>Middle East File: Moscow welcomes installation of Lebanon’s pro-Hezbollah army chief as president; Iranian, Syrian, Saudi, French FMs observe election

>The installation of Lebanon’s pro-Hezbollah army chief General Michel Suleiman as national president has (temporarily) resolved the political crisis in Lebanon, but in reality it negatively effects the long-term peace and security of the Levant by providing the terrorist organization/political party with a legitimate platform, including more than one third of cabinet seats, to totally subvert Lebanon and launch a military assault on Israel. The so-called Lebanese “peace” process was endorsed by the United Nations, the Arab League, and the Western Alliance, including the USA and the United Kingdom. The foreign ministers of Iran and Syria approvingly attended the parliamentary session that voted General Suleiman into office. Pictured above: Syrian FM Walid al-Moallem, left, speaks with Iranian FM Manochehr Mottaki during the swearing in ceremony in Beirut, on May 25, 2008. Iranian dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also congratulated Suleiman, apparently by telephone, upon the general’s election. Comment is hardly necessary.

General Takes Office As President Of LebanonVote Marks Symbolic End Of Government’s Crisis
By Anthony Shadid and Alia Ibrahim

Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, May 26, 2008; A12

BEIRUT, May 25 — Lebanon’s parliament elected the army commander, Gen. Michel Suleiman, as president Sunday, filling a post vacant for six months and bringing a symbolic if tenuous end to the country’s worst crisis since the 15-year civil war ended in 1990.

The vote for Suleiman was virtually uncontested, already agreed to in a deal negotiated in Qatar last week that ended an 18-month confrontation between forces allied with the government and the opposition led by the Shiite Muslim movement Hezbollah. Postponed 19 times, the election marked the first step in reconstituting what had looked more and more like a failed state in past months: an unfilled presidency, a cabinet deemed illegitimate by the opposition and a parliament that had not met since 2006.

After Suleiman’s election, by 118 votes of 127 possible, a flag-waving crowd that had gathered in his home town of Amchit erupted in cheers. Fireworks detonated over Beirut, cars blared their horns and church bells tolled. Staccato bursts of celebratory gunfire rattled across a capital that, less than two weeks ago, witnessed pitched gun battles redolent of civil war.

“I call upon all of you, politicians and citizens, to begin a new stage that is called Lebanon and the Lebanese,” Suleiman, who forewent his military uniform for the civilian suit of a politician, told parliament. To repeated rounds of applause, he said the country had paid dearly for what he called national unity. “Let us preserve it hand in hand.”

The deal that brought Suleiman to power represented another setback in the region for the United States, which has long sought to isolate Hezbollah, a group backed by Syria and Iran. Under the agreement, Hezbollah and its allies will have veto power in the coming cabinet — the group’s demand since the crisis began after a war with Israel in 2006 — demonstrating its clear role today as the single most powerful force in Lebanon.

The vote represented a rare moment of consensus across the political, social and ideological divide that still fractures Lebanon — from the country’s posture toward Israel to which foreign patron will play the greatest role in Lebanese politics, long vulnerable to regional crises. The foreign ministers of Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and France attended the parliamentary session, as did the emir of Qatar, who was seated at the podium of parliament in recognition of his government’s role in the negotiations, which nearly collapsed twice. In a telling sign, the United States was represented only by a congressional delegation.

“This last crisis ended with a winner and a vanquished,” said the emir, Sheik Hamad Bin Khalifa al-Thani. “The winner is Lebanon, and the vanquished is the feud, and this needs to be clear to all — today, tomorrow and forever.”

Streets in the capital and elsewhere Sunday were awash in Lebanese flags and posters celebrating Suleiman’s presidency. “The leader, the president,” one read. “Congratulations, Lebanon,” said another. Weary of almost continuous crises that have beset Lebanon since former prime minister Rafiq al-Hariri was assassinated in a 2005 car bombing in Beirut, many residents, regardless of their stance on the crisis, have greeted the agreement and election of Suleiman with relief that the country averted civil war, consolation perhaps muted by frustration that the confrontation lasted as long as it did.

Reservations have surged at hotels here, the stock market has rebounded and life has returned to a downtown paralyzed by an 18-month opposition sit-in.

Often heard in Lebanon, though, is the idea that the country has embarked on a truce, and no more. The question of Hezbollah’s arsenal remains pressing for government supporters, who tried to address the issue in the Qatar talks. Suleiman is expected to lead a dialogue over the issue with rival leaders.

The cabinet will remain in power through next summer, when parliamentary elections are expected to again enshrine in power the same leaders, some of them veterans of the civil war with almost-feudal influence over their followers.

Suleiman, 59, was appointed army commander in 1998, when Syria still exercised tutelage over Lebanon. He rose through the ranks of an army that, particularly in the 1990s, worked closely with Syria and Hezbollah, which fought a guerrilla war against Israel in southern Lebanon until its withdrawal in 2000. He emerged as a candidate of the opposition, then drew on the backing of government supporters to fill a post vacant since the term of Emile Lahoud, a Syrian ally and former general, ended in November.

Both sides had their grievances with Suleiman: The opposition was critical of the military for shooting on protesters in January; government supporters were angry at what they saw as the military’s acquiescence in allowing fighters of Hezbollah and its allies to enter predominantly Muslim West Beirut this month, where they routed government-backed militiamen in hours, forcing the government into the eventual compromise.

“The gun should only be pointed against the enemy,” Suleiman said. “We will not allow it another direction.”

Source: Washington Post

Neo-Soviet Russia has also bestowed its blessing on this dangerous accommodation with Hezbollah and its full integration into the Lebanese political system. State-run Voice of Russia reports: “Moscow welcomes the election of the former Lebanese Army commander General Michel Suleiman as Lebanon’s new president.” The same story continues:

This comes in a statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko, the statement that’s placed in the Foreign Ministry Website. Moscow hopes, he said, that the election of Lebanon’s president will help the country pull out of the period of crises and commotions, and gain internal accord and democratic stability on the reliable constitutional basis of the combination of interests of all religious groups and political forces in the country. Michel Suleiman was elected by the Lebanese MPs yesterday. The election was due to have taken place last September but has been postponed 19 times due to the opposition boycott. The agreement to settle the crisis was reached with the Arab League countries’ mediation in Qatar a few days ago.

3 responses to “>Middle East File: Moscow welcomes installation of Lebanon’s pro-Hezbollah army chief as president; Iranian, Syrian, Saudi, French FMs observe election

  1. mah29001 May 26, 2008 at 6:43 pm

    >No major surprise about this development here. The Iranian-state run media also promoted the pro-Hezbollah Lebanese army chief as President as well.

  2. mah29001 May 26, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    >It may also take some interest for the End of Times File, on the Islamic Prophet Muhammad and his Sunni successors such as Umar was a former Byzantine governor of Byzantine Palestine.He simply switched over to becoming an early Jihadist, and spread the new found religion of Islam to take control of old lands belonging to Bablyonia which was responsible for destroying the first Temple-Solomon’s Temple.The Shiite sect of Islam, however seems to be involved in occupying the old Assyian lands which also helped to aid Bablyonia in destroying Solomon’s Temple. Islam, must like its counterpart-Christianity helped unify these lands quite similar how Christianity unified Europe to be under its old Roman shell which the old Romans I believe misused G-d’s message and also infiltrated the new found Islamic religion as what Umar represents.

  3. mah29001 May 26, 2008 at 11:31 pm

    >You might also want to add to the pro-Hezbollah Lebanese army chief, that he’s also pro-Fatah al-Islam as he also allowed Fatah al-Islam leaders to flee the camp they were occupying.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: