other military districts, the Kavkaz 2009 maneuvers this July. “These exercises,” Kolmakov continued, “will involve overcoming aquatic barriers and airborne assaults. Special attention will be given to the formation of sniper groups. This is extremely important and will help us to effectively judge our experience of antiterrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus [such as in Chechnya, Ingushetia, and Dagestan].”
It should not be forgotten that the Kremlin positioned its military to re-invade and re-occupy Georgia last August under the guise of the Caucasus Frontier 2008 drill. In contravention of last year’s European Union-brokered ceasefire, at least 15,000 Russian troops currently occupy Georgia’s breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Since Russia imposed a unilateral moratorium on its adherence to the Cold War-era Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty in 2007 and to this day maintains 900 tanks in the Kaliningrad Oblast, wedged between Poland and Lithuania, Western governments should view with concern any Soviet military drill in Belarus, which is to the immediate east of Poland.
Kremlinologists should also be concerned by the possibility that Russia will hold a military maneuver near the Finnish border this September, concurrently with Zapad-2009. The Spanish edition of Novosti and Prensa Latina, linked above, mention in passing an operation by the name of Ladoga 2009. Internet search engines yield no additional information on this subject, suggesting that this is brand-new, open-source data. However, we speculate that Ladoga 2009 will take place near Lake Ladoga, a freshwater lake located in the Leningrad Oblast in northwestern Russia, near Saint Petersburg.
Ladoga is the largest lake in Europe, and the 14th largest lake by area in the world. As a stipulation of the criminal 1940 Moscow “Peace” Treaty, Lake Ladoga, previously shared with Finland, became an internal basin of the Soviet Union. Finland is not a member of NATO and has been discouraged by Russia from pursuing such a course. During the 1939-1940 Winter War the plucky Finns fended off an ineptly planned Soviet invasion that mistakenly took into account little resistance.
Last year Finnish military officials accused the Russians of ripping off a patented, computer-designed boreal camouflage pattern used by their forces. At the time Finnish Defense Staff spokesman Captain Eero Karhuvaara warned: “If Russian Ministry of the Interior troops were to invade Finland, we would have big trouble.”
Moscow Holds Belarus, Lures Sri Lanka within Its Orbit with Missile, Weapons Sales
As the Shanghai Cooperation Organization considers bringing Belarus and Sri Lanka on board as “dialogue partners,” Moscow, not so coincidentally, is seeking to offload military hardware in these two small communist-controlled states. On May 19 Rosoboronexport chief Anatoly Isaikin declared that “There are no problems with the sale of Tor-M2 and Buk-M2 air defense systems to Belarus. Today, major problems at the negotiations have been resolved and the issues are being discussed from the technical viewpoint. Price guidelines are being determined.” Isaikin issued this statement at the opening of the MILEX 2009 arms exhibition in the Belarusian capital. He revealed that the issue of Belarus’ purchase of Russia’s most advanced air defense system, the S-400 Triumf (NATO designation SA-21 Growler) and Iskander-E (SS-26 Stone), was being reviewed by an intergovernmental commission but “no decision had been made.”
The S-400 is believed to be able to destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles. The Iskander-E, which is an export version of the Iskander-M system in service with the Russian Ground Forces, is a tactical surface-to-surface missile that can deliver high-precision strikes at ground targets from a distance of up to 280 kilometers (170 miles).
Last November and again this past February Moscow and Minsk signed agreements to implement an integrated regional air defense system. The network will consist of five air force units, 10 anti-aircraft units, five technical service and support units, and one electronic warfare unit. The system will be placed under the command of a Russian or Belarusian Air Force or Air Defense Force senior commander. These developments, as noted above, are taking place within the political framework of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Pavel Borodin, who is state secretary of the Union State, underscored the fact that the new integrated air defense system is “vital” in countering NATO’s ongoing eastward expansion: “Military speaking, it is virtually a shield against NATO.”
Soviets Relish Victory in the Indian Ocean: Sri Lankan Government Endorses Power-Sharing Arrangement with “Defeated” Marxist Tamil Tigers
According to Novosti, Sri Lanka has ordered a number of military helicopters and other weapons from Russia, the country’s defense secretary revealed in an exclusive interview with the Kremlin propaganda outlet. “I have managed to reach an agreement with Russia on a loan to purchase military equipment, primarily helicopters for the air force, and other weaponry,” Sri Lankan Defense Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa explained, adding: “The helicopters had been already ordered.” Rajapaksa did not specify the dollar amount of the deal or the number of helicopters. He did admit, however, that they were needed to transport military personnel:
We will need them in the future. We are already using [Soviet/Russian-made] Mi-17 and Mi-24 helicopters, and we need more. Sri Lanka is willing to develop stronger military ties with Russia. We would like to bring our relations to the level where we could share [combat] experience.
In addition, the Sri Lankan government may secure Russia’s help in clearing mines in the northern part of the country, where Colombo has waged war against the separatist Tamil Tigers since 1976. The pending shipment of Russian military hardware to Sri Lanka, interestingly, occurs as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have conceded defeat in the wake of a major government offensive against rebel positions. On May 20 the Kremlin, no doubt to grease the weapons sale, issued a congratulatory statement to Colombo: “The government of Russia has extended warmest congratulations to the president and the government of Sri Lanka on the success achieved by the island nation in defeating LTTE terrorism.”
However, the reported death of rebel leader Velupillai Prabhakaran has not been confirmed by military officials and the threat of renewed guerrilla warfare remains. The Tamil Tigers once controlled a “shadow state” complete with courts, police, and a tax system across 5,400 square miles, or nearly one-fifth of this Indian Ocean island state. This past Sunday, though, government troops surrounded the remaining rebels in a 0.4-square-mile patch of land and were fighting off suicide bombers. More than 80,000 people have died in the conflict since 1983. The United Nations states that over 6,000 civilians have died in fighting since January 2009.
Rebel official Selvarasa Pathmanathan emailed a statement to the Associated Press, saying:
This battle has reached its bitter end. It is our people who are dying now from bombs, shells, illness and hunger. We cannot permit any more harm to befall them. We remain with one last choice — to remove the last weak excuse of the enemy for killing our people. We have decided to silence our guns.
Military spokesman Brigadier Udaya Nanayakkara denied that the rebels had laid down their weapons: “Fighting is still going on in small pockets.” Sri Lankan Media Minister Anura Yapa dismissed Pathmanathan’s appeal: “We want to free this country from the terrorist LTTE.”
At one time the LTTE also maintained a conventional army, fielded artillery batteries, operated a large navy, and even boasted a nascent air force, funded by an estimated US$200 to $300 million per year accrued from smuggling, fraud, and appeals to Tamil expatriates. The Tamil Tigers carried out hundreds of suicide attacks, including the 1991 assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, and were listed as a terror group by the USA and European Union.
That the Soviet strategists would commend Colombo for decimating a Marxist insurgency, as noted above, may seem confusing, but is possibly understandable in view of Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s offer to the rebels “to begin talks toward power sharing and political reconciliation.” Rajapaksa is a socialist who leads a center-left coalition containing communist members. The Wall Street Journal opines: “The war quickly became more about Prabhakaran’s determination to form an independent Tamil state under the exclusive control of his Marxist Tigers than about those Tamil grievances. The Tigers killed many moderate Tamil politicians who would have been willing to cooperate politically with Colombo.”
New Indian Government Dumps Communists but Maintains Strategic Partnership with Moscow
Meanwhile, north of Palk Strait, the social democratic Indian National Congress scored a resounding victory in that country’s five-week parliamentary election. On May 22, under the leadership of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh the INC will organize a second government with a stronger mandate that will not require the backing of India’s parliamentary communist parties. With more than 700 million eligible voters, India is the largest multiparty democracy in the world. The 76-year-old Singh is the first Indian head of government to win re-election after serving a five-year term since Indira Gandhi in 1971. Born into a Sikh family, Singh studied economics at Oxford University. As finance minister in the INC government of Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao from 1991 to 1996, Singh abandoned Soviet-style state planning and introduced free-market policies that have quadrupled the size of India’s economy. Sonia Gandhi, Italian-born widow of Rajiv, mentioned above, is the dynastic head of the ruling party.
Strategic partners Russia and India are cooperating in the development of the BrahMos missile and a fifth-generation T-50 PAK-FA multi-role fighter. The latter, which is viewed as a competitor to the US Air Force’s F-22 Raptor stealth fighter, was jointly designed and developed by the Sukhoi design bureau, which is part of the Kremlin’s United Aircraft Corporation, along with India’s Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., under an intergovernmental agreement signed in October 2007. Russia and India have also conducted joint military exercises, the last being this past January’s Indra-2009, which saw the arrival of Russia’s Peter the Great missile cruiser in the Indian Ocean.
>Final Phase Backgrounder: Russia’s putative ruler meets Communist Party boss Zyuganov; Medvedev: “We are in touch with each other on a regular basis”
May 16, 2009Posted by on
Pictured above: Russian Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov (center) pays his respects to party founder Vladimir Lenin at his mausoleum on Red Square in Moscow on April 22, 2009, the 138th anniversary of Lenin’s birth. Party vice chairman Ivan Melnikov is standing on Zyuganov’s right. A professor at Moscow State University, Melnikov is also chairman of the Russian State Duma’s Education Committee, which means an open communist is guiding the education of Russia’s youth.
That the putative rulers of Russia, President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, are in reality merely frontmen for the continuing Communist Party of the Soviet Union, otherwise known as the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, was made evident yet again when Medvedev consulted with CPRF Chairman Gennady Zyuganov at Medvedev’s Barvikha residence outside Moscow, on May 12.
The text of Medvedev’s speech to the CPRF delegation is posted at the Kremlin website. Noteworthy comments that reveal a unity of ideology and purpose between Russia’s potemkin politicians and the secretly governing Communist Party apparatus are boldfaced below. Most revealing is Medvedev’s admission: “I have consulted from time to time with Mr. Zyuganov on this subject and we are in touch with each other on a regular basis.” Kremlin-friendly journalists were initially present at the meeting but then Medvedev announced their departure with the obvious intent of pursuing a “closed door” strategy session: “We will spend some time with the media so that they know what we’re talking about, what we’re discussing, and then we’ll send them away.”
The full text of the May 12 Medvedev-Zyuganov encounter follows:
We continue the tradition of meeting with our major parties represented in the parliament. Today I am meeting with members of the Communist Party.
The agenda is wide open, as Mr. Zyuganov agreed when we spoke. So I don’t have anything earth shattering to announce. First and foremost I would of course like to thank our colleagues in the Communist Party for their active involvement in the foreign policy area. The Communist Party is the opposition party and it is very critical concerning many aspects of modern life: both its political aspects and the performance of public institutions.
Nevertheless in my opinion it is very important that we coordinate our efforts to further the foreign policy interests of our country and ensure its security. This is done in a range of areas. Here we have had almost no disagreements in formulating a coherent and unified position for the benefit of our nation.
I have consulted from time to time with Mr Zyuganov on this subject and we are in touch with each other on a regular basis. I am in touch with other colleagues as well. So in my opinion this is an extremely important aspect of our cooperation.
Concerning other issues, of course there are subjects on which we don’t see eye to eye. In particular, there is the question of how to deal with the current [financial] crisis. The Communist Party has its own view of the situation. No doubt that is a good thing, because if we all saw things the same way then the results of our respective efforts would be the same.
It is to be expected that there are points of view that differ from those of the President and the Government Cabinet concerning how our economic life should develop, how to get out of this crisis. Especially since some of your suggestions concerning war veterans, or how certain social issues might be addressed, are in so many ways similar to my own feelings, I am naturally ready to discuss your proposals on these issues, because only by engaging in such discussions can we come up with reasonable solutions. We have done this sort of thing before, and I would like to see it continue.
There are a number of policy initiatives, a number of policy decisions that also have to go through the crucible of the State Duma. The various parliamentary parties and factions have different views on these, including the Communist Party; however, I would also like to thank you for your participation in the critical discussion of these initiatives. In my view this has ultimately helped the Duma to come up with measures that are more precise, more sound, and more interesting.
By the way, I would like to inform you that today I will be signing the law On Guaranteeing Equal Coverage of the Activities of Parliamentary Parties on State Television and Radio Channels. The State Duma worked on this and I know that the Communist Party had its own position on it as well. Nevertheless, I believe that this law will be an important guarantee of the presence of opposition forces and parties in the electronic media. This is an important area in which we have been working.
Actually, that is probably all I want to say to launch our conversation. Now of course the floor is yours, Mr Zyuganov. As the leader you go first. We will spend some time with the media so that they know what we’re talking about, what we’re discussing, and then we’ll send them away.
From this unimpeachable source, it is therefore evident that a line of control extends from the “non-ruling” Communist Party of the Russian Federation/Soviet Union to the country’s “ex”-communist government leaders. News like this provides the hard facts that validate KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s 25-year-old prediction that the collapse of Soviet communism was a long-range deception designed to disarm the West, morally and militarily, prior to conquest, either by convergence or nuclear blackmail.
Although the Russian head of state addressed his communist guests as “dear colleagues,” it should be remembered that Medvedev is a Soviet Komsomol graduate and lackey of KGB-communist dictator Putin. When Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega visited Moscow last December, for the first time since the Cold War, Medvedev and Ortega referred to the other as “comrade.” When Medvedev and US President Barack Hussein Obama (a possible Soviet mole) rubbed elbows for the first time at the G20 summit in London last month, the former referred to the latter as “my new comrade.”
Beyond Medvedev’s introductory speech, in which he refers to the Communist Party’s participation in the formation of foreign policy and national security stances, we can only speculate on the specific topics broached at his meeting with Zyuganov.
Perhaps Medvedev and Zyuganov discussed Putin’s concurrent visit to Tokyo, where the government of Prime Minister Taro Aso is urging a settlement over the Kuril Islands dispute. Technically, Russia and Japan have been in a state of war since 1945, when Soviet troops seized and occupied the four southern Kuril Islands. “This peace treaty can only be done in a way that will meet the national interests of the Russian Federation,” Putin, without mincing words, told reporters, adding: “The content of a peace treaty will be a focus of future bilateral negotiations.”
Putin revealed on Tuesday, when he began his state visit to Japan, that Medvedev will discuss territorial issues and a formal peace treaty with Aso at the upcoming G8 summit in Italy. It should be pointed out that Silvio Berlusconi, Italy’s center-right prime minister, is a close friend of Putin and a staunch advocate of Russia’s merger with the European Union (or, more accurately, the EU’s absorption into the 21st-century Communist Bloc). By forcing a peace treaty on Japan “that will meet the national interests of the Russian Federation,” the Soviet strategists can proceed to woo Tokyo away from its well-established military alliance with Washington.
Perhaps the Russian president and the Communist Party chairman also discussed the Russian Security Council’s new “Arctic zone” policy, which Medvedev signed off on that very day. The new Kremlin policy document, which is effective until 2020, identifies Russia’s Arctic region as “a national strategic resource base capable of fulfilling the socio-economic tasks associated with national growth.” It also refers to the deployment of armed forces in the Arctic that are “capable of ensuring security under various military and political circumstances.” The secretary of the Russian Security Council is former Federal Security Service (FSB/KGB) boss Nikolai Patrushev.
In a previous post we reported on Russia’s proposal to organize a new Arctic Group of Forces to counter the influence of other polar states, namely, the USA (Alaska), Canada, Norway, and Denmark (Greenland). The Russian Navy has already been deployed to the seas around Norway’s Svalbard archipelago, where the Soviets maintain a mining settlement to this day. After meeting last week with her Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, US Secretary of State Clinton admitted that control over and exploitation of the Arctic seabed is one of the areas on the expanding US-Russian agenda. “We think it is in our interest to cooperate and it is in the interest of the world that the United States and Russia do so,” Clinton stated.
Perhaps, too, Medvedev and Zyuganov discussed the manufactured conflict between Russia and Georgia, a conflict that is providing Moscow with a pretext to attack the West over the issue of “NATO expansionism” in the “former” Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic. On Monday Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili–a US-educated lawyer who began his political career under the tutelage of “former” Georgian Communist Party boss Eduard Shevardnadze–met opposition leaders with the intent of finding a compromise to end anti-government protests that began on April 9.
The meeting took place in the Interior Ministry building, behind closed doors. After the meeting, Salome Zurabishvili, leader of the Path of Georgia party, informed reporters: “During the so-called negotiations, Saakashvili alleged that I was a GRU [Russian military intelligence] agent, that Nino Burdzhanadze [former parliament speaker, who now heads Democratic Movement-United Georgia] was receiving money from Russia.” Zurabishvili related that she challenged Saakashvili to produce any facts to substantiate his allegations. She then threatened to continue the protests outside the state television station until the president resigns.
Perhaps the Russian president and the Communist Party chairman, furthermore, discussed Moscow’s proposed European security treaty that would unite the European Union, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union (EU), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) in one framework. “A new document should be drafted to ensure security in Europe and it should not be aimed against NATO,” Medvedev explained to Rossiya TV channel, in an interview to be aired on Saturday, May 16. Alluding to the Cold War as “hard history lessons of the 20th century,” he continued:
The existing set of European security institutions was created in the 1970s and has become obsolete. Unfortunately, security in Europe is not improving… NATO is becoming larger, while security is being split into fragments. We cannot accept this approach [NATO expansion], and we will react to it.
An efficient mechanism of European security should involve all supranational organizations on the continent, such as NATO, the European Union, the post-Soviet Commonwealth of Independent States, and the Collective Security Treaty Organization.
We are simply striving for a new level of security for our country, for our people, considering the hard history lessons of the 20th century.
Medvedev first floated the idea of a new European security treaty in Berlin last June. The merger of EU/NATO and CIS/CSTO into one gargantuan political-military structure, of course, is the fulfillment of Vladimir Lenin’s dream of a worldwide federation of communist states. Medvedev, Putin, Zyuganov, Mikhail Gorbachev—who promoted the concept of a “Common European Home” from the Atlantic to the Urals and whom Medvedev lauded on the occasion of the roving statesman’s last birthday—are faithfully carrying out the objectives of the Soviet Union’s founder. Behind them all lurks Oleg (“Man in the Shadows”) Shenin, former first secretary of the “old” CPSU Central Committee and ringleader of the potemkin anti-Gorbachevist coup of 1991.
Lastly, perhaps Medvedev and Zyuganov discussed the next summit of leaders of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) states, to take place in Yekaterinburg from June 15 to16. The SCO represents another stepping stone—along with the EU, CIS, CSTO, the United Nations, and other regional supranational bodies like the African Union and the Union of South American Nations—along Lenin’s path toward world government or, to use a term favored by the communist-friendly Council on Foreign Relations, “global governance.”
On Friday the Russian president, still entertaining “guests” at his Barvikha residence, received the SCO foreign ministers to hammer out the agenda for the June shindig. “As far as I understand, today you have finally put in the full form the documents that will be considered in Yekaterinburg,” he said, adding: “It can be said that the preparation for the summit has gained its full form. Foreign and defense ministers always meet before meetings of leaders.” Issues that will be considered at the SCO leaders’ summit will be the organization’s development and the consolidation of its authority over member states. SCO interior ministers and heads of security councils and counter-narcotics departments will also converge before the summit.
The pending mini-summit of counter-narcotics chiefs from the “former” Soviet republics should be analyzed in the light of the Communist Bloc’s five-decade-old narco-subversion plot against the West. These men will pretend to aid the “war on drugs” when, in fact, they are facilitating the “drugging of America and the West,” to quote the subtitle of Joseph Douglass’ 1990 book Red Cocaine.
After meeting at Barvikha, Foreign Minister Lavrov revealed that the SCO foreign ministers agreed to grant the status of dialogue partner to Belarus and Sri Lanka. “Many countries have shown the striving to interact with the SCO, so we’ve worked out a special status of partner in the dialogue with the SCO. Today, we’ve agreed to recommend to the heads of states, who will gather in Yekaterinburg on June 15-16, to grant such a status to Belarus and Sri Lanka.” Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko is an unreformed communist who pines for the good ol’ days of Soviet glory, while war-wracked Sri Lanka labors under a center-left-communist government, the United People’s Freedom Alliance.
>Latin America File: USA grants asylum to Nicaraguan reporter; Chavez threatens to shut down opposition-run TV channel, troops seize oil service firms
May 15, 2009Posted by on
>At the blog of the University of Texas at Austin’s Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas, Dean Graber, citing Nicaragua’s La Prensa newspaper, reports that the USA has granted asylum to journalist Georgina Lupiac, the first decision of its type since the return to power of communist Daniel Ortega in January 2007. US immigration lawyer Alfonso Oviedo, who is also president of the Nicaraguan American Fraternity, declared that the ruling was a victory because Lupiac successfully demonstrated that she was a victim of persecution and that her personal safety was endangered by pro-government forces.
Speaking to La Prensa’s Miami correspondent, Judith Flores, Lupiac asserted that supporters of Managua’s neo-Sandinista regime “are totalitarian and don’t accept when their errors are pointed out.” In November 2008 Lupiac, Flores, and members of the Nicaraguan Civic Task Force were threatened outside the Nicaraguan consulate in Miami by a group of Ortegistas, or sympathizers of the Sandinista National Liberation Front. According to the Miami newspaper La Estrella de Nicaragua (The Star of Nicaragua), consulate employees were the culprits. One of the “protesters” threatened Lupiac over a megaphone: “Georgina Lupiac, remember that your children are in Nicaragua under the control of the Sandinista Front.” According to La Estrella, Ortegistas in Nicaragua not only threatened to kill Lupiac but also torched her house, prompting her to seek political refuge in the USA.
In a related story the Costa Rican media, citing Miskito Indian Chief Steadman Fagoth, contends that the US government is conspiring with Nicaragua’s opposition parties to foment indigenous separatism in the country’s North Atlantic Autonomous Region. On a recent visit to Puerto Cabezas Fagoth allegedly witnessed US Department of State officials and US ambassador to Nicaragua Robert Callahan holding talks with leaders of the Liberal Constitutionalist Party and Nicaraguan Liberal Alliance. The putative subject under discussion was the destabilization of the neo-Sandinista regime.
This is not the first time that Ortega has raised the specter of “US meddling” in his country’s internal affairs. Ideological comrade Hugo Chavez rants about the same thing as he consolidates yet another red regime in America’s backyard. On May 14 the Kremlin media reported that the Chavezista regime plans to nationalize a major private bank, Banco de Venezuela, a subsidiary of Spanish banking group Santander. President Chavez unveiled the scheme in July 2008. Banco de Venezuela is one of the country’s four largest banking institutions, with assets estimated at US$1.2-1.9 billion. Last year’s post-summer slump in global oil prices, which dented the coffers of Chavez and his communist cronies, put the deal on hold.
Venezuela’s finance minister is scheduled to meet with bank representatives to finalize the deal by May 22. Chavez crowed: “This financial institution will be transferred to public ownership for all Venezuelans to strengthen the Venezuelan nation and stimulate economic development.” The bank’s takeover price has not been disclosed. In 1996 Santander acquired Banco de Venezuela for US$351.5 million through a public tender.
Since 1999 the Chavezista regime, which as we have copiously documented is closely aligned with Moscow, Beijing, and Havana, has embarked on a nationalization campaign, targeting large domestic companies in strategic economic sectors, including steel, cement, petroleum, and telecommunications, as well as seizing 2.3 million hectares of agricultural land.
In order to neutralize criticism of Venezuela’s submission to communism, Nicolas Maduro, president of Chavez’s United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), has launched a salvo of accusations against the country’s last opposition-run television station. According to The Telegraph, Maduro accused 24-hour news channel Globovision of “media terrorism,” labeled the station and its director, Alberto Ravell, as “violators of the constitution and of the rights of Venezuelans,” as well as being “anti-democratic, failed and fascist.” The last comment about “fascism” is standard communist rhetoric. Pictured above, Ravell denies all allegations and retorted that the criminal probe into Globovision was “laughable intimidation.” Following the verbal assault on Globovision, Maria Corina Machado, director of an anti-Chavez organization called Sumate, predicted: “This is a mechanism to silence voices that have great credibility within and outside the country.”
In 2007 Chavez and his revolutionary buddies refused to renew the radio broadcast license of another opposition-run media network, RCTV, provoking outrage from journalists around the world. The fact that many of those very journalists are leftists, although not necessarily reds, exposes the truly dangerous character of Venezuela’s “Bolivarian Revolution.” RCTV continues to transmit TV programming via satellite and cable.
Last week, reports the Financial Times, Chavez sent troops to seize the operations of 60 foreign-owned oil service companies, in a bid to counter the adverse effects of the slide in crude futures. “We have started to nationalize all these activities connected to oil exploitation,” Comrade Chavez was quoted by The Telegraph as saying, adding: “This is a revolutionary offensive.” Under a new law passed by the National Assembly, which is dominated by the PSUV, the Communist Party of Venezuela, and allied leftist groupings, “all funding will pass through a central account managed by the government.”
Meanwhile, the same link reports, Chavez’s leading political rival, Manuel Rosales, who challenged him for the presidency in 2006 and was then charged with corruption, has fled to Peru where he received asylum. Rosales’ presence in Peru will no doubt sour relations between Caracas and Lima. Peru’s pro-USA president Alan Garcia is a social democrat like his “guest” Rosales, but faces a resurgent Sendoro Luminoso guerrilla insurgency. The Communist Party of Peru-Shining Path possesses subterranean links to Latin America’s many-tentacled Red Axis, embodied in the highly subversive but little-known Bolivarian Continental Coordination and the somewhat more well-known Sao Paulo Forum. In reality, most denizens of the shopping mall regime have probably heard of neither organization.
In view of US President Barack Hussein Obama’s friendly handshaking session with Chavez at the Summit of the Americas, we fully expect Washington to turn a blind eye to Latin America’s “Red Spread” and the Soviets’ revitalized interest in the region. The governments of Peru, Mexico, Colombia, and Panama–the voters of which recently and wisely rejected the Chavez-backed presidential candidate–are the only ones south of the Rio Grande River that may be described as having a “non-adversarial” relationship with the USA. However, Mexican President Felipe Calderon’s comments at Port of Spain, in which he denounced the US embargo against Cuba, and Colombia’s interest in purchasing Russian military hardware would appear to diminish the number of truly “US-friendly” regimes in the region still further. For all of its media image blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan, at least the Bush Administration took a dim view of the communist dictatorships in Havana and Caracas.
>USSR2 File: Soviet leadership flaunts missile power in Victory Day parade, warns of resurgent "fascism" in thinly veiled, verbal attack against NATO
May 10, 2009Posted by on
>Today, for the second year in a row after an 18-year hiatus, tanks and missiles rumbled across Red Square during Russia’s Victory Day celebration. On this day Russians commemorate the defeat of Nazi Germany at the hands of the Allied Powers, then including the Soviet Union. The AFP news agency reports that:
Thousands of soldiers marched past [President Dmitry] Medvedev and [Prime Minister Vladimir] Putin, before dozens of heavy tanks, including the main T-90 battle tank and the Sprut self-propelled anti-tank gun, thundered through Red Square to the sound of martial music. There was a rare public showing for some of Russia’s best known missile systems, including the S-300 and S-400 anti-aircraft missiles, the short range Iskander-M and the medium-range Buk.
The road-mobile Topol ICBM is pictured above. The USA has no equivalent launch platform. On April 28 Russia Today quoted Ruslan Pukhov of Moscow’s Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies as saying: “Russia and China are the only ones who can take the challenge of the U.S. in the military field; others are unable to do it technically.”
“We are sure that any aggression against our citizens will be given a worthy reply,” Medvedev, flanked by his mentor Putin, addressed Muscovites. Betraying his training in the Soviet Komsomol and taking a swipe at NATO “expansionism” in Georgia and elsewhere in the “post”-Soviet sphere, he added: “The victory over fascism is a great example and a great lesson for all peoples and is still current today when people are again starting military adventures. Protecting the motherland is our holy duty, it is a moral foundation for all generations. The future of Russia will be peaceful, happy and successful.”
During the parade, Russia’s defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, brimmed with neo-Soviet patriotism. “Greetings comrades!” he barked at the assembled soldiers, standing in an open-top ZiL limousine, “I congratulate you on the 64th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War.” “Hurrah!” the soldiers returned. Hurrah, indeed. Although Lenin’s ghoulish crypt was largely obscured by festive decorations, it is apparent that the founder of the Soviet Union still lives in the hearts of “new/old” Russia’s ruling cabal.
>Latin America File: Nicaragua to buy Russian planes, choppers to upgrade Soviet-era fleet, Sandinista-controlled army denies "irregular forces" claim
May 9, 2009Posted by on
>Since his re-installation as president in January 2007, Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega has reverted to his “old ways,” by reconsolidating Soviet-era political-military-economic linkages with Russia, aggressively moving against the country’s political opposition, cozying up to the region’s other communist and leftist states like Cuba and Venezuela, and harboring fugitives from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia and exiled political figures, like Thailand’s left-populist former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.
Pictured above: Ortega speaks with fellow leftist US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the Fifth Summit of the Americas in Port of Spain, Trinidad, on April 19, 2009. US President Barack Hussein Obama, whose attention above is drawn elsewhere, met with Central American leaders on the summit sidelines.
Yesterday, Novosti published the specific military hardware that Managua intends to buy from Moscow. “We are holding talks with Russia on the purchase of 4 to 8 helicopters and two aircraft for Nicaragua’s Armed Forces,” revealed General Omar Halleslevens, chief of the Nicaraguan National Army (NNA) and a veteran Sandinista. Halleslevens did not identify the type of the aircraft, but smoothed over the planned transaction by saying: “They will be used in the fight against drug-trafficking in the country and will not undermine the military balance in Central America.” This is a disengenuous statement since Managua appears to be purposely overlooking the state of anarchy that prevails in the Caribbean port of Bluefields, an important transit point for northbound FARC cocaine.
According to open sources, the Nicaraguan air force still operates several Soviet-made M-8 Hip military transport helicopters, at least five Mi-24 Hind attack helicopters, which were used to pulverize Contra positions during the 1980s civil war, and two An-26 Curl military transport planes. Last November, in a post-Cold War “first,” a Russian missile destroyer briefly weighed anchor at Bluefields, to discharge “humanitarian assistance” to the hurricane-wracked country. The political opposition in Managua reacted vehemently to the presence of the Russian Navy near its shores, going so far as to demand that the Nicaraguan armed forces repel the “invaders.”
Undaunted, the next month President Ortega made his first post-Cold War pilgrimage to Moscow since 1985, or 1987, depending on which source is consulted. Last month we also reported that the Nicaraguan military recently dispatched a small contingent of cadets to Russia for military, academic, and languge training.
Meanwhile, the NNA is denying “the existence of armed groups organized for political ends” (death squads?) operating in northern Nicaragua, near or along the Honduran border. General Adolfo Zepeda, head of the NNA public relations department, refuted claims to this effect by Episcopal Conference Vice President Bishop Abelardo Mata. This was the second time that Mata issued such claims about “irregular forces,” only to be “shot down,” so to speak, by the military’s PR man. In 2005, two years prior to Ortega’s re-admission to the executive office, Honduran officials charged that FARC was carrying out sales of drugs for weapons in Nicaragua. At the time Edwin Cordero, director of the Nicaraguan National Police, denied the claims.
Last November we published a report from the Nicaraguan media that Russian special forces are lurking about the country’s sparsely settled northeast sector. The country’s North Atlantic Autonomous Region is the location of a thus far non-violent secessionist movement by Moskito Indians.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: State Duma deputy proposes joint Russian-Cuban- Venezuelan drill in Caribbean, Bear bombers carry out routine patrol
May 8, 2009Posted by on
>On Thursday, reports Novosti, two Tu-95 Bear bombers carried out a 15-hour mission over the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. “The crews practiced instrumental flight maneuvers and conducted a series of other drills,” Lieutenant Colonel Vladimir Drik, a familiar spokesentity for the Russian Air Force, told the Kremlin media. During the patrol the bombers refueled from Il-78 Midas aerial tankers.
The Russian aircraft, grumbled Drik, were “shadowed” by NATO F-16 and Tornado fighters. As usual, he hastened to add: “All flights by Russian aircraft are performed in strict compliance with international law on the use of airspace over neutral waters, without violating the borders of other states.” The Soviets formally resumed strategic bomber flights over the world’s oceans in August 2007, following an order signed by then President, now Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin.
Pictured above: The opening scene from the iconic, Cold War-era movie Red Dawn (1984): Soviet and Cuban paratroopers pay a not-so-friendly visit to Calumet, Colorado.
The Communist Bloc has a full schedule of military exercises lined up for the remainder of this year and into the next. In fact, the tempo of so-called “anti-terrorism” drills appears to be picking up as Russia rattles its sabers against the “expansionist” practices of NATO, especially in Georgia. Last month, Russia, China, and the other members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization completed their third combined war game in Tajikistan, Norak Antiterror 2009. This summer the Moscow-Beijing Axis will carry out Peace Mission 2009 in northeast China and next year Peace Mission 2010 in Kazakhstan. The first two “Peace Mission” maneuvers took place in Russia and China in 2005 and 2007.
These joint drills reflect the growing relationship of open, anti-Western coordination between the two communist superpowers since 2001, when Moscow and Beijing, per KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s prediction, signed their treaty of friendship. During the second half of 2009, as reported in our last post, the People’s Liberation Army will also hold its own large-scale exercise across four military districts, involving 50,000 troops, airborne assault operations, and special forces missions.
The Kremlin media reports today that the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), which binds seven Not-So-Former Soviet republics into a military alliance, will hold joint rapid reaction exercises in Kazakhstan in August and September. The CSTO includes Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. In early February the alliance decided to organize a rapid reaction force. Russia’s first deputy foreign minister Andrei Denisov announced today that the CSTO’s new military formation was a topic of discussion at an ongoing meeting of CSTO deputy foreign, defense, and economics ministers at the Russian Foreign Ministry.
At the time of its announcement, Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev boasted that the rapid reaction force “will be just as good as comparable NATO forces, will be used to repulse military aggression, conduct anti-terrorist operations, fight transnational crime and drug trafficking, and neutralize the effects of natural disasters.” No doubt in an effort to preempt possible dissent in the Soviet hinterland, “Moscow stressed that the collective forces will not interfere in the domestic conflicts of the bloc’s member countries.”
We have for several months contended that the Soviets are patiently and incrementally assembling a “Red Dawn” military coalition in Latin America, presumably with the intention of attacking the USA on the pretext that the North Atlantic Alliance is meddling in their old stomping grounds, like Georgia, Ukraine, and the Baltic states. The latest rantings from one of Russia’s potemkin politicians prove our point yet again.
This week a Russian State Duma deputy, Sergei Abeltsev from Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s KGB-founded Liberal Democratic Party, proposed responding to the NATO military exercises in Georgia by inviting Cuba and Venezuela to take part in “large-scale” drills in the Caribbean Sea on July 2. The Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2009 command-and-staff exercise, which Moscow vehemently opposes even as its troops occupy Georgia’s separatist regimes in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, began on Wednesday and will end on June 1. More than 1,300 troops from 19 NATO member and ally states were originally slated to participate. However, the “former” Yugoslav republic of Serbia and five “former” Soviet republics— Armenia, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, and Moldova—withdrew before the exercises commenced.
For their part, Russia and Venezuela held their first combined naval drill in the Caribbean in early December, following a week-long visit in September of two Tu-160 Blackjack bombers to the South American country.
“So that our U.S. partners do not question our peaceful intentions, I propose holding the exercises under the codename of ‘Reset-2009,’” Abeltsev mocked. The Obama Administration recently articulated its intention to “reset” relations with Moscow. Abeltsev continued his rant: “The decision to hold the drills in Georgia during [Russia’s] WWII Victory Day celebrations is a total revision of the history of the Great Patriotic War. It is a direct insult to Moscow that borders on a malicious humiliation.” Abeltsev’s selection of July 2 as the date for the proposed Russian-Cuban-Venezuelan maneuver is obviously intended as a stab at America’s Fourth of July celebrations. In light of this report, one must ask if Abeltsev is speaking off the cuff or is he releasing a trial balloon that reflects the Soviet strategists’ true intentions for destroying America by conquest or convergence?
Incidentally, after the assassination of FSB defector Alexander Litvinenko in November 2006, Abeltsev, Zhirinovsky’s former bodyguard, rumbled: “The deserved punishment reached the traitor. I am sure his terrible death will be a warning to all the traitors that in Russia treason is not to be forgiven. I would recommend to citizen [Boris] Berezovsky to avoid any food at the commemorative feast for Litvinenko.”
The Victory Day celebrations to which Abeltsev refers will take place in Moscow’s Red Square on May 9 and commemorate the capitulation of Nazi Germany to the Allied Powers, which then included the Soviet Union. “Last year the S-300 air defense systems took part in the parade for the first time ever, and this year we will show the S-400,” Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov disclosed in today’s issue of Rossiiskaya Gazeta. Last year, for the first time since 1990, the Victory Day parade included the presence of tanks and missile launchers.
The S-400 Triumf (NATO designation SA-21 Growler) is expected to form the new backbone of Russia’s theater air and missile defenses until at least 2020. Two missile regiments equipped with the S-400 system have already been deployed to guard the airspace around Moscow and industrial zones in the heartland of European Russia. Saturday’s Victory Day parade will feature over 9,000 servicemen, 112 military vehicles, and 70 aircraft.
Meanwhile, the controversial NATO drill mentioned above kicked off yesterday in the midst of violent protests against President Mikhail Saakashvili, protests that led to the injury of 23 oppositionists at a police compound last night, and in the wake of Tuesday’s reported mutiny at a tank base. NATO, according to the Kremlin media, has “dismissed Russia’s concerns” about the drills, insisting that “they were not aimed against Russia.” Instead, Cooperative Longbow/ Lancer is designed to “improve interoperability and will not involve any light or heavy weaponry.” In a Russian radio interview yesterday, NATO spokesman James Appathurai protested: “The exercise had been planned before the Georgia war, and is not a show of support for Georgia.”
“The opposition, which has demanded Saakashvili step down over the war with Russia and his backsliding on democracy,” propagandizes Novosti, “said on Tuesday the coup reports were a ‘theatrical show’ staged by the president, and ‘virtual reality.’” Among the oppositionsts reported injured on Wednesday night are Levan Gachechiladze; Giya Maisashvili, Party of the Future leader; and Shalva Ogbaidze, from Democratic Movement-United Georgia. “We are fighting for democracy, and we will not disperse until we see President Mikheil Saakashvili resign,” declared Nino Burdzhanadze, the ex-parliamentary speaker who heads Democratic Movement- United Georgia.
In spite of the political turmoil and international intrigue in the Caucasus country, Saakashvili apparently has no plans to cancel his visit to the European Union’s Eastern Partnership summit in Prague on Thursday. “The president’s trip to Prague has not been cancelled. He will go as scheduled,” a presidential spokesentity related. Jan Fischer, the new caretaker prime minister of the Czech Republic, as we previously blogged, is an “ex”-communist.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: China to hold large-scale drills later this year, Kuayue-2009 exercise to involve 50,000 troops
May 6, 2009Posted by on
>In mid-April China completed its third joint war game with Russia and other members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Tajikistan, Norak Antiterror 2009. The Moscow-Beijing Axis is slated to hold two more combined maneuvers, Peace Mission 2009 in northeast China this summer and Peace Mission 2010 in Kazakhstan next year. In the meanwhile, Communist China is preparing to carry out its own large-scale military exercise, Kuayue-2009, involving 50,000 troops. Novosti, citing Xinhua, reports:
Four divisions supported by air force units will take part in the Kuayue-2009 drills, which will be conducted on the territory of the Shenyang, Lanzhou, Jinan and Guangzhou military districts.
The exercises will test the People Liberation Army’s (PLA) command and decision-making capabilities and the interoperability of ground troops and air units in intense electronic warfare conditions. The drills will also involve airborne assault operations and special forces missions.
The 2008 China Military Power Report, published by the US Congress, states that Beijing allocated as much as US$139 billion last year on modernizing its military forces. This sum is more than three times China’s officially announced defense budget. According to official Chinese data, the PLA boasts 2.3 million active personnel deployed in seven military districts, with over 800,000 reserves.
>WW4 File: Georgia accuses Russia of backing army mutiny earlier today, assassination plot against interior minister; NATO drill to begin on May 6
May 6, 2009Posted by on
>- May 6 Update: Russia Expels Canadian Director of NATO Information Office in Moscow (source)
- Kremlin Pulls Out of Russia-NATO Council Meeting Following Expulsion of Russian Diplomats in Brussels (source)
Earlier today an army mutiny took place at the Mukhrovani tank base, 20 kilometers from Tbilisi. Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, whom we suspect is party to the Soviets’ long-range deception plan, assured the republic in a televised address that the situation was under control. Not surprisingly, the president and the Interior Ministry accused Russia of backing mutinous Georgian military officers as part of a plot to overthrow the country’s leadership.
“The Georgian state did not yield to this provocation from Russia. This is an isolated incident–it did not spread to other military units, and the situation is under control,” Saakashvili announced. The president explained that he personally intervened by negotiating with the rebel soldiers and persuading them to surrender to police. Saakashvili continued: “The rebellion was aimed at creating unrest in Georgia, to damage the country’s security and democratic system. Before these events, Russia tripled its military presence in Georgia in a bid to provoke unrest, which was aimed against democracy and Georgia’s integration into Euro-Atlantic bodies.”
“Watching the country being torn apart by the current standoff is unbearable,” mutinous battalion commander Colonel Mamuka Gorgishvili was quoted as saying. He added: “There is a possibility of this standoff turning violent.” Later, in a public confession that was televised later on Tuesday, Gorgishvili admitted that he received orders from the National Guard commander Koba Otanadze to move 24 tanks under his command toward Tbilisi to support opposition rallies.
The Georgian Interior Ministry insisted that the mutiny was aimed at disrupting NATO military exercises due to start near Tbilisi on Wednesday. According to the ministry, 13 civilians were arrested and 500 military personnel are being interrogated. Police are preventing reporters from approaching the Mukhrovani tank base. The ministry also revealed that a Georgian national was arrested on charges of plotting to assassinate Interior Minister Vano Merabishvili. The Interior Ministry stated that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet was put on high alert after the rebellion. The Russian Navy denied the report.
The Kremlin itself declined to comment on Saakashvili’s allegations, but a source in Moscow facetiously told Novosti that the Georgian leader “needs to see a doctor.” A senior Russian security official, moreover, labeled reports of the Georgian army mutiny as a diversionary tactic “to ease pressure on the government amid ongoing protests against Saakashvili.” On April 30 Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin warned in connection with NATO’s expulsion of two diplomats from its Brussels headquarters: “We shall not yield to the attempts to throw us off balance. Russia’s reaction is still to follow. It will be absolutely cold-blooded and balanced.”
Meanwhile, “post”-communist Armenia, which is closely allied with Russia, has announced its withdrawal from the highly controversial NATO drill, Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2009, even as Azerbaijan, which was the target of an obvious and bloody provocation last Thursday, has confirmed its participation.
>Latin America File: Supermarket magnate wins Panama’s presidential election, trouncing Chavez-backed candidate, halting regional "Red Spread"
May 4, 2009Posted by on
>The “Red Spread” has gobbled up much of Latin America since unabashed Marxist Hugo Chavez was elected president of Venezuela in 1998. Yesterday Panamanian supermarket magnate Ricardo Martinelli won the country’s presidential election, trouncing Balbina Herrera of the ruling center-left Democratic Revolutionary Party and halting the region’s almost total landslide toward communism. “Ricardo Martinelli’s success as a business magnate,” opines The Times, “persuaded voters that he was the best person to help Panama survive the global recession, which has slowed the country’s recent stellar economic growth.” Martinelli, who was educated in the USA, is pictured above.
Herrera was outgoing President Martin Torrijos’ anointed successor and allegedly a recipient of petrodollars from Venezuela’s communist dictator Hugo Chavez. Last October Panama Guide covered this shady connection:
Mega TV, a television channel produced by the opposition to the Venezuelan government of Hugo Chavez, made public information regarding the sources of financing for the presidential campaign of Balbina Herrera. The report contains details on connections to Chavez and an important business group that buys cheap fuel in Venezuela in order to resell it here locally in Panama in order to realize substantial profits. Balbina Herrera reacted to the information, but leftist groups such as Suntracs says it is a campaign looking to discredit them, and they denied any bond to Chavez.
If this subversive nexus between Venezuela’s red regime and Panamanian leftists is true, then Chavez can only nurse his defeat and disappointment this time around. Although it’s unlikely that Martinelli will curtail Red Chinese influence in Panama, we can only hope that the Soviets will be discouraged by the presence of a rightist government in Panama City and refrain from pulling more stunts in the region, like sending another destroyer through the Panama Canal, as they did last December.
>Latin America File: Venezuela hosts secret Iranian-Palestinian huddle, enters defense arrangement with Iran; Moskito Indians secede from Nicaragua
May 2, 2009Posted by on
According to Israeli media source Debkafile, during Iranian Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammed Najjar’s April 27-30 visit to Caracas, Tehran’s intelligence chiefs secretly met with visiting Palestinian Authority officials, led by Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyadh al-Maliki. The matchmakers were Venezuela’s communist dictator Hugo Chavez and Qatar’s monarch Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa. Najjar is pictured above, during a visit to a Venezuelan military establishment.
“If true,” warns Debkafile, “this would signal a drastic policy turnabout by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas away from Cairo and over to the radical Tehran and Damascus. The Ramallah-Tehran opening, if confirmed, could help bury the hatchet between the warring Fatah and Hamas and pave the way for a Palestinian unity government governed by rejectionist ideology.” A new Ramallah-Tehran Axis, of course, would also slam the door shut to future Israeli-Palestinian negotiations under the administration of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In MSM reports, cited this week at our blog, Najjar’s presence in Caracas was simply characterized as a move to strengthen bilateral military relations between allies Iran and Venezuela. “Iran pledges its full support to promote the Venezuelan military’s defense capabilities in the framework of mutual defensive agreements,” Najjar declared on April 30, after huddling with Chavez. The Iranian defense minister also conferred with Venezuelan Vice President and acting Defense Minister Ramon Carrizalez, at which time they signed a memorandum of understanding that governs “training and mutual exchange of military experiences.”
At the same time, the Iranian and Palestinian delegations conspired under cover of celebrations marking Venezuela’s decision to sever diplomatic relations with Israel and open a Palestinian embassy in Caracas instead. KGB-trained President Mahmoud Abbas is reported to have welcomed the proposal for a clandestine Iranian-Palestinian meeting in Venezuela when it was suggested to him by Sheikh Khalifa at the Second Summit of Heads of State of South America and Arab Countries, held in Doha about one month ago. Debkafile’s “authoritative Caracas sources” reveal that the on-the-sly summit lasted about four hours and ended with a decision to continue the encounters in Doha, Moscow (which seeks to re-project its influence throughout the Middle East and undermine the West’s only ally in the region, Israel), and Ankara (which, even though a NATO member, is realigning with Russia and the Arab states).
Elsewhere in Latin America, Panamanians will march to the polling stations to vote for a new president on May 3. The two frontrunning candidates are Balbina Herrera, outgoing President Martin Torrijos’ anointed successor from the ruling Revolutionary Democratic Party, and businessman Ricardo Martinelli, from the opposition Alliance for Change. Martinelli enjoys a significant lead over Herrera in public opinion polls. On March 12 Herrera, possibly sensing defeat, accused Martinelli of chumming around with David Murcia Guzmán, a Colombian “businessman” who is currently jailed and facing trial on charges of money laundering. Herrera alleges that she has supplied proof to Panamanian authorities that links Martinelli’s Super99 grocery business with Murcia. She has stigmatized Martinelli as a “narco-candidate.”
Herrera’s accusations are either ironic or disengenuous, because in a past post we reported that Herrera apparently enjoys the financial backing of Venezuela’s Chavez, who has flung his petrodollars far and wide throughout Latin America to install and reinstall center-leftist and communist regimes. US and Colombian counter-narcotics authorities, moreover, have identified the involvement of corrupt elements in Venezuela’s National Guard and General Intelligence Office (known as DISIP until 2008) in the movement of FARC cocaine through South America into the USA. Lastly, we have reported that Panama itself has become an important networking hub for the Colombian and Mexican drug cartels as they relay red cocaine shipments northward to the USA and Europe via African narco-states like Guinea-Bissau.
Further south, on April 26 Ecuador’s socialist president and Chavez “mini me” Rafael Correa obtained a solid lead over closest rival, former president Lucio Gutierrez, following last Sunday’s general election. Correa’s re-election was confirmed in the first round of balloting. His Proud and Sovereign Fatherland Alliance, which dominates the Constituent Assembly elected in April 2007, obtained 46 percent of the votes in the National Congress, followed by the conservative Christian Social Party at 15 percent, and Gutierrez’s nationalist Patriotic Society Party at 14 percent.
The failure of Ecuadorean rightists to recapture the presidency and national legislature will not only further the communization of the country’s constitution, but also perpetuate the presence of a hostile, Moscow-backed regime south of Colombia. Bogota has for 50 years battled a major Marxist insurgency, which over the last decade has enjoyed financial and logistical support from Caracas, another Moscow-backed regime to Colombia’s east. In the final analysis, Latin America’s Red Axis will continue to outflank the region’s only pro-Washington state.
Finally, Nicaragua’s Moscow-backed neo-Sandinista regime faces a new challenge in the form of an under-reported secessionist movement along the country’s rural, poverty-stricken, cocaine-flooded Caribbean coast. On April 19 the indigenous peoples of the region, known as the Moskito Indians, declared the independence of the Communitarian Nation of the Moskitia and fired off a letter to United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon demanding recognition. The 400-member Indigenous Army of the Moskitia consists of mostly aging ex-combatants from the YATAMA uprising against the first Sandinista government in the 1980s, a wider part of the Nicaraguan Civil War propelled by the US-backed Contras.
An indigenous rebel Norman Molina, who travels under the nom de guerre Comandante Wild Dog, staged an unarmed takeover of the headquarters of the YATAMA party on April 22. Another separatist, Rev. Hector Williams, declared: “We are not puppets. We are men. And now we have the weight of a nation on our shoulders.” The good reverend also sports the grand title of Wihta Tara, or Great Judge of the Nation of Moskitia. However, it is unclear whether the group presents a real threat to Managua.
Organized in 1987, the North and South Atlantic Autonomous Regions (RAAN and RAAS) are geographically and culturally isolated from the rest of Nicaragua. The RAAN is mostly inhabited by Miskito and Mayangna Indians, while its southern neighbor is home to most of the country’s black Creole population. Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega, who claims indigenous blood and is the only leader in the world to recognize the Russian-backed “statelets” of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is tight-lipped about the popular uprising in his own stomping grounds. The ruling Sandinista National Liberation Front has not yet issued any formal response to the claims of the Communitarian Nation of the Moskitia. “How are they going to take control of the police and military? Please!” scoffed RAAN Governor Reynaldo Francis.
Brooklyn Rivera, a Miskito lawmaker with the YATAMA party, outlines the prospects of the separatist movement:
It will depend on how the government reacts. If the government takes the situation seriously and addresses the demands of the people, the situation could be controlled. But if it’s ignored, it could fester and grow. There are lots of ex-combatants who are very unsatisfied with the government, they’ve been waiting for over two years for the government to comply with its promises. The worst-case scenario would be if the government responded with force. If they did, there would be a situation like there was in the 1980s.
The Bush Admin’s response to the on-again, off-again street violence that followed Nicaragua’s November municipal election was rather tepid. The Obama Team’s response to a full-blown anti-Sandinista insurgency could be tempered by the White House’s pre-occupation with thawing relations with Communist Cuba.
>WW4 File: Medvedev denounces NATO exercise in Georgia as “open provocation,” Georgia condemns Moscow’s security agreements with Abkhazia, S. Ossetia
May 2, 2009Posted by on
- South Ossetian “Prime Minister” Aslanbek Bulantsev Served as Head of KGB/FSB Financial Department in Russia’s North Ossetia
- Georgian Gunman Massacres 13 Students at Azerbaijan State Oil Academy, Follows February Assassination of Country’s Air Force Chief
- Baku to Still Participate in NATO’s Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2009 Command-and-Staff Drill near Tbilisi; Serbia Joins Kazakhstan and Moldova in Withdrawing from Same
For a number of weeks the Kremlin has destabilized the political situation in the Caucasus region by issuing ominous warnings against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The latter is preparing for the Cooperative Longbow/Lancer 2009 command-and-staff drill at a military base near the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. Nineteen NATO member and “post”-communist states are participating in the maneuver, which will involve 1,300 soldiers but feature neither light nor heavy weaponry. The drill will take place under the aegis of the Partnership for Peace program. Kazakhstan, openly communist Moldova, and Serbia, where Slobodan Milosevic’s “ex”-communist Socialist Party of Serbia holds key government posts, have withdrawn from this particular drill.
By contrast, Azerbaijan, which we have shown is still under secret communist control, is pressing ahead with its promised participation. In a development that reeks of Kremlin intrigue, a “Georgian” gunman yesterday massacred 13 students at a college in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. Was this an attempt by Moscow, using its agents on the ground in the Caucasus, to dissuade Azerbaijan’s covert communist leadership from joining the NATO drill in Georgia?
On April 30 “President” Dmitry Medvedev, a lackey of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Russia’s KGB-communist dictator, once again denounced the NATO drill in the “former” Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic:
NATO’s plans to hold exercises in Georgia…are an open provocation. Exercises must not be held there where a war has been fought. The exercises could have negative consequences for those who made the decision to hold them.
We view any actions that could be considered by Tbilisi as encouragement of a course towards the country’s remilitarization and the senseless strengthening of military components as measures that run counter to the six principles of conflict settlement agreed last August.
In an exclusive interview with the Kremlin’s international propaganda platform Russia Today, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov intoned: “Now, when the situation in the Caucasus is tense, the decision looks short-sighted and not partner-like. It will hardly help restore our full-fledged relations with the alliance.”
Georgian Defense Minister David Sikharulidze retorted by saying: “The exercises will be launched next week, and they are the necessary ingredient for attaining Georgia’s major goal of getting integrated into the North Atlantic alliance.” A source at the NATO headquarters in Brussels informed Novosti that Moscow was overreacting: “The drills are not the end of the world and no one is being forced to participate.”
For its part, Georgia’s Foreign Ministry has sternly condemned Russia’s signing of border protection agreements with the “puppet regimes” in Abkhazia and South Ossetia: “Georgia sharply criticizes the so called agreements signed by the Russian Federation and the representatives of the puppet regimes of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on April 30. In reality the ‘agreements’ are another attempt by Russia to increase its military potential on Georgia’s occupied territory and legitimize the occupation.” NATO also verbally retaliated by stating that the documents are in breach of previous post-conflict agreements, such as the ceasefire brokered by French President and former European Union President Nicolas Sarkozy last August, and “not in the interests of long-term peace and security in the South Caucasus region.”
Pictured above: President Medvedev hosts South Ossetian “President” Eduard Kokoity (right) and Abkhazian “President” Sergei Bagapsh (left) at the Kremlin, on April 30. Each of these men began his career in the old Soviet regime.
Under renewable five-year agreements, or until the two regions can form their own border guard services, Russian forces will guard Abkhazia and South Ossetia’s borders with Georgia proper, including “maritime frontiers” in the case of Abkhazia. The last will no doubt entail patrols by the Russian Navy’s Black Sea Fleet. Only Russia and neo-Sandinista Nicaragua recognize the “independence” of the regimes in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali.
The three parties also signed interdepartmental agreements on cooperation between the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB/KGB), Abkhaz State Security Service, and South Ossetian Committee of State Security. “The fact that the South Ossetia counter-intelligence service,” writes former KGB agent Konstantin Preobrazhensky (1976-1991), “headed by Russian citizens, has been named in the Soviet manner as the KGB (and not the FSB like in contemporary Russia) merits attention.” He continues:
The abbreviation “KGB” has come to be pronounced with great respect in Putin’s Russia. But this name cannot be used openly inside Russia, given the negative Soviet connotations, not least internationally. However, this does not apply to South Ossetia, where the acronym symbolizes the nostalgia for the USSR prevalent not only among the South Ossetian leadership but among the Russian officers tasked to administer the enclave.
South Ossetian “Prime Minister” Aslanbek Bulantsev served as head of the KGB/FSB Financial Department in Russia’s North Ossetia between 1986 and 2006.
Bilateral relations between NATO and the Soviets deteriorated even further this week when the Western Alliance expelled from the organization’s Brussels headquarters two Russian diplomats on charges of spying. The expulsion was connected to the Estonian spy scandal, in which the Estonian Defense Ministry’s former security chief Herman Simm handed NATO secrets to Moscow. One diplomat is the son of Vladimir Chizhov, Russia’s ambassador to the European Union. Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin responded angrily to the expulsions at a news conference in Brussels on Thursday:
We shall not yield to the attempts to throw us off balance. Russia’s reaction is still to follow. It will be absolutely cold-blooded and balanced. The provocation’s masterminds will fail to upset Russia’s determination to clear away the garbage of confrontation in relations with NATO. The spying charges are utterly groundless. The place, the timing, and the leakage of information to the media that ensued, point to a pre-planned, deliberate action.
Meanwhile, Azerbaijan’s participation in the Cooperative Longbow/ Lancer drill was endangered yesterday in what appears to be a possible Moscow-orchestrated provocation. According to Novosti, Georgia’s ambassador to Azerbaijan has confirmed that a Georgian gunman was responsible for massacring students at a college in Baku earlier in the day. “Official sources have confirmed the information,” Nikoloz Natbiladze related. At least thirteen people were killed and 11 wounded when the gunman opened fire at the State Oil Academy. Azerbaijan’s Interior Ministry identified the shooter as Farda Gadyrov. Born in 1980, Gadyrov is a Georgian national but of Azerbaijani origin. After shooting indiscriminately at students and staff with a Makarov pistol, he killed himself.
Azerbaijan’s State Oil Academy is a major international center for the training of oil industry specialists. Past students include Soviet-era secret police chief Lavrenty Beria and Vagit Alekperov, president of Russia’s largest independent oil producer, LUKoil. An investigation into the incident has been launched under the supervision of President Ilham Aliyev, son of the former Soviet republic’s KGB-communist party boss Heydar, who died in 2003. The chief of Aliyev’s presidential staff, Ramiz Mehtiev, was the Communist Party of Azerbaijan’s chief ideologist during the 1980s. In February of this year the chief of Azerbaijan’s air force was also gunned down in the streets of Baku.
Notwithstanding the mayhem in Baku, Azerbaijan’s defense ministry confirmed today that its troops will take part in the controversial NATO drill in Georgia. The announcement follows a meeting on Wednesday in Brussels between Aliyev and NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. President Aliyev reiterated Azerbaijan’s commitment to expanding NATO-Azerbaijan relations and the country’s active participation in the Individual Partnership Action Plan. Like Georgian president and alleged KGB asset Mikhail Saakashvili, Aliyev, who remains in contact with his masters in Moscow, is obediently stirring the pot of international tensions in the Caucasus, to NATO’s detriment.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: Moscow- Beijing Axis plans war games for 2009-2010 following Tajikistan exercise; Moldova drops NATO drill
April 30, 2009Posted by on
>Breaking News: NATO Expels Two Russian Diplomats in Connection with Estonian Spy Scandal, One Diplomat Son of Russian Ambassador to European Union
Pictured here: Kazakh soldiers, taken from Kazakhstan Ministry of Defense website.
Eradicating the US nuclear arsenal remains a top priority for the Soviet strategists, while concurrently pursuing peaceful East-West convergence, with the threat of nuclear blackmail in the background.
The first round of US-Soviet consultations on a new strategic arms reduction treaty begins in Rome this Friday. First inked in 1991, at the “end” of the Cold War, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START 1) requires that each country reduce its nuclear warheads to 3,000 and its delivery vehicles to 1,600. START 1 expires on December 5, 2009. US Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller and Anatoly Antonov, director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Department for Security and Disarmament, are leading the negotiations on May 1. Igor Neverov, director of the Foreign Ministry’s North American Department, told Novosti on April 23 that the discussions will resume on May 7 in Washington, at a meeting between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
During an official visit to Helsinki during the week of April 19, Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev insisted that the new deal to replace START 1 must also cover delivery systems. The 2002 Moscow Treaty envisioned cuts of between 1,700 and 2,200 warheads by each country by December 2012. Medvedev and US President Barack Hussein Obama, a possible Soviet mole, agreed during their meeting at the Group of 20 summit earlier this month on an immediate start to talks on a new treaty.
Incidentally, veteran political operative Clinton lost the Democratic Party nomination last year to then US Senator Obama, but apparently secured a promise from her victorious rival to enter his cabinet. Not so coincidentally, too, Clinton’s hubby “Slick Willie,” the former US president and Arkansas governor, is a suspected KGB asset. There is therefore no good reason to believe that leftist-globalist Secretary of State Clinton has America’s sovereignty and national security at heart in negotiating a disarmament treaty with the Soviets.
It is surely no accident, moreover, that Rome was chosen as the venue for negotiations leading to a new strategic arms reduction framework. Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, although a center-rightist by profession, is buddy buddies with Russia’s KGB-communist dictator, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Berlusconi also recently welcomed to Rome Alexander Lukashenko, Belarus’ unabashed communist dictator, with the purpose of pushing the “former” Soviet republic into the European Union. Like Putin, Lukashenko is committed to restoring the Soviet Union. Russia and Belarus are united in a common political-military-economic entity called the Union State, founded in 1996. The Communist Party of Belarus, which is closely linked to the (secretly ruling) Communist Party of the Russian Federation, openly supports Lukashenko in the national parliament.
The Moscow-Beijing Axis, embodied in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), serves as one of several communist counterweights to NATO and was amazingly predicted by KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn in his first book, New Lies for Old, 25 years ago. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China feigned hostility in order to disguise their united devotion to world communism’s long-range plan for global domination, formally promulgated at the Eighty-One Party Congress in Moscow in 1960. Open military coordination between the Soviets and the Red Chinese during the Cold War would have no doubt aroused NATO’s alarm and possibly provoked an undesirable military response from the West.
Since the fake demise of communism in Eastern Europe, however, military coordination between Moscow and Beijing, facilitated by a new telephone hotline between the two general staffs, has proceeded steadily since a treaty of friendship and cooperation was signed in 2001. Thus far, Russia and China have held at least three joint war games: Peace Mission 2005, Peace Mission 2007, and Norak-Antiterror 2009. The first two were held in both Russia and China, while the third was carried out in mid-April of this year in Tajikistan. Two more combined military exercises are planned: Peace Mission 2009, to be held this summer in northeast China, and Peace Mission 2010, to be held obviously next year, this time in Kazakhstan.
After Wednesday’s session of SCO defense ministers in Moscow, Russia’s Anatoly Serdyukov announced: “Specific anti-terror activities will be practiced at drills in Kazakhstan. All previous and upcoming military exercises involving SCO countries are of a counterterrorism nature. The decision to hold the exercises entitled Peace Mission 2010 was made last May  in Dushanbe at a similar meeting.” As we regularly note and as Serdyukov reiterates in the previous quote, military coordination within the Communist Bloc is frequently carried out under the pretense of combating “terrorism.” However, the USA and its allies are the real targets of communist hatred.
Kremlin mouthpieces stridently deny that the SCO is a military alliance, along the lines of NATO or the “post”-Soviet Collective Security Treaty Organization. However Novosti honestly describes the SCO as a “regional security group” comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Russia assumed the SCO presidency last August. Disturbingly, Iran, India, Mongolia, and Pakistan hold observer status. Iran, of course, is run by a bunch of Islamo-Nazi nutjobs bent on destroying Israel, India boasts a socialist government that was supported by the communists until July 2008, Mongolia labors under an 87-year-old communist regime feigning social democracy, while Pakistan’s socialist government risks capitulation before the Taliban insurgency.
Personal relations between the Soviet and Red Chinese leadership are warm and fuzzy. On April 27, after conversing with the Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi in Moscow, Medvedev enthused about the pending visit of Chinese President/Tyrant Hu Jintao to Russia: “This year we’ve met with Chairman Hu Jintao during the G-20 summit in London. We have an intensive agenda this year, including the visit to the Russian Federation by the Chinese chairman, as well as other events with our and your participation. We’re pleased with good friends should have regular consultations, moreover in the period when it is necessary for economic and political reasons.” Russian Prime Minister Putin, Medvedev’s master, is also slated to visit Beijing, reports Itar-Tass.
In addition to promoting military integration, the Moscow-Beijing Axis is committed to energy integration within the Communist Bloc. On April 21 Russia and China inked an agreement by which a new branch from the East Siberia-Pacific Ocean (ESPO) oil pipeline will be built between the two countries. The new pipeline will extend from the Skovorodino refinery in Russia’s Far East to Mohe County in China’s Heilongjiang province and must be completed by the end of 2010. After signing the deal, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, who chairs the state oil company Rosneft, gushed: “The agreement creates a new foundation for developing our energy cooperation. This is a unique agreement of a long-term nature, which is accompanied by financial agreements, and to implement it we have already begun building a branch from the main pipeline toward China.”
The Skovorodino-Mohe pipeline will pass under the Amur River and will pump 15 million metric tons of petroleum per year. The pipeline is part of Russian efforts to diversify export routes from Siberia. Under the intergovernmental deal, China will provide US$25 billion in loans to Rosneft and pipeline operator Transneft. Deputy PM Sechin, a “former” GRU resident who armed Latin American insurgents during the 1980s, is also heavily involved in revitalizing relations between Moscow and the Western Hemisphere’s predominantly leftist regimes, including Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. He visited these countries several times in 2007 and 2008.
While Russia has established firm political-military-economic links with both Iran and Venezuela, the regimes in Tehran and Caracas are also promoting ties between themselves. State-run IRNA news agency reported yesterday that Iranian Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammed Najjar recently met with Venezuelan Vice President Ramon Carrizalez, who is also acting defense minister, in the Venezuelan capital. The purpose of the meeting was to “strengthen” military cooperation. Like Iran, the communist regime of President Hugo Chavez is staunchly pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, a fact highlighted by comments made by the dictator during Israel’s military incursion into the Gaza Strip in December and January.
The Soviet strategists are not only consolidating military linkages among Communist Bloc countries, but regularly denouncing NATO exercises in “former” Soviet republics and “former” Soviet Bloc states, such as Georgia. In a not very surprising move, Moldova has followed Kazakhstan in withdrawing from the Western Alliance’s Cooperative Longbow/Lancer drills, to begin shortly near Tbilisi. A number of “post”-communists countries were slated to join this exercises under NATO’s Partnership for Peace program. In early April Moldova’s ruling communist party won a third consecutive election, provoking violent anti-communist, pro-Romanian riots and prompting a swift statement of support from Moscow for the regime of President Vladimir Voronin, a former Soviet Interior Ministry general.
End Times File: Israel’s Isolation: Russian-Arab-Iranian Invasion, Destruction of Damascus Loom as Turkey Holds First-Ever Military Drill with Syria
Meanwhile, the Soviet strategists continue to woo NATO members like Greece and Turkey into a closer embrace that has already undermined the West’s military alliance against the Communist Bloc. Moscow will exhibit over 120 types of weaponry at the IDEF 2009 arms show in Istanbul between April 27 and 30. “Turkey is mostly interested in buying short- and medium-range air defense systems and combat helicopters,” stated Anatoly Aksenov, senior adviser at the Kremlin’s arms export monopoly, Rosoboronexport. Aksenov, who leads the Russian delegation at the IDEF 2009 exhibition, revealed that several military-technical cooperation contracts could be signed between the two countries after the show.
Last year, Turkish media reported that Ankara was planning to buy 32 used Mi-28 Havoc helicopters from Russia in a deal totaling US$1 billion. In February, states Novosti at the link above, the Russian and Turkish defense ministers agreed to boost bilateral military-technical ties “despite the fact that Turkey is a NATO member.” Since the mid-1990s Turkey has implemented a large-scale program to modernize its armed forces, to be completed by 2020. The Kremlin has embarked on a similar program under first Putin and then Medvedev, as we have copiously documented here.
Like Iran and Venezuela, the Justice and Development regime in Ankara is also unashamedly pro-Islamist and stridently anti-Israel, two facts exposed during the Israeli Defense Forces’ Operation Cast Lead. This week’s war game between Turkey and Syria, an avowed enemy of Israel, is yet more proof that Turkey is no longer committed to the North Atlantic Alliance and has effectively moved into orbit around the Communist Bloc and its Islamo-Marxist proxies in the Middle East.
From the vantage of Bible prophecy, we see the end-times anti-Israel military confederacy described by the prophet Ezekiel coalescing before our eyes. This development foreshadows the rapture of the church and then the first events of the early tribulation period: 1) Antichrist’s seven-year covenant with Israel, establishing a brief but false peace in the Middle East (Daniel 9:27), 2) a short war between Israel and Syria leading to Damascus’ destruction, probably by Israel exercising the so-called Samson Option (Isaiah 17:1), and 3) the Russian-led invasion of the Holy Land, only to be supernaturally defeated by God (Ezekiel 38-39). Current events prove that the international isolation of Israel, with US complicity, has begun.
The AP news agency reports today of Turkey’s dismissive reaction to Israel’s response to the Turko-Syrian maneuver: “Turkey’s military chief is not concerned about Israel’s reaction to a joint drill involving Turkish and Syrian soldiers. Defense Minister Ehud Barak called this week’s exercise a “disturbing development.” [Turkish] Gen. Ilker Basbug told reporters Wednesday he was ‘not concerned by Israel’s reaction,’ and Turkey wasn’t seeking any other country’s consent.” The first-ever drill between Ankara and Damascus also represents the first-ever drill between a NATO member and an Arab nation. According to the Turkish military, “The aim of the exercise is to boost friendship, cooperation and confidence between the two countries’ land forces, and to increase the ability of border troops to train and work together.” Turkey’s involvement in the drill is putatively linked to the government’s efforts to suppress the Marxist guerrillas of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, in the southeast part of the country. The stateless Kurdish separatists are also based in northern Iraq and northwest Iran.
The cooperation between Turkey and Syria follows discreet talks between the Obama Team and the regimes in Damascus and Tehran, apparently well before the US president’s inauguration. On January 31 the AFP news agency reported that “a group of experts under the auspices of the think tank, the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), announced Thursday that they met for more than two hours in Damascus with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The experts included Ellen Laipson, a former White House adviser under president Bill Clinton and a member of the Obama transition team.” Last Friday, while visiting Washington, Jordan’s King Abdullah warned: “Israel must choose between integrating into the region or remaining isolated. Delaying a two-state solution would be disastrous for Israelis and Palestinians.”
Soviet Deception in the Balkans: Kosovo Views Serbia’s Staunch Ally Russia as “Friendly State,” Calls for Recognition
Finally, in the Balkans, the disingenuous nature of Kosovo’s secession from Serbia, a staunch ally of Russia, was exposed this week when Pristina, the capital of a country that is only partly recognized worldwide, urged Moscow to accept Kosovar independence. “Russia can do two things: Exert pressure on Belgrade and persuade it not to use force, and recognize the independence of Kosovo,” declared Hajredin Kuci, Kosovo’s deputy prime minister, at a Pristina news conference attended by Russian, Belarusian, Ukrainian, and Moldovan reporters. Significantly, Kuci stated: “Kosovo views Russia as a friendly state.”
The regime in Pristina is controlled by former members of the Marxist Kosovo Liberation Army, while members of Slobodan Milosevic’s “ex”-communist Socialist Party of Serbia hold key posts in the Belgrade regime. In 1999 Russian troops rushed to take control of Pristina ahead of NATO forces during the latter’s bombing campaign of Yugoslavia. Yugoslav President Milosevic’s showdown with the West eventually led to his ouster in 2000 and controversial demise in a Hague jail cell six years later. Moscow withdrew its forces from Kosovo/Serbia in 2003.
>Latin America/USA Files: Chavez to Obama in Trinidad: “I want to be your friend”; US president defends handshake with country’s avowed enemy
April 25, 2009Posted by on
- Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA) Meeting Denounces Summit of the Americas as “Imperialist” for Excluding Cuba
Pictured above: “The Eight Amigos”: Leaders from ALBA countries and others aspiring to membership in the bloc of socialist states converge at “anti-Summit of the Americas summit.” From left to right: Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Bolivian President Evo Morales, Cuban President Raul Castro (in army uniform), Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez (also in army uniform), Prime Minister Roosevelt Skeritt of Dominica, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, and Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa.
Between April 17 and 19 the USA’s new socialist (Kenyan-born?) president Barack Hussein Obama attended the Summit of the Americas in Port of Spain, the capital of Trinidad and Tobago, a tropical archipelago near the coast of Communist Venezuela. The fifth summit of the 34-nation Organization of American States, reports the Voice of America, is “being hailed by most participants as a new beginning for relations in the region.” President Obama was praised by his peers for “setting a new tone of openness,” especially with respect to his comments about defrosting Washington’s relations with Havana and his congenial handshaking session with Venezuela’s virulently anti-USA dictator Hugo Chavez.
Some Republican lawmakers in the USA, including Senator John Ensign, denounced Obama’s friendliness toward Chavez. “You have to be careful who you are seen joking around with,” grumbled Ensign, adding: “And I think it was irresponsible for the president to be seen kind of laughing and joking with Hugo Chavez.” We agree. Obama insists that he has “great differences” with Chavez, but he also defended his actions. “It’s unlikely that as a consequence of me shaking hands or having a polite conversation with Mr. Chavez that we are endangering the strategic interest of the United States,” the US president protested.
Venezuela’s communist dictator, a close ally of Moscow, Beijing, and Havana, once called former President George W. Bush the “Devil” and last year expelled the US Ambassador from Caracas, a move that prompted the White House to expel Venezuela’s counterpart. At the summit in Port of Spain, Chavez offered to kiss and make up by dispatching a new envoy to Washington.
Michael Shifter, an analyst on US-Latin American relations at the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington believes, rightly to our way of thinking, that Chavez, rather than Obama, was the one launching a charm offensive: “He’s a politician and he understands that Obama is enormously popular throughout Latin America, in the United States today and in Venezuela. And I think it was smart politics for Chavez to associate himself to Obama, to be nice to Obama, to open up to Obama and have these kind of gracious, warm moments with Obama because he knows it plays well with his constituency.”
During their first encounter in Port of Spain, Chavez crooned to Obama: “I want to be your friend.” Chavez, who is also a big fan of US academic Noam Chomsky, pushed a copy of the book, The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of Pillage of a Continent, on the US president. Written by Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano, the book is about alleged US and European exploitation of the region.
Back in Caracas, Chavez crowed: “I am coming back from Trinidad and Tobago, from the Americas Summit where, without a doubt, the position that Venezuela and its government has always defended, especially starting 10 years ago, of resistance, dignity, sovereignty and independence has obtained in Port of Spain, one of the biggest victories of our history.” Apparently alluding to Obama’s election and the Democratic Party’s control over both houses of the US Congress, he added: “It would seem that the changes that started in Venezuela in the last decade of the 20th century have begun to reach North America.” Communists like Chavez are masters of false friendship. Chavez’s good buddy Vladimir Putin, Russia’s KGB-communist dictator, used the same tactics on former President Bush after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
The day before the Summit of the Americas kick off, reports Voice of America at the link above, Cuban President Raul Castro delivered a speech in which he stated that Cuba is willing to discuss any issue with the USA, including human rights, press freedom and political prisoners. Despite the peace overture, President Obama cautioned that he does not expect relations between the two adversaries to “thaw overnight.”
Nicaragua’s Past/Present Marxist Dictator Ortega Scurries to Havana Second Time in Three Weeks, Wife and Chief Ideologist Rosario at His Side
This past Tuesday, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega touched down in Havana en route to Managua from Port of Spain to brief his revolutionary mentor Fidel Castro on last weekend’s Fifth Summit of the Americas, a gathering upon which the former Cuban president heaped contempt in an essay. Obama, reports the AP news agency at the previous link, told the summit that US policy toward Cuba must be “revised” but insisted that the economic embargo against the island will not be lifted until the communist regime demonstrates progress on human rights issues. Cuba state television offered no details about the meeting between Daniel and Fidel, two long-time friends and ideological allies who ultimately dance to the tune of the KGB. Ortega also met with Fidel before the Organization of American States (OAS) shindig, which Cuba has never been invited to attend.
The Cuban media reported that Ortega’s address in Port of Spain was broadcast on Cubavision and Cubavision Internacional on Wednesday. Over Cuban airwaves the Nicaraguan dictator condemned the “second class” treatment shown to Latin America’s heads of state and government on their arrival at the Port of Spain airport due to the earlier arrival of “the emperor of the hemisphere,” meaning the US president. Ortega also accused the US delegation of “censoring” the agendas of its Latin American counterparts, although he rejoiced in the fact that the issue of Cuba’s pariah status was broached during the summit.
While in Havana Ortega also met Cuban President Raul Castro, Fidel’s younger brother, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez and, significantly, the boss of the Ideological Department of the Central Committee of the ruling Communist Party of Cuba, Rolando Alfonso. Accompanying Ortega was his wife and communications director, Rosario Murillo. Former guerrilla girl Rosario also oversees the Sandinista-dominated Councils of Citizens’ Power, the Nicaraguan counterpart of Cuba’s Committees for the Defense of the Revolution, resurrected in 2007 when Ortega re-assumed the presidency after a 17-year absence.
In the context of the vigorous power networking taking place among Western Hemisphere communist leaders over the last two years, Ortega’s presence in Havana this week is worrisome for at least two reasons. First, as noted above, the Sandinista leader enjoys a decades-old friendship with the Castro Bros. and, second Daniel and Rosario previously visited Cuba only three weeks ago.
This week, reports Novosti, Nicaragua joined a wider trend throughout Central and South America of scrapping visa requirements for Russian citizens travelling to that country. Managua’s decision to facilitate the admission of Russian “tourists” will no doubt provide cover for agents of Moscow’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) and military intelligence (GRU). In view of the Kremlin’s little-publicized plan to renovate the Soviet-built, never-used military runway at Punta Huete and dredge a deep-water port at Monkey Point, on Nicaragua’s Caribbean coast, this is not an insignificant diplomatic development.
Colombia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru, and Venezuela have removed similar restrictions on Russian citizens visiting their countries. A visa-free regime between Argentina and Russia will take effect in the near future, while Russian and Chilean presidents, Dmitry Medvedev and Michelle Bachelet, have stated their intention to work towards a visa-free arrangement during a meeting in April. With the exception of Colombia, every one of these Latin American countries has a communist or center-left government.
During a joint press conference with Obama after the Summit of the Americas, Mexican President Felipe Calderon, one of the USA’s few center-right allies in the Western Hemisphere, urged Washington to terminate its five-decade blockade against Cuba. “The US blockade began when neither Obama nor I had been born and it has not succeeded,” commented Calderon. He then praised the White House’s decision to lift travel restrictions against Cuban-Americans wishing to visit the island communist state. Calderon enthused: “My country is friends with Cuba and the United States and it is ready to cooperate in the resolution of problems between both nations. It is now time to look ahead for the good of hemispheric relations.”
Students of the international communist conspiracy should expect Obama to incrementally defrost relations between Washington and Havana, as reported above. When a visa-free regime is finally implemented between the two countries, expect the Communist Party of Cuba to flood the Continental USA with agents of the state Intelligence Directorate.
The Summit of the Americas was preceded by the 7th Presidential Summit of the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA), held in Cumana, capital of Venezuela’s Sucre state. Founded in 2004 as a counterweight to the US-led OAS and Free Trade Area of the Americas, ALBA is a bloc of socialist nations under the leadership of Chavez and the Castro Bros. and specifically consists of Cuba, Bolivia, Dominica, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. Ecuador and St. Vincent and the Grenadines are considering membership. Ominously, even Russia has expressed an interest in joining the anti-Washington bloc in America’s backyard.
This particular ALBA get-together wound up its meetings with a pointed resolution rejecting the policies of the Washington- dominated Summit of the Americas. Venezuelan President Chavez, who later attended the OAS meeting as noted above, read a 15-point statement, blaming capitalism for creating the current global economic crisis and criticizing U.S. “imperialist policy” on Latin America, especially with respect to Washington’s blockade of Cuba. “We contend there’s no consensus for adopting that draft statement and we propose an exhaustive debate,” Chavez ranted. Alluding to Puerto Rico’s independence movement, Nicaraguan President Ortega chimed in: “You can not call that summit ‘of the Americas’ because Cuba and Puerto Rico are missing.” On Thursday Bolivian President Morales warned that he and his leftist colleagues will “prepare for our battle at the Summit of the Americas for the United States to change its policies.” He added: “Obama has a moral and ethical obligation to repair the damage caused by his country’s former presidents.”
The Obama White House dismissed the ALBA veto to the declaration of the Fifth Summit of the Americas as “irresponsible and misplaced.” While accompanying Obama in Mexico City on April 16, adviser Jeffrey Davidow defended the OAS declaration:
The declaration of the summit is a document, a fairly lengthy document that’s been negotiated for the last nine months by all 34 countries, including Venezuela. It’s been a laborious process of negotiation. Many of Venezuela’s points were accepted, as were the points of the United States and other countries. This decision to not sign the document is something that just came up in the last day or so, and is inconsistent with the negotiations that have been going on for almost a year.
Bolivian President Morales Scores Political Victory with Hunger Strike, Fends off Assassination Attempt by Mercenaries with Eastern European Links
Earlier this month, reported BBC News, on April 18, Bolivia’s communist president Evo Morales, an important player in Latin America’s Red Axis, was the target of a failed assassination attempt carried out, intriguingly, by a five-member hit squad with a strong Eastern European connection. On April 16 Bolivian police tracked the mercenaries to a hotel in the eastern city of Santa Cruz, a hotbed of regional secessionism. After confronting the hit squad, police engaged the group in a gunbattle. Three gunmen were killed and two arrested.
The gunmen who were killed included Romanian national Arpad Magyarosi, Irish national Michael Martin Dwyer, and the group’s Bolivian-Hungarian ringleader Eduardo Rosa Flores. The last fought in the war for Croatian independence in the 1990s, at which time he commanded a paramilitary organization. The two men arrested were Mario Francisco Tasik Astorga, another veteran of the Croatian war, and Elot Toaso, a Hungarian computer expert. While Irish national Dwyer has no obvious Eastern European link, it is possible that he was a militant in Ireland’s dormant Marxist republican insurgency.
In addition to President Morales, the hit squad reportedly intended to kill Bolivian Vice-President Alvaro Garcia Linera, a former guerrilla like El Salvador’s new vice president Salvador Ceren, and Santa Cruz Governor Ruben Costas, a bitter opponent of Morales and his ruling Movement toward Socialism (MAS) party. Secessionist Governor Costas doubts the national government’s information, accusing Morales of “mounting a show” aimed at discrediting the opposition. Bolivian authorities suspect the hit squad of orchestrating a dynamite attack on the home of a Catholic cardinal early during the week of April 12.
Morales revealed the existence of the alleged plot as he travelled first to Venezuela and then Trinidad and Tobago for the ALBA summit and Summit of the Americas, respectively. “There has been no immediate explanation,” ponders BBC, “of why the alleged plotters would target government and opposition targets alike.” Indeed. Perhaps someone in the Kremlin or Lubyanka has the answer, although we would expect Morales, who dutifully trouped to Russia in February, is Moscow’s man in La Paz.
In a related story, Morales ended a five-day hunger strike on April 14 when Bolivian legislators approved a new election law that will permit the president to run for a second term in the next election, scheduled for December. During his politically motivated fast, Morales urged his supporters to seize a major part of the seats in the 27-seat senate, which is controlled by the rightist opposition. The ruling MAS party had enough votes to approve the election law, but opposition lawmakers blocked the bill for nearly a week by refusing to attend a special bicameral session, thereby preventing a quorum. Bolivians approved a new constitution by referendum in January.
Morales’ successful hunger strike represents another wider trend among Latin America’s predominantly leftist leaders of seeking to remove term limits and advance constitutional reform in the direction of socialism. In February Chavez was essentially made “President for Life” by referendum, while Ortega likewise seeks to abolish presidential term limits in Nicaragua. Eucadorean President Rafael Correa, Chavez’s “mini me,” is poised for another four-year term as a result of tomorrow’s presidential election.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: Kremlin to increase number of warplanes at Kyrgyzstan base after US departure, Russian aircraft to join Kyrgyz drill
April 25, 2009Posted by on
This past Monday, reports the AFP news agency, a Russian general announced that Moscow will increase the number of warplanes stationed at the Kant Air Base in Kyrgyzstan after the US and allied armed forces vacate the Manas Air Base in August. Manas is the last such US military installation in Central Asia and has been used since December 2001 to support Operation Enduring Freedom in neighboring Afghanistan.
“The Russian leadership plans to increase the number of individual warplanes at Kant,” Nikolai Bordyuzha informed the Kyrgyz parliament on April 20. He downplayed the departure of NATO militaries from the Central Asian country: “I don’t think that the US airbase at Manas fundamentally influenced the security situation in the region.” In February the “post”-communist regime in Bishkek was swayed by a US$2 billion loan from Moscow to evict coalition forces from Manas. Bordyuzha is secretary-general of the Moscow-dominated Collective Security Treaty Organization and a career Chekist. In a post earlier this week we noted his disapproval of NATO’s Cooperative Lancer/Longbow military drill in Georgia.
Russia has long maintained a small contingent of combat aircraft at Kant (pictured above), which is not far from both Bishkek and Manas. The base currently houses about 400 troops, including 250 officers and NCOs and 150 conscripts, and deploys several Su-25 Frogfoot close air support aircraft and Su-27 Flanker fighters, two Mi-8 combat transport helicopters, and four L-39 combat trainers.
In a related story Russian Su-25s will join Kyrgyzstan’s armed forces to carry out the active phase of the latter’s Security-2009 tactical exercise in the southern part of the country on April 25. Kyrgyzstan will contribute over 500 servicemen, armored vehicles, self-propelled artillery, and aircraft. The exercise involves live-firing drills aimed at suppressing “terrorists.” The Kyrgyz Defense Ministry disclosed: “A flight of Su-25 attack aircraft from the Kant airbase and Kyrgyz Air Force Mi-24 helicopters will provide aerial fire support during the drills.”
Last weekend troops from Russia, China, Kyrgyzstan and the other Central Asian members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization completed the Norak-Antiterror 2009 drill in Tajikistan.
In another story related to Russia’s ongoing testing of its nuclear arsenal, the Russian Strategic Missile Forces successfully test-fired a Topol ICBM on April 10. The purpose of such tests is to extend this category of missile’s service life for an additional 22 years.
Finally, in a directive that no doubt reflects the Kremlin’s intention to once again place Russia’s military and military intelligence under the ideological control of the (secretly ruling) Communist Party of the Soviet Union, GRU chief General Valentin Korabelnikov was sacked on Friday. The 63-year-old Korabelnikov held the position since 1997 and is replaced by his deputy Lieutenant General Alexander Shlyakturov. Moscow gave no explanation for Korabelnikov’s dismissal. However, the general was bumped over into an advisory capacity in the General Staff.
Independent military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer notes that Korabelnikov clashed with Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov over plans to slice up the GRU and remove special units under its control. “This is the beginning of a major reform of Russia’s military intelligence,” Felgenhauer explained. Another analyst, Alexander Golts, stated “The Kremlin is eager to shun generals with a clear Soviet mentality.” This is either a naive or disengenuous statement. We would rather say just the opposite. Serdyukov’s father in law is Viktor Zubkov, former prime minister, current Gazprom chairman, and “ex”-CPSU cadre.
>WW4 File: Tajikistan hosts SCO war game; Russia massing troops in Georgia’s breakaway regions; Moldovan vote recount “confirms” communist victory
April 23, 2009Posted by on
- Four Large Amphibious Landing Craft Left Sevastopol in Second Week of April, Two Used to Insert Russian Marines into Abkhazia during August 2008 Invasion
- CSTO General Secretary, Career Chekist Bordyuzha Brands Cooperative Lancer/Longbow Exercise “Provocation,” Russia’s NATO Envoy Rogozin Denounces War Game as “Insanity”
- Russian FSB/KGB Arrests Georgian “Spy” Plotting against Sochi Olympics, Moscow-Backed Separatists Accuse OSCE Observers of Provocations
It [South Ossetia] will be Russia. And Georgia used to be Russian, too.
– Russian Ground Forces Lieutenant “Sergei,” statement made to AP news agency at South Ossetia-Georgia (proper) border checkpoint, April 21, 2009
Pictured above: On April 13 Russian soldiers stand at a checkpoint to the entrance of the Georgian village of Akhmaji, on the boundary with Russian-controlled South Ossetia. Georgian police maintain their own checkpoint about 100 yards away.
Established in 2001, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) kicked off its first joint military exercise in 2005, followed by a second in 2007. Both war games were held in Russian and Chinese territory. The SCO actually represents the culmination of many decades of collusion between Moscow and Beijing, typified by the deceptive “Sino-Soviet split” that led to several (fabricated) border skirmishes in 1969. Although a third “Peace Mission” drill is slated for the summer of 2009, the SCO actually carried out its third war game, Norak-Antiterror 2009, on April 17 and 18 at the Fakhrobod training ground in Tajikistan’s Khatlon province, about 50 kilometers south of the national capital Dushanbe. Tajikistan, of course, was until 1991 known as the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic.
According to Faridoun Mahmadaliyev, spokesentity for the Tajik Ministry of Defense, Norak-Antiterror 2009 was conducted as part of a common plan formulated at the SCO anti-terror center. “The exercise that was conducted in two stages involved operational groups and special units of the armed forces of Tajikistan, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia,” Mahmadaliyev intoned, adding:
The purpose of the exercise was to rehearse coordination and interaction in antiterrorist missions. The exercise that involved military personnel along with armored vehicles, artillery and aircraft closed on April 18 featuring life-fire missions with combat helicopters.
Representatives of defense and civilian institutions structures from the CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States] and other countries observed the exercise.
We have documented many times before that the neo-Soviet leadership prepares for war against NATO and its allies and positions military assets for specific operations under the guise of “anti-terror” drills. This was the case with Caucasus Frontier 2008, which the Soviets began three weeks prior to their Georgian incursion. At the same time US and Georgian forces were holding the Immediate Response 2008 drill near Tbilisi. A similar situation is once again forming in the Caucasus region as the SCO completes Norak-Antiterror 2009 only weeks before NATO carries out the Cooperative Lancer/Longbow 2009 military exercise, like Immediate Response to be held on Georgian soil, from May 6 to June 1. The “terrorists” in Norak-Antiterror 2009 were apparently armed for “Soviet bear,” requiring suppression by armored vehicles, artillery, and combat aircraft.
Sino-Soviet collaboration in the military sphere is also seen in the presence of the missile cruiser Varyag, the flagship of Russia’s Pacific Fleet, in a parade of 21 foreign warships that will commemorate the 60th anniversary of the People’s Liberation Army Navy. The Chinese Navy launched the maritime ceremony on Monday, off the coast of the eastern city of Qingdao, in Shandong province. The fleet review will feature Chinese nuclear-powered submarines. “It is not a secret that China has nuclear submarines, which are key to safeguarding our country’s national security,” Xinhua quoted PLA Navy Vice Admiral Ding Yiping as saying.
Elsewhere in the “post”-Soviet space the Soviets are positioning their military assets closer to the “renegade” Georgian capital of Tbilisi. Following last August’s re-invasion and re-occupation of Georgia’s two separatist regions, the Russians established permanent military bases in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, boosting their troop presence in each to 7,000. Although Moscow denies any designs of annexing the two territories, the latest Russian military activity near Akhmaji, a checkpoint between South Ossetia and Georgia proper, suggests otherwise:
At a military checkpoint between Georgia and its breakaway region of South Ossetia, the word “Russia” is hand-painted in pink on a concrete security barrier. “It will be Russia,” said a Russian army lieutenant as the Ossetian soldiers under his command nodded. “And Georgia used to be Russian, too,” said the young freckle-faced lieutenant, who would give only his first name, Sergei. Three armored personnel carriers and a tank were dug in around the checkpoint.
Russia has troops just 25 miles (40 kilometers) from the Georgian capital, in violation of the European Union-brokered cease-fire that ended last year’s brief war. And in recent weeks, it has put even more soldiers and armored vehicles within striking distance of the city ahead of street protests against Georgia’s president.
The AP article linked above elaborates on the augmentation and movement of Russian troops in Georgia’s breakaway regions, as well as a “freshly dug anti-tank trench” along the highway to Tbilisi:
Russia’s Foreign Ministry confirmed the Kremlin has sent reinforcements to the boundary lines. It was responding to fears the Georgian government would provoke clashes to distract from the opposition protests, ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko said.
Georgia’s Interior Ministry said Russia has 15,000 soldiers in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which would be far more than in past months. Since the beginning of April, Russia has moved 130 armored vehicles toward the boundary line from elsewhere in South Ossetia and 70 more have entered South Ossetia from Russia, ministry spokesman Shota Utiashvili said.
Russia’s Defense Ministry refused to comment on the composition of its forces, and Georgia’s claims could not be independently verified. European monitors who patrol the boundary lines are not allowed into South Ossetia or Abkhazia, and journalists also are stopped at Russian checkpoints.
Peter Semneby, the EU special representative for the South Caucasus, said the Russian military presence is clearly “significantly larger” than it was.
From a Georgian police checkpoint just 100 yards (meters) from a Russian roadblock controlling access to the village of Akhmaji, a half dozen Russian tanks and other armored vehicles can be seen in the valley.
Local police chief Timur Burduli said the vehicles appeared during the first week of April and are the Russian forces closest to Tbilisi, the Georgian capital. “A tank needs only 40 minutes,” he said.
Along the highway to Tbilisi, a freshly dug anti-tank trench stretches across a long field. Steve Bird, spokesman for the EU monitors, said the Georgians have been building such defenses in recent weeks.
In addition to stridently objecting to NATO’s Cooperative Lancer/Longbow 2009, the Kremlin is not pleased that several oil and gas pipelines supplying the West traverse Georgia, from the Caspian Sea and Central Asia to Turkey and beyond. These energy conduits, which the Russian Air Force attempted to bomb during the Caucasian War, are beyond Moscow’s overt control. “Russia wants to be the monopoly supplier,” observes Georgian political analyst Shalva Pichkhadze at the link above.
We have previously blogged about the protests demanding the resignation of President Mikhail Saakashvili, whom we suspect is a KGB agent playing along with Moscow’s long-range deception plan. One Georgian media source contends that Saakashvili’s uncle, Temur Alasania, is allegedly in the employ of the Russian internal security apparatus.
In a related story, Novosti reports that the first six Mi-28N Night Hunter attack helicopters have been delivered to the Russian Ground Forces’ North Caucasus Military District, a military source revealed on Tuesday. This military district is adjacent to the “former” Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic and was the site of the Caucasus Frontier 2008 drill, mentioned above, just prior to the re-invasion of Georgia. The Mi-28N, manufactured by the Rostvertol plant in southern Russia, is designed to carry out hunter-killer missions against main battle tanks, helicopters, ground forces, and armor in all weather conditions. The Russian Defense Ministry plans to procure between 45 and 67 Mi-28Ns over the next few years, fully replacing the 1970s-era Mi-24 Hind combat/troop transport helicopter by 2015.
Not only is the Russian army creeping closer to Tbilisi, but also the Kremlin’s navy appears to be preparing for some sort of action against Georgia’s only maritime coast on the Black Sea. On April 16 Information Dissemination blog reported that the Russian Navy has deployed all 22 vessels in its Black Sea Fleet for drills: “Earlier this week, as per the agreement between Russia and the Ukraine, Russian officials notified the Ukraine that 22 of its Black Sea Fleet vessels will leave Sevastopol for military maneuvers. Those ships were expected to depart earlier this week, but it was noteworthy when all of the amphibious ships deployed first rather than all of the ships at once.” On the same day the Eurasia Daily Monitor reported:
It is important that the Russian military acknowledges its mobilization and forward deployment of troops and ships. At present, it is impossible to know precisely how many additional army units have been moved within striking distance of Georgian territory.
However, the composition of the naval force that disembarked from Sevastopol is not secret, since the Ukrainian authorities must be informed. It seems to be larger than the force that was deployed against Georgia last August. Four large amphibious landing craft left Sevastopol last week, while in August 2008 only two were reportedly deployed to insert a regiment of marines into Abkhazia in the small port of Ochamchira, close to the border with Georgia (Vlast, August 18). The marines were later deployed in the invasion of Western Georgia.
On April 17 President Dmitry Medvedev, KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin’s lapdog, warned that “Russia will be closely watching the drills and will if necessary, make appropriate decisions.” He added: “Such decisions are disappointing and do nothing to help restore full-level contacts between the Russian Federation and NATO.”
The anti-NATO comments emanating from the Kremlin were echoed by Russia’s NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin on April 18: “On Monday I addressed NATO [incoming] Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen with a letter asking [him] to cancel the drills in Georgia, due to start in early May. I believe this is absurdity and insanity. It is provocational to rattle the saber near our borders until Russia-NATO military contacts are restored and until trust is restored between our sides.” On April 20 Rogozin announced that in protest Russia will withdraw from a scheduled meeting with senior NATO military officials. Formal high-level contacts between Russia and NATO only resumed recently after being frozen by NATO in the wake of last summer’s Caucasian War.
A few days later, while visiting Kyrgyzstan, CSTO Secretary General Nikolai Bordyuzha, a career Chekist, branded NATO maneuvers in Georgia as a provocation: “I absolutely agree that carrying out of the exercises in the territory of Georgia especially after last year’s conflict is nothing else but demonstration of support of those aggressive actions undertaken during Michael Saakashvili’s regime concerning the citizens of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.”
Sergei Bagapsh, de facto “president” of Abkhazia, retorted that his separatist regime will hold a counter-exercise in response to Cooperative Lancer/Longbow 2009: “The planned NATO exercises in Georgia do not lead to the stabilization of the situation in the Caucasus. We observe the situation in Georgia and we will conduct our own drills in response.”
The NATO drills are putatively designed to improve interoperability between the armed forces of NATO and partner countries, within the framework of the Partnership for Peace, Mediterranean Dialogue, and Istanbul Cooperation Initiative programs. The exercise will involve 1,300 troops, but will not include light or heavy weaponry. A total of 19 countries will participate in the exercises. These countries include NATO members Britain, Canada, Greece, Spain, Turkey, and the United States of America, NATO ally United Arab Emirates, as well as a number of “post”-communist countries, including Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Georgia, Hungary, Serbia, and Macedonia.
Kazakhstan, which belongs to the Moscow-controlled CSTO, has decided to pull out of the NATO drill. Explaining Astana’s decision, Kazakh government spokesentity Danial Akhmetov huffed: “We are too busy for this.” Communist Moldova, which received Moscow’s backing after the April 7 “Twitter Revolution,” is also scheduled to participate in Cooperative Lancer/Longbow. It remains to be seen whether Moldovan President Vladmir Voronin, a former Soviet Interior Ministry general, develops second thoughts about his country’s involvement.
Meanwhile, in what reeks of a Kremlin-contrived provocation, the intrepid defenders of the fatherland at the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB/KGB) declared on Tuesday that they have apprehended a Georgian spying on preparations for the Olympic Games in Sochi, the Black Sea resort city near Georgia, and plotting “subversive activities.” An FSB spokesentity intoned to Interfax and Novosti:
The Russian FSB uncovered and halted an agent of the Georgian security services… illegally trespassing on Russian territory with the aim of carrying out reconnaissance and subversive activities. He was directed to gather information on the socio-political situation in the region, and on the preparation for the Olympic Games. We have identified the spy as Mamuka Maisuradze. He will be banned from entering Russia as a threat to Russian security.
Maisuradze has been operating in the region since 2000. He has been arming bandits in the North Caucasus with explosives to incite anti-Russian actions.
The secretary of Georgia’s National Security Council, Eka Tkeshelashvili, denied that the man identified by the FSB/KGB was a Georgian agent. “Such a person is not a staff member of the Georgian intelligence services,” Tkeshelashvili informed AFP, adding: “I see a clear connection between this arrest and the recent capture of a Nashi activist by the Georgian authorities.” Georgian authorities allege that Russian citizen Alexander Kuznetsov, who was detained last week, had been planning an armed provocation against Georgia, but Moscow insisted that Kuznetsov’s confession was coerced.
For their part South Ossetian authorities briefly detained on Tuesday two observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. Separatist officials accused the observers of illegally crossing into South Ossetian territory. “The situation is now over and they are returning to base,” Martha Freeman, spokeswoman for the OSCE mission in Tbilisi, told AFP. However, Eduard Kokoity, de facto “president” of South Ossetia, accused the observers of instigating “provocative” actions: “The OSCE observers unlawfully crossed the border of South Ossetia in the Tskhinvali district by car and were detained by South Ossetian border guards. The actions of the OSCE observers have a provocative character.” The mandate of the OSCE’s 24-member mission in Georgia expires on June 30. Moscow opposes any extension of that mandate. A European Union mission of 225 unarmed observers is also monitoring the ceasefire between Russia and Georgia.
Pictured here: Moldovan communists worship at the shrine of their messiah in Chisinau, on April 22, Vladimir Lenin’s birthday.
Moldovan State Prosecutor Remands Businessman in Custody, Accused of Bankrolling “Twitter Revolution”; Ukrainian Communists Back Voronin
In another Not-So-Former Soviet republic, Moldova, a parliamentary vote recount has confirmed the communist party’s electoral victory on April 5. According to the initial poll results, the Communist Party of the Republic of Moldova attracted around half of the votes, resulting in violent anti-communist, pro-Romanian riots in the capital Chisinau. The country’s Constitutional Court made the decision to hold a recount at the request of President Vladimir Voronin, who chairs the ruling communist party. The communists hold 60 out of 101 parliamentary seats, which means they are only one seat away from being able to unilaterally elect the president. Two-term president Voronin must step down on May 7, presumably in favor of a party colleague. Moldova’s prime minister Zinaida Greceanii, a close Voronin ally, is his presumed successor.
On April 17, reports Novosti, Moldova’s Prosecutor General’s Office remanded Moldovan businessman Gabriel Stati in custody on suspicion of inciting mass riots and an attempted coup. Stati and his bodyguard will remain in custody for 30 days in Chisinau while the state prosecutor investigates the case. If found guilty, Stati could face up to 15 years for inciting mass riots in the country and an additional 25 years for the attempted coup. That Moldova’s communists would identify an oil and construction industry magnate as the source of the “Twitter Revolution” should surprise no one. Stati was living in Ukraine until Chisinau submitted an extradition request to Kiev.
For its part, the Communist Party of Ukraine sympathizes with the Voronin regime: “The presidium of the central committee of the Ukrainian Communist party notes that the government overthrow attempt in the Republic of Moldova cannot be viewed separately from the events which began with the establishment of the Saakashvili dictatorship in Georgia in 2003-2004 and the ‘orange putsch in Ukraine.'”
Incidentally, there is widespread belief in Georgia, states the Information Dissemination blog quoted above, that “Russia helped finance the [anti-Saakashvili] demonstrations that began April 9th, but it is noteworthy those demonstrations have become smaller and smaller each day.” Along that theme, Moldovan billionaire Stati’s links to the KGB-controlled Red Mafiya are worth exploring.
In an April 12 interview broadcast on Russia’s NTV channel, “President” Medvedev referred to the Moldovan unrest as “monstrous” and singled out Romanian irredentists for denunciation: “Such civil activity should be held within the legal framework and not in the way of the so-called color revolutions, which bring nothing but poverty and problems with human rights. What happened in our close neighbor, in Moldova, is unfortunately an example of how events can develop in an absolutely unconstitutional way. The footage we saw looked monstrous, when there were attempts to hang flags of another country on the main state buildings, the symbols of a state.” Along the same theme, Voronin has identified the Romanian intelligence service as the culprit behind the “Twitter Revolution.”
>Latin America/Asia Files: Thailand’s exiled left-populist PM materializes in Managua, rubs elbows with Ortega, claims Nicaraguan passport, new job
April 17, 2009Posted by on
>- Anti-Thaksin Leader Sondhi Limthongkul Seriously Injured by Gunmen in Early Friday Morning Attack, Condition Stable Following Surgery
- First Contingent of Nicaraguan Cadets Heads to Russia for Military Training, Russian Delegation to Arrive in Managua to Discuss Upgrades for Country’s Soviet-Built Army
In January, Nicaraguan authorities revealed to the AFP news agency this week, Thailand’s exiled left-populist prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra materialized in Managua, rubbed elbows with past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega, claimed a Nicaraguan passport, and acquired a new job. “President Ortega,” an official statement from Managua disclosed, “asked the foreign ministry to accredit him [Thaksin] as an ambassador of Nicaragua on a special mission, in order to facilitate his efforts to bring investments to our country.”
Nicaragua, which is once again under the overt control of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN), issued the statement on Wednesday, only hours after authorities in Bangkok revoked Thaksin’s Thai passport in light of the banished politician’s alleged incitement of recent deadly anti-government protests. During the unrest in the streets of Bangkok, pro-Thaksin forces, known as “Red Shirts” due to their high-visibility Hugo Chavez-style T-shirts, clashed with police and pro-government supporters, including royalists and pro-business groups. Pro-Thaksin forces are formally organized as the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship.
Thailand, a Buddhist country with a constitutional monarchy, has never endured a full-blown communist regime, unlike the rest of Southeast Asia, including Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. Thailand’s communist guerrillas terminated their armed warfare against the government in the early 1980s. However, we have documented how Thaksin’s two previous political parties, both of which have been banned by Thailand’s Constitutional Court, are infiltrated at the highest levels by former cadres of the otherwise defunct Communist Party of Thailand. Thaksin’s current political vehicle is the For Thais Party.
“We have diplomatic relations with Nicaragua but no extradition agreement,” foreign ministry spokesman Tharit Charungvat informed AFP. Tharit admitted that Thailand has not yet issued a formal protest to Nicaragua for harboring and employing Thaksin. On Wednesday Thai authorities explained that they cancelled Thaksin’s passport after the billionaire tycoon called for a “revolution” against the pro-monarchist government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva. Apparently in response to Thaksin’s call to arms, last Saturday Red Shirts stormed a Thai beach resort, where an Association of Southeast Asian Nations summit was meeting. “The ministry can cancel or recall a passport if it can prove that a person has caused damage to the country,” stated government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn.
Thaksin lives in exile to avoid a two-year jail term for corruption. In an interview filmed in the United Arab Emirates before the announcement of the passport cancellation, Thaksin predictably denied that he had incited the Red Shirts’ violence.
At dawn on Friday, BBC News reports, Sondhi Limthongkul, head of the anti-Thaksin forces, the People’s Alliance for Democracy, was seriously injured in an assassination attempt. Sondhi’s so-called “Yellow Shirts” helped to oust Thaksin from power in 2006 and brought down a pro-Thaksin government last year. “At least two attackers followed Sondhi’s car, overtook it and sprayed it with about 100 rounds of gunfire from AK-47 and M-16s,” related local police commander Colonel King Kwaengwisatchaicharn. Sondhi was en route to his television station to record a program.
Thailand is one of several non-communist Asian countries with which neo-Sandinista Nicaragua maintains relations. The Republic of China is another. Instead of predictably snuggling up to Beijing, as it did during the 1980s, Nicaragua’s second communist regime recognizes Taipei, a linkage established by Managua’s liberal-conservative governments during the 1990s. This may be for the purpose of subverting Taiwan and Thailand into the Communist Bloc, but more likely for the purpose of attracting business investments, as admitted above by Managua itself. In light of Ortega’s cozy relationship with Thaksin, one is inclined to wonder if the Sandinistas are supporting a slow-motion crypto-communist coup in Thailand.
Meanwhile, in a sign that the revitalized Moscow-Managua Axis is moving ahead, Brigadier General Adolph Zepeda, public relations chief for the Nicaraguan Army, announced today that his country has dispatched its first contingent of 19 cadets to Russia for military, academic, and language training. Zepeda also revealed that a Russian military delegation will be arriving in Nicaragua over the next few days to continue discussions on the subject of technology transfers and re-equipping the Nicaraguan military, which uses mostly Soviet-vintage weapons. “The technicians of this [Russian] military mission will support us in the maintenance and correct operation of aircraft, armored vehicles, and armament,” explained Zepeda to La Voz del Sandinismo, the official mouthpiece of the FSLN.
The Cold War has returned to Central America and communism is once again oozing throughout the region, having claimed its latest victim, El Salvador, by the ballot box last month. But is anyone in the shopping mall regime paying attention?
>Final Phase Backgrounder: Soviet strategists accomplish major objective: Germany’s vice chancellor urges Obama to remove US nuclear warheads
April 16, 2009Posted by on
- Right Wing of Social Democratic Leadership Blocks Kurt Beck’s Bid to Push Party Leftward, Endorses Foreign Minister for Chancellor; Frank-Walter Steinmeier Already Committed to Angela Merkel’s Strategic Partnership with Russia
- SPD Mulls National Coalition with “Former” East German Communists as September 2009 Bundestag Election Approaches; Putin Ally and Former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder Calls Potential Alliance “Thoroughly Realistic”
- Federal Republic of Germany’s Domestic Intelligence Agency: 31,000 “Extremists” in Left Party and other Far-Left Formations, 6,000 Prepared to Overthrow Government by Force
- German Communist Party Cadre, Former Left Party Member in Lower Saxony State Parliament Lauds Stasi, Praises Berlin Wall
Pictured above: Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev and German Vice Chancellor/Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the 45th Munich Security Conference in February.
It has been many months since we filed a report under “Final Phase Backgrounder.” However, the fulfillment of KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s detailed 25-year-old warnings about the Soviet strategic deception are becoming more and more apparent with the passage of time. Specific developments that validate Golitsyn’s thesis that communism in Eastern Europe transformed itself, rather than “died,” include:
- The federalization of the European Economic Community into the European Union (EU) in 1993, per Mikhail Gorbachev’s 1989 prescription for a “common European home” from the Atlantic Ocean to the Ural Mountains
- The absorption into the EU of “post”-communist countries where leftist parties are still under covert Soviet control via the International Meeting of Communist and Workers’ Parties, the International Communist Movement, the Socialist International, the Party of European Socialists, European United Left–Nordic Green Left, and other inter-party organizations
- The transformation of Europe into a “neutral, socialist” bloc of nations subservient to the Kremlin’s energy imperialism, via projects such as the Nord Stream and South Stream natural gas pipelines
- The undermining of European conservative parties by figuratively placing an “Open for Business” sign over Russia and temporarily hiding the expansionistic threat of Soviet communism
- The rise of the Moscow-Beijing Axis, as embodied in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, founded in 2001
- The restoration of the Moscow-Berlin Axis, as embodied by a series of bilateral agreements, beginning in 1990, and a new strategic partnership contrived in 2006
- The election of socialist and possible Soviet mole Barack Hussein Obama to the US presidency in 2008
- The withdrawal of the US atomic arsenal from Europe, increasing the vulnerability of NATO to a nuclear blitzkrieg from Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces
In his first book New Lies for Old (1984), Golitsyn sketches the predictive framework for these “post”-Cold War realities. Please note your resident blogger’s comments in brackets.
The communist strategists have achieved their purpose thus far by misleading the West on developments in the communist world with three main aims in view: to relieve Western pressure on the communist regimes while they are “building socialism” and laying the groundwork for an eventual worldwide federation of communist states [including the European Union, African Union, Union of South American Nations, Commonwealth of Independent States, etc.]; to provoke the Western responses they desire to their activist diplomacy and international communist strategy [such as unrest in Moldova and Georgia in April 2009]; and to prepare the ground for a major shift in communist tactics in the final phase of policy [beginning] in the 1980s [and continuing into the early 21st century] (page 322).
There are increasing signs of preparation for a communist initiative on Germany, the key to progress toward a neutral, socialist Europe [our emphasis]. Among these were the meeting between [Soviet dictator Leonid] Brezhnev and the East German leader, [Erich] Honecker, in the Crimea in 1980 at which a European conference on disarmament was discussed. Similar discussions took place between the Soviet and West German peace committees in February 1980 (page 335).
Pressure could well grow for a solution to the German problem in which some form of confederation between East and West Germany [realized in 1990] would be combined with neutralization of the whole and a treaty of friendship with the Soviet Union [also realized in 1990 and greatly expanded since then] (page 341).
NATO could hardly survive this process [our emphasis] (page 341).
The disappearance of the Warsaw Pact [replaced by the Collective Security Treaty Organization and Shanghai Cooperation Organization] would have little effect on the coordination of the communist bloc, but the dissolution of NATO could well mean the departure of American forces from the European continent and a close European alignment with a “liberalized” Soviet bloc (page 341).
The EEC [European Economic Community, now European Union] on present lines, even if enlarged, would not be a barrier to the neutralization of Europe and the withdrawal of American troops. It might even accelerate the process (page 341).
“’Liberalization’ in Eastern Europe on the scale suggested could have a social and political impact on the United States itself, especially if it coincided with a severe economic depression,” suggests Golitsyn in the last chapter of New Lies for Old, “The Final Phase” (page 342). In view of the serious global recession that began in 2008 and Presidents George W. Bush and Obama’s application of “financial socialism” to America’s economic woes–a phrase used by Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev–the former KGB major’s admonitions are once again worth pondering.
In a September-November 1990 memorandum to the US Central Intelligence Agency, Golitsyn expounds on the implications of German reunification for the advancement of the Soviet strategy to conquer Europe. The establishment of bilateral relations and binding obligations between Moscow and Bonn/Berlin began under the chancellorship of center-rightist Helmut Kohl. The linkages in the Moscow-Berlin Axis have only grown tighter over the last 20 years, under both Christian Democratic (CDU) and Social Democratic (SPD) governments, forcing reunified Germany into a subservient position before the Moscow Leninists. Golitsyn’s memo, published in The Perestroika Deception (1995, 1998), refers to Kohl, but his analysis is also applicable to Kohl’s Christian Democratic successor, the current German chancellor, Angela Merkel. Please note our comments in brackets.
Since West Germany was considered by the Soviets as politically the most vulnerable country in Western Europe, the main weight of the Soviet assault was directed against that country [our emphasis]. To ensure success, the Soviets made use of skilled diplomacy, agents of influence, pressure and significant concessions to the Germans on reunification. The result was a breakthrough for the Soviets [our emphasis].
The Germans responded with enthusiasm, providing massive financial, economic and technological aid to the Soviets—developing into their principal partners in the execution of their economic strategy. Ironically, Germany is moving towards partnership with the USSR under a conservative chancellor, Kohl. The problem with Kohl [and Merkel] is not that he is using the situation to gain his re-election but that he is recklessly disregarding the lessons of the history of Germany’s past dealings with the Soviets [our emphasis]. He overlooks the fact that it was the German General Staff [under Kaiser Wilhelm II] who financed [revolutionary Vladimir] Lenin and brought him to the Finland Station [in 1917].
No sooner had Lenin succeeded with his October Revolution than he attempted to re-export it to Germany [via the short-lived Bavarian Soviet Republic and the Spartacist insurrection]. Although Kohl dismisses the idea, the comparison between Lenin’s negotiation and exploitation of the 1922 Treaty of Rapallo with the Germans and the present Soviet strategy with regard to economic collaboration offered by Kohl and his Foreign Minister, Genscher, is close and compelling.
What Kohl [and Merkel] fails to realize is that the Soviet strategists aim to use Germany’s economic and technological might to convert the USSR into the dominant power in a united Europe. Chancellor Kohl [and Merkel] had his eyes on the next election. But Gorbachev and the strategists are thinking further ahead. It was no accident that Gorbachev referred to reunited Germany’s right not only to participate in NATO but to join whatever alliance Germany preferred. What he had in mind was the possibility that a future Germany under a Social Democratic Government [such as Gerhard Schröder’s (1998-2005) or possibly a future one under current Vice Chancellor Frank-Walter Steinmeier] would switch to political alliance with the USSR. Domination of a united Europe by a Soviet-German political and economic partnership would be a significant achievement for the second round of the October World Socialist Revolution (page 125).
As noted in passing above, a Moscow-Berlin Axis first existed after the secret Treaty of Rapallo (1922-1933), signed between the Weimar Republic and the Soviet Union, and then again briefly after the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (1939-1941). Contrary to the Treaty of Versailles, Rapallo allowed German military units to train on Soviet territory in exchange for technology transfers from Berlin to Moscow. Germany’s National Socialist dictator Adolf Hitler terminated the Moscow-Berlin Axis when he hurled his armies against the Soviet Union in Operation Barbarossa.
Since Kohl’s retirement from German politics in 1998, there has been one Social Democratic government in Berlin, under former chancellor Gerhard Schröder, a close personal ally of Russia’s KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin who advanced still further the Moscow-Berlin Axis. In fact, last year the Kremlin awarded “Comrade” Schröder with a post in the foreign relations section of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Schröder also chairs the shareholders’ committee of Nord Stream, a joint enterprise of Kremlin entity Gazprom, BASF/Wintershall, E.ON Ruhrgas, and N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie.
The current German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who is also Merkel’s vice chancellor, is an SPD member who intends to lead his party to victory again in the September 27, 2009 Bundestag election. Steinmeier was formally nominated as the Social Democrats’ chancellor-candidate at a convention on October 18, 2008. The SPD also chose Transport, Building and Urban Affairs Minister Franz Müntefering to replace party leader Kurt Beck. Steinmeier is totally committed to ending all vestiges of the Cold War and expanding Merkel’s new strategic partnership with Russia. After Medvedev’s election in March 2008, Steinmeier gushed:
Russia is and remains an indispensable strategic partner if we want to secure peace in Europe. But it’s not only us who needs Russia — Russia also needs us. Let us take the president [Medvedev] at his word. Let us accept his partnership proposition. Russia’s transformation — it’s as much in his interest as it is in ours. The European Union must develop closer ties with countries in central Asia and the Caucasus as well as the Ukraine and Belarus — providing the latter agrees to work on its human rights record. We should enshrine a new charter with Russia, focused on democracy and peace. The Cold War is today definitively consigned to history.
One year later, on April 14, 2009, the UPI news agency reported that Steinmeier intends to ask Washington to remove its nuclear warheads stationed in Germany. “These weapons are militarily obsolete,” Steinmeier informed German newsmagazine Der Spiegel. Seizing upon Obama’s communist-inspired vision of a nuclear-free world, articulated over a week ago in Prague, Steinmeier insisted that Washington should first withdraw its nuclear weapons from Germany. He added that any disarmament conference that the USA attends with Russia should include scrapping “weapons in this category.” Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, the US military has downsized its nuclear arsenal in fellow NATO states but, at present, it maintains approximately 100 nuclear warheads in Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Turkey. Another SPD government in Germany, especially under Steinmeier’s leadership, will effectively gut NATO’s ability to resist neo-Soviet aggression.
Chancellor Merkel has in the past argued that having nukes in Germany elevated the country’s security profile within NATO, but Steinmeier rejects that idea. Since Steinmeier and Merkel will face off in September’s parliamentary election, they have begun to adopt different positions on several issues. In any case, Merkel’s commitment to NATO as a bulwark against neo-Soviet aggression is dubious. Merkel was not only raised in East Germany but also joined the ruling communist party’s youth section as a girl.
Current public opinion polls reveal that popular support for the German Left and Right is evenly matched. For example, the CDU and its long-time ally in the state of Bavaria, the Christian Social Union (CSU), enjoy the support of 34 percent of voters, while the SPD enjoys only 27 percent. While the CSU/CSU could form a stable coalition with the liberal Free Democratic Party, as it did during the Cold War, thereby commanding support from a total of 48 percent of the electorate, the SPD could similarly enter a grand coalition with the Green and Left parties, thereby also commanding support from about 48 percent of the electorate.
The Left Party was founded in 2007 through the merger of the Party of Democratic Socialism, the successor organization to the German Democratic Republic’s ruling Socialist Unity Party (SED), and Labour and Social Justice Electoral Alternative, a party founded in 2005 by disgruntled SPD members based in western Germany. Since then, the Left Party, not to mention the Green Party, has drained support away from the SPD. East Germany’s “former” communists have in fact cleared the five percent threshold to enter into the state parliaments of eastern Germany. In recent regional elections in western Germany, the Left Party also entered for the first time the state parliaments of Bremen, Hamburg, Hesse, and Lower Saxony. Left Party leader Oskar Lafantaine is an ex-SPD boss, who is notorious for branding former US President George W. Bush as a “terrorist” and praising Venezuela’s communist dictator Hugo Chavez for nationalizing power companies.
Since the formation of the Left Party, the SPD leadership has been divided over the possibility of inviting their far-left colleagues into a future coalition government. In October 2007 former chancellor Schröder was quoted as saying that an alliance between the SPD and the Left Party after 2009 was “thoroughly realistic.” Some political analysts attribute former SPD leader Kurt Beck’s departure from that office to his suggestion, made last year, of collaborating with the Left Party at the state and federal levels. In particular, the SPD’s right wing slammed Beck for “giving a green light” to the state party leader in Hesse to form a minority government with the Left Party. That particular venture failed.
Nevertheless, Müntefering sharply criticized Beck for cozying up to Germany’s far left, foreseeing a still further decline in the SPD’s fortunes. At the same time, the left wing of the SPD, including deputy party leader Andrea Nahles, expressed cautious support for Beck’s proposal. “The Left Party has become a political reality, also in western Germany,” Nahles told Der Spiegel adding: “Everyone in the SPD should accept this reality. Kurt Beck’s course is the correct one. However, the SPD should continue to refuse working together with the Left Party at the national level. No coalition, no tolerance or any kind of cooperation with this party.”
Beck’s attempt to shift the party leftward and so return to the SPD’s “socialist roots” represented a broader strategy aimed at dumping former chancellor Schröder’s Agenda 2010 reforms, modeled on ex-British prime minister Tony Blair’s “New Labour” policies. Instead, he sought to reinvigorate the party’s support base within western Germany’s working class and among advocates of “social justice.” The attempt obviously failed with Beck’s resignation last September. In the end, therefore, if Germany’s Social Democrats join forces with the Left Party, then it will be under Steinmeier’s leadership. Granted, Steinmeier’s candidacy for the chancellorship was backed by the SPD’s right wing, including Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück, Brandenburg Governor Matthias Platzeck, and Müntefering. However, it is evident from the quote above, that Steinmeier is already committed to consolidating the Moscow-Berlin Axis, with or without the domestic involvement of East Germany’s “former” communists.
It is not too surprising that many leaders in the SPD are nervous about snuggling up to the hard-core leftists in Germany’s Left Party. In February 2008 Christel Wegner, a cadre of the German Communist Party who ran on the Left Party ticket, made the audacious statement, in her capacity as deputy in Lower Saxony’s state parliament, that East Germany’s secret police, the Stasi, and the Berlin Wall were “useful” in protecting the country from “reactionary forces” (that is, fascists and capitalists). “I think that when one builds a new societal form,” Wegner reflected, “then one needs such an organ because one has to protect oneself from other forces, reactionary forces, that look for opportunities to weaken a state from the inside.” She added: “The construction of the Wall was, in any case, a measure taken to prevent West Germans from continuing to come into East Germany.” Wegner was promptly expelled from the Left Party. Some offended CDU politicians in Lower Saxony demanded that Wegner also be expelled from the state parliament. Wegner is a paying member of Greenpeace.
In a related development, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, warns that the Left Party has been “infiltrated by far-left extremists and former communists.” One of the responsibilities of this agency is to monitor political extremism, both on the Left and Right. Der Spiegel reports that the Left Party contains several influential factions committed to advancing violent communist revolution in Germany:
The most powerful individual faction within the party is the Communist Platform (KPF) with 840 members, according to the report. It struggles openly for the “overthrow of capitalism” and is making massive attempts to influence the party’s new political platform, the agency writes.
The agency also mentions a faction with around 60 members called the Marxist Forum (MF), “an association of orthodox communist-oriented members and sympathizers,” including former members of the Socialist Unity Party (SED), the communist party which ruled the former East Germany.
The KPF and MF participate in a movement within the Left Party known as the Geraer Dialogue/Socialist Dialogue. This group, which has 120 members, is a “receptacle for extremist forces,” according to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Its political platform expressly includes “the extra-parliamentary struggle for social change.”
Other left-wing extremist movements within the Left Party include the Socialist Left with 550 members, as well as a pro-Cuban faction, the Cuba Si Working Group, with 420 members.
According to the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s 2006 annual report there are about 31,000 extremists in the Left Party and other far-left formations, of whom around 6,000 are prepared to overthrow the government by force.
>USSR2 File: Moldovan opposition to boycott vote recount, Voronin: Romanian agents behind “Twitter Revolution”; Saakashvili faces "Necktie Revolution"
April 14, 2009Posted by on
>In Russia, business and the mafia are one and the same — business, mafia, and the KGB. Large Russian businesses are run by the mafia and the KGB. An order goes out telling Georgian businessmen who live in Moscow to finance various political parties here in Georgia. Moscow would rather see Georgia destabilized than leaning toward the West.
– Vakhtang Rcheulishvili, former deputy speaker of Georgian parliament; quoted by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, March 27, 2009
Pictured above: While addressing his country’s parliament today, Romanian President Traian Basescu condemned Moldova’s treatment of ethnic Romanians and offered to fast-track one million applications for citizenship piling up in Romania’s embassy in Chisinau.
Although European monitors endorsed the results of Moldova’s April 5 parliamentary election, a poll that granted a third consecutive victory to the ruling communist party, domestic unrest two days later prompted the government of President Vladimir Voronin to restore the public’s trust by submitting to a vote recount tomorrow.
After serving two terms, Voronin must step down from his office. Moldova’s president is elected by parliament. Moldovan media consider Zinaida Greceanii, the country’s female prime minister and a Voronin croney, to be the most likely candidate for president. Moldova is covered by the European Union’s Neighborhood Policy and the new president is expected to attend the May 7 launch of the EU’s Eastern Partnership at a summit in Prague. The Czech Republic currently holds the rotating EU presidency. Incidentally, as we blogged before, the new caretaker prime minister in Prague, Jan Fischer, is an “ex”-cadre of the old Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. Moldova and Cyprus, moreover, are the only European countries with democratically elected, openly communist governments.
Notwithstanding his concessions to Moldova’s liberal opposition, Voronin, a former Soviet Interior Ministry general who collects a Kremlin pension, continues to lash out against Romania. In an interview with the Spanish newspaper El Pais, Voronin ranted:
Citizens of Serbia and Romania masterminded pogroms in Chisinau. The arrival of nine persons from Serbia, as well as agents of the Romanian secret services had been registered in Chisinau. They wished to use the moment to stage an operation like a ‘colour revolution’. The events in Belgrade, Tbilisi, Bishkek and Kiev took place according to such a scenario. The events have been filmed, so we can identify the offenders who attacked policemen. We are going to arrest and prosecute them.
“We have proof on video of the participation of citizens from the neighboring state in the protests,” confirmed Grigory Petrenko, chairman of Moldova’s parliamentary foreign relations committee. He added:
It is not an accident that during the protests in front of the parliament and presidential administration they yelled slogans calling for unification with Romania. It is not an accident that the Romanian flag was raised on top of the presidential administration building, along with a map of a so-called Greater Romania, and it is not an accident that there was a large number of Romanians participating in the protest.
Voronin’s mention of Belgrade, Tbilisi, Bishkek, and Kiev refers to Serbia’s 2000 Bulldozer Revolution that ousted communist dictator Slobodan Milosevich, who died while on trial at The Hague in 2006; Georgia’s 2003 Rose Revolution that ousted communist dictator Eduard Schevardnadze, an ally of former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev who remains Moscow’s man in Tbilisi to this day; Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution that blocked an electoral victory for communist dictator Leonid Kuchma’s hand-picked successor Viktor Yanukovich; and Kyrgyzstan’s 2005 Tulip Revolution, which not-so-ironically replaced one “ex”-Soviet apparatchik with another one.
These fake anti-communist coups were named after the November 1989 Velvet Revolution that supposedly topped Czechoslovakia’s red regime. Soviet Bloc defector and dissident testimony proves that the Prague operation was masterminded by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) and its Czechoslovakian counterpart. The KGB, the “sword and shield” of the CPSU, and Czechoslovakia’s State Security (StB) then carried out Moscow’s plan of false “democratization” through bogus political organizations like Charter 77.
Along the theme of Eastern Europe’s “color revolutions,” the Western MSM has portrayed last Tuesday’s anti-communist riots in the Moldovan capital as the “Twitter Revolution.” Twitter is a social networking forum on the Internet, where many protesters plotted their demonstration in Piata Marii Adunari Nationale, the main square in downtown Chisinau. “Digital tools like Twitter, Facebook and SMS text messaging played a key role in the massive youth protests that rocked the Communist government in the former Soviet republic of Moldova this week,” relates the AFP news agency. The same source continues:
The flow of Twitter comments could be searched with the tag #pman which stood for the name of Moldova’s central square, Piata Marii Adunari Nationale. Meanwhile a group set up on the social networking site Facebook called ‘Down With Communists!’ boasted over 500 members on Wednesday along with a logo of a stick-figure man dumping a Communist hammer and sickle in a trash can.
Unimpressed by the stamp of approval placed on the poll results by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the Council of Europe, Moldova’s opposition alleges that the ruling communists rigged the election in their favor. Foreign witnesses also allege that last Tuesday’ riots were staged by “provocateurs” who commandeered an otherwise peaceful protest march. In an April 8 interview with EurActiv, Julien Danero, a Belgian researcher who witnessed the unrest, asserted: “Yes, I think that those who did the rampage were provocateurs. Even the opposition parties could not control the developments in any way. They were making speeches nearby, and all the speakers, politicians and young people were making appeals for calm, saying that the EU would recognize the protests only if they were peaceful.”
The leaders of the three main opposition parties–Our Moldova, the Liberal Party, and the Liberal Democratic Party—announced today that they intend to boycott the scheduled recount, denouncing the move as a ruse to cover up election violations and to ensure the continuation of communist rule.
The war of words between Chisinau and Bucharest is heating up as a result of the Twitter Revolution. Today Romania’s “ex”-communist President Traian Basescu warned: “We cannot tolerate Romanian citizens be threatened with guns by political leaders in the Republic of Moldova, as such actions cannot be in no way tolerable, while speaking of human lives. We drew attention that using weapons against the civil population, among which there were Romanian citizens too, is a crime.” The Romanian president also requested legislators to simplify the procedure by which one million ethnic Romanians in Moldova can obtain citizenship from Bucharest. EurActiv reports that this decision will “raise eyebrows in EU capitals, which would end up with another emigration wave of ‘millions of hungry, new EU citizens.'” Romanian-speaking Moldova has a total of four million people. As the country faces the possibility of becoming a failed state, Chisinau’s backers in Moscow will no doubt edge closer to war with NATO.
Indeed, following the April 7 riots, Russia’s neo-Soviet leadership strongly endorsed Moldova’s communist government and, alluding to Romanian irredentism, condemned external meddling in the small country’s affairs. It is not clear to what extent the Putinist and Voronin regimes were involved in fomenting fake anti-communist/pro-Romanian provocations in Chisinau. However, between April 3 and 8 Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev held telephone conversations with Voronin and other leaders of the Commonwealth of Independent States. The topics of discussion reportedly included the results of the April 2 Group of 20 summit in London, and upcoming meetings of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, the Collective Security Treaty Organization’s Collective Security Council, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s Council of Heads of State. Moldova’s unrest, of course, began on April 7. Thus, it is possible that just prior to Moldova’s election Moscow communicated its intention to Chisinau to provoke communist-controlled NATO member state Romania.
Pictured here: After six days of protest in Tbilisi, Georgians continue to demand the resignation of the country’s president.
Elsewhere in the “post”-Soviet space, Georgia’s opposition continues to besiege the country’s deceptively pro-USA/NATO president Mikhail Saakashvili, a social democrat who is an alleged KGB agent and known protégé of Schevardnadze. Last Thursday and Friday tens of thousands of Georgians, as part of a campaign of civil disobedience, took to the streets of Tbilisi to block roads near the president’s official residence and the state broadcaster’s headquarters.
The chief opposition leader is Levan Gachechiladze, a liberal-conservative businessman who founded Georgia’s United Opposition and ran in the January 2008 presidential poll that re-elected Saakashvili. “We will turn Tbilisi into a city of tents and cells,” vowed Gachechiladze, who has participated in six days of protest outside the presidential residence. A Conservative Party of Georgia activist, Lasha Chkhartishvili, urged residents gathering in front of the residence to bring neckties and hang them on a fence. Last August, explains Novosti, Saakashvili became the object of mockery in both Georgia and Russia when he was caught on camera nervously chewing his necktie while discussing the Russian invasion by telephone with a top Western official.
Political analysts, according to Reuters, insist, however, that Saakashvili’s ruling United National Movement retains wide support, even though the president has reshuffled his cabinet in the face of some high-level political defections. Saakashvili has accused the opposition of receiving “Russian money” and the Kremlin of building up its military presence in Georgia’s breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. At the same time, in what appears to be a provocation designed to lure NATO into a war with Russia, the Georgian president declared: “Although the concentration of Russian forces in Georgia and beyond it exceeds what was there in August last year, I don’t think there is a possibility that Russia will resume a large-scale military adventure. As regards our relations with Russia, Russians keep saying that they want good relations with Georgia, but only after a change in government.”
This week South Ossetian “President” Eduard Kokoity, a Soviet Komsomol graduate, rumbled: “The Georgian army cannot resist to the Russian and South Ossetian military forces stationed in Tskhinvali Region. Russian and Ossetian border guards will protect the borders of the republic together soon.” He was quick to add: “The joint control of borders does not mean that South Ossetia is not an independent republic.” Only Russia and neo-Sandinista Nicaragua have recognized the “independence” of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Russian President Medvedev, his master KGB-communist dictator Vladimir Putin, and the Russian Foreign Ministry have not disguised their desire for “regime change” in Tbilisi. Georgian political scientist Ghia Nodia provides a brief overview of Kremlin intrigue in its “former” satellite in the Caucasus Mountains:
Russia is attempting to satisfy this demand for a change of government by supplying political alternatives. Russia has been trying to create some kind of a fifth column in Georgia, be it by strengthening [Igor] Giorgadze’s Justice Party or through the creation of some NGOs. They probably thought that since Saakashvili was brought in by the West, they could similarly change the government in Georgia.
So far, such efforts, including the backing of former [Georgian] Security Minister Igor Giorgadze’s Justice Party in 2005-06, have been unsuccessful.
Russia hasn’t given up the plan. It still hopes that by continuing to push this agenda they will bring about political instability.
Interpol fugitive Igor Giorgadze, who is reportedly hiding out in Russia, is the son of retired Soviet Army general Panteleimon Giorgadze, boss of the United Communist Party of Georgia. The latter is allied with Gennady Zyuganov’s (secretly ruling) Communist Party of the Russian Federation. The several communist parties that operate in Georgia do not command much popular support but, as can be seen, their leaders are important fifth columnists for Moscow.
At the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty link above, even Georgia’s former border guard commander Badri Bitsadze, husband of former parliament speaker and opposition leader Nino Burjanadze, has shady links with the Kremlin via the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB/KGB) and the Russian and Georgian mafias. “In Russia, business and the mafia are one and the same — business, mafia, and the KGB,” explains Vakhtang Rcheulishvili, former deputy speaker of the Georgian parliament. “Large Russian businesses are run by the mafia and the KGB. An order goes out telling Georgian businessmen who live in Moscow to finance various political parties here in Georgia.” Rcheulishvili, who does not hesitate to call Russia’s internal repression apparatus by its old name (that is, KGB), adds: “Moscow would rather see Georgia destabilized than leaning toward the West.”
Meanwhile, Russia’s fiery NATO envoy Dmitry Rogozin has articulated the Kremlin’s displeasure with another planned joint NATO-Georgia military exercise to be held at Georgia’s Vaziani military base from May 3 to June 3. NATO troops and Georgia’s armed forces wrapped up a previous combined drill, Immediate Response 2008, one week before Russia’s re-invasion and re-occupation of the “former” Soviet republic on August 5, 2008. “NATO is trying to interfere in Georgia’s affairs in this way,” Rogozin complained to Novosti on Tuesday. The Cooperative Longbow/Lancer-2009 drills will include 900 service personnel from 23 NATO member states, to be held under NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program, of which Russia is also a member. The exercises will improve interoperability between NATO and Georgian troops. Specifically, Cooperative Longbow will train staff, while Cooperative Lancer will consist of field drills.
Rogozin huffed: “The exercises are an expression of support for Saakashvili, and a challenge to the newly independent South Ossetia and Abkhazia.” He added ominously: “Russia will be forced to react.” Rogozin concluded: “The Saakashvili regime shows gross disregard towards those people sacrificed on the altar of his Napoleonic ambitions.” In other words, the Kremlin views Saakashvili as a “fascist.”
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which embodies the Moscow-Beijing Axis, plans to carry out joint military drills in Tajikistan between April 17 and 19, as well as in northeast China in the summer. These will constitute the third and fourth Sino-Soviet war games since 2005.
>USA File: Intel officials, cybersecurity experts: Russian, Chinese hackers mapping electrical grid, deploying “attack software” for future disruptions
April 9, 2009Posted by on
If we go to war with them [Russia or China], they will try to turn them [malware] on.
– Senior US intelligence official
At Once Upon a Time in the West we regularly monitor attempts by the Communist Bloc to disrupt or bring down the Internet, as well as penetrate and interfere with civilian and military computer systems in NATO countries. Yesterday the Wall Street Journal, citing various US intelligence officials and cybersecurity experts, reported that hackers from Russia and China have been caught red-handed (pun intended) mapping the US electrical grid and deploying malware to activate at a later date.
“Cyberspies have penetrated the U.S. electrical grid and left behind software programs that could be used to disrupt the system, according to current and former national-security officials,” begins the WSJ, continuing: “The spies came from China, Russia and other countries, these officials said, and were believed to be on a mission to navigate the U.S. electrical system and its controls. The intruders haven’t sought to damage the power grid or other key infrastructure, but officials warned they could try during a crisis or war.”
“The Chinese have attempted to map our infrastructure, such as the electrical grid. So have the Russians,” a senior US intelligence official is quoted as saying, adding: “If we go to war with them, they will try to turn them on.”
“The espionage appears pervasive across the U.S. and doesn’t target a particular company or region,” observes a former Department of Homeland Security official. “There are intrusions [in electrical systems], and they are growing. There were a lot last year.” The US electrical grid consists of five separate networks covering the eastern states, the western states, Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii.
Experts at the US Cyber Consequences Unit think tank explained that “attack programs” search for openings in a computer network through which the software and its human controllers overseas can acquire the same access and powers as a systems administrator.
Intelligence officials admit that many of the intrusions were not detected by the companies in charge of the infrastructure but, rather, by US government agencies. The WSJ relates that the newspaper’s sources in the intelligence community “worry about cyber attackers taking control of electrical facilities, a nuclear power plant or financial networks via the Internet.”
“Over the past several years, we have seen cyberattacks against critical infrastructures abroad, and many of our own infrastructures are as vulnerable as their foreign counterparts,” Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence, recently told lawmakers. “A number of nations, including Russia and China, can disrupt elements of the U.S. information infrastructure.”
Last year, a senior Central Intelligence Agency official, Tom Donahue, informed a meeting of utility company representatives in New Orleans that a cyberattack brought down power equipment in multiple regions around the world. The outage was followed by extortion demands.
Intelligence officials, the WSJ concludes, “cautioned that the motivation of the cyberspies wasn’t well understood, and they don’t see an immediate danger.” It is not known whether these breaches in cybersecurity are government sponsored, but Russian and Chinese officialdom is quick to deny culpability. “These are pure speculations,” spluttered Yevgeniy Khorishko, a spokesentity at the Russian Embassy in Washington, DC, adding: “Russia has nothing to do with the cyberattacks on the U.S. infrastructure, or on any infrastructure in any other country in the world.”
Wang Baodong, Khorishko’s counterpart at the Chinese Embassy, piously intoned: “The Chinese government resolutely oppose[s] any crime, including hacking, that destroys the Internet or computer network. We have laws barring the practice. China is ready to cooperate with other countries to counter such attacks. Some people overseas with Cold War mentality are indulged in fabricating the sheer lies of the so-called cyberspies in China.” Sure, Comrade Khorishko, Comrade Wang, we believe you.
For anyone who holds to the Golitsynian thesis, though, the motivation of Russian and Chinese cyberspies should be evident. The Communist Bloc is preparing to cripple civilian and military computer systems in the West immediately prior to a hot war.
In January 2008 the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved new industry protection measures that will improve computer server security and counter cyberattacks. Last week, Senate Democrats introduced a proposal that will require all private companies managing critical infrastructure to comply with new cybersecurity standards. More ominously, the Senate bill will grant President Barack Hussein Obama emergency powers to control the electrical grid and other critical infrastructure, which could be good or bad, depending on whether Obama is a Soviet mole, as we suspect. Under the Bush administration, Congress approved US$17 billion in secret funds to protect government networks. The Obama administration is considering the possibility of expanding the program. A senior Pentagon official stated on Tuesday that the Department of Defense has over the last six months allocated US$100 million to repair cyber damage.
>USSR2/EU Files: Moldova’s communist president severs relations with Bucharest following pro-Romanian riots, Moscow backs Voronin
April 8, 2009Posted by on
>Is another manufactured crisis brewing in the “post”-Soviet space, this time in Moldova? Last year the Soviet strategists goaded Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, an alleged KGB agent, into attacking South Ossetia’s separatist regime, where most residents hold Russian passports. Clashes between Georgian and South Ossetian forces resulted in Russia’s re-invasion of Georgia over a five-day period, the establishment of Soviet military bases in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and a new state of chilly relations between Russia and NATO. Previously, Russian forces withdrew from their Soviet-era garrison in Georgia in November 2006.
Pictured above: On April 8 anti-government activists gathered for a second day of protests near Moldova’s parliament building in Chisinau. Riot police regained control of the president’s office and parliament early Wednesday after they were ransacked by the protesters.
Now, in the wake of Moldova’s disputed Sunday parliamentary election–in which the ruling communist party won a third consecutive victory, sparking violent protests by anti-communists and Romanian irredentists–President Vladimir Voronin has accused Bucharest of destabilizing Moldova, expelled Romania’s ambassador, and announced visa restrictions on Romanian citizens.
“We made the decision to impose visa restrictions with Romania,” Voronin blustered, adding: “Moreover, the Romanian ambassador to Moldova has been declared persona non grata. Romania’s influence in the riots is very serious and that the government knew who was behind the events, though some of them had escaped. Romania is involved in everything that has happened. Patience also has its limits.”
Turning on Moldova’s liberal opposition, Voronin rumbled: “They should concede defeat with decency.” Alluding to his role as Soviet Interior Ministry general in the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic, Voronin added that authorities will use force if “mass disorder” resumes: “I tried to prevent bloodshed in 1989 and 1991, when I was interior minister. Yesterday I was almost ready to take such a decision. Corresponding measures could be taken in the future if this happens again. The authorities have the grounds to take such steps, in line with the law.” As a result of his faithful activities in the old Soviet regime, Voronin reportedly draws a pension (compliance money?) from the Kremlin to this day. He has served two presidential terms since 2001 and must cede the office to another member of the communist party.
On Wednesday Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov rushed to the defense of Voronin by dismissing the Moldovan opposition’s demand for a second election, noting that international monitors determined that the original poll was free and fair. “We are deeply concerned by what happened in Moldova yesterday, I hope the situation will be taken under control,” Lavrov intoned in Moscow, “Demands for fresh elections and the revision of the vote results are absolutely groundless, as all international monitors agreed that the election complied with democratic and legal norms.”
The Russian Foreign Ministry also took a dim view of Romania’s alleged involvement behind the Tuesday riots: “Judging by the slogans shouted in the squares, plenty of Romanian flags in the hands of organizers of these outrages, their aim is to discredit the achievements in strengthening the sovereignty of Moldova. The Russian foreign ministry hopes that common sense will prevail, public and constitutional order will be restored in the next few days and the choice of the Moldovan citizens will be confirmed by all politically responsible forces.”
Representatives of Moldova’s two main opposition parties, Our Moldova and the Liberal Democratic Party, denied responsibility for the riots. “What happened yesterday had nothing to do with the Liberal Democratic Party. We are not planning to call for anyone to hit the streets today,” Alexander Tenase complained. This was not the stance of Liberal Democratic leader Vladimir Filat yesterday, who reportedly threatened to use force to instigate a vote recount.
Ironically, or perhaps not, Romania’s government is stacked with “ex”-communists, like the rest of Eastern Europe. This fact suggests that the nationalist saber rattling between Chisinau and Bucharest is part of the Soviet deception strategy and, thus, designed to confuse Western analysts and flush out domestic anti-communists. Formerly part of the Warsaw Pact, Romania is now a NATO member state. However, the two major political parties in Bucharest trace their origin to the communist-controlled National Salvation Front that replaced dictator Nicolae Ceausescu in December 1989. The KGB–using their agent Ion Iliescu, Romania’s first “post”-communist president–scripted the execution of Ceausescu when it became apparent that the latter was unwilling to comply with Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev’s disingenuous plan for “democratizing” Moscow’s Eastern European satellites.
Meanwhile, during Tuesday’s riots in Chisinau Ukraine placed its border control police units along the 1,222-kilometer border with Moldova on alert. Itar-Tass quoted Kiev’s border service chief, Sergei Astakhov, as saying: “Border protection was strengthened over aggravation of the situation in the neighbouring country.”
Additional provocations can be expected in Moldova and Transnistria, Moldova’s ethnically Russian breakaway region, in which the Kremlin portrays NATO member state Romania as an aggressor and creates a pretext to establish a military presence in Moldova, thereby also outflanking “pro”-NATO Ukraine.
>USSR2/EU Files: Kremlin accuses USA of militarizing space, using Kyrgyzstan base to spy on Russia, China; Medvedev lauds Obama as “My new comrade"
April 7, 2009Posted by on
- “Ex”-Communist (Surprise!) Chosen as Czech Republic’s Caretaker Prime Minister; Social Democratic-Communist Coalition Promises to Scrap US Radar Base Deal after October Election (Surprise!)
- US President/“Comrade” Obama Regales Adoring Audience in Prague with Vision of “Peace in Our Time,” Urges America to Enter Total Disarmament Regime with the Soviet Strategists
- Moldovan Reds Win Election (Surprise!), Form Third Government; Anti-communists, Romanian Irredentists Riot, Threaten to Force Vote Recount
This past Friday, in an interview with Krasnaya Zvezda (Red Star), the newspaper of the Russian Defense Ministry, Lieutenant General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, deputy head of the department for international military cooperation, accused Washington of militarizing outer space. Buzhinsky pointed to the US National Space Policy, signed by former President George W. Bush on August 31, 2008, as proof:
The new doctrine adds a tougher and more unilateral nature to these actions. Russian military experts see in this doctrine a disguised bid of the USA to weaponization of outer space.
As you know, space is already used for military purposes. Many countries have deployed and continue deploying in it satellites of reconnaissance, communications, navigation and other systems designed to perform tasks for ensuring their defence potential and security.
Anti-satellite weapons make an integral part of the U.S. missile defence system. The efficiency of the anti-satellite weapons was shown graphically in 2008, when the U.S. antimissile Standard-3M downed the U.S. spy satellite US-193.
Despite the statements of some U.S. officials that the satellite destruction had to be performed just once only to minimize risks for life and health of people, many analysts are of another opinion. They believe that the U.S. tested a new type of weapons capable of destroying spacecraft.
By accusing Washington of militarizing space, of course, Moscow thereby creates a pretext to do the same. This was the entire thrust behind the Kremlin-directed propaganda that followed the apparently accidental collision of a US comsat and Russian milsat in February.
Along the same theme, on Sunday Rossiya TV accused Washington of using its air base in Manas, Kyrgyzstan, slated to be closed in August, to spy on Russia and China. The “documentary” on Rossiya TV asserted:
In one of the buildings … there is a multi-channel, multi-functional system of radio-electronic surveillance.
This station can eavesdrop the whole world — every fax, every e-mailed letter. Every call from a mobile or landline phone is being recorded and processed. Billions of messages are being intercepted.
At Manas, the U.S. built a station which controls entire Central Asia, parts of China and Siberia. For Americans, the existence of the intelligence complex at the base is more important than the runway. It was done in a treacherous way, without being endorsed by the Kyrgyz authorities.
Rossiya TV is widely perceived as a propaganda arm of the Kremlin, while the US$2 billion loan that Moscow extended to Bishkek earlier this year is viewed at this blog as a thinly disguised attempt to oust the Americans from their last Central Asian base.
Russia does not hesitate to denounce NATO “expansionism” in the old Soviet Bloc, even though we believe that this is part of the long-range Soviet strategy to provide a pretext for preemptive military strikes against the West. NATO’s BAST-E II drill provides such a pretext.
Today, according to the Estonian Defense Ministry, NATO fighter jets will carry out air defense exercises over the capitals of Estonia and Lithuania, Tallinn and Riga. During the Baltic Air Sovereignty Training Event II, the same source stated, “The populations of the Estonian and Lithuanian Capitals may well see NATO fighter aircraft overfly their cities. Onlookers in the vicinity of Riga International Airport will also see NATO fighter aircraft enacting a practice Air Policing exercise.” The one-day drill will focus on improving interoperability among NATO air forces.
BAST-E II is a continuation of drills held in October 2008. NATO’s commitment to protect the airspace over Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia expires in 2011. Since all three countries are wary of neo-Soviet aggression, most recently displayed last August in Georgia, they are urging an extension of the agreement until 2018.
Even as Moscow beats the war drum against Washington, the neo-Soviet leadership feigns friendship with the USA by granting permission to NATO to transit non-military cargoes over Russian territory to Afghanistan. “I do not believe that the transit of toilet rolls via rail through Russia for NATO’s use in Afghanistan constitutes a betrayal of the motherland,” Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s fiery envoy to NATO, joked on Monday. Rogozin also hinted that military cooperation between Russia and NATO, which was severed after the invasion of Georgia, could be re-established after ministerial meetings of the NATO-Russia Council, to be held between May 18 and June 6.
The USA’s planned National Missile Defense bases in Poland and the Czech Republic, as well as Russia’s refusal to comply with the Cold War-era Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty are two more sources of tension between Russia and NATO. The only reason that Moscow is “playing nice” with Brussels at this time is to be in the best possible position to plunge the dagger into the North Atlantic Alliance at a later date.
Yesterday the UPI news agency reported that the Czech Republic’s outgoing government and opposition leaders have agreed that 58-year-old economist Jan Fischer will organize a caretaker cabinet by May 9 and lead the country until the October 9-10 general election. Fischer will replace outgoing Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek, whose government resigned in mid-March. Topolanek belongs to the center-right Civic Democratic Party, although he began his career in the youth section of the ruling Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. For his part, Fischer is not currently affiliated with any party, but between 1980 and 1990 was also a cadre of the ruling communist party. Fischer has directed the republic’s statistical office since 2003. In another article, the same source confidently predicts the outcome of the next Czech poll: “The Social Democrats and Communists, two parties that strongly oppose letting the United States build the radar base, will form the next government.”
The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSCM) is the Czech Republic’s main communist party and chief successor to the old Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. In the 2006 Chamber of Deputies election the KSCM picked up 26 seats, thereby also making the party the country’s third largest.
This past Sunday US President Barack Hussein Obama addressed adoring crowds in Prague and urged a “nuclear-free world” (pictured above in Hradcany Square). Translated from commiespeak, this means that America must scrap its nuclear deterrent while the Kremlin gangsters secretly modernize and expand their own battery of nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles. First, notwithstanding North Korea’s in-your-face provocations, “Obamessiah” offered Czechs a history lesson in the Cold War and then painted a grim picture of nuclear war:
The existence of thousands of nuclear weapons is the most dangerous legacy of the Cold War. No nuclear war was fought between the United States and the Soviet Union, but generations lived with the knowledge that their world could be erased in a single flash of light. Cities like Prague that had existed for centuries would have ceased to exist.
Today, the Cold War has disappeared but thousands of those weapons have not. In a strange turn of history, the threat of global nuclear war has gone down, but the risk of a nuclear attack has gone up. More nations have acquired these weapons. Testing has continued. Black markets trade in nuclear secrets and materials. The technology to build a bomb has spread. Terrorists are determined to buy, build or steal one. Our efforts to contain these dangers are centered in a global nonproliferation regime, but as more people and nations break the rules, we could reach the point when the center cannot hold.
Obama then proposed the negotiation of new treaties with Russia, implementing strategic arms reduction and a comprehensive test ban, as well as ending the production of fissile materials. Obama then mentioned that he and his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev instigated this process during the Group of 20 summit in London last week.
First, the United States will take concrete steps toward a world without nuclear weapons.
To put an end to Cold War thinking, we will reduce the role of nuclear weapons in our national security strategy and urge others to do the same. Make no mistake: as long as these weapons exist, we will maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal to deter any adversary, and guarantee that defense to our allies — including the Czech Republic. But we will begin the work of reducing our arsenal.
To reduce our warheads and stockpiles, we will negotiate a new strategic arms reduction treaty with Russia this year. President Medvedev and I began this process in London, and will seek a new agreement by the end of this year that is legally binding, and sufficiently bold. This will set the stage for further cuts, and we will seek to include all nuclear weapons states in this endeavor.
To achieve a global ban on nuclear testing, my administration will immediately and aggressively pursue U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. After more than five decades of talks, it is time for the testing of nuclear weapons to finally be banned.
And to cut off the building blocks needed for a bomb, the United States will seek a new treaty that verifiably ends the production of fissile materials intended for use in state nuclear weapons. If we are serious about stopping the spread of these weapons, then we should put an end to the dedicated production of weapons grade materials that create them.
Second, together, we will strengthen the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as a basis for cooperation.
The basic bargain is sound: countries with nuclear weapons will move toward disarmament, countries without nuclear weapons will not acquire them; and all countries can access peaceful nuclear energy. To strengthen the treaty, we should embrace several principles. We need more resources and authority to strengthen international inspections. We need real and immediate consequences for countries caught breaking the rules or trying to leave the treaty without cause.
Although Obama was directly addressing the Czechs, he was no doubt also appealing to a global audience that includes patriotic US citizens who did not vote for him and who reject his policy of disarming America, as well as sending reassuring signals to the Soviet strategists and their friends in the Council on Foreign Relations.
Obama’s peace rhetoric sounds nice to the ideologically challenged sound bite generation, but we strongly suspect that America’s new president is a smooth-talking Soviet mole who is more committed to submerging the USA into Moscow’s Red World Order than even former president Bill Clinton, another suspected KGB asset. Last November, after Obama’s election, former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev enjoined Obama to implement “perestroika” (socialist restructuring) in the USA. Later, on March 20, Obama, along with US Vice President Joe Biden, secretly met with Gorbachev at the White House. Spokesmen in Washington and Moscow refused to divulge details of this under-reported meeting, but it appears that America’s days as a free nation are numbered.
Following Obama’s first encounter with Medvedev at the G20 summit, the Russian head of state tellingly referred to the US president as “comrade.” In connection with NATO’s expansion into the old Soviet Bloc, Medvedev, a Soviet Komsomol graduate, told reporters: “Yesterday I spoke about this with my new comrade, President Barack Obama.” He then added: “I believe that we managed to establish contact. . . . I cannot say that we made much progress on the most serious issues. Let’s wait and see. I liked the talks. It is easy to talk to him. He can listen. The start of this relationship is good. Today it’s a totally different situation [compared to former President George W. Bush]. This suits me quite well.” Incidentally, when Nicaragua’s past/present Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega made his first “post”-Cold War trek to Moscow last December, Medvedev also referred to El Comandante as “comrade.”
The shopping mall regime long since swallowed communist deception–hook, line, and sinker–but Eastern Europe’s citizen-slaves have learned some hard lessons. This past Sunday the ruling Communist Party of the Republic of Moldova, formerly the Moldavian section of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, won its third consecutive parliamentary election. The results afford the communists at least 62 seats in the new legislative session, with 61 votes in the 101-member chamber required to elect a new president. Since President Vladimir Voronin, a former Soviet Interior Ministry general and thus Moscow’s man in Chisinau, has already served two terms, the Moldovan parliament must elect another communist for the chief executive office. The Central Election Commission stated that 59.49% of the more than 2.6 million eligible voters cast ballots under the watchful presence of some 5,500 local and international observers.
Anti-communists and Romanian irredentists were not pleased by Sunday’s red victory. On Tuesday 5,000 protestors stormed the presidential palace in Chisinau, only to be dispersed by police with water cannon. Some protesters demanded reunification with Romania, waved Romanian flags, and chanted “We are Romanians!” Rioters then broke into the parliament building, scribbled anti-communist slogans on walls, threw a smoke-bomb from an upper storey, and burned furniture in the streets. “The situation is under police control, and will remain under their control,” insisted Interior Ministry spokesentity Alla Meleka in an interview with Novosti. The protests, which began peacefully, were initially led by Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Filat, who warned that the opposition would go as far as using force to implement a vote recount.
Since 1992 Moscow has used the threat of Russian military intervention in Moldova’s ethnically Russian breakaway region of Transnistria to keep Chisinau under its thumb. Moldova and Cyprus are the only two European countries with democratically elected communist governments although, of course, “ex”-communists still dominate the leadership of most Not-So-Former Soviet Bloc states.
>Latin America File: Ortega heads for Havana, Salvadoran President-Elect Funes meets Lula in Brazil; South American, Arab leaders converge in Qatar
April 4, 2009Posted by on
- Chavez Denounces Capitalism, G20 Summit, Ex-President George W. Bush; Huddles with Qadaffi, Assad in Doha, Invites Sudan’s Genocidal Dictator to Visit Venezuela; Rubs Elbows with Ahmadinejad in Tehran
- Ecuador’s Socialist President Correa Anticipates Uneventful April 26 Re-Election, Defense Minister Leads Military Delegation to Moscow in March
- Soviet Communist Leader Zyuganov Urges President Obama to Release “Cuban Five” Espionage Agents, Terminate Economic Blockade against Havana
Pictured above: Seems like old times: Dan and Raul chillin’ in Havana.
No doubt laughing at reports of communism’s exaggerated demise, Communist Bloc leaders are busy power networking around the world in 2009. On Thursday Nicaragua’s past/present dictator Daniel Ortega travelled to Cuba where he has cultivated a long and ideologically fruitful relationship with the Castro Bros. Like Fidel, now in self-contemplative retirement, and Raul, who guides the ship of state in his brother’s stead, Daniel is a decades-old KGB asset. The Cuban state media reports that Ortega travelled to Havana upon the communist leadership’s invitation:
According to Granma news daily, the meeting reaffirmed the excellent state of relations between the Caribbean archipelago and the Central American nation while both leaders expressed their intention to continue strengthening the bilateral ties. Raul and Ortega exchanged opinions on different topics such as the challenges that Cuba and Nicaragua face amidst the complex international situation and discussed other topics of regional and multilateral interest. Also present at the meeting were Cuban First Vice President Jose Ramon Machado Ventura, Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla and Rosario Murillo, President of the Council of the Citizen’s Power of Nicaragua.
Accompanying Ortega was his wife Rosario, who presides over the Councils of Citizen’s Power, the Sandinista counterpart to Cuba’s Committees for the Defense of the Revolution. On April 1 Nicaragua broke off trade talks with the European Union. “We cannot negotiate with a gun to the head,” Ortega complained in a speech posted on El Comandante’s website. “They want to put us in a free trade agreement where the shark swallows the sardine,” he pouted. What’s wrong with free trade, Dan? Karl Marx bestowed his imprimatur on free trade back in the 1840s. Real capitalists, as far as we’re concerned, are not opposed to some protectionism to safeguard national interests.
In another example of Nicaragua’s reintegration into the Communist Bloc, on March 24 Managua inked an accord with state-owned firm PetroVietnam for the exploration of offshore oil and natural gas reserves. The signing ceremony was attended by Petroleos de Nicaragua CEO Francisco López and PetroVietnam President Dinh La Thang, with Ortega participating as witness of honor (loosely defined). López explained that the accords with PetroVietnam cover viability studies on both coasts. PetroVietnam also pledged to provide technical assistance with the construction of the El Supremo Sueño de Bolivar refinery, to be located in Nagarote, 90 kilometers west of Managua. El Supremo will cost US$3.9 billion to build and will refine 150,000 barrels of crude oil per day, transforming energy-starved Nicaragua into an exporter of petroleum derivatives. The project is being constructed with financial assistance from close ally Venezuela. López announced that: “A PetroVietnam executive mission will be arriving in Nicaragua within four weeks to explore the distinct possibility that there are large reserves of petroleum and natural gas in our country.”
In addition to Vietnam, Venezuela, and Iran, Russia, as we have previously documented, has also promised to beef up Nicaragua’s energy infrastructure. In the 1980s El Comandante revealed a penchant for designer sunglasses now, like Mikhail (“I’ll Always Be a Communist”) Gorbachev, he’s an aging communist windbag. As long as Ortega enjoys Moscow’s backing, though, the neo-Sandinista regime in Managua is potentially dangerous.
Since his election two weeks ago, Salvadoran President-Elect Mauricio Funes, the moderate-left figurehead for the soon-to-be-ruling Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN), has responded to accusations that he is Hugo Chavez’s man in San Salvador by retorting: “Chavez will not meddle in El Salvador.” The formerly ruling Nationalist Republican Alliance (ARENA) has played up alleged relations between the FMLN and Venezuela’s red dictator. However, Funes also pledged that El Salvador will have “superb” relations with the USA, on the one hand, and Venezuela, Bolivia, and Nicaragua, on the other hand. Since US President Barack Hussein Obama is a socialist, while the other three countries sport communist dictatorships, warming relations between the USA and Latin America’s Red Axis are possible as long as Chavez stops beating the anti-Washington war drum. Tellingly, Chavez was the first Latin American Red Axis leader to congratulate Funes and expressed his desire to “deepen the links of brotherhood between our people and governments.”
President-Elect Funes has also pledged to restore diplomatic relations with Cuba, severed nearly 50 years ago, after the Castro Bros. seized power. On March 19 Funes told a news conference: “We would be, at present, the only country in Latin America that doesn’t have diplomatic relations with Cuba. The date on which relations with Cuba will be re-established remains up to my discretion.” During the civil war that wracked the country between 1980 and early 1992 the Soviet Union and Cuba funneled arms to the FMLN guerrillas. Vice President-Elect Salvador Sanchez Ceren was the FMLN’s battlefield commander between 1984 and 1992, which means he’s a hard-core revolutionary which, in turn, proves that Funes is little more than a façade for the party’s unreconstructed Marxist leadership.
The AFP news agency reported, at the link above, that on March 19 President-Elect Funes made a private trip to Brazil, where he met fellow moderate leftist head of state, President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Funes’ wife, Dr. Vanda Pignato, is a Brazilian national who was involved in the formation of Lula’s ruling Workers’ Party in 1980. Lula, along with retired red thug Fidel Castro, founded the narco-communist-terrorist Sao Paul Forum ten years later. Thus, we see that El Salvador’s new president is also well plugged into the Western Hemisphere’s Communist Bloc leadership network.
One of outgoing President Tony Saca’s last official functions was to represent El Salvador at the Central American Integration System (SICA) meeting in Managua on March 25. He excused Funes’ absence, noting that his successor was visiting Brazil. Nicaraguan Foreign Minister Samuel Santos welcomed the delegations at the Augusto C. Sandino International Airport. Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom did not attend due to the worsening situation created by organized crime in his country, a situation not unrelated to the narco-anarchy in neighboring Mexico. Instead Colom was represented by his foreign minister. Saca was the only rightist present at the SICA meeting, which is now a tool for Latin America’s ascendant Red Axis.
Summit host Ortega persuaded participants to hold a regional “summit in defense of employment” in Managua on May 19-20. The summit will invite government and business leaders from throughout Central America and the Caribbean Basin to develop a common strategy, the outcome to be determined in advance, of course, by the region’s political left.
Elsewhere in Central America, the Latin American Herald Tribune, citing Panama’s drug czar Rafael Guerrero, has revealed that the Colombian and Mexican drug cartels are increasingly using Panama as a staging area for northbound shipments of cocaine. This recreational drug is produced in large part under the auspices of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, hence terrorism expert Joseph Douglass’ 20-year-old term “red cocaine.” “Panama has become the main logistical point for meetings between those who commit this crime, mainly members of [Mexico’s] Sinaloa, Gulf and Tijuana cartels,” explained Guerrero.
On March 16 the Naval Aviation Service of Panama acknowledged the arrest the previous week of 17 people, including both Colombian and Panamanian citizens, from whom about 1.2 tons of cocaine and three speedboats were confiscated along the country’s Pacific coast, near the Colombian border. Panamanian authorities do not rule out the possibility that Colombian narcos have infiltrated the country’s southern province Darien in order to set up a cocaine processing laboratory in the area.
The totalitarian nature of Venezuela’s red dictatorship is evident in the fugitive career of opposition leader Manuel Rosales, who is evading arrest by Chavez’s cronies. Last year Chavez vowed to jail Rosales on corruption charges. Omar Barboza, an official spokesman for Rosales’ party, revealed that the opposition leader had moved to a “safe place” to avoid capture. “It is not possible for Manuel Rosales to exercise his right to defend himself in Venezuela,” Barboza explained. “I don’t think it does any favors to the country when people don’t face justice,” Venezuela’s Communications Minister Jesse Chacon retorted. Rosales unsuccessfully ran for president in 2006. The Chavezista regime, like the neo-Sandinista regime in Managua, has utilized the legal system to neutralize opposition leaders. Last year Venezuelan officials blocked the candidacy of Leopoldo Lopez, who was favored to win election in Caracas and seen as a possible future presidential candidate.
Speaking from Tehran, where he materialized after attending the Second Summit of Heads of State of South America and Arab Countries (ASPA) in Doha, Qatar, Chavez denounced the Group of 20 meeting in London and demanded the end of capitalism. Rant on: “It’s impossible that capitalism can regulate the monster that is the world financial system, it’s impossible. Capitalism needs to go down. It has to end. And we must take a transitional road to a new model that we call socialism.” Rant off. On Friday Chavez and his buddy President Mahmoud (“Iwannajihad”) Ahmadinejad launched a joint commercial bank designed to expedite trade and industrial projects between Venezuela and Iran, two OPEC states facing declining crude prices.
At his previous engagement in Qatar, Chavez informed journalists that he considered the ASPA meeting “a good opportunity to give shape to the idea of the pluripolar world, what he called the new architecture of the post-US imperial world.” In an interview with Prensa Latina, Chavez described the “ASPA integration goal” in glowing, revolutionary terms: “Those are our inspiring roots and, more than inspiring, they are like the energy that drives us. [Jose] Marti, [Simon] Bolivar, [Francisco de] Miranda, Fidel [Castro], they are all with us and their flag of struggle. Now is the time, as Karl Marx proposed, for all that theory to come true. Our challenge is to turn it into something practical and able to work as a machine.” For their part, statesmen from the 22-member Arab League expressed appreciation for South America’s solid support for the Palestinian Arabs. Veteran anti-Semite Chavez, conveniently forgetting the fact that in 1947 the United Nations offered both Jews and Arabs separate states, used the occasion to blast Israel’s policy in West Bank and Gaza Strip. Incidentally, the Palestinian Arabs responded to the first offer of statehood by saying: “No thanks, we’ll kill all of the Jews instead.” Six decades later the world is still seeking to impose a two-state solution on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
While in Doha, Chavez opened his big month one more time to reveal his support for Islamic terrorism by opposing the international arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court against genocidal Sudanese dictator Omar al-Bashir, who was also in attendance. “I spoke with al-Bashir and asked him about the risks he is facing when he visits a foreign country. I invited him to visit Caracas, and I told him, ‘I hope you do not have any problem there.’” During his opening address at the ASPA summit, Chavez asked the applauding audience: “Why do they not order the arrest of [former US president George W.] Bush, who is a genocidal murderer, who ruled the United States for eight years, and ordered bombing Iraq?” Venezuela endorsed the ICC in 1998, shortly before Chavez assumed the presidency of that country. On the summit sidelines, Chavez huddled with veteran Libyan strongman and African Union chairman Muammar al-Qaddafi (“Duck”), Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, and Lebanon’s pro-Hezbollah president Michel Suleiman.
In a related story, on March 23 Caracas hosted seven South American finance ministers at a meeting of the new Bank of the South, which will provide member states with an alternative source of financing apart from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. The act creating Banco del Sur was signed in late 2007 by Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela. “We are committed to creating the Bank of the South. There is a great force against it, but we keep moving on,” commented Chavez.
In tiny Ecuador Chavez’s “mini me,” President Rafael Correa, an economist who trained at the Université catholique de Louvain in Belgium, looks forward to an uneventful re-election on April 26. According to Santiago Perez pollster Correa is currently supported by 52 percent of voters. The Institutional Renewal Party of National Action candidate, multimillionaire and banana magnate Alvaro Noboa, can count on receiving 11 percent of the votes, while former President Lucio Gutierrez, another leftist, can count on 12 percent. The constituent assembly that governs Ecuador is dominated by Correa’s socialist Proud and Sovereign Fatherland Alliance and other socialist and communist groupings.
In spite of his youthful good looks, Correa is a dangerous socialist who has not only snuggled up to Caracas and Havana, but also Moscow. In March Ecuadorean Defense Minister Javier Ponce traveled to Russia to continue negotiations on a bilateral technical-military cooperation pact. Ponce, who was slated to meet with representatives of the Russian Defense and Development and Trade Ministries, was accompanied by brass from the Ecuadorean air force and navy. Ponce’s Moscow trip is a follow-up to the cooperation accords that the two countries signed in Quito last November, when Nikolai Patrushev, current secretary of the Russian Security Council and former chief of the Federal Security Service (FSB/KGB), touched down in the South American country. The neo-Soviet leadership, as we have copiously documented at this blog, is anxious to re-project its Cold War-era power throughout the Western Hemisphere.
Last but not least, the Soviet strategists continue to closely monitor the “Red Spread” in Latin America as well as encourage their client state in Havana. On March 23 the Cuban media reported that Gennady Zyuganov, chairman of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, urged the US Supreme Court to overturn the convictions of the notorious Cuban Five. In 1998 Antonio Guerrero, Rene Gonzalez, Gerardo Hernandez, Ramon Labañino, and Fernando Gonzalez, three of whom are known agents of Cuba’s Intelligence Directorate, were jailed for infiltrating Miami-based anti-Castro groups. Chairman Zyuganov threw his weight behind an international amicus curiae signed by former presidents, legislators, and 10 Nobel Prize winners, stating that the document is an effective legal tool that could be used to launch an appeal. He also urged US President Barack Hussein Obama, whom we suspect maybe a Soviet mole, to lift the 50-year-old economic blockade against Cuba.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: 3rd Sino- Soviet war game slated for April 17-19 in Tajikistan; DPRK to launch Rodong, deploys nukes to missile sites
April 3, 2009Posted by on
>The Soviets and the Communist Chinese will hold their third joint war game in Tajikistan between April 17 and 19. This is not the “Peace Mission 2009″ drill slated for northeast China in the summer. Both war games, however, will occur under the auspices of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). This month’s exercise will not only include military personnel from Russia and China, but also Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and the host country. “Military planes and helicopters, heavy armor and soldiers will be used in the exercises,” the Tajik Defense Ministry explained in a statement, adding: “The war games are aimed at improving cooperation in counter-terrorist operations as well as readiness in opposing international terrorism, political extremism and separatism.”
Pictured above: Chinese paratroopers jump from their transport during the final stage of Peace Mission 2007 in Chelyabinsk, in Russia’s Ural Mountains region, on August 17, 2007.
The AFP news agency observes that the SCO is a “regional group dominated by Moscow and Beijing that has raised concern in the West about becoming a possible counterweight to NATO.” The MSM finally gets it: The SCO and the related Collective Security Treaty Organization, also controlled by Moscow, are most definitely counterweights to NATO. It is worth noting that Tajikistan borders Afghanistan, where NATO forces are struggling to crush a lingering Taliban insurgency and eliminate Al Qaeda hideouts. By flexing its military muscle in Central Asia, the Communist Bloc is clearly sending a message to the North Atlantic Alliance that Western influence is not appreciated in the Soviet Empire’s old vassal state in Kabul. In short, the Moscow-Beijing Axis is preparing for war against the West under the guise of “counter-terrorist operations.”
Meanwhile, the Stalinist hellhole known as the People’s Democratic Republic of Korea, reported the British media on March 31, has deployed nuclear warheads to at least two underground missile-launching facilities. “I received the information from the national intelligence agency of a certain country that they believe North Korea has deployed nuclear warheads at two underground facilities for Rodong missiles,” Daniel Pinkston, senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, told The Telegraph from Seoul. “We estimate that North Korea has as many as 320 Rodong missiles, which can be launched from mobile transporters anywhere in the country, and we are assessing the threat these pose,” Pinkston added. Rodong missiles have an estimated range of 1,300 kilometers, placing Japan within range of the two missile bases that have been identified in North Korea.
North Korea’s reported deployment of nuclear weapons will exacerbate tensions in the region, already strained due to Pyongyang’s determination to launch an experimental satellite. Lift off is scheduled to take place between April 4 and 8. Satellite surveillance images reveal a three-stage Rodong rocket at the Musudan-ri launch pad, near the east coast of North Korea. Experts estimate that technicians could attach a nuclear warhead to the missile with 48 hours. The Japanese government has threatened to shoot down the rocket, provoking a stream of “anti-imperialist” invective from Crazy Kim’s communist nuthouse. The intelligence reports suggest that the warheads are made from plutonium extracted at the Yongbyon nuclear complex, which North Korea sporadically promises to dismantle in return for fuel assistance, but never does.
>Red Terror File: Former Chechen chief of Russia’s Vostok Battalion gunned down in Dubai on Saturday, or maybe not; suspects with Slavic names arrested
April 2, 2009Posted by on
This past Saturday in Dubai unknown gunmen killed Sulim Yamadayev, former commander of the Vostok Battalion, a Russian Ground Forces’ group comprised mainly of pro-Moscow Chechens. Organized in 2003, the Vostok (East) and related Zapad (West) Battalions are affiliated with the 42nd Motorized Rifle Division, which is permanently stationed in Chechnya. These two battalions were also directly subordinate to Russian military intelligence (GRU).
“Unfortunately, he is dead and has been buried in Dubai,” mourned Ziad Spassibi, who represents Chechnya in Russia’s Federation Council, the rubberstamp parliament’s upper house. Spassibi then provided some details about Sulim’s burial: “He was buried on Monday in the al-Kuz cemetery in Dubai at 3:00 pm local time (1100 GMT) on Monday.”
This is just another open-and-shut case of Moscow-orchestrated red terror in which an untrustworthy Chechen asset is eliminated, right? Nyet. It turns out that “Hero of Russia” Sulim may not be dead after all. Sulim is pictured above at Hankala airport, a military base outside Grozny, on September 16, 2007.
Contrary to official reports from United Arab Emirates police, where Spassibi probably derived his information, Sulim’s younger brother insists that the former Chechen separatist is not dead. Instead, Sulim was seriously wounded in a brief gun battle that took place outside Jumeirah Beach Residence luxury hotel. “He feels fine,” Isa revealed in a telephone interview from Dubai, adding: “The doctors do not let us talk with him for a long time. They also said nothing threatens his life. Everything will be fine.”
Meanwhile UAE police chief Major General Dahi Khalfan Tamim contends that “The murder was organized by a criminal group that has foreign links. Four or five people have been detained on suspicion of the murder. One of them is a Russian national.” On April 1 Russia’s consulate general told Novosti that “At least seven people have been detained in connection with the murder, all of whom had Slavic surnames.”
Yamadayev was discharged from his post as battalion commander last August over an alleged involvement in the abduction and murder of a Chechen businessman 10 years before. In the early part of August 2008 Sulim reportedly fought alongside Russian forces during the invasion of Georgia. Yamadayev’s brother Ruslan, a former member of the Russian State Duma, was gunned down in Moscow last September. Ruslan was a prominent rival of Chechnya’s pro-Moscow President Ramzan Kadyrov who, naturally, denied any involvement in the killing.
In a story that may cast some light on the present case, in 2004, in the nearby Persian Gulf state of Qatar, a court convicted two GRU agents of using a car bomb to murder Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev, the former president in exile of Chechnya. Qatari authorities asserted that Russia’s agents received their orders directly from then Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov.
So, we must ask the inevitable questions. First, are reports of Sulim’s death greatly exaggerated? Second, did someone in the Kadyrov puppet regime, Russian Defense Ministry or GRU order the assassination (or attempted assassination)? Finally, is it possible that someone wants Sulim to appear dead? Answer those questions as you please, but one thing is sure: the Kremlin is too busy monitoring Internet usage among Russia’s citizen-slaves to tell the truth about anything.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: Smirnov offers to host Russian military base in Transnistria; Kremlin to organize “Arctic Group of Forces"
April 2, 2009Posted by on
>On March 24 Igor Smirnov, the “ex”-communist president of the unrecognized Pridnestrovian Moldovan Republic, or simply Transnistria, invited Russia to establish a full-blown military base in the diminutive country wedged between Moldova and Ukraine. “If Russia needs military bases here, we have legislation on Russian troops,” Smirnov informed journalists. Possibly in response to Smirnov’s saber rattling, Novosti reports, Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin pulled out of a meeting with Smirnov, scheduled to take place the next day.
One week prior to Voronin’s snub, the leaders of Russia, Moldova, and Transnistria agreed to continue talks on the issue of Transnistria’s status at a meeting in Moscow. They reiterated their commitment to the “five-plus-two formula,” which includes Russia, Ukraine, the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the European Union, and the USA, as well as the two “disputing” parties, Moldova and Transnistria. Smirnov has also expressed interest in either joining Russia outright or possibly the Union State of Russia and Belarus.
Pictured above: Voronin and Smirnov attend “kiss and make up” meeting at Tiraspol, on December 24, 2008.
Relations between Moldova and its ethnically Russian separatist region have been tense since March 1992, when Moldova declared independence from the Soviet Union, and Transnistria in turn proclaimed itself an independent republic. Russia has maintained a small garrison of peacekeepers in Transnistria since July 1992, but the negotiation process for troop withdrawal was suspended in February 2006. Under the Joint Control Commission, Russia is permitted to field a maximum of 385 peacekeepers on Transnistrian (Moldovan) soil.
In view of the fact that the governments in Moscow and Tiraspol are both connected to the old Soviet regime, while the government in Chisinau is openly communist, one should be forgiven for concluding that the whole dispute between Moldova and Transnistria is part of the long-range Soviet deception. The primary purpose of the dispute would probably consist of confusing Western analysts into believing that the former communist regimes of Eastern Europe are disunited.
A military base, per Smirnov’s invitation, would institutionalize and no doubt enhance the Russian presence in the unrecognized state. A fully equipped air base in Transnistria, moreover, could conceivably serve as a stopover for the Kremlin’s strategic bombers en route to Southern Europe, the Balkan Peninsula, or the Middle East. Russia is illegally building military bases in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Georgia’s separatist regions that are recognized only by Russia and neo-Sandinista Nicaragua. Moscow has also threatened to construct a naval base on Abkhazia’s Black Sea coast and is presently building a naval base in the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiisk.
The Russian Navy views Novorossiisk as an alternative to the Black Sea Fleet’s headquarters in Sevastopol should the Ukrainian government, which is also deceptively connected to the old Soviet regime, finalize plans to evict the Russians in 2017. “The infrastructure is being built under the federal program for the construction of a naval base in Novorossiisk until 2020,” Vice Admiral Oleg Burtsev, deputy head of the navy’s general staff, told Novosti. The Black Sea Fleet, Burtsev continued, must deploy eight to 10 submarines as soon as possible to bolster the overall strength of the armed forces in southern European Russia. The fleet currently deploys one Project 877 Kilo-class diesel-electric submarine, while an outdated Project 641 Foxtrot-class sub is being overhauled. Almost two weeks ago we blogged that at least 10 Russian nuclear-armed attack submarines, commissioned with the Northern and Pacific Fleets, are presently patrolling the world’s oceans.
On March 27 the Russian Security Council, which is chaired by former chief of the Federal Security Service, Nikolai Patrushev, announced that the FSB will organize an Arctic Group of Forces to protect Kremlin interests in the polar region. “However, it does not mean that we are planning to militarize the Arctic. We are focusing on the creation of an effective system of coastal security, the development of arctic border infrastructure, and the presence of military units of an adequate strength,” a Kremlin spokesentity soothed. The Arctic Group of Forces will utilize assets of the navy’s Northern and Pacific Fleets and military districts that border the Arctic Ocean.
The security council published its designs for the North Pole at its website under the document “The Fundamentals of Russian State Policy in the Arctic Up to 2020 and Beyond.” In the last four years Russia has carried out two Arctic expeditions, the first to the Mendeleyev underwater island chain in 2005 and the second to the Lomonosov Ridge in 2007, to lend credence to its territorial claims in the region. Moscow intends to submit documentary support to the United Nations on the external boundaries of Russia’s territorial shelf by 2010.
Canada, the USA’s closest ally and the other half of NORAD, has not taken kindly to neo-Soviet expansionism in the polar region. Even as Moscow broadcast its plan to form an Arctic military force, a spokesperson for Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon huffed: “Canada is an Arctic power. The government is engaged in protecting the security of Canada and in exercising its sovereignty in the North, including Canadian waters.” Catherine Loubier explained: “Canada plans to have more Arctic patrol vessels, construct a deep water port and eavesdropping network in the region, hold annual military exercises, and boost the number of Inuit Arctic rangers keeping an eye on goings-on along our northern frontier.”
While Canada has every right to exercise sovereignty in its Arctic region, it is unlikely that the Kremlin gangsters will be frightened by these trivial assertions of power. Ultimately, Canadians depend on Washington’s goodwill and nuclear arsenal to keep the Soviets out of North America.
Moscow Moves in the Middle East and Southwest Asia
Elsewhere, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which embodies the Moscow-Beijing Axis, continues to extend its influence throughout Asia by wooing observer states like Iran and Pakistan into full membership with an organization that has become unashamedly militaristic in its objectives, to wit a third Sino-Soviet war game to take place this year. Novosti reports that declared nuclear power Pakistan, like incipient nuclear power Iran, is also seeking complete absorption into this new Eurasian Communist Bloc.
“I hope that one day we will be invited to join this organization,” Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi announced last Friday, as he attended the SCO shindig in Moscow. “We are currently reviewing the situation in Afghanistan and its influence on neighboring states” Qureshi explained, ominously adding, “Russia and China could play a key role in improving the situation in the impoverished state.”
Like the CSTO, with which it shares a memorandum of understanding, the SCO serves as the Moscow-Beijing Axis’ counterweight to NATO. The organization embraces Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. Iran, India, Mongolia and Pakistan have observer status. Russia assumed the SCO presidency last August.
The present SCO get-together in Moscow is a veritable super-summit of communist, “post”-communist, semi-communist, and pro-communist states, with predictable endorsements from the United Nations and the Obama Administration. Foreign ministers from SCO member and observer states are not the only delegates in attendance. Afghanistan, Turkey, and the USA also sent representatives. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the heads of CSTO, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference, of which is Russia is an observer state, are also taking part in the event.
Russia, not surprisingly, is not content to meddle in its old stomping grounds in Afghanistan, but has decided to extend its influence into post-Baathist Iraq, by supplying military equipment to the US-backed government there. On March 31 Novosti reported that Moscow will ship 22 Mi-171 Hip transport helicopters to Baghdad. According to a spokesman for Helicopters of Russia, Iraq’s Airfreight Aviation Ltd. signed a contract at an unstated time with the Ulan Ude helicopter plant for an undisclosed sum. The Ulan Ude factory, which is based in East Siberia, manufactures Mi-171 transport and Mi-171Sh combat/transport helicopters. Russia’s chummy, new-found relationship with Iraq, former US President George W. Bush’s showcase for “Middle East democracy,” represents the tip of the iceberg with respect to the Kremlin’s geopolitical designs in the region.
Putatively committed to settling regional conflict through its membership in the Middle East Diplomatic Quartet, Russia does not hesitate to arm Israel’s most embittered enemies, the Palestinian Arabs. Novosti reports that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced that Moscow will soon ship 50 armored personnel vehicles (APCs) to the Palestinian Authority. “All of these 50 armored vehicles will be taken from the Defense Ministry’s available resources–that is to say, from depots where mothballed vehicles are stored,” a source in the Russian Defense Ministry revealed. The same source explained that on-board weapons would be removed from the APCs prior to delivery. The Soviets first offered armored vehicles to the Palestinian Authority in 2005 to help the Fatah terrorist regime in Ramallah “maintain order” (meaning, suppress the populace and attack Jewish settlers). Fearing the vehicles could fall into the hands of Hamas, which has controlled Gaza since 2007, Israel first opposed the idea but the spineless government of then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon subsequently agreed to the shipment of “weapon-less” military vehicles.
Financial Crisis Forces Resignation of Hungarian and Czech Prime Ministers, United Nations Joins Russia and China in Urging Global Currency
The global financial crisis has brought down two more Not-So-Former Soviet Bloc governments, those of Hungary and the Czech Republic, in addition to Latvia’s in February.
On March 21 Hungary’s unpopular prime minister Ferenc Gyurcsany resigned, effectively acknowledging the inability of the minority ruling Hungarian Socialist Party to counter the regional effects of the world recession. In the 1980s, when Hungary was an open communist dictatorship, Gyurcsany led the youth section of the party’s previous incarnation, the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party. Not so coincidentally, outgoing PM Gyurcsany visited Russia barely two weeks ago before his resignation. At the time he conferred with both “President” Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, Russia’s KGB-communist dictator. Was Gyurcsany’s departure from Hungarian politics the subject of discussion with his Moscow masters? We can only speculate, but it seems likely.
György Surányi, economist and former “dissident,” is being touted as the next head of government. In 1986 Surányi, then a technocrat in the Finance Ministry’s Financial Research Institute, co-authored a study on political and economic reform that prompted Hungary’s communist rulers to dissolve the institute. In other words, Surányi bears all the hallmarks of a communist-controlled dissident. The former president of the “post”-communist Hungarian National Bank and current chairman of CIB Bank presently enjoys the backing of both the Hungarian Socialist Party and the small Free Democratic Party. This means, of course, that Surányi has Moscow’s imprimatur.
Last week the Czech Republic’s prime minister Mirek Topolanek also resigned, citing the country’s economic woes as pretext. The collapse of Topolanek’s center-right government, reports The Telegraph, threatens to destabilize Prague’s six-month presidency of the European Union, leaving the federation “rudderless” ahead of a crucial Group of 20 summit in London underway today. Topolanek offered the following explanation for his resignation and refusal to institute a caretaker government until his country’s EU presidency expires on June 30: “I believe it can complicate our negotiating power. Partners in Europe have grown used to us negotiating hard. In this sense it can happen that our position will be weakened. Political instability will only deepen uncertainty and concerns, and will hurt the chances of successfully overcoming the consequences of the economic crisis.”
Like Gyurcsany, in the early part of his political career Topolanek belonged to the youth section of Czechoslovakia’s ruling communist party. The no-confidence vote that brought down Topolanek’s cabinet will most likely delay Czech ratification of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty until the autumn, after elections that the communist-infiltrated Social Democratic Party hopes to win.
Last, but definitely not least, the United Nations, an embryonic world government jointly founded by the Soviets and Council on Foreign Relations in 1945, joined Russia and China in blessing the concept of a global currency reserve system to replace the dollar-based system. The UN panel pontificated on the importance of “reforming” (socializing) the world’s financial system:
A new Global Reserve System — what may be viewed as a greatly expanded SDR (Special Drawing Rights), with regular or cyclically adjusted emissions calibrated to the size of reserve accumulations, could contribute to global stability, economic strength and global equity.
Recovery would require all developed countries, in the short term, to take strong, coordinated and effective actions [meaning socialism] to stimulate their economies.
This would lay the basis for the long-run [socialist] reforms that will be necessary if we are to have a more stable and more prosperous global economy and avoid future global crises.
The panel is chaired by Joseph Stiglitz, the US economist who has lauded the nationalization (communization) programs of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Taking up the slogan “Cough up some more dough, Mack,” the Stiglitz panel proposed that developed countries bail out developing ones with anti-crisis packages (which would thrill Nicaragua’s panhandling Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega), impose more market regulation everywhere, and create yet another UN agency, to be called the Economic Council. Last Wednesday International Monetary Fund managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn conceded that discussions on a new global reserve currency to replace the US dollar were “legitimate” and will take place “in the coming months.” That’s nice. Where would you like that mark, sir? On your forehead or right hand?
USA/USSR2 Files: Obama, Biden secretly met Gorbachev at White House on March 20, last Nov. ex-Soviet leader urged US president to initiate perestroika
March 25, 2009Posted by on
- Russian Diplomat in Ottawa Calls Canada’s Testy Response to Bomber Intrusion “Cold War Mentality,” Washington Silent on Incident
- Obama as Soviet Mole: Tom Fife’s Controversial 1992 Conversation with Anonymous Russian Scientist’s Wife Revisited
- Council on Foreign Relations Website Quotes US National Security Adviser James L. Jones: “I Take My Daily Orders from Dr. Kissinger”
- Male Secondary Students in Russia to Receive “Voluntary” Pre-Military Training under Interior Ministry Directive, Assigned to Regular Troop Units
- People’s Bank of China Governor Joins Neo-Soviet Leadership in Urging Establishment of Global Currency to Replace US Dollar, Praises Economist John Maynard Keynes
The tiff between Russia and Canada over the former’s revived Arctic military activities continues. As previously blogged, Dmitry Trofimov, head of the political section of Russia’s embassy in Ottawa, has been summoned to appear before the Canadian parliament’s defense committee to explain the presence of two strategic bombers near the Yukon coast several hours before the arrival of US President Barack Hussein Obama in the Canadian capital last month.
“It was nothing but a coincidence,” Trofimov protested, “From the point of international law, nothing happened. Absolutely nothing. Military training flights will continue so long as other countries conduct them on the boundaries of Russia’s airspace.” Canada’s conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, and his defense minister, Peter MacKay, “raised a stink” about the bomber intrusion. Trofimov, in turn, responded to the Canadian government’s testy reaction by saying: “The Cold War mentality is still there, which is deplorable.”
By contrast, the US government, which is determined to “press the reset button” on bilateral relations with Moscow, has been silent about the February 18 bomber incident near Canadian airspace. It is evident from the statements of the neo-Soviet leadership that the Kremlin views Obama as a pliable friend, if not an outright covert asset, as discussed below. It is expected that Obama will meet his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev for the first time at next month’s London Group of 20 summit.
The US government has also been silent with respect to two important, apparently related incidents that took place on March 20. The MSM revealed yesterday that Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met former Soviet tyrant Mikhail (“I’ll Always Be a Communist”) Gorbachev at the White House last Friday, in what can only be described as a “secret meeting” since the encounter was not previously published on the US president’s official daily schedule. Reuters news agency acquired the revelation via Gorby’s spokesman Konstantin Petrenko, who refused to divulge details of the discussion.
When White House spokesman Robert Gibbs was grilled at a news conference about why the meeting between Obama, Biden, and Gorbachev was not previously disclosed, Gibbs offered an incredible explanation: “The president tends to roam around the larger (White) House and sometimes walks into meetings that weren’t previously on his schedule.” We can only speculate about the subject matter that President Obama discussed with the Soviet strategists’ top PR man. However, a clue may be afforded from Gorbachev’s praise for Obama last November.
Following the president’s election Gorbachev, in an interview with Italy’s La Stampa, urged Obama to implement “perestroika” (restructuring) in the USA to “overcome the financial crisis and restore balance in the world.” He complained that “The Republicans have failed to realize that the Soviet Union no longer exists, that Europe has changed, and that new powers like China, Brazil and Mexico have emerged as important players on the world stage. The world is waiting for Obama to act. The White House needs to restore trust in cooperation with the United States among the Russians.” Gorbachev then referred to Obama as a “man of our times”:
This is a man of our times, he is capable of restarting dialogue, all the more since the circumstances will allow him to get out of a dead-end situation. Barack Obama has not had a very long career, but it is hard to find faults, and he has led an election campaign winning over the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton herself. We can judge from this that this person is capable of engaging in dialogue and understanding current realities.
Novosti picked up Gorbachev’s La Stampa interview, as well as Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s opinion of the US president, expressed in the Russian business daily Vedomosti. Khodorkovsky founded the now defunct Yukos oil giant but is presently serving a prison term on fraud and tax evasion charges. Like Gorbachev, he used the word perestroika in describing the future direction of the Obama administration. “Being a liberal myself,” Khodorkovsky pontificated, “I think that the world will take a left turn and that a global perestroika would be a logical response to the global crisis.” Sounding like a communist rather than a capitalist, he added: “The paradigm of global development is about to change. The era inaugurated by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher 30 years ago is over. Decisions in neoliberal economies have been made mainly by supranational institutions and transnational corporations.” Khodorkovsky predicted:
Globalization will slow to a crawl, but will not stop. The ‘golden billion’ of the world’s richest people will have to abandon hopes of increasing their wealth, but high consumer standards which developed at the end of the 20th century will be unaffected by the change. The striving for political freedom and open competition of personalities and ideas will not disappear.
To what sort of “restructuring” is master communist deceiver Gorbachev and Komsomol capitalist Khodorkovsky alluding? Why, socialism, of course. In the 1980s Gorbachev outlined his vision of a “mature socialist society” in Russia and a world conquered for communism. In Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World (Harper & Row, 1987), the not-so-retired Soviet dictator writes:
Perestroika is closely connected with socialism as a system. That side of the matter is being widely discussed, especially abroad, and our talk about perestroika won’t be entirely clear if we don’t touch upon that aspect.
Does perestroika mean that we are giving up socialism or at least some of its foundations? Some ask this question with hope, others with misgiving.
. . .To put an end to all the rumors and speculations that abound in the West about this, I would like to point out once again that we are conducting our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed. Every part of our program of perestroika–and the program as a whole, for that matter–is fully based on the principle of more socialism and more democracy.
More socialism means a more dynamic pace and creative endeavor, more organization, law and order, more scientific methods and initiative in economic management, efficiency in administration, and a better and materially richer life for the people.
More socialism means more democracy, openness and collectivism in everyday life, more culture and humanism in production, social and personal relations among people, more dignity and self-respect for the individual.
More socialism means more patriotism and aspiration to noble ideals, more active civic concern about the country’s internal affairs and about their positive influence on international affairs.
In other words, more of all those things which are inherent in socialism and in the theoretical precepts which characterize it as a distinct socio-economic formation.
We will proceed toward better socialism rather than away from it.
. . .We want more socialism and, therefore, more democracy.[pages 36-37]
If the socialist nature of perestroika is still unclear, in spite of the above quote, then consider the following excerpt from a report that Gorbachev delivered to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union’s Central Committee and the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on November 2, 1987:
The idea of perestroika rests upon our seventy-year history, on the sound foundation of the basically new social edifice erected in the Soviet Union; it combines continuity and innovation, the historical experience of Bolshevism and what socialism is today. It is up to us to continue and carry forward the cause of the pioneers of the Revolution and of socialism. And we are certain to achieve this by our work, by making creative use of the experience of the generations that blazed the October trail before us [October and Perestroika: The Revolution Continues. Ottawa: Soviet Embassy, 1987].
Last Friday, at the secret White House meeting, did Gorbachev personally urge President Obama to implement socialist restructuring in the USA? Since Obama is in fact an under-the-radar socialist this scenario is very possible, which means America has most certainly entered its last days as a free country. A startling essay by Tom Fife, “The First Time I Heard of Barack,” exposes the US president as a veritable “Manchurian Candidate.” Fife is a software developer who visited Russia between 1992 and 1994 in order to launch a business in collaboration with “some people from the Russian scientific community.” We cannot vouch for the authenticity of Fife’s sources, but simply reproduce below, for the reader’s consideration, the statements of “T.M.,” a Russian woman devoted to the “communist cause,” uttered in 1992.
Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon. What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?
Well, you will; and he will be a Communist. Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League”. You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.
It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.
“She was full of little details about him,” Fife continues, “that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air. She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature.”
“Have no doubt,” T.M. gushed, “he is one of us, a Soviet. . . . he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”
“So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove? Well, it’s definitely anecdotal,” Fife admits, adding:
It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed. Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.
Secretive, high-level discussions between Moscow and Washington have in fact taken place since former US secretary of state and alleged Soviet agent “Bor” Henry Kissinger established a “strategic working group” with former KGB chief Yevgeny Primakov at then Russian President Vladimir Putin’s private residence in 2007. On the very same day that Obama and Biden accidentally “bumped” into Gorby at the White House, “Dr. K” was leading a delegation of retired US statesmen, including former secretaries of state George Shultz and James Baker, to Moscow where they conferred with Soviet Komsomol graduate Medvedev.
The US contingent on this committee, it should be pointed out, is stacked with Council on Foreign Relations alumni, which should come as no surprise to astute observers of elite politics. The CFR, like the Soviet strategists, is committed in its own fashion to the demise of US sovereignty, East-West convergence, and the establishment of world government. The current global financial crisis provides these elite manipulators with an ideal crisis to advance the much-touted “New (Red) World Order,” articulated last November by Britain’s Labour prime minister Gordon Brown.
How much behind-the-scenes authority does Dr. K, the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, wield today? The comments of National Security Adviser James L. Jones at the 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy, held at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof on February 8, 2009, are instructive:
Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.
If these remarks were not posted at the CFR website, we would consider them apocryphal, like Fife’s otherwise dramatic, Hollywoodesque assertions above. Incidentally, Scowcroft was National Security Adviser to President Gerald Ford and George H. W. Bush, while Berger held the same capacity in the administration of President (and alleged KGB asset) Bill Clinton.
Bilateral ties between Moscow and Washington nose-dived last year, with Russia complaining about NATO “expansionism” and US plans for a missile shield in Central Europe, and the USA chastising Russia for re-invading and re-occupying Georgia. In light of President Obama’s determination to reduce the US military stockpile of nuclear weapons and achieve a new détente with the Russians, as well as the furtive manipulations of the Kissinger-Primakov cabal, Fife’s supposed revelations assume new significance.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin continues to prepare Russia’s citizen-slaves for war with the West by activating air raid sirens, silent since the old Soviet era, and brainwashing male students with military discipline and patriotism lessons under the auspices of Interior Ministry police troops. Not content to harness the street-fighting muscle of United Russia’s Young Guard, Nashi, Young Russia, and other Putinist youth groups, earlier this month Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliev signed an order to create educational squadrons. These will be attached to 85 Interior Ministry units and comprised of 14- to 16-year-old students, called “sons of regiments.” The latter term hearkens back to the Second World War when Soviet troops took (kidnapped?) orphan boys to the front lines, fed and dressed them, and taught them how to play martial music. A famous Russian children’s book by Valentin Kataev, published in 1944 and titled Son of the Regiment, narrates the story of such a boy.
Modern “sons of regiments” will follow the same tradition. The educational squadrons will form the regular field bands of Interior Ministry units, be supplied with food and uniforms, attend compulsory secondary school classes, and receive a salary equivalent to that of involuntary service soldiers. All “volunteers” will require parental consent to enlist in the Kremlin’s new educational squadrons. Like Prime Minister Putin, his boss, Interior Minister Nurgaliev is a career Chekist.
Finally, the ruling Communist Party of China has joined the neo-Soviet leadership of Russia and Kazakhstan in demanding the institution of a global currency to replace the dying US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. In an essay posted on the People’s Bank of China’s website, Zhou Xiaochuan, the central bank’s governor, stated: “The goal is to create a reserve currency that is disconnected from individual nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies.” Remarked Qu Hongbin, chief China economist for HSBC, in response to the proposal: “This is a clear sign that China, as the largest holder of US dollar financial assets, is concerned about the potential inflationary risk of the US Federal Reserve printing money.”
Although Zhou did not mention the US dollar, his essay expressly rejected the current dollar-dominated (capitalist) monetary system: “The outbreak of the crisis and its spillover to the entire world reflected the inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system.” Instead, Zhou proposed expanding the role of special drawing rights (SDRs), a function of the International Monetary Fund founded in 1969 to support the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate regime. The value of SDRs is currently based on a basket of four currencies, the US dollar, Japanese yen, European Union euro, and British pound sterling. The IMF primarily uses SDRs as a unit of account.
Under the Chinese proposal, the valuation of SDRs would be based on all major economies. Zhou’s “economic prescription” would also organize a settlement system between SDRs and other currencies for the purpose of international trade and financial transactions. Comrade Zhou acknowledged the role of socialist economist John Maynard Keynes in making a similar suggestion in the 1940s. ‘Nuff said.
>Communism with Canadian Characteristics: Ottawa summons Russian embassy official before defense committee, grilled over Arctic bomber, sub intrusions
March 22, 2009Posted by on
>Pictured here: A helicopter takes off with the bodies of four Canadian soldiers killed after an IED exploded yesterday, during a mission in the Taliban stronghold of Zhari in Kandahar, a province in southern Afghanistan.
As a rule, regardless of the party in power, Canadians are sensitive about issues of national sovereignty, especially with their closest ally, the USA. In recent weeks, Canada’s Conservative government has reacted testily to the presence of Russian strategic bombers near the country’s airspace. A senior Russian embassy official in Ottawa has been summoned to appear before a parliamentary committee to explain Russia’s military presence in Canada’s Far North. The Globe and Mail reports today:
The scheduled appearance by Dmitry Trofimov, the embassy’s head of political section, before the House of Commons defence committee comes just one month after a diplomatic dustup between the two countries. After Canada revealed it sent fighter jets to intercept two Russian bombers near Canadian airspace on the eve of U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Canada, politicians here unleashed a flurry of strong words for their Arctic neighbour.
Following Obama’s visit to Ottawa, Prime Minister Stephen Harper spoke of “increasingly aggressive Russian actions around the globe and Russian intrusions into our airspace.” Offended Russian officials retorted that their aircraft, which materialized near the Northwest Territories on February 18, were conducting regular military training, that Canada was given advance notice of the flight, and that there was no violation of Canadian airspace.
Trofimov is scheduled to discuss the bomber incident, but opposition MPs have vowed to interrogate Moscow’s representative about Russia’s submarine policies in the Arctic Ocean. In light of the government’s feisty response to airspace violations, the opposition has expressed puzzlement over its unwillingness to discuss the presence of a foreign submarine in Canada’s Eastern Arctic last summer.
The Globe and Mail reports “federal officials attempted to play down the sighting, which was made by hunters and was deemed ‘reliable,’ according to internal documents. The Canadian Forces said they could not comment on the subsequent investigation.” An official in the Foreign Affairs Ministry was quoted as saying: “All information regarding submarine movements is classified, but that Canada does share information with allied nations operating submarines to avoid underwater collisions.”
Government party MP Laurie Hawn, a defence committee member and former fighter pilot, rejects Russia’s contention that Moscow informs other countries about flight plans. He’s also dubious about gathering reliable information regarding submarine traffic in Canada’s Arctic region. “People who operate submarines don’t generally talk about where they go,” observed Hawn.
About this incident, which occured on August 9, 2008, at the northern end of Baffin Island near a hunting camp, another Globe and Mail article relates: “The sub sighting occurred kilometres away from the location of a mysterious explosion that had been reported to authorities 10 days earlier and made news across Canada.”
Last Friday the Russian Navy admitted that at least 10 of its nuclear-armed attack submarines are presently patrolling the world’s oceans. It is possible, of course, that the submarine under investigation in Canada’s Eastern Arctic belonged to the US Navy. For decades Ottawa has insisted that the Americans first request permission to use the Northwest Passage. “Experts,” reports state-run CBC, “say that for decades, U.S. submarines have been sneaking around Arctic waters inside what Canada considers its territory. Russian, French and British submarines are believed to have gone in the waters as well.”
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: 3rd Sino-Soviet war game dubbed "Peace Mission 2009"; Russian Navy: 10 nuke-armed subs on patrol in world’s oceans
March 20, 2009Posted by on
- Two Russian Maritime Patrol Aircraft Fly Within 500 Feet of Aircraft Carrier USS Stennis in Sea of Japan this Past Monday (source)
The Moscow-Beijing Axis will hold its third joint war game, dubbed Peace Mission 2009, this summer in northeast China, the Russian Defense Ministry disclosed on Wednesday. The two previous Sino-Soviet drills were also called “Peace Mission” and took place in 2005 and 2007 in both countries. “The final decision on the date, venue, name and forces involved will be made at bilateral consultations to be held in the last 10 days of March,” a ministry source explained. For its part, the Chinese Defense Ministry stated this past Tuesday that “the joint maneuvers were aimed at developing a strategic partnership between Russia and China.”
The agreement to hold Peace Mission 2009 was reached at last year’s meeting between Russia and China’s defense ministers. The two communist allies established their first military hotline in December.
The progress of military coordination by the Moscow-Beijing Axis was predicted as far back as 1984 when KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn exposed the so-called Sino-Soviet split as a strategic deception designed to promote the idea among Western analysts that there were ideological and practical divisions within the Communist Bloc. After predicting the fake demise of communism in Eastern Europe under the guidance of a “reformist” Soviet leader (realized under Mikhail Gorbachev, 1985-1991), Golitsyn then warned that “post”-communist Russia would ally itself with Communist China as “one clenched fist” (realized in 2001). The “reconstructed” Soviet Union would then neutralize both NATO and the United States of America, the first through the admission of “ex”-Soviet Bloc states into the North Atlantic Alliance (realized in 1999), the second through the promotion of socialist governments (realized under Presidents Bill Clinton, 1993-2001; and Barack Obama, 2009-present).
At this point, it would become obvious to the whole world that the balance of power had shifted away from the “bourgeois states” and toward the socialist states. Such a ruse was necessary, Golitsyn argued, since during the Cold War NATO would have been greatly alarmed by open military cooperation between the two communist superpowers. In validation of his accurate method of analysis, Golitsyn’s two books–New Lies for Old (especially Chapter 25, “The Final Phase”) and The Perestroika Deception (1995, 1998)–read like a script of the last 25 years of world history.
With refreshing candor the Russian Navy admitted this week that 10 attack submarines armed with nuclear weapons are presently patrolling the world’s oceans. “Up to 10 submarines are conducting various missions around the globe, including training and combat patrol missions with nuclear weapons on board,” a source in the naval general staff told Novosti today. Most of these submarines belong to the Northern and Pacific Fleets. The Kremlin maintains a fleet of 60 nuclear-powered and diesel-electric submarines in active service, including 10 nuclear-powered strategic submarines and more than 30 nuclear-powered attack submarines.
“The Navy General Staff believe that strategic submarines will continue playing an important role in safeguarding Russia’s national security because they remain one of the key components of Russia’s military might and serve as a reliable deterrent to potential threats and aggression against the country,” the same source explained.
Russia, continues Novosti, plans to completely modernize the naval component of its nuclear triad by 2016. Its navy recently began mooring trials of the first Borey-class nuclear-powered strategic submarine, which will be equipped with Bulava SLBMs. The Yury Dolgoruky, built at the Sevmash plant in northern Russia, left its dry dock in April 2007. The vessel is 170 meters (580 feet) long, carries a crew of 107, can dive to a maximum depth of 450 meters (1,500 feet), sustain a submerged speed of 29 knots, and launch 16 ballistic missiles and torpedoes. Two other Borey-class submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and the Vladimir Monomakh, will be completed in 2009 and 2011, respectively. Russia plans to build a total of eight Borey-class submarines by 2015.
A fourth-generation Graney class nuclear-powered attack submarine will be delivered to the Russian Navy in 2010 or 2011. The Severodvinsk submarine will be able to launch long-range cruise missiles with nuclear warheads, as well as engage “hostile” (meaning US Navy) submarines and surface warships. The second vessel of the Graney class is expected to enter service by 2015.
In a related story, the Russian Air Force, Novosti reports, has launched a four-day exercise near the city of Vorkuta, north of the Arctic Circle. Six Tu-160 Blackjack and Tu-95 Bear-H strategic bombers will test-launch cruise missiles and drop precision-guided bombs at the Pemboi test range. The exercise is part of a command-and-staff drill supervised by Major General Pavel Androsov, commander of Russia’s strategic aviation, and will last until March 20.
Concurrently, in southwest Siberia 5,000 troops and 400 armored vehicles are carrying out a large land-and-air war game (pictured at top), as 7,000 NATO troops begin their third Cold Response drill in Norway. The latter entails countering a simulated invasion of Western Europe’s offshore oil fields.
>Communist Bloc Military Updates: 7,000 NATO troops hold “Cold Response” war game in Norway as Russian armed forces carry out Siberian drill
March 19, 2009Posted by on
- Russian Military Deploys Second S-400 Triumf Air Defense Regiment, First Regiment Deployed near Moscow in 2007
- Alleged Soviet Agent Henry Kissinger Leads Team of Former Statesmen to Moscow to Negotiate America’s Surrender
- Russia and Kazakhstan’s “Ex”-Communist Leaders to Pitch Idea of Global Currency at April’s Group of 20 Summit in London
Pictured above: Norwegian Air Force F-16 fighter jet participates in NATO’s last Cold Response exercise in 2007.
On Monday the US Defense Department, foolishly in our opinion, made light of Russia’s proposed use of air bases in Cuba and Venezuela for its strategic bombers, a prospect that was first broached in the Kremlin media last July and then again last week. “That would be quite a long way for those old planes to fly,” Geoff Morrell, Pentagon press secretary, scoffed to the AFP news agency. “Admiral Mike Mullen is not overly concerned about other nations [like Cuba and Venezuela] trying to forge bilateral relations with other partners and friends,” huffed an anonymous defense official, referring to the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff.
We are also concerned that Moscow may try to station its bombers in neo-Sandinista Nicaragua. Although Managua is still participating in joint military drills, like Tradewinds 2009, with the USA, this could change in the near future since Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega is also closely allied with Havana and Caracas and insists, against Washington’s wishes, upon retaining at least 400 Soviet-built SA-7 SAMs.
The US Air Force certainly possesses more modern technology than its Russian counterpart, such as the 1990s-era B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. However, the US military’s fleet of 1950s-era B-52 Stratofortress bombers is roughly comparable with the Tu-95 Bear, the fastest propeller-driven plane in the world, while the 1970s-era B-1 Lancer is comparable to the 1980s-era Tu-160 Blackjack, the largest combat aircraft in the world. The latter, in fact, is once again rolling off the assembly line, one every year or so. Some estimates place the number of operational Blackjacks at 19 or 20, not the commonly touted 14 or 16.
In April 2006 the Kremlin boasted that at least two Blackjacks reached the coast of Alaska without tripping NORAD’s alert system. The next year a Tu-160 flew within 20 miles of the British city Kingston upon Hull before Royal Air Force planes intercepted the bomber. Russia’s most advanced strategic bomber, as far as we are aware, is not equipped with stealth technology, although these incidents suggest otherwise. The Sukhoi PAK-FA multi-role fighter under development will probably possess this capability. Both the US and Russian air forces, in fact, are in a race to develop the 21st century’s first generation of strategic bombers.
On Tuesday Russian “President” Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s compliant lackey, announced that beginning in 2011 the Russian military will begin a large-scale modernization program. One result will be to boost the share of modern weaponry in the Kremlin arsenal to 30% by 2015 and 70% by 2020. Speaking to Defense Ministry apparatchiks, Medvedev said:
Last year we equipped a number of military units with new weaponry, and we will start large-scale rearmament of the Armed Forces in 2011. They must be able to accomplish all tasks aimed at ensuring Russia’s military security. This process would involve the enhancement of combat readiness of all military units.
Despite the current financial difficulties, Russia has never had better favorable conditions to create modern and highly efficient armed forces. Long-term plans in the defense sphere should be based on a Russian national security strategy for the period up to 2020, which the [Russian] Security Council should endorse in the near future.
The drum of NATO “expansionism” is the pretext that the neo-Soviet leadership is beating to justify its own militaristic adventurism. “There are attempts to continue broadening the military infrastructure of the North Atlantic Alliance near our borders,” Medvedev rumbled at the same meeting, intimating future warfare with the West: “An analysis of the military and political situation in the world shows that in a number of regions serious potential for conflict remains.”
The modernization of the Russian Armed Forces includes the deployment of the country’s most advanced air defense missile system, the S-400 Triumf, which was first tested in 2007. According to Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, the second S-400 regiment was this week placed on combat duty. The first operational S-400 regiment was deployed in 2007 and tasked with protecting the airspace around Moscow and industrial centers in the heart of European Russia. The S-400 (NATO designation SA-21 Growler) is expected to form the core of Russia’s new theater air and missile defenses until 2020 or 2025.
The S-400 can intercept and destroy airborne targets at a maximum distance of 400 kilometers (250 miles), twice the range of the US military’s MIM-104 Patriot, and two and a half times that of Russia’s “late-model” S-300 system. Military analysts believe that the S-400 can also destroy stealth aircraft, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles. A typical S-400 regiment consists of eight launchers with four missiles each, and a mobile command post. The new state arms procurement program will arm 18 S-400 battalions as of 2015.
Meanwhile, Russia and NATO are carrying out concurrent war games that belie diplomatic gestures for restored relations severed after Russia’s five-day war with Georgia. For its part, the Kremlin, as we previously blogged, is deploying more than 5,000 troops in land-and-air exercises in Siberia. Russian Defense Ministry publication Krasnaya Zvezda (“Red Star”) reports that General Vladimir Boldyrev, chief of the Russian Ground Forces, is overseeing the seven-day drill, which includes fighter planes, helicopters, and 400 armored vehicles.
Four thousand miles to the west, NATO member Norway is hosting 7,000 soldiers from 12 countries in the “Cold Response” exercise, which simulates an invasion to control Arctic oil fields. This threat is implied by Moscow’s assertion of sovereignty over a large chunk of the resource-rich polar region in 2007. Participating countries include France, Germany, and Spain, as well as neutral neighbors Sweden and Finland, the latter bravely fending off a Soviet invasion in 1939. The Cold Response war game scenario involves a hostile power called “Northland” (Russia?) attacking fictional “Midland” (a hapless Baltic state?), which is home to minority “Northlanders” (ethnic Russians?) and offshore oil fields. Cold Response exercises previously took place in 2006 and 2007.
In a related story, the Russian Navy is rotating the single warship that it has contributed to the United Nations-sanctioned anti-piracy mission near the coast of Somalia. The Admiral Vinogradov will be replaced by the Admiral Panteleyev. Both ships are Udaloy-class destroyers from the Pacific Fleet and each is armed with anti-ship missiles, 30-mm and 100-mm guns, and Ka-27 Helix anti-submarine helicopters. Although its “post”-Soviet presence is slight in the Indian Ocean, the Russian Navy has over the last year trumpeted its intention to expand and project its power throughout the world’s oceans. This endeavor will include the addition of three yet-to-be-built aircraft carriers to its current complement of one, the Northern Fleet’s carrier Admiral Kuznetsov.
Modernizing Russia’s nuclear deterrent, according to Medvedev, will be another top priority, notwithstanding US President Barack Hussein Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and roving statesman Henry Kissinger’s treasonous peace overtures to Moscow.
Since the early 1970s Kissinger has been accused of being a KGB asset, specifically Agent “Bor.” In any case, President Richard Nixon’s former secretary of state co-chairs, along with former KGB chief Yevgeny Primakov, a “strategic working group” on US-Russian relations that was founded in 2007 at Putin’s private residence. This cabal has furtively met on several occasions since then, including at the White House in January 2008 with then President George W. Bush in attendance. One of the main purposes of the Kissinger-Primakov group is to provide continuity between Bush and Obama’s policies toward Russia. In reality, there is little substantive difference between both administrations with respect to acknowledging and countering the 50-year-old Soviet deception strategy.
According to the US embassy in Moscow, Kissinger, who last met with Medvedev in December, will fly to Moscow for talks with the neo-Soviet leadership on March 20. He will be accompanied by James Baker and George Shultz, two other former secretaries of state, former Defense Secretary William Perry, and ex-US Senator Sam Nunn. Obama, who may encounter Medvedev for the first time at the Group of 20 meeting in London next month, will probably visit Russia in July, Moscow-based Kommersant Daily reports. It is well known that the Obama Administration is seeking to “reset” relations with Russia and secure Kremlin support for US policies on Afghanistan, Iran, and mutual nuclear arms reduction. The G20 industrialized and developing nations include Russia, although not without some objections by members who rightly deny that Russia is a true democracy.
On Monday the Soviet communists published their agenda for the upcoming G20 meeting, in which they called for the formation of a supranational reserve currency as part of a reform of the global capitalist system. “The International Monetary Fund should investigate the possible creation of a new reserve currency, widening the list of reserve currencies or using its already existing Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs, as a superreserve currency accepted by the whole of the international community,” the Kremlin urged in a statement issued on its website. Both Medvedev and Putin have repeatedly called for the ruble to be used as a regional reserve currency, although the idea has received little support outside Russia.
Moscow’s plea for a global currency is not the first to emerge from the Not-So-Former Soviet Union in recent days. Speaking at a G20 forum in Astana earlier last week, Kazakhstan’s “ex”-communist president Nursultan Nazarbayev defended his proposal for the oddly named “acmetal.” The proposal was seconded by Canadian economist Robert Mundell, who helped to design the euro. “I must say that I agree with President Nazarbayev on his statement and many of the things he said in his plan, the project he made for the world currency, and I believe I’m right on track with what he’s saying,” Mundell gushed, adding: “The idea has great promise.” Nazarbayev and Mundell urged the G20 states to form a working group on the proposal at the next month’s summit, which will focus on the world economic crisis. “We should deliver our thoughts and the thoughts of this conference to the leaders of those countries,” Nazarbayev intoned.
The establishment of a global government and currency is not only an objective of the Soviet communists and their Western globalist bagmen and mouthpieces, but is viewed by Bible prophecy scholars as a forerunner of the mark of the beast, in which the world’s inhabitants will during the tribulation period receive an imprint on the forehead or right hand that permits them to buy and sell.